Egypt - Egyptian Premier LeagueData current as of 17 July 2026

Ceramica Cleopatra vs Al Masry: match statistics

Ceramica Cleopatra crest
Ceramica Cleopatra
0 : 1half-time 0:0
Al Masry crest
Al Masry

Ceramica Cleopatra vs Al Masry: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Ceramica Cleopatra play Al Masry in Egyptian Premier League (Egypt). The match date is 1 May 2026 at 16:00. Final score: 0:1.

Current form

Ceramica Cleopatra: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match. Al Masry: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match.

Goal statistics

Ceramica Cleopatra scores 1.31 and concedes 0.81 goals per match. Al Masry scores 1.35 and concedes 1.12. League average: 2.02 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Ceramica Cleopatra 42%, Al Masry 50%. Over 2.5: Ceramica Cleopatra 23%, Al Masry 42%. League level: BTTS 47%, Over 2.5 34%.

xG, shots and style

Al Masry has higher xG: 1.23 vs 1.19. Ceramica Cleopatra: 9.8 shots per match, Al Masry: 10.7.

Match halves

Ceramica Cleopatra: half-time lead 35%, second-half goals 0.77. Al Masry: half-time lead 27%, second-half goals 0.88.

Goals by minute

Ceramica Cleopatra: 76-90+ (9 goals). Al Masry: 61-75 (9 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Egyptian Premier League: 2.02 goals per match, BTTS 47%, Over 2.5 34%.

Head-to-head

1 H2H matches: 0-0-1. Average goals 5.00, BTTS 100%.

Match description

Ceramica Cleopatra holds a clear advantage in home metrics: at home they score on average 1.73 goals per match and have a 64% win rate with an average of 0.91 goals conceded, while Al Masry on the road average only 0.92 goals and win 25% of matches. The hosts create more high-quality chances — 11.45 shots and 4.27 on target per match with 15% conversion, compared to visitors’ 10.42 shots, 3.75 on target and 9% conversion away. In the last five matches Ceramica have 1 win and 4 draws (6 scored, 4 conceded, 1.4 points per match), whereas Al Masry have 1 win, 3 draws and 1 loss (7 scored, 9 conceded, 1.2 points per match), indicating a weaker away defense. xG data also favor the hosts: Ceramica have average xG 1.33 with xG against 1.25, while Al Masry record xG 1.22 with xG against 1.40, suggesting the hosts generate more valuable chances and are less exposed to counters. Considering better conversion (15% vs 9%), a lower share of matches without a goal for Ceramica (9% vs 33%) and the home goal difference (+9 for hosts vs 0 for visitors away), I assess the probabilities as: home win 60%, draw 25%, away win 15%.

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
0 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

52Possession (%)48
Ceramica CleopatraAl Masry
6Shots7
Ceramica CleopatraAl Masry
2Shots on target4
Ceramica CleopatraAl Masry
0.95xG1.08
Ceramica CleopatraAl Masry
3Corners1
Ceramica CleopatraAl Masry
58Dangerous attacks48
Ceramica CleopatraAl Masry
24Fouls20
Ceramica CleopatraAl Masry
1Cards0
Ceramica CleopatraAl Masry

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Ceramica CleopatraAl Masry
1.31Goals scored / match1.35
Ceramica CleopatraAl Masry
0.81Goals conceded / match1.12
Ceramica CleopatraAl Masry
57%Average possession53%
Ceramica CleopatraAl Masry
3.81Shots on target / match3.54
Ceramica CleopatraAl Masry

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

9.81Shots per match10.69
Ceramica CleopatraAl Masry
3.81Shots on target3.54
Ceramica CleopatraAl Masry
13.3%Shot conversion12.6%
Ceramica CleopatraAl Masry
57%Possession53%
Ceramica CleopatraAl Masry
1.19xG for1.23
Ceramica CleopatraAl Masry
1.24xG against1.26
Ceramica CleopatraAl Masry

Shooting quality

Ceramica Cleopatra: Efficient finishingAl Masry: Balanced
Ceramica CleopatraAl Masry
Accuracy (shots on target)39%33%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.340.38

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Al Masry is 60% better for: last-5 form.

1 pts / match - Ceramica Cleopatra · 1.6 pts / match - Al Masry

Ceramica Cleopatra
DWLDL
Season result split
46% W31% R23% P
Season (W-D-L)
12-8-6
1.69 pts / match · goal difference +13
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-2-2
1.00 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
7-4-2
Last 5 at home
0-4-1
DDDLD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.8Goals conceded: 0.8xG: 1.06Opponent xG: 1.18BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 0%
Al Masry
DDWWL
Season result split
38% W38% R23% P
Season (W-D-L)
10-10-6
1.54 pts / match · goal difference +6
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-2-1
1.60 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
4-6-3
Last 5 away
2-1-2
LLDWW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.21Opponent xG: 1.22BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 20%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Ceramica Cleopatra is 38% better for: goals conceded per match.

0.81 goals / match - Ceramica Cleopatra · 1.12 goals / match - Al Masry

Ceramica Cleopatra scoring profile: strong

Ceramica Cleopatra scores in 77% of matches (20 of 26 matches), while Al Masry keeps a clean sheet in 38% (10 of 26 matches).

Al Masry scoring profile: strong

Al Masry scores in 77% of matches (20 of 26 matches), while Ceramica Cleopatra keeps a clean sheet in 38% (10 of 26 matches).

34Goals scored (season)35
Ceramica CleopatraAl Masry
21Goals conceded (season)29
Ceramica CleopatraAl Masry
2.12Average goals in match2.46
Ceramica CleopatraAl Masry
4Goals scored (last 5)5
Ceramica CleopatraAl Masry
4Goals conceded (last 5)5
Ceramica CleopatraAl Masry

How often they score at least...

77%1 goal77%
Ceramica CleopatraAl Masry
42%2 goals38%
Ceramica CleopatraAl Masry
12%3 goals15%
Ceramica CleopatraAl Masry
0%4 goals4%
Ceramica CleopatraAl Masry

How often they concede at least...

62%1 goal62%
Ceramica CleopatraAl Masry
15%2 goals31%
Ceramica CleopatraAl Masry
4%3 goals15%
Ceramica CleopatraAl Masry
0%4 goals4%
Ceramica CleopatraAl Masry

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

42%
Ceramica Cleopatra - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.11 of 26 matches
47%
League average

Goal patterns

15%BTTS at half-time19%
Ceramica CleopatraAl Masry
8%BTTS in both halves4%
Ceramica CleopatraAl Masry
23%Scored in both halves23%
Ceramica CleopatraAl Masry

BTTS and goal count

19%Min. 3 goals and BTTS31%
Ceramica CleopatraAl Masry
4%Min. 3 goals without BTTS12%
Ceramica CleopatraAl Masry
40%BTTS - last 540%
Ceramica CleopatraAl Masry

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

58%Min. 1 goal before half-time58%
Ceramica CleopatraAl Masry
19%Min. 2 goals before half-time19%
Ceramica CleopatraAl Masry
12%Min. 3 goals before half-time15%
Ceramica CleopatraAl Masry

2nd half

81%Min. 1 goal after half-time85%
Ceramica CleopatraAl Masry
38%Min. 2 goals after half-time46%
Ceramica CleopatraAl Masry
4%Min. 3 goals after half-time15%
Ceramica CleopatraAl Masry

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Ceramica Cleopatra is 18% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.5 pts / match - Ceramica Cleopatra · 1.27 pts / match - Al Masry

Ceramica Cleopatra - half-time state
35% leading46% draw19% trailing
Al Masry - half-time state
27% leading46% draw27% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.5Points per match (1st half)1.27
Ceramica CleopatraAl Masry
0.54Goals scored (1st half)0.46
Ceramica CleopatraAl Masry
0.35Goals conceded (1st half)0.46
Ceramica CleopatraAl Masry
0.88Average goals (1st half)0.92
Ceramica CleopatraAl Masry
69%Clean sheet before half-time62%
Ceramica CleopatraAl Masry
58%No goal before half-time62%
Ceramica CleopatraAl Masry

After half-time (2nd half)

1.62Points per match (2nd half)1.62
Ceramica CleopatraAl Masry
0.77Goals scored (2nd half)0.88
Ceramica CleopatraAl Masry
0.46Goals conceded (2nd half)0.65
Ceramica CleopatraAl Masry
1.23Average goals (2nd half)1.54
Ceramica CleopatraAl Masry
58%Clean sheet after half-time50%
Ceramica CleopatraAl Masry
42%No goal after half-time38%
Ceramica CleopatraAl Masry

Ceramica Cleopatra - second-half results

42% W35% R23% P
39
Half-time points
14
Half-time goals
+5
Goal difference (1st half)
42
Second-half points
+8
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.50
PPG before half-time
Lead holding131%

Leads at half-time in 35% of matches and wins 46%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Concedes 0.1 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Al Masry - second-half results

42% W35% R23% P
33
Half-time points
12
Half-time goals
0
Goal difference (1st half)
42
Second-half points
+6
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.27
PPG before half-time
Lead holding141%

Leads at half-time in 27% of matches and wins 38%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.2

Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Ceramica Cleopatra - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.601.00
Goals scored / match0.60.2
Goals conceded / match0.40.4
Average goals in match1.00.6
1 goal80%60%
2 goals20%0%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet60%60%
No goal40%80%
Goal difference+1-1
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 3
Al Masry - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.001.60
Goals scored / match0.40.6
Goals conceded / match0.60.4
Average goals in match1.01.0
1 goal60%80%
2 goals20%20%
3 goals20%0%
Clean sheet60%60%
No goal60%40%
Goal difference-1+1
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 40% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 2

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Ceramica Cleopatra
ScoredConceded
3
2
0-15
5
3
16-30
6
4
31-45
6
3
46-60
5
2
61-75
9
7
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (9 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.

Al Masry
ScoredConceded
4
2
0-15
3
3
16-30
5
7
31-45
5
3
46-60
9
5
61-75
9
9
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (9 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.29
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.2 : 1.1
Estimated goal split
home : away
114%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
46%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+118%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
59%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
5%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 20 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Ceramica Cleopatra

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.05
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.55
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-12.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.12
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.43
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
126%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
83%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.69
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
26% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 9% come in the first quarter-hour.
26%

Al Masry

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.03
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.26
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-6.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.12
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.14
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
138%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
108%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.06
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.4
Late goals
26% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 11% come in the first quarter-hour.
26%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Egyptian Premier League).

Teams vs league

Ceramica CleopatraLigaAl Masry
Average goals in match 2.122.02 2.46
Both teams scored 42%47% 50%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 23%34% 42%
Clean sheets 38%35% 38%
Goal before half-time 58%58% 58%
Goal after half-time 81%70% 85%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.02
Average goals per match
47%
Both teams scored
34%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
35%
Clean sheets
1.04
Home goals / match
0.98
Away goals / match
+6%
Home attack advantage
+6%
Home defence advantage
+6%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
58%
1 goal
21%
2 goals
7%
3 goals
1%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
70%
1 goal
34%
2 goals
9%
3 goals
3%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Ceramica Cleopatra 0 - 0 - 1 Al Masry. Average goals 5.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.

FAQ

What was the result of Ceramica Cleopatra vs Al Masry?

The Egyptian Premier League match finished Ceramica Cleopatra 0:1 Al Masry. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Ceramica Cleopatra vs Al Masry?

Ceramica Cleopatra score 1.31 goals per game on average and Al Masry 1.35. The Egyptian Premier League average is 2.02 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 34% of games. Both teams score in 42% of Ceramica Cleopatra's matches and 50% of Al Masry's.

What form are Ceramica Cleopatra and Al Masry in?

Over the last 5 games Ceramica Cleopatra have a 1-2-2 record (1.00 points per game) and Al Masry 2-2-1 (1.60 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Ceramica Cleopatra vs Al Masry?

The statistical background for Ceramica Cleopatra vs Al Masry — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.