Belgium - Pro LeagueData current as of 23 July 2026

Cercle Brugge vs FCV Dender EH: match statistics

Cercle Brugge crest
Cercle Brugge
2 : 1half-time 1:0
FCV Dender EH crest
FCV Dender EH

Cercle Brugge vs FCV Dender EH: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Cercle Brugge play FCV Dender EH in Pro League (Belgium). The match date is 24 April 2026 at 20:45. Final score: 2:1.

Current form

Cercle Brugge: 3-0-2, 1.80 points/match. FCV Dender EH: 1-0-4, 0.60 points/match.

Goal statistics

Cercle Brugge scores 1.47 and concedes 1.61 goals per match. FCV Dender EH scores 0.86 and concedes 1.72. League average: 2.67 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Cercle Brugge 67%, FCV Dender EH 61%. Over 2.5: Cercle Brugge 58%, FCV Dender EH 56%. League level: BTTS 54%, Over 2.5 49%.

xG, shots and style

Cercle Brugge has higher xG: 1.62 vs 1.26. Cercle Brugge: 14.3 shots per match, FCV Dender EH: 10.8.

Match halves

Cercle Brugge: half-time lead 36%, second-half goals 0.61. FCV Dender EH: half-time lead 17%, second-half goals 0.42.

Goals by minute

Cercle Brugge: 31-45+ (16 goals). FCV Dender EH: 0-15 (7 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Pro League: 2.67 goals per match, BTTS 54%, Over 2.5 49%.

Head-to-head

3 H2H matches: 1-2-0. Average goals 1.67, BTTS 33%.

Match description

Cercle Brugge are the favorites: in the last 5 matches they have 3 wins, 1 draw and 1 loss and have scored 13 goals, while FCV Dender EH have 1 win, 0 draws and 4 losses and 4 goals. The home side have an advantage in quality of chances — Cercle’s average xG is 1.74 versus 1.23 for the visitors, and they also register more shots and shots on target (15.63 and 5.31 compared to 10.38 and 4.13). Form corroborates the edge: hosts average 2 points per match over the last 5 fixtures, visitors only 0.6, and Dender failed to score in 38% of away games versus 19% for hosts. However both teams have defensive issues — Cercle concede on average 1.94 goals at home, and Dender have a negative goal difference on the road (-10) and conceded 11 goals in the last 5 matches, which increases the outcome uncertainty. Considering the attacking superiority, xG and current form, I expect a home win, but with a moderate probability of a draw.

Half-by-half

1 : 0
1st half
1 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

53Possession (%)47
Cercle BruggeFCV Dender EH
9Shots13
Cercle BruggeFCV Dender EH
5Shots on target3
Cercle BruggeFCV Dender EH
1.38xG1.51
Cercle BruggeFCV Dender EH
7Corners6
Cercle BruggeFCV Dender EH
64Dangerous attacks67
Cercle BruggeFCV Dender EH
9Fouls9
Cercle BruggeFCV Dender EH
0Cards2
Cercle BruggeFCV Dender EH

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Cercle BruggeFCV Dender EH
1.47Goals scored / match0.86
Cercle BruggeFCV Dender EH
1.61Goals conceded / match1.72
Cercle BruggeFCV Dender EH
48%Average possession48%
Cercle BruggeFCV Dender EH
4.94Shots on target / match3.78
Cercle BruggeFCV Dender EH

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

14.31Shots per match10.75
Cercle BruggeFCV Dender EH
4.94Shots on target3.78
Cercle BruggeFCV Dender EH
10.3%Shot conversion8%
Cercle BruggeFCV Dender EH
48%Possession48%
Cercle BruggeFCV Dender EH
1.62xG for1.26
Cercle BruggeFCV Dender EH
1.55xG against1.76
Cercle BruggeFCV Dender EH

Shooting quality

Cercle Brugge: AttackingFCV Dender EH: Balanced
Cercle BruggeFCV Dender EH
Accuracy (shots on target)35%35%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.110.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.300.23

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Cercle Brugge is 200% better for: last-5 form.

1.8 pts / match - Cercle Brugge · 0.6 pts / match - FCV Dender EH

Cercle Brugge
WWWLL
Season result split
28% W31% R42% P
Season (W-D-L)
10-11-15
1.14 pts / match · goal difference -5
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-0-2
1.80 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
3-5-10
Last 5 at home
2-1-2
DLWWL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.4Goals conceded: 1.8xG: 1.89Opponent xG: 1.37BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 100%
FCV Dender EH
LLLWL
Season result split
14% W28% R58% P
Season (W-D-L)
5-10-21
0.69 pts / match · goal difference -31
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-0-4
0.60 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
3-5-10
Last 5 away
1-1-3
DLWLL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 2.2xG: 1.26Opponent xG: 1.98BTTS: 100%Over 2.5: 100%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Cercle Brugge is 71% better for: goals scored per match.

1.47 goals / match - Cercle Brugge · 0.86 goals / match - FCV Dender EH

Cercle Brugge is 7% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.61 goals / match - Cercle Brugge · 1.72 goals / match - FCV Dender EH

Cercle Brugge scoring profile: very strong

Cercle Brugge scores in 81% of matches (29 of 36 matches), while FCV Dender EH keeps a clean sheet in 17% (6 of 36 matches).

FCV Dender EH scoring profile: very strong

FCV Dender EH scores in 67% of matches (24 of 36 matches), while Cercle Brugge keeps a clean sheet in 22% (8 of 36 matches).

53Goals scored (season)31
Cercle BruggeFCV Dender EH
58Goals conceded (season)62
Cercle BruggeFCV Dender EH
3.08Average goals in match2.58
Cercle BruggeFCV Dender EH
12Goals scored (last 5)6
Cercle BruggeFCV Dender EH
9Goals conceded (last 5)11
Cercle BruggeFCV Dender EH

How often they score at least...

81%1 goal67%
Cercle BruggeFCV Dender EH
42%2 goals19%
Cercle BruggeFCV Dender EH
17%3 goals0%
Cercle BruggeFCV Dender EH
8%4 goals0%
Cercle BruggeFCV Dender EH

How often they concede at least...

78%1 goal83%
Cercle BruggeFCV Dender EH
53%2 goals56%
Cercle BruggeFCV Dender EH
22%3 goals22%
Cercle BruggeFCV Dender EH
8%4 goals8%
Cercle BruggeFCV Dender EH

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

54%
League average

Goal patterns

22%BTTS at half-time28%
Cercle BruggeFCV Dender EH
6%BTTS in both halves3%
Cercle BruggeFCV Dender EH
22%Scored in both halves11%
Cercle BruggeFCV Dender EH

BTTS and goal count

50%Min. 3 goals and BTTS53%
Cercle BruggeFCV Dender EH
8%Min. 3 goals without BTTS3%
Cercle BruggeFCV Dender EH
80%BTTS - last 5100%
Cercle BruggeFCV Dender EH

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

86%Min. 1 goal before half-time64%
Cercle BruggeFCV Dender EH
47%Min. 2 goals before half-time33%
Cercle BruggeFCV Dender EH
14%Min. 3 goals before half-time14%
Cercle BruggeFCV Dender EH

2nd half

72%Min. 1 goal after half-time78%
Cercle BruggeFCV Dender EH
50%Min. 2 goals after half-time44%
Cercle BruggeFCV Dender EH
25%Min. 3 goals after half-time22%
Cercle BruggeFCV Dender EH

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Cercle Brugge is 39% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.39 pts / match - Cercle Brugge · 1 pts / match - FCV Dender EH

Cercle Brugge - half-time state
36% leading31% draw33% trailing
FCV Dender EH - half-time state
17% leading50% draw33% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.39Points per match (1st half)1
Cercle BruggeFCV Dender EH
0.86Goals scored (1st half)0.44
Cercle BruggeFCV Dender EH
0.69Goals conceded (1st half)0.67
Cercle BruggeFCV Dender EH
1.56Average goals (1st half)1.11
Cercle BruggeFCV Dender EH
44%Clean sheet before half-time47%
Cercle BruggeFCV Dender EH
47%No goal before half-time61%
Cercle BruggeFCV Dender EH

After half-time (2nd half)

1.08Points per match (2nd half)0.81
Cercle BruggeFCV Dender EH
0.61Goals scored (2nd half)0.42
Cercle BruggeFCV Dender EH
0.92Goals conceded (2nd half)1.06
Cercle BruggeFCV Dender EH
1.53Average goals (2nd half)1.47
Cercle BruggeFCV Dender EH
44%Clean sheet after half-time36%
Cercle BruggeFCV Dender EH
50%No goal after half-time61%
Cercle BruggeFCV Dender EH

Cercle Brugge - second-half results

22% W42% R36% P
50
Half-time points
31
Half-time goals
+6
Goal difference (1st half)
39
Second-half points
-11
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.39
PPG before half-time
Lead holding78%

Leads at half-time in 36% of matches and wins 28%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.

Defence after half-time+0.2

Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

FCV Dender EH - second-half results

17% W31% R53% P
36
Half-time points
16
Half-time goals
-8
Goal difference (1st half)
29
Second-half points
-23
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.00
PPG before half-time
Lead holding82%

Leads at half-time in 17% of matches and wins 14%. Usually protects the lead until full-time.

Defence after half-time+0.4

Concedes 0.4 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Cercle Brugge - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match2.601.40
Goals scored / match1.21.2
Goals conceded / match0.21.6
Average goals in match1.42.8
1 goal100%100%
2 goals40%80%
3 goals0%60%
Clean sheet80%40%
No goal0%20%
Goal difference+5-2
Half-time: 80% leading - 20% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 20% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 6
FCV Dender EH - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.000.60
Goals scored / match0.80.4
Goals conceded / match1.01.2
Average goals in match1.81.6
1 goal80%60%
2 goals60%60%
3 goals40%40%
Clean sheet20%40%
No goal40%60%
Goal difference-1-4
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 60% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 60% - Half-time goals total: 4

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Cercle Brugge
ScoredConceded
7
4
0-15
8
10
16-30
16
11
31-45
6
15
46-60
8
7
61-75
8
11
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (16 goli). Concedes most in 46-60 (15). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.

FCV Dender EH
ScoredConceded
7
10
0-15
3
6
16-30
6
8
31-45
5
10
46-60
3
14
61-75
7
14
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (7 goli). Concedes most in 61-75 (14). Late-goal balance (76-90): -7 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.83
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.6 : 1.2
Estimated goal split
home : away
106%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
64%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-41%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
54%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
6%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 17 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Cercle Brugge

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.07
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.21
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-8.1 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.15
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.06
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
103%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
130%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.66
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.3
Late goals
15% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 13% come in the first quarter-hour.
15%

FCV Dender EH

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.50
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.36
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+3.4 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.40
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.04
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
69%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
120%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.09
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.0
Late goals
23% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 23% come in the first quarter-hour.
23%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Pro League).

Teams vs league

Cercle BruggeLigaFCV Dender EH
Average goals in match 3.082.67 2.58
Both teams scored 67%54% 61%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 58%49% 56%
Clean sheets 22%27% 17%
Goal before half-time 86%71% 64%
Goal after half-time 72%75% 78%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.67
Average goals per match
54%
Both teams scored
49%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
27%
Clean sheets
1.43
Home goals / match
1.24
Away goals / match
+15%
Home attack advantage
+13%
Home defence advantage
+7%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
71%
1 goal
35%
2 goals
13%
3 goals
3%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
75%
1 goal
45%
2 goals
18%
3 goals
5%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (3): Cercle Brugge 1 - 2 - 0 FCV Dender EH. Average goals 1.67, both teams scored in 33% matches.

FAQ

What was the result of Cercle Brugge vs FCV Dender EH?

The Pro League match finished Cercle Brugge 2:1 FCV Dender EH. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Cercle Brugge and FCV Dender EH?

In the last 3 head-to-head matches Cercle Brugge won 1, FCV Dender EH won 0 and 2 ended level. These games averaged 1.67 goals, with both teams scoring in 33% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Cercle Brugge vs FCV Dender EH?

Cercle Brugge score 1.47 goals per game on average and FCV Dender EH 0.86. The Pro League average is 2.67 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 49% of games. Both teams score in 67% of Cercle Brugge's matches and 61% of FCV Dender EH's.

What form are Cercle Brugge and FCV Dender EH in?

Over the last 5 games Cercle Brugge have a 3-0-2 record (1.80 points per game) and FCV Dender EH 1-0-4 (0.60 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Cercle Brugge vs FCV Dender EH?

The statistical background for Cercle Brugge vs FCV Dender EH — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.