Spain - Segunda DivisiónNuevo Pepico AmatData current as of November 01, 2026

CD Eldense vs Granada CF: match statistics

CD Eldense crest
CD Eldense
0 : 2half-time 0:0
Granada CF crest
Granada CF

CD Eldense vs Granada CF: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

CD Eldense played against Granada CF in Segunda División (Spain). The game was played on November 1, 2026. Venue: Nuevo Pepico Amat. Final score: 0:2.

Recent form

CD Eldense has 3 wins, 0 draws and 2 losses over its last five games, averaging 1.80 points per game. Granada CF has 4 wins, 0 draws and 1 loss, with 2.40 points per game.

Scoring records

CD Eldense scores 1.18 goals per game and allows 1.36. Granada CF scores 1.64 and allows 1.27. Games in this league average 2.70 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 45% of CD Eldense's games and 55% of Granada CF's. The Over 2.5 rates are 55% and 55%, compared with league averages of 52% for BTTS and 50% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

Granada CF has the higher season xG average, 1.54 to 1.45 per game. CD Eldense takes 12.9 shots per game, while Granada CF takes 14.9.

First-half and second-half trends

CD Eldense leads at halftime in 9% of its games and scores 1.00 goals per game after halftime. Granada CF leads at halftime in 27% and scores 1.27 after halftime.

When the teams score

CD Eldense's most productive scoring window is minutes 76-90+ (6 goals). For Granada CF, it is minutes 61-75 (5 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

Segunda División games average 2.70 goals. Both teams score in 52% of games, and 50% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

There is not enough head-to-head history for a meaningful comparison.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

CD Eldense have the home advantage, scoring an average of 1.8 goals per game on their own ground, while Granada CF score 1.5 away from home. The hosts also create slightly better chances, posting an xG of 1.69 compared with 1.56 for the visitors, while Granada’s away defense allows opponents an xG of 1.77. Recent form favors the visitors: they have won 4 of their last 5 matches and scored 10 goals in that run, whereas Eldense have recorded 3 wins and scored 9 goals. Granada are also 6th in the table, with Eldense in 12th, so the hosts’ advantage is not clear-cut. The Eldense pick is based primarily on the home-versus-away defensive records: the hosts concede an average of 1.2 goals, while Granada concede 1.5 away from home.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

Eldense average 1.8 goals at home and have failed to score in none of the home matches included in the sample, while Granada concede an average of 1.5 goals away, with an xG conceded of 1.77. The visitors’ chances of scoring are supported by an average of 1.5 goals away from home and an xG of 1.56, although Eldense keep a clean sheet in 40% of their home matches. In their last 5 matches, both teams have recorded BTTS in 60% of cases, scoring an average of 1.8 and 2.0 goals respectively. The risk of at least one side failing to score remains significant, especially as Granada have failed to score in 33% of their away matches; however, the stronger attacking data points to a moderate lean towards BTTS - Yes.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

CD Eldense average 1.8 goals at home, while Granada concede 1.5 goals away, giving the hosts a solid platform to score. The visitors average 1.5 goals away, with an xG of 1.56, so they also have the potential to add a goal. The last five matches for both teams averaged 3.2 goals, with Over 2.5 goals landing in 60% of those games. However, the strongest signal is for Over 1.5 goals: it has landed in every Eldense home match and in 67% of Granada’s away matches, so I rate Over 1.5 higher than the riskier Over 2.5.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

The strongest individual scenario is CD Eldense leading at the break and winning at full time: the hosts were ahead at half-time in 40% of their matches, while Granada were trailing at that point in 67%. Eldense kept a clean sheet at half-time in 80% of its matches, whereas Granada conceded an average of 1.17 goals before the break. The hosts’ advantage at full time is supported by a 60% win rate and an average of 1.8 goals scored, compared with 1.5 goals conceded by the visitors; Granada also concede an average of 1.77 xG, against 1.26 for Eldense. However, the pick is not clear-cut, as Granada have won four of their last five matches, making a Granada lead or draw at half-time followed by an Eldense win a significant alternative HT/FT outcome.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Stats by half

0 : 0
First half
0 : 2
Second half

Game stats

59Possession (%)41
CD EldenseGranada CF
13Shots8
CD EldenseGranada CF
6Shots on target3
CD EldenseGranada CF
1.64xG0.92
CD EldenseGranada CF
4Corners2
CD EldenseGranada CF
55Dangerous attacks27
CD EldenseGranada CF
17Fouls12
CD EldenseGranada CF
2Cards1
CD EldenseGranada CF

Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

CD EldenseGranada CF
1.18Goals scored / game1.64
CD EldenseGranada CF
1.36Goals allowed / game1.27
CD EldenseGranada CF
50%Average possession49%
CD EldenseGranada CF
4.27Shots on target / game4.45
CD EldenseGranada CF

Team stats— who is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

12.91Shots per game14.91
CD EldenseGranada CF
4.27Shots on target4.45
CD EldenseGranada CF
9.2%Shot conversion11%
CD EldenseGranada CF
50%Possession49%
CD EldenseGranada CF
1.45xG for1.54
CD EldenseGranada CF
1.4xG against1.54
CD EldenseGranada CF

Shooting quality

CD Eldense: BalancedGranada CF: Attacking
CD EldenseGranada CF
Accuracy (shots on target)33%30%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.110.10
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.280.37

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team form— who is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

Granada CF is 33% better for: last-5 form.

1.8 pts / game - CD Eldense · 2.4 pts / game - Granada CF

CD Eldense
LWWWL
Season result split
36% W18% D45% L
Season (W-D-L)
4-2-5
1.27 pts / game · goal difference -2
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-0-2
1.80 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
2-2-1
Last 5 at home
2-2-1
DDLWW
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.8Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 1.44Opponent xG: 1.50BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%
Granada CF
LWWWW
Season result split
55% W18% D27% L
Season (W-D-L)
6-2-3
1.82 pts / game · goal difference +4
Last 5 (W-D-L)
4-0-1
2.40 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
3-1-2
Last 5 away
3-0-2
WLLWW
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 2.0Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 1.54Opponent xG: 1.50BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%

Goals— how do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Granada CF is 39% better for: goals scored per game.

1.18 goals / game - CD Eldense · 1.64 goals / game - Granada CF

Granada CF is 7% better for: goals allowed per game.

1.36 goals / game - CD Eldense · 1.27 goals / game - Granada CF

CD Eldense scoring profile: mixed

CD Eldense scores in 55% of games (6 of 11 games), while Granada CF keeps a clean sheet in 36% (4 of 11 games).

Granada CF scoring profile: very strong

Granada CF scores in 82% of games (9 of 11 games), while CD Eldense keeps a clean sheet in 18% (2 of 11 games).

13Goals scored (season)18
CD EldenseGranada CF
15Goals conceded (season)14
CD EldenseGranada CF
2.55Average goals per game2.91
CD EldenseGranada CF
9Goals scored (last 5)10
CD EldenseGranada CF
7Goals conceded (last 5)6
CD EldenseGranada CF

How often they score at least...

55%1 goal82%
CD EldenseGranada CF
36%2 goals64%
CD EldenseGranada CF
18%3 goals18%
CD EldenseGranada CF
9%4 goals0%
CD EldenseGranada CF

How often they concede at least...

82%1 goal64%
CD EldenseGranada CF
45%2 goals36%
CD EldenseGranada CF
9%3 goals27%
CD EldenseGranada CF
0%4 goals0%
CD EldenseGranada CF

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

9%BTTS at half-time9%
CD EldenseGranada CF
9%BTTS in both halves9%
CD EldenseGranada CF
9%Scored in both halves27%
CD EldenseGranada CF

BTTS and goal count

45%Min. 3 goals and BTTS45%
CD EldenseGranada CF
9%Min. 3 goals without BTTS9%
CD EldenseGranada CF
60%BTTS - last 560%
CD EldenseGranada CF

Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

64%Min. 1 goal before half-time73%
CD EldenseGranada CF
27%Min. 2 goals before half-time36%
CD EldenseGranada CF
18%Min. 3 goals before half-time9%
CD EldenseGranada CF

2nd half

64%Min. 1 goal after half-time82%
CD EldenseGranada CF
45%Min. 2 goals after half-time64%
CD EldenseGranada CF
18%Min. 3 goals after half-time27%
CD EldenseGranada CF

Game halves— when do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Granada CF is 70% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

0.64 pts / game - CD Eldense · 1.09 pts / game - Granada CF

CD Eldense - half-time state
9% leading36% draw55% trailing
Granada CF - half-time state
27% leading27% draw45% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

0.64Points per game (1st half)1.09
CD EldenseGranada CF
0.18Goals scored (1st half)0.36
CD EldenseGranada CF
0.91Goals conceded (1st half)0.82
CD EldenseGranada CF
1.09Average goals (1st half)1.18
CD EldenseGranada CF
36%Clean sheet before half-time55%
CD EldenseGranada CF
91%No goal before half-time64%
CD EldenseGranada CF

After half-time (2nd half)

1.45Points per game (2nd half)1.82
CD EldenseGranada CF
1Goals scored (2nd half)1.27
CD EldenseGranada CF
0.45Goals conceded (2nd half)0.45
CD EldenseGranada CF
1.45Average goals (2nd half)1.73
CD EldenseGranada CF
64%Clean sheet after half-time55%
CD EldenseGranada CF
45%No goal after half-time27%
CD EldenseGranada CF

CD Eldense - second-half results

27% W64% D9% L
7
Half-time points
2
Half-time goals
-8
Goal difference (1st half)
16
Second-half points
+6
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.64
PPG before half-time
Lead holding400%

Leads at halftime in 9% of games and wins 36%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime-0.5

Defense stays consistent across the full game.

Granada CF - second-half results

45% W45% D9% L
12
Half-time points
4
Half-time goals
-5
Goal difference (1st half)
20
Second-half points
+9
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.09
PPG before half-time
Lead holding204%

Leads at halftime in 27% of games and wins 55%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime-0.4

Defense stays consistent across the full game.

CD Eldense - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game0.601.80
Goals scored / game0.41.4
Goals allowed / game1.20.2
Average goals per game1.61.6
1 goal100%60%
2 goals40%60%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet0%80%
No goal80%40%
Goal difference-4+6
Half-time: 20% leading - 0% draw - 80% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 60% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 2
Granada CF - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.402.20
Goals scored / game0.41.6
Goals allowed / game0.80.4
Average goals per game1.22.0
1 goal80%80%
2 goals40%80%
3 goals0%40%
Clean sheet60%60%
No goal60%20%
Goal difference-2+6
Half-time: 40% leading - 20% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 40% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 2

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

CD Eldense
ScoredConceded
0
3
0-15
0
3
16-30
2
4
31-45
2
1
46-60
3
2
61-75
6
2
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (6 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): +4 - wins late phases.

Granada CF
ScoredConceded
1
5
0-15
3
2
16-30
0
2
31-45
4
3
46-60
5
0
61-75
5
2
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (5 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): +3 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

2.73
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
1.2 : 1.5
Estimated goal split
home : away
101%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
50%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
45%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
8%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 13 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

CD Eldense

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.05
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.23
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-0.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.27
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.04
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
75%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
120%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
+0.53
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.8
Late goals
46% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
46%

Granada CF

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
0.00
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.37
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-0.6 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.10
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.27
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
145%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
81%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
+0.58
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.9
Late goals
28% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 6% come in the first quarter-hour.
28%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League context— is this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Segunda División).

Teams vs league

CD EldenseLigaGranada CF
Average goals per game▼ 2.552.70▲ 2.91
Both teams scored▼ 45%52%▲ 55%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)▲ 55%50%▲ 55%
Clean sheets▼ 18%28%▲ 36%
Goal before half-time▼ 64%71%▲ 73%
Goal after half-time▼ 64%75%▲ 82%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.70
Average goals per game
52%
Both teams scored
50%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
28%
Clean sheets
1.57
Home goals / game
1.13
Away goals / game
+39%
Home attack advantage
+28%
Home defensive advantage
+15%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
71%
1 goal
35%
2 goals
14%
3 goals
5%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
75%
1 goal
46%
2 goals
13%
3 goals
6%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Granada CFYellow cardJuanjo Juanjo
  2. CD EldenseYellow cardJuan Larios López
  3. CD EldenseYellow cardJesus Clemente Corcho
  4. CD EldenseSubstitutionOn: Waldo Rubio MartínOff: Fidel Chaves de la Torre

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

FAQ

What was the result of CD Eldense vs Granada CF?

The Segunda División match finished CD Eldense 0:2 Granada CF. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before CD Eldense vs Granada CF?

CD Eldense score 1.18 goals per game on average and Granada CF 1.64. The Segunda División average is 2.70 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 50% of games. Both teams score in 45% of CD Eldense's matches and 55% of Granada CF's.

What form are CD Eldense and Granada CF in?

Over the last 5 games CD Eldense have a 3-0-2 record (1.80 points per game) and Granada CF 4-0-1 (2.40 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for CD Eldense vs Granada CF?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for CD Eldense vs Granada CF: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.