El Salvador - Salvadoran Primera DivisiónData current as of 19 July 2026

CD Platense vs Inter: match statistics

CD Platense crest
CD Platense
0 : 0half-time 0:0
Inter crest
Inter

CD Platense vs Inter: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

CD Platense play Inter in Salvadoran Primera División (El Salvador). The match date is 1 April 2026 at 23:00. Final score: 0:0.

Current form

CD Platense: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match. Inter: 3-0-2, 1.80 points/match.

Goal statistics

CD Platense scores 1.22 and concedes 1.43 goals per match. Inter scores 1.13 and concedes 1.40. League average: 2.67 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: CD Platense 57%, Inter 51%. Over 2.5: CD Platense 41%, Inter 53%. League level: BTTS 53%, Over 2.5 50%.

xG, shots and style

Inter has higher xG: 1.25 vs 1.24. CD Platense: 8.5 shots per match, Inter: 7.8.

Match halves

CD Platense: half-time lead 22%, second-half goals 0.70. Inter: half-time lead 22%, second-half goals 0.64.

Goals by minute

CD Platense: 31-45+ (12 goals). Inter: 31-45+ (13 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Salvadoran Primera División: 2.67 goals per match, BTTS 53%, Over 2.5 50%.

Head-to-head

3 H2H matches: 0-3-0. Average goals 2.67, BTTS 67%.

Match description

I expect a draw because the metrics indicate a very balanced match: Platense at home averages 1.35 goals scored and concedes 1.40, while Inter away scores 1.12 and concedes 1.82. Quality of chances is also similar — home xG for Platense is 1.31 versus 1.26 for Inter, with xG against of 1.33 vs 1.50, giving Platense a slight edge in chance creation. Platense has a high home draw rate (45%) and is less likely to finish goalless (20%), whereas Inter win only 18% of away matches and failed to score in 41% of games, which reduces the visitors’ offensive potential. In short-term form Platense over the last 5 matches is 1-1-3 (8 scored, 11 conceded, 0.8 points per game), and Inter 2-1-2 (3 scored, 8 conceded, 1.4 points per game), suggesting better point return for Inter but poorer goal output. Considering the higher home draw share, similar xG (1.31 vs 1.26) and moderate average total goals home and away (2.75 and 2.94), the most probable scenario is a points split.

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
0 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

49Possession (%)51
CD PlatenseInter
14Shots8
CD PlatenseInter
4Shots on target2
CD PlatenseInter
1.46xG0.88
CD PlatenseInter
4Corners2
CD PlatenseInter
41Dangerous attacks32
CD PlatenseInter
-1Fouls-1
CD PlatenseInter
-1Cards-1
CD PlatenseInter

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1.22Goals scored / match1.13
CD PlatenseInter
1.43Goals conceded / match1.4
CD PlatenseInter
48%Average possession53%
CD PlatenseInter
3.72Shots on target / match3.56
CD PlatenseInter

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

8.48Shots per match7.78
CD PlatenseInter
3.72Shots on target3.56
CD PlatenseInter
14.4%Shot conversion14.6%
CD PlatenseInter
48%Possession53%
CD PlatenseInter
1.24xG for1.25
CD PlatenseInter
1.33xG against1.22
CD PlatenseInter

Shooting quality

CD Platense: Efficient finishingInter: Efficient finishing
CD PlatenseInter
Accuracy (shots on target)44%46%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.150.16
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.330.32

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Inter is 80% better for: last-5 form.

1 pts / match - CD Platense · 1.8 pts / match - Inter

CD Platense
LDWDL
Season result split
20% W41% R39% P
Season (W-D-L)
9-19-18
1.00 pts / match · goal difference -10
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-2-2
1.00 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
4-11-8
Last 5 at home
1-2-2
WLDLD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.8Goals conceded: 0.8xG: 1.38Opponent xG: 1.26BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 0%
Inter
WWLLW
Season result split
29% W33% R38% P
Season (W-D-L)
13-15-17
1.20 pts / match · goal difference -12
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-0-2
1.80 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
4-7-11
Last 5 away
1-2-2
DDWLL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 1.52Opponent xG: 1.26BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 40%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

CD Platense is 8% better for: goals scored per match.

1.22 goals / match - CD Platense · 1.13 goals / match - Inter

CD Platense scoring profile: strong

CD Platense scores in 67% of matches (31 of 46 matches), while Inter keeps a clean sheet in 27% (12 of 45 matches).

Inter scoring profile: strong

Inter scores in 64% of matches (29 of 45 matches), while CD Platense keeps a clean sheet in 22% (10 of 46 matches).

56Goals scored (season)51
CD PlatenseInter
66Goals conceded (season)63
CD PlatenseInter
2.65Average goals in match2.53
CD PlatenseInter
4Goals scored (last 5)5
CD PlatenseInter
4Goals conceded (last 5)6
CD PlatenseInter

How often they score at least...

67%1 goal64%
CD PlatenseInter
33%2 goals40%
CD PlatenseInter
17%3 goals9%
CD PlatenseInter
4%4 goals0%
CD PlatenseInter

How often they concede at least...

78%1 goal73%
CD PlatenseInter
35%2 goals47%
CD PlatenseInter
20%3 goals16%
CD PlatenseInter
7%4 goals2%
CD PlatenseInter

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

53%
League average

Goal patterns

17%BTTS at half-time20%
CD PlatenseInter
7%BTTS in both halves4%
CD PlatenseInter
15%Scored in both halves16%
CD PlatenseInter

BTTS and goal count

35%Min. 3 goals and BTTS44%
CD PlatenseInter
7%Min. 3 goals without BTTS9%
CD PlatenseInter
40%BTTS - last 540%
CD PlatenseInter

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

67%Min. 1 goal before half-time60%
CD PlatenseInter
26%Min. 2 goals before half-time36%
CD PlatenseInter
11%Min. 3 goals before half-time13%
CD PlatenseInter

2nd half

72%Min. 1 goal after half-time78%
CD PlatenseInter
48%Min. 2 goals after half-time40%
CD PlatenseInter
24%Min. 3 goals after half-time22%
CD PlatenseInter

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

CD Platense - half-time state
22% leading48% draw30% trailing
Inter - half-time state
22% leading51% draw27% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.13Points per match (1st half)1.18
CD PlatenseInter
0.52Goals scored (1st half)0.49
CD PlatenseInter
0.59Goals conceded (1st half)0.62
CD PlatenseInter
1.11Average goals (1st half)1.11
CD PlatenseInter
52%Clean sheet before half-time56%
CD PlatenseInter
63%No goal before half-time64%
CD PlatenseInter

After half-time (2nd half)

0.98Points per match (2nd half)1.27
CD PlatenseInter
0.7Goals scored (2nd half)0.64
CD PlatenseInter
0.85Goals conceded (2nd half)0.78
CD PlatenseInter
1.54Average goals (2nd half)1.42
CD PlatenseInter
46%Clean sheet after half-time44%
CD PlatenseInter
54%No goal after half-time56%
CD PlatenseInter

CD Platense - second-half results

17% W46% R37% P
52
Half-time points
24
Half-time goals
-3
Goal difference (1st half)
45
Second-half points
-7
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.13
PPG before half-time
Lead holding91%

Leads at half-time in 22% of matches and wins 20%. Usually protects the lead until full-time.

Defence after half-time+0.3

Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Inter - second-half results

33% W27% R40% P
53
Half-time points
22
Half-time goals
-6
Goal difference (1st half)
57
Second-half points
-6
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.18
PPG before half-time
Lead holding132%

Leads at half-time in 22% of matches and wins 29%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.2

Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

CD Platense - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.001.40
Goals scored / match0.20.6
Goals conceded / match0.40.4
Average goals in match0.61.0
1 goal60%80%
2 goals0%20%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet60%60%
No goal80%60%
Goal difference-1+1
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 20% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 1
Inter - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.602.00
Goals scored / match0.20.8
Goals conceded / match0.80.4
Average goals in match1.01.2
1 goal60%80%
2 goals40%20%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet40%60%
No goal80%40%
Goal difference-3+2
Half-time: 0% leading - 60% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 20% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 1

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

CD Platense
ScoredConceded
6
9
0-15
6
7
16-30
12
11
31-45
10
10
46-60
12
14
61-75
10
15
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (12 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (15). Late-goal balance (76-90): -5 - late phases are a weakness.

Inter
ScoredConceded
6
5
0-15
3
14
16-30
13
9
31-45
11
8
46-60
6
10
61-75
12
17
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (13 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (17). Late-goal balance (76-90): -5 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.59
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.3 : 1.3
Estimated goal split
home : away
97%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
54%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+3%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
43%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
12%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 8 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

CD Platense

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.09
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.12
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-11.8 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.02
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.10
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
91%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
108%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
18% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 11% come in the first quarter-hour.
18%

Inter

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.03
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.30
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+0.6 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.12
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.18
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
86%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
104%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.60
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
24% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 12% come in the first quarter-hour.
24%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Salvadoran Primera División).

Teams vs league

CD PlatenseLigaInter
Average goals in match 2.652.67 2.53
Both teams scored 57%53% 51%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 41%50% 53%
Clean sheets 22%27% 27%
Goal before half-time 67%68% 60%
Goal after half-time 72%78% 78%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.67
Average goals per match
53%
Both teams scored
50%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
27%
Clean sheets
1.34
Home goals / match
1.32
Away goals / match
+2%
Home attack advantage
+1%
Home defence advantage
+3%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
68%
1 goal
32%
2 goals
12%
3 goals
4%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
78%
1 goal
44%
2 goals
20%
3 goals
6%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (3): CD Platense 0 - 3 - 0 Inter. Average goals 2.67, both teams scored in 67% matches.

Inter
0 : 0
CD Platense Municipal Zacatecoluca
CD Platense Municipal Zacatecoluca
2 : 2
Inter
Inter
2 : 2
CD Platense Municipal Zacatecoluca

FAQ

What was the result of CD Platense vs Inter?

The Salvadoran Primera División match finished CD Platense 0:0 Inter. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between CD Platense and Inter?

In the last 3 head-to-head matches CD Platense won 0, Inter won 0 and 3 ended level. These games averaged 2.67 goals, with both teams scoring in 67% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before CD Platense vs Inter?

CD Platense score 1.22 goals per game on average and Inter 1.13. The Salvadoran Primera División average is 2.67 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 50% of games. Both teams score in 57% of CD Platense's matches and 51% of Inter's.

What form are CD Platense and Inter in?

Over the last 5 games CD Platense have a 1-2-2 record (1.00 points per game) and Inter 3-0-2 (1.80 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for CD Platense vs Inter?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for CD Platense vs Inter: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.