Celtic vs Hearts: match statistics
Celtic vs Hearts: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Celtic played against Hearts in Premiership (Scotland). The game was played on May 16, 2026. Final score: 3:1.
Recent form
Celtic has 5 wins, 0 draws and 0 losses over its last five games, averaging 3.00 points per game. Hearts has 4 wins, 1 draw and 0 losses, with 2.60 points per game.
Scoring records
Celtic scores 1.89 goals per game and allows 1.08. Hearts scores 1.78 and allows 0.84. Games in this league average 2.75 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 57% of Celtic's games and 46% of Hearts's. The Over 2.5 rates are 68% and 51%, compared with league averages of 51% for BTTS and 53% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Celtic has the higher season xG average, 1.90 to 1.66 per game. Celtic takes 16.5 shots per game, while Hearts takes 14.3.
First-half and second-half trends
Celtic leads at halftime in 46% of its games and scores 1.03 goals per game after halftime. Hearts leads at halftime in 38% and scores 1.05 after halftime.
When the teams score
Celtic's most productive scoring window is minutes 76-90+ (17 goals). For Hearts, it is minutes 76-90+ (17 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Premiership games average 2.75 goals. Both teams score in 51% of games, and 53% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, 3 previous meetings were available. The record was 0 home wins, 1 draw and 2 away wins. Those games averaged 3.67 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Celtic are the favorites for this tie: at home they win 78% of matches and have a perfect run in their last 5 games (5/5), scoring 17 goals, while Hearts have won 4 and drawn 1 in their last 5, scoring 11 goals. The hosts generate clearly more high-quality chances – average xG 2.2 and 7.06 shots on target for Celtic versus xG 1.6 and 4.78 shots on target for Hearts – which converts to 2.22 goals per home game against 1.61 goals per away game for the visitors. Defensively Celtic also have the edge: they concede 0.78 goals per home match and keep 50% clean sheets, whereas Hearts concede 1.11 goals away and have 33% clean sheets; additionally Hearts fail to score in 22% of their away games, while Celtic fail to score in only 6% of home matches. It should be noted, however, that over the whole season Hearts have conceded 31 goals versus Celtic’s 40, and Hearts have a 50% win rate away, which keeps them a real contender. Considering game control (possession 66% vs 55%), chance quality and xG metrics, I predict a home win.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
I back BTTS - Yes because in the last 5 matches Celtic has BTTS 100% and Hearts 80%, providing a strong signal of offensive form from both teams. xG comparison shows Celtic generates an average xG 1.71 versus Hearts’ average xG conceded of 1.25, while Hearts posts xG 1.60 against Celtic’s xG conceded 0.99, so both sides create chances that exceed the opponent’s defensive numbers. Seasonal goals averages are 1.95 for Celtic and 1.61 for Hearts, with seasonal goals conceded 0.58 vs 1.11; although Celtic has a seasonal clean sheet expected rate of 58% (vs 33% for Hearts), in the last 5 matches Celtic has conceded an average of 1.4 goals, which diminishes the weight of the seasonal clean sheet figure. Shot metrics also support both sides: Celtic averages 14.79 shots and 5.32 on target (Hearts 13.83 and 4.78), with conversion rates of 13% vs 12%, so the volume and quality of chances should produce goals from both teams. Considering the 100% and 80% BTTS form, positive xG-to-opponent-defense relationships and seasonal goals averages, I assess BTTS probability at 70% vs 30% for No Goal; therefore selection: yes.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Expected goals by a simple average of xG and opponent xG conceded are: Celtic 1.48 (xG attack 1.71 and Hearts xG defense 1.25), Hearts 1.30 (xG attack 1.60 and Celtic xG defense 0.99), total 2.78. Season data shows Over 1.5 in 68% of Celtic matches and 72% of Hearts matches, while Over 2.5 occurs in 47%/56% of fixtures, indicating a stronger signal for the 1.5 threshold. In the last 5 matches Celtic scored 17 goals (3.4 per match) and Hearts 11 goals (2.2 per match), and recent xG is 1.8 vs 1.68, which further increases the likelihood of goals. Using a Poisson model for the sum with λ=2.78 I estimate probabilities: Over 1.5 ≈76%, Over 2.5 ≈52% and Over 3.5 ≈30%, therefore the strongest and safest signal from the data is to back Over 1.5.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Celtic are clear favorites: at home they average 1.95 goals scored and concede 0.58 per match, while Hearts away average 1.61 scored and 1.11 conceded. By half-time the hosts score on average 0.74 goals and concede 0.26; Celtic led at the break in 8 matches, i.e. in 42% of their home appearances, which suggests a strong likelihood of a 1-0 lead at Half-Time. Over Full-Time the statistics also favor Celtic: they have 58% clean sheets at home versus Hearts’ 33% clean sheets away, and the hosts’ xG is 1.71 versus the visitors’ 1.60 xG with xG against 0.99 vs 1.25, confirming the hosts’ offensive-defensive advantage. Form further supports Celtic — they have won all 5 of their last home matches (100% in the last 5), while Hearts have won 4 of 5 away (80%), so I expect the hosts to maintain the edge and win the match (HT/FT: 1/1 implied).
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Celtic | Hearts | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 34% | 35% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.34 | 0.35 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Celtic is 15% better for: last-5 form.
3 pts / game - Celtic · 2.6 pts / game - Hearts
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Celtic is 6% better for: goals scored per game.
1.89 goals / game - Celtic · 1.78 goals / game - Hearts
Hearts is 29% better for: goals allowed per game.
1.08 goals / game - Celtic · 0.84 goals / game - Hearts
Celtic scores in 86% of games (32 of 37 meczów), while Hearts keeps a clean sheet in 46% (17 of 37 meczów).
Hearts scores in 89% of games (33 of 37 meczów), while Celtic keeps a clean sheet in 35% (13 of 37 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Celtic
Over / Under - Hearts
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Celtic is 18% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.78 pts / game - Celtic · 1.51 pts / game - Hearts
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Celtic - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 46% of games and wins 68%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
Hearts - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 38% of games and wins 65%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.80 | 2.20 |
| Goals scored / game | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.6 | 0.4 |
| Average goals per game | 1.8 | 1.6 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 80% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 60% |
| No goal | 0% | 20% |
| Goal difference | +3 | +4 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.00 | 2.60 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.6 | 1.6 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.6 | 0.2 |
| Average goals per game | 1.2 | 1.8 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 80% |
| No goal | 60% | 20% |
| Goal difference | 0 | +7 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (17 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (12). Late-goal balance (76-90): +13 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (17 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): +12 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Celtic
Hearts
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Premiership).
Teams vs league
| Celtic | Liga | Hearts | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▲ 2.97 | 2.75 | ▼ 2.62 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 57% | 51% | ▼ 46% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 68% | 53% | ▼ 51% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 35% | 28% | ▲ 46% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 81% | 76% | ▲ 78% |
| Goal after half-time | • 81% | 80% | ▼ 76% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Referee context
See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.
Head-to-head
Record from Celtic's perspective: 0 wins, 1 draw and 2 losses against Hearts. Games average 3.67 goals, and both teams scored in 100% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Celtic vs Hearts?
The Premiership match finished Celtic 3:1 Hearts. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Celtic and Hearts?
In the last 3 head-to-head matches Celtic won 0, Hearts won 2 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 3.67 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Celtic vs Hearts?
Celtic score 1.89 goals per game on average and Hearts 1.78. The Premiership average is 2.75 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 53% of games. Both teams score in 57% of Celtic's matches and 46% of Hearts's.
What form are Celtic and Hearts in?
Over the last 5 games Celtic have a 5-0-0 record (3.00 points per game) and Hearts 4-1-0 (2.60 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Celtic vs Hearts?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.


