El Salvador - Salvadoran Primera DivisiónData current as of September 06, 2026

CD Platense vs Inter: match statistics

CD Platense crest
CD Platense
0 : 0half-time 0:0
Inter crest
Inter

CD Platense vs Inter: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

CD Platense played against Inter in Salvadoran Primera División (El Salvador). The game was played on April 1, 2026. Final score: 0:0.

Recent form

CD Platense has 1 win, 1 draw and 3 losses over its last five games, averaging 0.80 points per game. Inter has 2 wins, 1 draw and 2 losses, with 1.40 points per game.

Scoring records

CD Platense scores 1.31 goals per game and allows 1.56. Inter scores 1.11 and allows 1.44. Games in this league average 2.74 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 59% of CD Platense's games and 50% of Inter's. The Over 2.5 rates are 49% and 53%, compared with league averages of 55% for BTTS and 53% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

Inter has the higher season xG average, 1.25 to 1.22 per game. CD Platense takes 8.1 shots per game, while Inter takes 7.7.

First-half and second-half trends

CD Platense leads at halftime in 23% of its games and scores 0.72 goals per game after halftime. Inter leads at halftime in 22% and scores 0.64 after halftime.

When the teams score

CD Platense's most productive scoring window is minutes 31-45+ (11 goals). For Inter, it is minutes 31-45+ (10 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

Salvadoran Primera División games average 2.74 goals. Both teams score in 55% of games, and 53% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

Before this game, 3 previous meetings were available. The record was 0 home wins, 3 draws and 0 away wins. Those games averaged 2.67 goals, with both teams scoring in 67% of them.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

I expect a draw because the metrics indicate a very balanced match: Platense at home averages 1.35 goals scored and concedes 1.40, while Inter away scores 1.12 and concedes 1.82. Quality of chances is also similar — home xG for Platense is 1.31 versus 1.26 for Inter, with xG against of 1.33 vs 1.50, giving Platense a slight edge in chance creation. Platense has a high home draw rate (45%) and is less likely to finish goalless (20%), whereas Inter win only 18% of away matches and failed to score in 41% of games, which reduces the visitors’ offensive potential. In short-term form Platense over the last 5 matches is 1-1-3 (8 scored, 11 conceded, 0.8 points per game), and Inter 2-1-2 (3 scored, 8 conceded, 1.4 points per game), suggesting better point return for Inter but poorer goal output. Considering the higher home draw share, similar xG (1.31 vs 1.26) and moderate average total goals home and away (2.75 and 2.94), the most probable scenario is a points split.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

Seasonal BTTS metrics are similar: Platense has BTTS 47%, Inter 53%, and the league average BTTS is 55%, which provides moderate support for a both-teams-to-score scenario. However, the last 5 matches show a large disparity: Platense has BTTS 60% while Inter has 0% and scored only 3 goals in those five matches (0.6 per game). Inter fails to score in 41% of season matches and concedes 1.82 goals per game on average, and Platense concedes 2.2 goals on average in the last 5 matches (11 in total), suggesting the risk of one side failing to reply is real. In terms of chance quality Platense has xG_for 1.23 while Inter xG_against is 1.50; both teams produce a similar number of shots on target (3.47 vs 3.71) but Inter has recently been poor at finishing. Therefore the strongest signal is to back 'No' (No BTTS) with an estimated probability of 60% versus 40% for 'Yes' (BTTS - Yes).

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

Both teams have a high share of matches over 1.5 goals this season: Platense 74% and Inter 76%, so I assess the chance for Over 1.5 at around 75%. An xG-based model gives 1.37 xG for Platense (1.23 attack vs 1.50 opponent defense) and 1.14 xG for Inter (1.26 attack vs 1.02 Platense defense), total expected goals 2.51. The 2.5 line gives mixed signals: Platense has 37% of matches >2.5, Inter 71% — their arithmetic mean is 54%, so I forecast a moderate 55% for Over 2.5, although a Poisson model for 2.51 goals yields P(≥3) of about 46%. Over 3.5 is less likely (seasonal 21% for Platense and 47% for Inter), hence I project 33% for Over 3.5 and 67% for Under 3.5. The strongest play is Over 1.5 (side: over, line: 1.5) — both teams regularly clear this threshold and we have 2.51 expected goals.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

Half-time statistics indicate a high incidence of draws: the home side were level at the break in 10 matches (53%), and the away side in 9 matches (53%), therefore an HT draw is most likely. The hosts kept a clean sheet at half-time in 74% of matches and averaged 0.53 goals scored by half-time with 0.26 conceded, whereas the visitors averaged 0.41 goals and conceded 1.00 by the break, supporting a low-scoring first half (e.g. 0-0). After half-time the probability of a home win increases: the hosts earned an average of 1.47 points after the break versus 0.88 for the visitors and have a better season points average 1.32 versus 0.82, while opponents concede on average 1.82 goals per match, so I expect the hosts to turn the game around in the second half. Both teams’ xG are similar (1.23 for the hosts vs 1.26 for the visitors), but the visitors have a higher xG against (1.50) and register slightly more on-target shots (3.71 vs 3.47), indicating the visitors’ weaker defense. Consequently, given the 53% chance of a draw at half-time, the robust 74% of home clean sheets at half-time and the opponents’ weaker defense (1.82 conceded), the most probable scenario is a Half-Time draw and a home win at Full-Time (X/1).

View first-half and second-half statistics

Stats by half

0 : 0
First half
0 : 0
Second half

Game stats

49Possession (%)51
CD PlatenseInter
14Shots8
CD PlatenseInter
4Shots on target2
CD PlatenseInter
1.46xG0.88
CD PlatenseInter
4Corners2
CD PlatenseInter
41Dangerous attacks32
CD PlatenseInter
-1Fouls-1
CD PlatenseInter
-1Cards-1
CD PlatenseInter

Pre-game profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

1.31Goals scored / game1.11
CD PlatenseInter
1.56Goals allowed / game1.44
CD PlatenseInter
47%Average possession53%
CD PlatenseInter
3.64Shots on target / game3.58
CD PlatenseInter

Team statswho is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

8.05Shots per game7.69
CD PlatenseInter
3.64Shots on target3.58
CD PlatenseInter
16.2%Shot conversion14.4%
CD PlatenseInter
47%Possession53%
CD PlatenseInter
1.22xG for1.25
CD PlatenseInter
1.35xG against1.25
CD PlatenseInter

Shooting quality

CD Platense: Counter-attackingInter: Efficient finishing
CD PlatenseInter
Accuracy (shots on target)45%47%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.150.16
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.360.31

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

Inter is 75% better for: last-5 form.

0.8 pts / game - CD Platense · 1.4 pts / game - Inter

CD Platense
LWLLD
Season result split
21% W38% R41% P
Season (W-D-L)
8-15-16
1.00 pts / game · goal difference -10
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-1-3
0.80 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
4-9-7
Last 5 at home
1-2-2
DDLWL
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.6Goals conceded: 2.2xG: 1.24Opponent xG: 1.27BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%
Inter
WWDLL
Season result split
25% W33% R42% P
Season (W-D-L)
9-12-15
1.08 pts / game · goal difference -12
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
3-5-9
Last 5 away
1-1-3
WLLDL
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 0.6Goals conceded: 1.6xG: 1.44Opponent xG: 1.37BTTS: 0%Over 2.5: 40%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

CD Platense is 18% better for: goals scored per game.

1.31 goals / game - CD Platense · 1.11 goals / game - Inter

Inter is 8% better for: goals allowed per game.

1.56 goals / game - CD Platense · 1.44 goals / game - Inter

CD Platense scoring profile: strong

CD Platense scores in 69% of games (27 of 39 meczów), while Inter keeps a clean sheet in 28% (10 of 36 meczów).

Inter scoring profile: strong

Inter scores in 64% of games (23 of 36 meczów), while CD Platense keeps a clean sheet in 21% (8 of 39 meczów).

51Goals scored (season)40
CD PlatenseInter
61Goals conceded (season)52
CD PlatenseInter
2.87Average goals per game2.56
CD PlatenseInter
8Goals scored (last 5)3
CD PlatenseInter
11Goals conceded (last 5)8
CD PlatenseInter

How often they score at least...

69%1 goal64%
CD PlatenseInter
36%2 goals36%
CD PlatenseInter
21%3 goals11%
CD PlatenseInter
5%4 goals0%
CD PlatenseInter

How often they concede at least...

79%1 goal72%
CD PlatenseInter
41%2 goals47%
CD PlatenseInter
23%3 goals19%
CD PlatenseInter
8%4 goals3%
CD PlatenseInter

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

55%
League average

Goal patterns

21%BTTS at half-time19%
CD PlatenseInter
8%BTTS in both halves6%
CD PlatenseInter
18%Scored in both halves17%
CD PlatenseInter

BTTS and goal count

41%Min. 3 goals and BTTS42%
CD PlatenseInter
8%Min. 3 goals without BTTS11%
CD PlatenseInter
60%BTTS - last 50%
CD PlatenseInter

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

72%Min. 1 goal before half-time58%
CD PlatenseInter
31%Min. 2 goals before half-time33%
CD PlatenseInter
13%Min. 3 goals before half-time14%
CD PlatenseInter

2nd half

72%Min. 1 goal after half-time78%
CD PlatenseInter
51%Min. 2 goals after half-time44%
CD PlatenseInter
28%Min. 3 goals after half-time22%
CD PlatenseInter

Game halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

CD Platense - half-time state
23% leading46% draw31% trailing
Inter - half-time state
22% leading53% draw25% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.15Points per game (1st half)1.19
CD PlatenseInter
0.59Goals scored (1st half)0.47
CD PlatenseInter
0.64Goals conceded (1st half)0.61
CD PlatenseInter
1.23Average goals (1st half)1.08
CD PlatenseInter
49%Clean sheet before half-time58%
CD PlatenseInter
59%No goal before half-time64%
CD PlatenseInter

After half-time (2nd half)

0.92Points per game (2nd half)1.19
CD PlatenseInter
0.72Goals scored (2nd half)0.64
CD PlatenseInter
0.92Goals conceded (2nd half)0.83
CD PlatenseInter
1.64Average goals (2nd half)1.47
CD PlatenseInter
44%Clean sheet after half-time44%
CD PlatenseInter
54%No goal after half-time56%
CD PlatenseInter

CD Platense - second-half results

15% W46% R38% P
45
Half-time points
23
Half-time goals
-2
Goal difference (1st half)
36
Second-half points
-8
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.15
PPG before half-time
Lead holding91%

Leads at halftime in 23% of games and wins 21%. Usually protects a halftime lead through the final whistle.

Defense after halftime+0.3

Allows 0.3 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

Inter - second-half results

31% W28% R42% P
43
Half-time points
17
Half-time goals
-5
Goal difference (1st half)
43
Second-half points
-7
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.19
PPG before half-time
Lead holding114%

Leads at halftime in 22% of games and wins 25%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime+0.2

Allows 0.2 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

CD Platense - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.000.80
Goals scored / game0.61.0
Goals allowed / game0.81.4
Average goals per game1.42.4
1 goal80%100%
2 goals20%60%
3 goals20%40%
Clean sheet40%20%
No goal60%20%
Goal difference-1-2
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 20% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 3
Inter - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.201.00
Goals scored / game0.40.2
Goals allowed / game0.80.8
Average goals per game1.21.0
1 goal40%60%
2 goals40%20%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet80%60%
No goal80%80%
Goal difference-2-3
Half-time: 20% leading - 60% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 2

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

CD Platense
ScoredConceded
6
8
0-15
6
7
16-30
11
10
31-45
8
9
46-60
11
13
61-75
9
14
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (11 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (14). Late-goal balance (76-90): -5 - late phases are a weakness.

Inter
ScoredConceded
6
4
0-15
1
10
16-30
10
8
31-45
10
7
46-60
5
9
61-75
8
14
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (10 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (14). Late-goal balance (76-90): -6 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

2.71
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
1.4 : 1.3
Estimated goal split
home : away
99%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
55%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-2%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
44%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
11%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 9 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

CD Platense

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.13
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.12
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-9.1 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.09
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
-0.21
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
95%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
116%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
-0.20
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
18% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 12% come in the first quarter-hour.
18%

Inter

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
0.00
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.33
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-1.1 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.14
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
-0.19
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
82%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
104%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
+0.32
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
20% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 15% come in the first quarter-hour.
20%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Salvadoran Primera División).

Teams vs league

CD PlatenseLigaInter
Average goals per game 2.872.74 2.56
Both teams scored 59%55% 50%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 49%53% 53%
Clean sheets 21%27% 28%
Goal before half-time 72%68% 58%
Goal after half-time 72%78% 78%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.74
Average goals per game
55%
Both teams scored
53%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
27%
Clean sheets
1.38
Home goals / game
1.35
Away goals / game
+2%
Home attack advantage
+2%
Home defensive advantage
+3%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
68%
1 goal
33%
2 goals
13%
3 goals
5%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
78%
1 goal
47%
2 goals
21%
3 goals
5%
4 goals

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Referee context

See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.

Jaime Alfredo HerreraMatches officiated: 14
-Cards per match
0Penalties per match
1 / X / 236%Home wins28%Draws36%Away wins

Head-to-head

Record from CD Platense's perspective: 0 wins, 3 draws and 0 losses against Inter. Games average 2.67 goals, and both teams scored in 67% of them.

Inter
0 : 0
CD Platense
CD Platense
2 : 2
Inter
Inter
2 : 2
CD Platense

FAQ

What was the result of CD Platense vs Inter?

The Salvadoran Primera División match finished CD Platense 0:0 Inter. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between CD Platense and Inter?

In the last 3 head-to-head matches CD Platense won 0, Inter won 0 and 3 ended level. These games averaged 2.67 goals, with both teams scoring in 67% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before CD Platense vs Inter?

CD Platense score 1.31 goals per game on average and Inter 1.11. The Salvadoran Primera División average is 2.74 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 53% of games. Both teams score in 59% of CD Platense's matches and 50% of Inter's.

What form are CD Platense and Inter in?

Over the last 5 games CD Platense have a 1-1-3 record (0.80 points per game) and Inter 2-1-2 (1.40 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for CD Platense vs Inter?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for CD Platense vs Inter: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.