Canada - Canadian Premier LeagueSpruce MeadowsData current as of September 08, 2026

Cavalry FC vs Pacific FC: match statistics

Cavalry FC crest
Cavalry FC
3 : 0half-time 0:0
Pacific FC crest
Pacific FC

Cavalry FC vs Pacific FC: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

Cavalry FC played against Pacific FC in Canadian Premier League (Canada). The game was played on May 24, 2026. Venue: Spruce Meadows. Final score: 3:0.

Recent form

Cavalry FC has 3 wins, 2 draws and 0 losses over its last five games, averaging 2.20 points per game. Pacific FC has 0 wins, 1 draw and 4 losses, with 0.20 points per game.

Scoring records

Cavalry FC scores 1.50 goals per game and allows 0.50. Pacific FC scores 1.00 and allows 2.00. Games in this league average 2.31 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 50% of Cavalry FC's games and 67% of Pacific FC's. The Over 2.5 rates are 33% and 67%, compared with league averages of 54% for BTTS and 38% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

Cavalry FC has the higher season xG average, 1.55 to 1.28 per game. Cavalry FC takes 12.8 shots per game, while Pacific FC takes 10.5.

First-half and second-half trends

Cavalry FC leads at halftime in 33% of its games and scores 0.83 goals per game after halftime. Pacific FC leads at halftime in 17% and scores 0.83 after halftime.

When the teams score

Cavalry FC's most productive scoring window is minutes 16-30 (2 goals). For Pacific FC, it is minutes 61-75 (2 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

Canadian Premier League games average 2.31 goals. Both teams score in 54% of games, and 38% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

Before this game, 5 previous meetings were available. The record was 3 home wins, 1 draw and 1 away win. Those games averaged 3.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 40% of them.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

I forecast a home win because Cavalry FC holds a clear advantage in form and home metrics. At home Cavalry has a record of 4 wins, 2 draws and 0 losses, scoring 2.0 goals and conceding 1.0 on average per match with an average xG of 1.81 versus 1.20. In the last 5 matches the hosts have scored 7 goals and recorded 3 wins (form ddwww, averaging 2.2 points per game), while Pacific scored 4 and conceded 10 in that period (form dllll, averaging 0.2 points per game). Additionally, Cavalry averages 16 shots and 6 on target per home game, whereas Pacific away averages only 7 shots and 3 on target and concedes 2.0 goals per away match. Although Pacific’s conversion rate is high (~29% versus Cavalry’s 13%), the low shot volume and high goals conceded in recent games favor a home victory.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

I select BTTS - Yes (80% vs 20%) — the key signal is Pacific FC’s season BTTS 100% and 100% of matches over 2.5 goals, with Pacific averaging 2.0 scored and 2.0 conceded per game (6 scored, 12 conceded). Cavalry FC has a season BTTS 60% and BTTS 40% in the last 5; seasonally they score 0.8 goals per game (9 goals), but in the last five matches they average 1.4 goals and xG 1.6, indicating the home side’s attack has improved. Pacific in the last 5 matches has xG 0.78 but a very high conversion rate of 29% with an average of 7 shots and 3 shots on target per game, while Cavalry has a 7% conversion with 11.2 shots and also 3 shots on target, which increases the away side’s chance to score. Defensively Cavalry concede only 0.4 goals on average in the last 5 (2 conceded), and Pacific concede 2.0 per game in the same run (10 conceded), showing the guests’ vulnerability and favoring goal exchange. Overall, considering Pacific’s 100% BTTS, Cavalry’s 60% BTTS, recent xG and form (home: ddwww, away: dllll), the both teams to score scenario is stronger, hence the pick: Yes.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

Based on xG from the last 5 matches, Cavalry has xG_for 1.6 and Pacific xG_for 0.78; xG against are 1.64 (against Pacific) and 1.21 (against Cavalry) respectively, yielding expected 1.62 goals for Cavalry and 1.00 for Pacific, totaling 2.62. From a Poisson distribution this sum translates to approximately a 74% chance of at least 2 goals (Over 1.5), ~49% for at least 3 goals (Over 2.5) and ~27% for at least 4 goals (Over 3.5). In the last 5 matches Cavalry scored 7 goals (avg 1.4) and conceded 2 (0.4), while Pacific scored 4 goals (0.8) and conceded 10 (2.0), which confirms the visitors’ tendency toward higher-scoring games. Seasonal metrics show Cavalry at home have Over 2.5 in 60% of matches, Pacific have Over 2.5 in 100% and BTTS 60% and 100% respectively; additionally Pacific have a 29% conversion rate on an average of 7 shots, and Cavalry 11.2 shots with a 7% conversion. On this basis the strongest and clearest signal is a bet on Over 1.5.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

The strongest signal indicates an away lead at Half-Time: leadingAtHTPercentage_away = 100% and scoredAVGHT_away = 1.0 versus scoredAVGHT_home = 0.0, meaning the away side averages 1 goal before the break while the home side scores none. For Full-Time I lean towards an away win because seasonScoredAVG_away = 2.0 vs seasonScoredAVG_home = 0.8 and the away side’s shot conversion is 29% compared to 7% for the home side, despite the home team taking more shots (11.2 vs 7.0). Although xG suggests the home team creates more chances (xg_for_avg_home = 1.28 vs xg_for_avg_away = 0.0), the home team’s low conversion and the away team’s higher efficiency increase the likelihood that the away lead will hold until the end. A warning is form: form_l5_home = "ddwww" and last5_winPercentage_overall_home = 60% versus form_l5_away = "dllll" and last5_winPercentage_overall_away = 0%, which gives some comeback potential for the home side, hence moderate chances of a draw or a home turnaround.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Stats by half

0 : 0
First half
3 : 0
Second half

Game stats

50Possession (%)50
Cavalry FCPacific FC
18Shots7
Cavalry FCPacific FC
6Shots on target0
Cavalry FCPacific FC
1.88xG0.59
Cavalry FCPacific FC
5Corners4
Cavalry FCPacific FC
46Dangerous attacks20
Cavalry FCPacific FC
12Fouls6
Cavalry FCPacific FC
2Cards0
Cavalry FCPacific FC

Pre-game profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

Cavalry FCPacific FC
1.5Goals scored / game1
Cavalry FCPacific FC
0.5Goals allowed / game2
Cavalry FCPacific FC
48%Average possession52%
Cavalry FCPacific FC
4.83Shots on target / game3
Cavalry FCPacific FC

Team statswho is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

12.83Shots per game10.5
Cavalry FCPacific FC
4.83Shots on target3
Cavalry FCPacific FC
11.7%Shot conversion9.5%
Cavalry FCPacific FC
48%Possession52%
Cavalry FCPacific FC
1.55xG for1.28
Cavalry FCPacific FC
1.32xG against1.87
Cavalry FCPacific FC

Shooting quality

Cavalry FC: BalancedPacific FC: Balanced
Cavalry FCPacific FC
Accuracy (shots on target)38%29%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.310.33

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

Cavalry FC is 1000% better for: last-5 form.

2.2 pts / game - Cavalry FC · 0.2 pts / game - Pacific FC

Cavalry FC
WDDWW
Unbeaten in the last 5 games
Season result split
67% W33% R0% P
Season (W-D-L)
4-2-0
2.33 pts / game · goal difference +6
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-2-0
2.20 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
1-1-0
Last 5 at home
1-1-0
WD
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 0.4xG: 1.50Opponent xG: 1.36BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 20%
Pacific FC
LDLLL
No win in the last 5 games
Season result split
0% W17% R83% P
Season (W-D-L)
0-1-5
0.17 pts / game · goal difference -6
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-1-4
0.20 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
0-1-0
Last 5 away
0-1-0
D
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 2.0xG: 1.36Opponent xG: 1.92BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Cavalry FC is 50% better for: goals scored per game.

1.5 goals / game - Cavalry FC · 1 goals / game - Pacific FC

Cavalry FC is 300% better for: goals allowed per game.

0.5 goals / game - Cavalry FC · 2 goals / game - Pacific FC

Cavalry FC scoring profile: very strong

Cavalry FC scores in 83% of games (5 of 6 meczów), while Pacific FC keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 6 meczów).

Pacific FC scoring profile: mixed

Pacific FC scores in 67% of games (4 of 6 meczów), while Cavalry FC keeps a clean sheet in 50% (3 of 6 meczów).

9Goals scored (season)6
Cavalry FCPacific FC
3Goals conceded (season)12
Cavalry FCPacific FC
2Average goals per game3
Cavalry FCPacific FC
7Goals scored (last 5)5
Cavalry FCPacific FC
2Goals conceded (last 5)10
Cavalry FCPacific FC

How often they score at least...

83%1 goal67%
Cavalry FCPacific FC
50%2 goals33%
Cavalry FCPacific FC
17%3 goals0%
Cavalry FCPacific FC
0%4 goals0%
Cavalry FCPacific FC

How often they concede at least...

50%1 goal100%
Cavalry FCPacific FC
0%2 goals67%
Cavalry FCPacific FC
0%3 goals33%
Cavalry FCPacific FC
0%4 goals0%
Cavalry FCPacific FC

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

54%
League average

Goal patterns

17%BTTS at half-time0%
Cavalry FCPacific FC
0%BTTS in both halves0%
Cavalry FCPacific FC
33%Scored in both halves17%
Cavalry FCPacific FC

BTTS and goal count

33%Min. 3 goals and BTTS67%
Cavalry FCPacific FC
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
Cavalry FCPacific FC
40%BTTS - last 560%
Cavalry FCPacific FC

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

50%Min. 1 goal before half-time67%
Cavalry FCPacific FC
33%Min. 2 goals before half-time0%
Cavalry FCPacific FC
0%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
Cavalry FCPacific FC

2nd half

67%Min. 1 goal after half-time100%
Cavalry FCPacific FC
50%Min. 2 goals after half-time67%
Cavalry FCPacific FC
0%Min. 3 goals after half-time50%
Cavalry FCPacific FC

Game halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Cavalry FC is 101% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.67 pts / game - Cavalry FC · 0.83 pts / game - Pacific FC

Cavalry FC - half-time state
33% leading67% draw0% trailing
Pacific FC - half-time state
17% leading33% draw50% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.67Points per game (1st half)0.83
Cavalry FCPacific FC
0.67Goals scored (1st half)0.17
Cavalry FCPacific FC
0.17Goals conceded (1st half)0.5
Cavalry FCPacific FC
0.83Average goals (1st half)0.67
Cavalry FCPacific FC
83%Clean sheet before half-time50%
Cavalry FCPacific FC
50%No goal before half-time83%
Cavalry FCPacific FC

After half-time (2nd half)

1.67Points per game (2nd half)0.33
Cavalry FCPacific FC
0.83Goals scored (2nd half)0.83
Cavalry FCPacific FC
0.33Goals conceded (2nd half)1.5
Cavalry FCPacific FC
1.17Average goals (2nd half)2.33
Cavalry FCPacific FC
67%Clean sheet after half-time0%
Cavalry FCPacific FC
33%No goal after half-time33%
Cavalry FCPacific FC

Cavalry FC - second-half results

33% W67% R0% P
10
Half-time points
4
Half-time goals
+3
Goal difference (1st half)
10
Second-half points
+3
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.67
PPG before half-time
Lead holding203%

Leads at halftime in 33% of games and wins 67%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime+0.2

Allows 0.2 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

Pacific FC - second-half results

0% W33% R67% P
5
Half-time points
1
Half-time goals
-2
Goal difference (1st half)
2
Second-half points
-4
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.83
PPG before half-time
Lead holding0%

Leads at halftime in 17% of games and wins 0%. Sometimes gives up a halftime lead.

Defense after halftime+1.0

Allows 1.0 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

Cavalry FC - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.401.80
Goals scored / game0.60.8
Goals allowed / game0.20.2
Average goals per game0.81.0
1 goal40%60%
2 goals40%40%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet80%80%
No goal60%40%
Goal difference+2+3
Half-time: 20% leading - 80% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 60% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 3
Pacific FC - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.000.20
Goals scored / game0.20.8
Goals allowed / game0.41.6
Average goals per game0.62.4
1 goal60%100%
2 goals0%60%
3 goals0%60%
Clean sheet60%0%
No goal80%40%
Goal difference-1-4
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 20% draw - 80% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 1

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

Cavalry FC
ScoredConceded
0
0
0-15
2
0
16-30
2
1
31-45
1
0
46-60
2
1
61-75
2
1
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (2 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (1). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

Pacific FC
ScoredConceded
0
0
0-15
1
0
16-30
0
3
31-45
1
4
46-60
2
1
61-75
2
4
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (2 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

2.50
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
1.8 : 0.8
Estimated goal split
home : away
108%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
59%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+20%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
56%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
6%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 17 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

Cavalry FC

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.23
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.77
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-2.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.05
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.82
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
134%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
42%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
-0.13
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
22% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
22%

Pacific FC

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.59
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.41
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-2.6 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.28
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
-0.13
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
84%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
179%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
+0.03
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.7
Late goals
33% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
33%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Canadian Premier League).

Teams vs league

Cavalry FCLigaPacific FC
Average goals per game 2.002.31 3.00
Both teams scored 50%54% 67%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 33%38% 67%
Clean sheets 50%25% 0%
Goal before half-time 50%50% 67%
Goal after half-time 67%81% 100%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.31
Average goals per game
54%
Both teams scored
38%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
25%
Clean sheets
1.12
Home goals / game
1.19
Away goals / game
+-6%
Home attack advantage
+-6%
Home defensive advantage
+-11%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
50%
1 goal
15%
2 goals
0%
3 goals
0%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
81%
1 goal
46%
2 goals
27%
3 goals
8%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Cavalry FCYellow cardAdam Pearlman
  2. Cavalry FCGoalSergio Andres Camargo
  3. Pacific FCSubstitutionOn: Roshawn Kadeem Delahaye JuhmiOff: Matthew Baldisimo
  4. Cavalry FCGoalAmer DidicAssist: Tobias Warschewski
  5. Pacific FCSubstitutionOn: Tristan MarshallOff: Christian Greco-Taylor
  6. Pacific FCSubstitutionOn: Mattias ValesOff: Ronan Kratt
  7. Cavalry FCYellow cardEryk Kobza
  8. Cavalry FCSubstitutionOn: Curtis OforiOff: Goteh Ntignee

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Record from Cavalry FC's perspective: 3 wins, 1 draw and 1 loss against Pacific FC. Games average 3.00 goals, and both teams scored in 40% of them.

Pacific FC
1 : 2
Cavalry FC
Pacific FC
3 : 3
Cavalry FC
Pacific FC
1 : 0
Cavalry FC
Cavalry FC
1 : 0
Pacific FC
Cavalry FC
4 : 0
Pacific FC

FAQ

What was the result of Cavalry FC vs Pacific FC?

The Canadian Premier League match finished Cavalry FC 3:0 Pacific FC. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Cavalry FC and Pacific FC?

In the last 5 head-to-head matches Cavalry FC won 3, Pacific FC won 1 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 3.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 40% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Cavalry FC vs Pacific FC?

Cavalry FC score 1.50 goals per game on average and Pacific FC 1.00. The Canadian Premier League average is 2.31 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 38% of games. Both teams score in 50% of Cavalry FC's matches and 67% of Pacific FC's.

What form are Cavalry FC and Pacific FC in?

Over the last 5 games Cavalry FC have a 3-2-0 record (2.20 points per game) and Pacific FC 0-1-4 (0.20 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Cavalry FC vs Pacific FC?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.