Egypt - Egyptian Premier LeagueData current as of 23 July 2026

Ceramica Cleopatra vs Pyramids FC: match statistics

Ceramica Cleopatra vs Pyramids FC: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Ceramica Cleopatra play Pyramids FC in Egyptian Premier League (Egypt). The match date is 5 May 2026 at 19:00. Final score: 1:1.

Current form

Ceramica Cleopatra: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match. Pyramids FC: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match.

Goal statistics

Ceramica Cleopatra scores 1.31 and concedes 0.81 goals per match. Pyramids FC scores 1.65 and concedes 0.81. League average: 2.02 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Ceramica Cleopatra 42%, Pyramids FC 54%. Over 2.5: Ceramica Cleopatra 23%, Pyramids FC 50%. League level: BTTS 47%, Over 2.5 34%.

xG, shots and style

Pyramids FC has higher xG: 1.64 vs 1.19. Ceramica Cleopatra: 9.8 shots per match, Pyramids FC: 14.8.

Match halves

Ceramica Cleopatra: half-time lead 35%, second-half goals 0.77. Pyramids FC: half-time lead 38%, second-half goals 0.92.

Goals by minute

Ceramica Cleopatra: 76-90+ (9 goals). Pyramids FC: 61-75 (11 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Egyptian Premier League: 2.02 goals per match, BTTS 47%, Over 2.5 34%.

Head-to-head

1 H2H matches: 0-0-1. Average goals 1.00, BTTS 0%.

Match description

Pyramids FC are 2nd in the table while Ceramica Cleopatra sit 4th; the visitors also have a superior goal tally this season — 40 goals scored versus the hosts’ 33. In the last 5 matches Pyramids have scored 11 goals and won 3 games, whereas Ceramica have only 4 goals with a record of 1 win, 3 draws and 1 loss, which clearly favors the visitors’ form. Pyramids generate more high-quality chances (avg. 5.09 shots on target and xG 1.57 per match) versus Ceramica’s 4.08 shots on target and xG 1.30, and also register 13.82 shots per match on average vs 11 for the hosts, increasing the likelihood of effective finishing. Ceramica, however, have strengths: at home they maintain on average 59% possession, a better shot conversion rate of 14% (vs 12% for Pyramids) and a lower average goals conceded 0.92 per match (vs 1.00), which can make it harder for the visitors to score freely. Considering Pyramids’ superior shooting efficiency and recent form (average points per match in the last 5: 2.0 for Pyramids vs 1.2 for Ceramica, and 11 vs 4 goals scored), I forecast an away win; estimated probabilities: Ceramica 30%, draw 25%, Pyramids 45%.

Half-by-half

1 : 1
1st half
0 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

39Possession (%)61
Ceramica CleopatraPyramids FC
9Shots11
Ceramica CleopatraPyramids FC
5Shots on target3
Ceramica CleopatraPyramids FC
1.03xG1.3
Ceramica CleopatraPyramids FC
3Corners7
Ceramica CleopatraPyramids FC
14Dangerous attacks53
Ceramica CleopatraPyramids FC
20Fouls13
Ceramica CleopatraPyramids FC
3Cards2
Ceramica CleopatraPyramids FC

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Ceramica CleopatraPyramids FC
1.31Goals scored / match1.65
Ceramica CleopatraPyramids FC
0.81Goals conceded / match0.81
Ceramica CleopatraPyramids FC
57%Average possession59%
Ceramica CleopatraPyramids FC
3.81Shots on target / match5.27
Ceramica CleopatraPyramids FC

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

9.81Shots per match14.85
Ceramica CleopatraPyramids FC
3.81Shots on target5.27
Ceramica CleopatraPyramids FC
13.3%Shot conversion11.1%
Ceramica CleopatraPyramids FC
57%Possession59%
Ceramica CleopatraPyramids FC
1.19xG for1.64
Ceramica CleopatraPyramids FC
1.24xG against0.83
Ceramica CleopatraPyramids FC

Shooting quality

Ceramica Cleopatra: Efficient finishingPyramids FC: Dominant
Ceramica CleopatraPyramids FC
Accuracy (shots on target)39%35%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.11
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.340.31

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Pyramids FC is 100% better for: last-5 form.

1 pts / match - Ceramica Cleopatra · 2 pts / match - Pyramids FC

Ceramica Cleopatra
DWLDL
Season result split
46% W31% R23% P
Season (W-D-L)
12-8-6
1.69 pts / match · goal difference +13
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-2-2
1.00 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
7-4-2
Last 5 at home
0-4-1
DDDLD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.8Goals conceded: 0.8xG: 1.06Opponent xG: 1.18BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 0%
Pyramids FC
LWWDW
Season result split
62% W23% R15% P
Season (W-D-L)
16-6-4
2.08 pts / match · goal difference +22
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-1-1
2.00 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
6-4-2
Last 5 away
3-1-1
WWWLD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.8Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.35Opponent xG: 0.95BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Pyramids FC is 26% better for: goals scored per match.

1.31 goals / match - Ceramica Cleopatra · 1.65 goals / match - Pyramids FC

Ceramica Cleopatra scoring profile: strong

Ceramica Cleopatra scores in 77% of matches (20 of 26 matches), while Pyramids FC keeps a clean sheet in 38% (10 of 26 matches).

Pyramids FC scoring profile: very strong

Pyramids FC scores in 88% of matches (23 of 26 matches), while Ceramica Cleopatra keeps a clean sheet in 38% (10 of 26 matches).

34Goals scored (season)43
Ceramica CleopatraPyramids FC
21Goals conceded (season)21
Ceramica CleopatraPyramids FC
2.12Average goals in match2.46
Ceramica CleopatraPyramids FC
4Goals scored (last 5)9
Ceramica CleopatraPyramids FC
4Goals conceded (last 5)5
Ceramica CleopatraPyramids FC

How often they score at least...

77%1 goal88%
Ceramica CleopatraPyramids FC
42%2 goals54%
Ceramica CleopatraPyramids FC
12%3 goals19%
Ceramica CleopatraPyramids FC
0%4 goals4%
Ceramica CleopatraPyramids FC

How often they concede at least...

62%1 goal62%
Ceramica CleopatraPyramids FC
15%2 goals19%
Ceramica CleopatraPyramids FC
4%3 goals0%
Ceramica CleopatraPyramids FC
0%4 goals0%
Ceramica CleopatraPyramids FC

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

42%
Ceramica Cleopatra - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.11 of 26 matches
47%
League average

Goal patterns

15%BTTS at half-time27%
Ceramica CleopatraPyramids FC
8%BTTS in both halves4%
Ceramica CleopatraPyramids FC
23%Scored in both halves42%
Ceramica CleopatraPyramids FC

BTTS and goal count

19%Min. 3 goals and BTTS42%
Ceramica CleopatraPyramids FC
4%Min. 3 goals without BTTS8%
Ceramica CleopatraPyramids FC
40%BTTS - last 560%
Ceramica CleopatraPyramids FC

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

58%Min. 1 goal before half-time62%
Ceramica CleopatraPyramids FC
19%Min. 2 goals before half-time31%
Ceramica CleopatraPyramids FC
12%Min. 3 goals before half-time8%
Ceramica CleopatraPyramids FC

2nd half

81%Min. 1 goal after half-time85%
Ceramica CleopatraPyramids FC
38%Min. 2 goals after half-time38%
Ceramica CleopatraPyramids FC
4%Min. 3 goals after half-time15%
Ceramica CleopatraPyramids FC

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Pyramids FC is 15% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.5 pts / match - Ceramica Cleopatra · 1.73 pts / match - Pyramids FC

Ceramica Cleopatra - half-time state
35% leading46% draw19% trailing
Pyramids FC - half-time state
38% leading58% draw4% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.5Points per match (1st half)1.73
Ceramica CleopatraPyramids FC
0.54Goals scored (1st half)0.73
Ceramica CleopatraPyramids FC
0.35Goals conceded (1st half)0.35
Ceramica CleopatraPyramids FC
0.88Average goals (1st half)1.08
Ceramica CleopatraPyramids FC
69%Clean sheet before half-time69%
Ceramica CleopatraPyramids FC
58%No goal before half-time42%
Ceramica CleopatraPyramids FC

After half-time (2nd half)

1.62Points per match (2nd half)1.85
Ceramica CleopatraPyramids FC
0.77Goals scored (2nd half)0.92
Ceramica CleopatraPyramids FC
0.46Goals conceded (2nd half)0.46
Ceramica CleopatraPyramids FC
1.23Average goals (2nd half)1.38
Ceramica CleopatraPyramids FC
58%Clean sheet after half-time58%
Ceramica CleopatraPyramids FC
42%No goal after half-time27%
Ceramica CleopatraPyramids FC

Ceramica Cleopatra - second-half results

42% W35% R23% P
39
Half-time points
14
Half-time goals
+5
Goal difference (1st half)
42
Second-half points
+8
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.50
PPG before half-time
Lead holding131%

Leads at half-time in 35% of matches and wins 46%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Concedes 0.1 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Pyramids FC - second-half results

50% W35% R15% P
45
Half-time points
19
Half-time goals
+10
Goal difference (1st half)
48
Second-half points
+12
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.73
PPG before half-time
Lead holding163%

Leads at half-time in 38% of matches and wins 62%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Concedes 0.1 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Ceramica Cleopatra - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.601.00
Goals scored / match0.60.2
Goals conceded / match0.40.4
Average goals in match1.00.6
1 goal80%60%
2 goals20%0%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet60%60%
No goal40%80%
Goal difference+1-1
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 3
Pyramids FC - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.401.60
Goals scored / match1.00.8
Goals conceded / match0.80.2
Average goals in match1.81.0
1 goal60%60%
2 goals60%20%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet40%80%
No goal40%60%
Goal difference+1+3
Half-time: 20% leading - 80% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 40% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 60% - Half-time goals total: 5

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Ceramica Cleopatra
ScoredConceded
3
2
0-15
5
3
16-30
6
4
31-45
6
3
46-60
5
2
61-75
9
7
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (9 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.

Pyramids FC
ScoredConceded
3
3
0-15
7
2
16-30
9
4
31-45
3
5
46-60
11
2
61-75
10
5
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (11 goli). Concedes most in 46-60 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): +5 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.29
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.1 : 1.2
Estimated goal split
home : away
113%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
48%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-56%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
68%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
3%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 33 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Ceramica Cleopatra

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.05
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.55
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-12.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.12
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.43
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
126%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
83%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.69
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
26% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 9% come in the first quarter-hour.
26%

Pyramids FC

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.81
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.03
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-9.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.01
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.02
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
168%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
78%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.08
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
23% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 7% come in the first quarter-hour.
23%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Egyptian Premier League).

Teams vs league

Ceramica CleopatraLigaPyramids FC
Average goals in match 2.122.02 2.46
Both teams scored 42%47% 54%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 23%34% 50%
Clean sheets 38%35% 38%
Goal before half-time 58%58% 62%
Goal after half-time 81%70% 85%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.02
Average goals per match
47%
Both teams scored
34%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
35%
Clean sheets
1.04
Home goals / match
0.98
Away goals / match
+6%
Home attack advantage
+6%
Home defence advantage
+6%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
58%
1 goal
21%
2 goals
7%
3 goals
1%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
70%
1 goal
34%
2 goals
9%
3 goals
3%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Ceramica Cleopatra 0 - 0 - 1 Pyramids FC. Average goals 1.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.

FAQ

What was the result of Ceramica Cleopatra vs Pyramids FC?

The Egyptian Premier League match finished Ceramica Cleopatra 1:1 Pyramids FC. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Ceramica Cleopatra vs Pyramids FC?

Ceramica Cleopatra score 1.31 goals per game on average and Pyramids FC 1.65. The Egyptian Premier League average is 2.02 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 34% of games. Both teams score in 42% of Ceramica Cleopatra's matches and 54% of Pyramids FC's.

What form are Ceramica Cleopatra and Pyramids FC in?

Over the last 5 games Ceramica Cleopatra have a 1-2-2 record (1.00 points per game) and Pyramids FC 3-1-1 (2.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Ceramica Cleopatra vs Pyramids FC?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.