Chapecoense vs Flamengo: match statistics
Chapecoense vs Flamengo: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Chapecoense played against Flamengo in Serie A (Brazil). The game was played on July 23, 2026. Venue: Arena Condá. Final score: 0:4.
Recent form
Chapecoense has 0 wins, 1 draw and 4 losses over its last five games, averaging 0.20 points per game. Flamengo has 2 wins, 2 draws and 1 loss, with 1.60 points per game.
Scoring records
Chapecoense scores 0.94 goals per game and allows 1.94. Flamengo scores 1.82 and allows 0.94. Games in this league average 2.65 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 61% of Chapecoense's games and 47% of Flamengo's. The Over 2.5 rates are 44% and 65%, compared with league averages of 59% for BTTS and 50% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Flamengo has the higher season xG average, 1.64 to 1.28 per game. Chapecoense takes 12.7 shots per game, while Flamengo takes 14.8.
First-half and second-half trends
Chapecoense leads at halftime in 0% of its games and scores 0.61 goals per game after halftime. Flamengo leads at halftime in 53% and scores 1.00 after halftime.
When the teams score
Chapecoense's most productive scoring window is minutes 76-90+ (8 goals). For Flamengo, it is minutes 0-15 (8 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Serie A games average 2.65 goals. Both teams score in 59% of games, and 50% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
There is not enough head-to-head history for a meaningful comparison.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Flamengo are the favorites: they sit 2nd in the table with 10 wins, 4 draws and 3 losses this season, while Chapecoense are 20th with just 1 win, 6 draws and 11 losses. In the last 5 matches Flamengo average 2.0 points per game (3W-1D-1L), whereas Chapecoense only 0.6 points per game with a 1W-4L record. Defensively the visitors have a clear edge: Flamengo concede 1.00 goal on the road on average and keep 33% clean sheets, while Chapecoense concede 2.22 at home and have only 11% clean sheets; over the season Chapecoense have conceded 35 goals versus 16 conceded by Flamengo. Offensively Chapecoense attempt more shots at home (16.0 shots, 4.56 on target) and have an xG of 1.60, while Flamengo away register 12.67 shots (4.33 on target) with xG 1.40, but Chapecoense’s lower conversion (9% vs 13%) and weaker defense diminish the value of their chance-creation advantage. On that basis I give the highest probability to a Flamengo victory.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
I assess BTTS (Both Teams To Score) as more likely: 65% vs 35% for No BTTS. Primary case: Flamengo’s form — in the last 5 matches they have xG_for 1.97 and scored 8 goals (1.6 per game), and seasonally they have 31 goals and 1.67 goals per game, which increases the likelihood of the away side scoring. Chapecoense have conceded on average 1.6 goals in their last five matches and have a recent xG_against of 1.84, indicating defensive vulnerability, despite a seasonal clean sheet rate of 50%. Both teams create chances — Chapecoense 17.25 shots per game with a 12% conversion (seasonal average 2.0 goals), Flamengo 12.67 shots and 13% conversion — so realistically both sides have a real chance to score. Additionally, the league average BTTS is 57%, with seasonal BTTS at 38% (Chapecoense) vs 56% (Flamengo); combining form and xG, I favor the "Both Teams To Score" scenario.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Total expected goals from xG are 1.63 for Chapecoense (xG_for 1.90 with opponent xG_against 1.36) and 1.36 for Flamengo (xG_for 1.40 with home xG_against 1.31), giving a combined total of 2.99 goals. Season stats show Chapecoense have 100% of matches over 1.5 goals and Flamengo 89%, so Over 1.5 is almost certain — I assess it at ~96%. The 2.5 line has solid support: season Over 2.5 is 63% for the home side and 67% for the visitors, with the league average at 50% — against the expected 2.99 goals I assign Over 2.5 at about 68%. Additionally, the home team average 17.25 shots (5.5 on target) with 12% conversion, and Flamengo 12.67 shots (4.33 on target) with 13% conversion, which supports an expectation of at least 3 goals. Over 3.5 is unlikely (season Over 3.5: 25% and 11%), therefore the strongest signal from the data is Over on the 2.5 line.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Statistical analysis indicates Chapecoense's advantage in the first half and overall: the hosts led at the break in 63% of their matches (5 times), and their average xG per match is 1.90 versus Flamengo's 1.40. Combined with a higher average of shots (17.25 vs 12.67) and shots on target (5.5 vs 4.33), this suggests Chapecoense creates more scoring opportunities. Additionally, Chapecoense concedes only 0.25 goals on average by half-time compared to 0.44 for Flamengo and has a better points return at home (2.13 pts/match) than Flamengo away (1.89), supporting the likelihood they will maintain a lead at half-time. However, Flamengo’s better form in the last 5 matches (60% wins vs the hosts’ 20%) and greater number of first-half goals this season (13 vs 7) introduce a real risk of a turnaround. High first-half goal rates (over 0.5: 88% for the hosts and 78% for the visitors) confirm a goal in the first half is very likely, but the hosts’ offensive and defensive metrics signal a stronger likelihood of taking and keeping the lead. Therefore the most probable scenario is 1/1 (hosts lead at half-time and win Full-Time), although draw and away-win scenarios remain meaningful secondary risks.
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Chapecoense | Flamengo | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 26% | 33% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.10 | 0.11 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.28 | 0.37 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Flamengo is 700% better for: last-5 form.
0.2 pts / game - Chapecoense · 1.6 pts / game - Flamengo
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Flamengo is 94% better for: goals scored per game.
0.94 goals / game - Chapecoense · 1.82 goals / game - Flamengo
Flamengo is 106% better for: goals allowed per game.
1.94 goals / game - Chapecoense · 0.94 goals / game - Flamengo
Chapecoense scores in 61% of games (11 of 18 meczów), while Flamengo keeps a clean sheet in 41% (7 of 17 meczów).
Flamengo scores in 88% of games (15 of 17 meczów), while Chapecoense keeps a clean sheet in 6% (1 of 18 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Chapecoense
Over / Under - Flamengo
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Flamengo is 153% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
0.72 pts / game - Chapecoense · 1.82 pts / game - Flamengo
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Chapecoense - second-half results
Allows 0.3 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
Flamengo - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 53% of games and wins 59%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.2 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 0.60 | 0.60 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.2 | 0.6 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.8 | 1.0 |
| Average goals per game | 1.0 | 1.6 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 20% |
| No goal | 80% | 40% |
| Goal difference | -3 | -2 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.40 | 1.80 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.4 | 1.0 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.4 | 0.8 |
| Average goals per game | 0.8 | 1.8 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 60% |
| No goal | 60% | 20% |
| Goal difference | 0 | +1 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (8 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (8 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Chapecoense
Flamengo
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Serie A).
Teams vs league
| Chapecoense | Liga | Flamengo | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▲ 2.89 | 2.65 | ▲ 2.76 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 61% | 59% | ▼ 47% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 44% | 50% | ▲ 65% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 6% | 23% | ▲ 41% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 56% | 77% | ▲ 82% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 83% | 78% | ▲ 94% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
FAQ
What was the result of Chapecoense vs Flamengo?
The Serie A match finished Chapecoense 0:4 Flamengo. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Chapecoense vs Flamengo?
Chapecoense score 0.94 goals per game on average and Flamengo 1.82. The Serie A average is 2.65 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 50% of games. Both teams score in 61% of Chapecoense's matches and 47% of Flamengo's.
What form are Chapecoense and Flamengo in?
Over the last 5 games Chapecoense have a 0-1-4 record (0.20 points per game) and Flamengo 2-2-1 (1.60 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Chapecoense vs Flamengo?
The statistical background for Chapecoense vs Flamengo — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.


