Wales - Welsh Premier LeagueCyncoed Campus Artificial PitchData current as of November 01, 2026

Cardiff MU vs Penybont: match statistics

Cardiff MU crest
Cardiff MU
0 : 5half-time 0:3
Penybont crest
Penybont

Cardiff MU vs Penybont: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

Cardiff MU played against Penybont in Welsh Premier League (Wales). The game was played on October 31, 2026. Venue: Cyncoed Campus Artificial Pitch. Final score: 0:5.

Recent form

Cardiff MU has 2 wins, 2 draws and 1 loss over its last five games, averaging 1.60 points per game. Penybont has 4 wins, 0 draws and 1 loss, with 2.40 points per game.

Scoring records

Cardiff MU scores 1.86 goals per game and allows 1.29. Penybont scores 1.92 and allows 0.85. Games in this league average 3.34 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 43% of Cardiff MU's games and 62% of Penybont's. The Over 2.5 rates are 57% and 62%, compared with league averages of 50% for BTTS and 62% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

Cardiff MU has the higher season xG average, 1.57 to 1.47 per game. Cardiff MU takes 12.9 shots per game, while Penybont takes 11.2.

First-half and second-half trends

Cardiff MU leads at halftime in 50% of its games and scores 1.14 goals per game after halftime. Penybont leads at halftime in 62% and scores 0.62 after halftime.

When the teams score

Cardiff MU's most productive scoring window is minutes 61-75 (9 goals). For Penybont, it is minutes 31-45+ (11 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

Welsh Premier League games average 3.34 goals. Both teams score in 50% of games, and 62% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

Before this game, 2 previous meetings were available. The record was 0 home wins, 1 draw and 1 away win. Those games averaged 3.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Penybont sit 3rd and have won 4 of their last 5 matches, while eighth-placed Cardiff MU have recorded 3 wins over the same period. The visitors scored 13 goals across those five matches, compared with the hosts’ 9, and average 2.17 goals per away game, against Cardiff MU’s 2.14 at home. The biggest difference is defensive: Penybont concede an average of 0.83 goals away from home and limit opponents to chances worth 0.82 xG, whereas Cardiff MU concede 1.86 goals at home, with opponents averaging 1.87 xG. Penybont have won 67% of their away matches, compared with Cardiff MU’s 43% home win rate, so despite their similar attacking output, the evidence points more strongly towards an away win.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

Cardiff MU score an average of 1.71 goals per match, while Penybont average 2.17, giving both teams a solid basis for finding the net. The case for BTTS - Yes is also supported by the fact that the hosts failed to score in only 14% of their matches, compared with 17% for the visitors. Across their last five matches, the teams averaged 1.8 and 2.6 goals respectively, although BTTS landed in 40% of Cardiff MU's matches and 80% of Penybont's during that period. The visitors' defense does concede an average of just 0.83 goals and keeps a clean sheet in 33% of matches, which tempers confidence in the prediction, but the stronger attacking indicators point to BTTS - Yes.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

Cardiff MU score an average of 1.71 goals per match, while Penybont average 2.17, supporting at least two goals despite both teams' solid defenses. The case for Over 1.5 goals is further supported by this line being cleared in 71% of Cardiff's matches and 67% of Penybont's. Over their last five matches, the teams scored 1.8 and 2.6 goals per game respectively, although their average xG figures were lower, at 1.61 and 1.91. Over 2.5 goals has less support in the data, as both teams concede fewer than one goal per match on average this season: Cardiff 0.86 and Penybont 0.83. Therefore, with a projected total of 2.85 goals, Over 1.5 offers a clearer signal than the higher lines.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

Penybont have stronger attacking numbers, averaging 2.17 goals compared with Cardiff MU’s 1.71, while their xG stands at 1.75 against the hosts’ 1.24. The visitors average 1.5 goals before half-time and have not trailed at the break in any of the six away matches analyzed, giving grounds to back them to lead at the break. Their 67% away win rate and four victories in their last five matches overall also support the prospect of them maintaining their advantage. The risk is nevertheless considerable: Cardiff MU led at half-time in 5 of their 7 home matches and have not lost at home, so 1/1 and X/2 remain close alternatives. Despite these caveats, Penybont’s advantage in shots on target—6.5 to 4.0 per match—makes a half-time lead for the visitors followed by a full-time win the single most likely outcome.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Stats by half

0 : 3
First half
0 : 2
Second half

Game stats

49Possession (%)51
Cardiff MUPenybont
8Shots10
Cardiff MUPenybont
1Shots on target6
Cardiff MUPenybont
0.86xG1.4
Cardiff MUPenybont
1Corners2
Cardiff MUPenybont
37Dangerous attacks47
Cardiff MUPenybont
4Fouls6
Cardiff MUPenybont
0Cards0
Cardiff MUPenybont

Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

Cardiff MUPenybont
1.86Goals scored / game1.92
Cardiff MUPenybont
1.29Goals allowed / game0.85
Cardiff MUPenybont
49%Average possession57%
Cardiff MUPenybont
5.14Shots on target / game5.15
Cardiff MUPenybont

Team stats— who is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

12.86Shots per game11.23
Cardiff MUPenybont
5.14Shots on target5.15
Cardiff MUPenybont
14.4%Shot conversion17.1%
Cardiff MUPenybont
49%Possession57%
Cardiff MUPenybont
1.57xG for1.47
Cardiff MUPenybont
1.54xG against1.14
Cardiff MUPenybont

Shooting quality

Cardiff MU: Efficient finishingPenybont: Efficient finishing
Cardiff MUPenybont
Accuracy (shots on target)40%46%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.13
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.360.37

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team form— who is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

Penybont is 50% better for: last-5 form.

1.6 pts / game - Cardiff MU · 2.4 pts / game - Penybont

Cardiff MU
DWWLD
Season result split
43% W29% D29% L
Season (W-D-L)
6-4-4
1.57 pts / game · goal difference +8
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-2-1
1.60 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
3-2-2
Last 5 at home
2-2-1
WDDWL
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 1.32Opponent xG: 1.47BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%
Penybont
WWWLW
Season result split
69% W23% D8% L
Season (W-D-L)
9-3-1
2.31 pts / game · goal difference +14
Last 5 (W-D-L)
4-0-1
2.40 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
4-1-1
Last 5 away
3-1-1
WDWWL
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 2.6Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 1.62Opponent xG: 1.15BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 80%

Goals— how do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Penybont is 52% better for: goals allowed per game.

1.29 goals / game - Cardiff MU · 0.85 goals / game - Penybont

Cardiff MU scoring profile: very strong

Cardiff MU scores in 79% of games (11 of 14 games), while Penybont keeps a clean sheet in 31% (4 of 13 games).

Penybont scoring profile: very strong

Penybont scores in 85% of games (11 of 13 games), while Cardiff MU keeps a clean sheet in 36% (5 of 14 games).

26Goals scored (season)25
Cardiff MUPenybont
18Goals conceded (season)11
Cardiff MUPenybont
3.14Average goals per game2.77
Cardiff MUPenybont
7Goals scored (last 5)13
Cardiff MUPenybont
7Goals conceded (last 5)6
Cardiff MUPenybont

How often they score at least...

79%1 goal85%
Cardiff MUPenybont
50%2 goals62%
Cardiff MUPenybont
21%3 goals31%
Cardiff MUPenybont
14%4 goals8%
Cardiff MUPenybont

How often they concede at least...

64%1 goal69%
Cardiff MUPenybont
36%2 goals15%
Cardiff MUPenybont
14%3 goals0%
Cardiff MUPenybont
7%4 goals0%
Cardiff MUPenybont

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

0%BTTS at half-time31%
Cardiff MUPenybont
0%BTTS in both halves8%
Cardiff MUPenybont
50%Scored in both halves38%
Cardiff MUPenybont

BTTS and goal count

36%Min. 3 goals and BTTS54%
Cardiff MUPenybont
21%Min. 3 goals without BTTS8%
Cardiff MUPenybont
60%BTTS - last 580%
Cardiff MUPenybont

Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

71%Min. 1 goal before half-time77%
Cardiff MUPenybont
21%Min. 2 goals before half-time46%
Cardiff MUPenybont
7%Min. 3 goals before half-time31%
Cardiff MUPenybont

2nd half

100%Min. 1 goal after half-time77%
Cardiff MUPenybont
57%Min. 2 goals after half-time31%
Cardiff MUPenybont
43%Min. 3 goals after half-time0%
Cardiff MUPenybont

Game halves— when do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Penybont is 20% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.79 pts / game - Cardiff MU · 2.15 pts / game - Penybont

Cardiff MU - half-time state
50% leading29% draw21% trailing
Penybont - half-time state
62% leading31% draw8% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.79Points per game (1st half)2.15
Cardiff MUPenybont
0.71Goals scored (1st half)1.31
Cardiff MUPenybont
0.29Goals conceded (1st half)0.38
Cardiff MUPenybont
1Average goals (1st half)1.69
Cardiff MUPenybont
79%Clean sheet before half-time62%
Cardiff MUPenybont
50%No goal before half-time31%
Cardiff MUPenybont

After half-time (2nd half)

1.57Points per game (2nd half)1.38
Cardiff MUPenybont
1.14Goals scored (2nd half)0.62
Cardiff MUPenybont
1Goals conceded (2nd half)0.46
Cardiff MUPenybont
2.14Average goals (2nd half)1.08
Cardiff MUPenybont
43%Clean sheet after half-time54%
Cardiff MUPenybont
21%No goal after half-time46%
Cardiff MUPenybont

Cardiff MU - second-half results

50% W7% D43% L
25
Half-time points
10
Half-time goals
+6
Goal difference (1st half)
22
Second-half points
+2
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.79
PPG before half-time
Lead holding86%

Leads at halftime in 50% of games and wins 43%. Usually protects a halftime lead through the final whistle.

Defense after halftime+0.7

Allows 0.7 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

Penybont - second-half results

31% W46% D23% L
28
Half-time points
17
Half-time goals
+12
Goal difference (1st half)
18
Second-half points
+2
Goal difference (2nd half)
2.15
PPG before half-time
Lead holding111%

Leads at halftime in 62% of games and wins 69%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime+0.1

Defense stays consistent across the full game.

Cardiff MU - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.601.40
Goals scored / game0.41.0
Goals allowed / game0.41.0
Average goals per game0.82.0
1 goal60%100%
2 goals20%60%
3 goals0%40%
Clean sheet80%40%
No goal60%0%
Goal difference00
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 20% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 2
Penybont - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game2.001.40
Goals scored / game1.80.8
Goals allowed / game0.60.6
Average goals per game2.41.4
1 goal80%100%
2 goals60%40%
3 goals60%0%
Clean sheet40%40%
No goal40%40%
Goal difference+6+1
Half-time: 60% leading - 20% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 20% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 9

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

Cardiff MU
ScoredConceded
4
2
0-15
3
1
16-30
3
1
31-45
2
4
46-60
9
4
61-75
5
6
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (9 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

Penybont
ScoredConceded
3
3
0-15
3
2
16-30
11
0
31-45
3
0
46-60
1
1
61-75
4
5
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (11 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

2.96
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
1.4 : 1.6
Estimated goal split
home : away
89%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
53%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+2%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
67%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
3%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 33 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

Cardiff MU

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.03
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.54
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-6.4 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.29
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.25
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
99%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
88%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
+0.03
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.4
Late goals
19% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 15% come in the first quarter-hour.
19%

Penybont

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.33
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.74
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-2.7 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.45
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.29
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
132%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
45%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
+0.09
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.7
Late goals
16% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 12% come in the first quarter-hour.
16%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League context— is this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Welsh Premier League).

Teams vs league

Cardiff MULigaPenybont
Average goals per game▼ 3.143.34▼ 2.77
Both teams scored▼ 43%50%▲ 62%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)▼ 57%62%• 62%
Clean sheets▲ 36%25%▲ 31%
Goal before half-time▼ 71%80%▼ 77%
Goal after half-time▲ 100%85%▼ 77%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.34
Average goals per game
50%
Both teams scored
62%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
25%
Clean sheets
1.88
Home goals / game
1.46
Away goals / game
+29%
Home attack advantage
+22%
Home defensive advantage
+14%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
80%
1 goal
41%
2 goals
22%
3 goals
9%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
85%
1 goal
53%
2 goals
26%
3 goals
11%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. PenybontSubstitutionOn: Eduino VazOff: Daniel Jefferies
  2. PenybontGoalNathan Daniel Wood
  3. PenybontGoalTom Mehew
  4. PenybontGoalTyler Walker
  5. Cardiff MUSubstitutionOn: Ryan ReynoldsOff: Joel Edwards
  6. PenybontGoalTom Mehew
  7. PenybontGoalTom Mehew
  8. PenybontSubstitutionOn: Ethan CannOff: Chris Venables
  9. Cardiff MUSubstitutionOn: Sam JonesOff: Sam Snaith

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Record from Cardiff MU's perspective: 0 wins, 1 draw and 1 loss against Penybont. Games average 3.00 goals, and both teams scored in 50% of them.

Penybont FC
1 : 1
Cardiff Metropolitan University FC
Cardiff Metropolitan University FC
0 : 4
Penybont FC

FAQ

What was the result of Cardiff MU vs Penybont?

The Welsh Premier League match finished Cardiff MU 0:5 Penybont. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Cardiff MU and Penybont?

In the last 2 head-to-head matches Cardiff MU won 0, Penybont won 1 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 3.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Cardiff MU vs Penybont?

Cardiff MU score 1.86 goals per game on average and Penybont 1.92. The Welsh Premier League average is 3.34 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 62% of games. Both teams score in 43% of Cardiff MU's matches and 62% of Penybont's.

What form are Cardiff MU and Penybont in?

Over the last 5 games Cardiff MU have a 2-2-1 record (1.60 points per game) and Penybont 4-0-1 (2.40 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Cardiff MU vs Penybont?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Cardiff MU vs Penybont: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.