United States - USL League OneDavid Stanton Field At CCSData current as of September 01, 2026

Chattanooga Red Wolves vs Athletic Club Boise: match statistics

Chattanooga Red Wolves vs Athletic Club Boise: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

Chattanooga Red Wolves played against Athletic Club Boise in USL League One (United States). The game was played on August 29, 2026. Venue: David Stanton Field At CCS. Final score: 2:3.

Recent form

Chattanooga Red Wolves has 1 win, 1 draw and 3 losses over its last five games, averaging 0.80 points per game. Athletic Club Boise has 2 wins, 2 draws and 1 loss, with 1.60 points per game.

Scoring records

Chattanooga Red Wolves scores 1.90 goals per game and allows 1.60. Athletic Club Boise scores 1.50 and allows 1.41. Games in this league average 2.93 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 65% of Chattanooga Red Wolves's games and 64% of Athletic Club Boise's. The Over 2.5 rates are 70% and 64%, compared with league averages of 58% for BTTS and 60% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

Athletic Club Boise has the higher season xG average, 1.64 to 1.36 per game. Chattanooga Red Wolves takes 11.0 shots per game, while Athletic Club Boise takes 14.1.

First-half and second-half trends

Chattanooga Red Wolves leads at halftime in 30% of its games and scores 1.05 goals per game after halftime. Athletic Club Boise leads at halftime in 23% and scores 0.86 after halftime.

When the teams score

Chattanooga Red Wolves's most productive scoring window is minutes 46-60 (10 goals). For Athletic Club Boise, it is minutes 76-90+ (8 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

USL League One games average 2.93 goals. Both teams score in 58% of games, and 60% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 0 home wins, 0 draws and 1 away win. Those games averaged 3.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Chattanooga Red Wolves have a clearly stronger home profile: they win 60% of their matches, average 2.0 goals scored, and keep a clean sheet in 50% of games. Athletic Club Boise win just 30% of their away matches, concede an average of 1.9 goals per game, and have a negative goal difference of -4. However, the hosts are in poor current form, having collected only 4 points from their last five matches while conceding as many as 15 goals, which increases the visitors’ chances of scoring. Boise have shown more stable form, earning 8 points in their last five fixtures and conceding only 7 goals, while also producing slightly higher-quality chances away from home in terms of xG: 1.46 compared with 1.32. Despite the visitors’ better recent trend, Chattanooga’s home efficiency and Boise’s clearly weaker defensive record away from home support a cautious pick in favor of the hosts.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

The signal for both teams to score is clear, as the seasonal BTTS rate stands at 58% for Chattanooga Red Wolves and as high as 70% for Athletic Club Boise, compared with the league average of 59%. In their last five matches, both teams have scored consistently: the hosts recorded BTTS in 100% of games, while the visitors did so in 80%, averaging 2.0 and 1.6 goals scored respectively. Chattanooga, however, conceded as many as 3.0 goals per match during this period and allowed opponents an xG of 2.17, which significantly increases Boise’s chances of scoring. Meanwhile, Boise’s defense concedes 1.9 goals per game on a seasonal basis, while the hosts generate an average xG of 1.79 and register 4.75 shots on target per match. Although Chattanooga keep a clean sheet in 33% of matches, the hosts’ current defensive struggles and the attacking numbers of both teams provide stronger support for the BTTS - Yes scenario.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

The strongest pick is Over 1.5 goals, as Chattanooga have cleared this line in 83% of their matches this season, while Athletic Club Boise have done so in 70%. The hosts’ last five games produced an average of as many as 5.0 goals, as they scored 2.0 but conceded 3.0 per match. Over the same period, Boise averaged 1.6 goals scored, with average xG of 1.79, while Chattanooga’s defense allowed opponents 2.17 xG. The hosts also create chances consistently, averaging 1.79 xG and 15.92 shots per match, whereas the visitors concede 1.9 goals per game over the season. The projected total of 3.35 goals offers a clear edge for the Over 1.5 line, although the risk is significantly higher at elevated goal lines.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

A draw at half-time is the most likely outcome, as Athletic Club Boise were level after 45 minutes in 70% of their matches and never held the lead at that stage. However, Chattanooga Red Wolves have a clear overall quality advantage this season, averaging 1.5 goals scored and 1.0 conceded, while Boise concede 1.9 goals per match. The hosts also create better chances, with an average xG of 1.79 compared with their opponents’ 1.46, while Boise’s defense allows an average xG of 1.74. Matches involving both teams tend to open up significantly after the break, with a goal scored in 92% of Chattanooga’s matches and 100% of Boise’s, increasing the hosts’ chances of turning the draw into a win. Despite Red Wolves’ weaker recent form, their season win rate of 58%, compared with 30% for the visitors, supports the X/1 scenario.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Stats by half

0 : 1
First half
2 : 2
Second half

Game stats

46Possession (%)54
Chattanooga Red WolvesAthletic Club Boise
9Shots14
Chattanooga Red WolvesAthletic Club Boise
3Shots on target6
Chattanooga Red WolvesAthletic Club Boise
1.08xG1.67
Chattanooga Red WolvesAthletic Club Boise
3Corners4
Chattanooga Red WolvesAthletic Club Boise
41Dangerous attacks51
Chattanooga Red WolvesAthletic Club Boise
19Fouls10
Chattanooga Red WolvesAthletic Club Boise
4Cards2
Chattanooga Red WolvesAthletic Club Boise

Pre-game profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

Chattanooga Red WolvesAthletic Club Boise
1.9Goals scored / game1.5
Chattanooga Red WolvesAthletic Club Boise
1.6Goals allowed / game1.41
Chattanooga Red WolvesAthletic Club Boise
Chattanooga Red WolvesAthletic Club Boise
37%Average possession56%
Chattanooga Red WolvesAthletic Club Boise
4.1Shots on target / game4.5
Chattanooga Red WolvesAthletic Club Boise
Chattanooga Red WolvesAthletic Club Boise
Chattanooga Red WolvesAthletic Club Boise

Team statswho is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

11Shots per game14.05
Chattanooga Red WolvesAthletic Club Boise
4.1Shots on target4.5
Chattanooga Red WolvesAthletic Club Boise
17.3%Shot conversion10.7%
Chattanooga Red WolvesAthletic Club Boise
37%Possession56%
Chattanooga Red WolvesAthletic Club Boise
1.36xG for1.64
Chattanooga Red WolvesAthletic Club Boise
1.75xG against1.41
Chattanooga Red WolvesAthletic Club Boise

Shooting quality

Chattanooga Red Wolves: Counter-attackingAthletic Club Boise: Dominant
Chattanooga Red WolvesAthletic Club Boise
Accuracy (shots on target)37%32%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.460.33

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

Athletic Club Boise is 100% better for: last-5 form.

0.8 pts / game - Chattanooga Red Wolves · 1.6 pts / game - Athletic Club Boise

Chattanooga Red Wolves
LLWLD
Season result split
50% W10% R40% P
Season (W-D-L)
10-2-8
1.60 pts / game · goal difference +6
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-1-3
0.80 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
6-1-3
Last 5 at home
3-1-1
WWWLD
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 2.0Goals conceded: 3.0xG: 0.99Opponent xG: 2.17BTTS: 100%Over 2.5: 100%
Athletic Club Boise
WLDWD
Season result split
45% W23% R32% P
Season (W-D-L)
10-5-7
1.59 pts / game · goal difference +2
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-2-1
1.60 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
3-3-4
Last 5 away
2-1-2
LWWLD
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.6Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 1.78Opponent xG: 1.49BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 80%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Chattanooga Red Wolves is 27% better for: goals scored per game.

1.9 goals / game - Chattanooga Red Wolves · 1.5 goals / game - Athletic Club Boise

Athletic Club Boise is 13% better for: goals allowed per game.

1.6 goals / game - Chattanooga Red Wolves · 1.41 goals / game - Athletic Club Boise

Chattanooga Red Wolves scoring profile: very strong

Chattanooga Red Wolves scores in 90% of games (18 of 20 meczów), while Athletic Club Boise keeps a clean sheet in 27% (6 of 22 meczów).

Athletic Club Boise scoring profile: very strong

Athletic Club Boise scores in 86% of games (19 of 22 meczów), while Chattanooga Red Wolves keeps a clean sheet in 25% (5 of 20 meczów).

38Goals scored (season)33
Chattanooga Red WolvesAthletic Club Boise
32Goals conceded (season)31
Chattanooga Red WolvesAthletic Club Boise
3.5Average goals per game2.91
Chattanooga Red WolvesAthletic Club Boise
10Goals scored (last 5)8
Chattanooga Red WolvesAthletic Club Boise
15Goals conceded (last 5)7
Chattanooga Red WolvesAthletic Club Boise

How often they score at least...

90%1 goal86%
Chattanooga Red WolvesAthletic Club Boise
60%2 goals55%
Chattanooga Red WolvesAthletic Club Boise
20%3 goals5%
Chattanooga Red WolvesAthletic Club Boise
15%4 goals5%
Chattanooga Red WolvesAthletic Club Boise

How often they concede at least...

75%1 goal73%
Chattanooga Red WolvesAthletic Club Boise
50%2 goals41%
Chattanooga Red WolvesAthletic Club Boise
25%3 goals18%
Chattanooga Red WolvesAthletic Club Boise
5%4 goals5%
Chattanooga Red WolvesAthletic Club Boise

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

65%
Chattanooga Red Wolves - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.13 of 20 meczów
64%
Athletic Club Boise - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.14 of 22 meczów
58%
League average

Goal patterns

40%BTTS at half-time23%
Chattanooga Red WolvesAthletic Club Boise
5%BTTS in both halves9%
Chattanooga Red WolvesAthletic Club Boise
30%Scored in both halves27%
Chattanooga Red WolvesAthletic Club Boise

BTTS and goal count

65%Min. 3 goals and BTTS59%
Chattanooga Red WolvesAthletic Club Boise
5%Min. 3 goals without BTTS5%
Chattanooga Red WolvesAthletic Club Boise
100%BTTS - last 580%
Chattanooga Red WolvesAthletic Club Boise

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

Full game - team comparison (Over)

Chattanooga Red WolvesAthletic Club Boise
Chattanooga Red WolvesAthletic Club Boise
Chattanooga Red WolvesAthletic Club Boise
Chattanooga Red WolvesAthletic Club Boise
Chattanooga Red WolvesAthletic Club Boise

1st half

80%Min. 1 goal before half-time64%
Chattanooga Red WolvesAthletic Club Boise
50%Min. 2 goals before half-time36%
Chattanooga Red WolvesAthletic Club Boise
30%Min. 3 goals before half-time9%
Chattanooga Red WolvesAthletic Club Boise

2nd half

90%Min. 1 goal after half-time95%
Chattanooga Red WolvesAthletic Club Boise
50%Min. 2 goals after half-time45%
Chattanooga Red WolvesAthletic Club Boise
20%Min. 3 goals after half-time27%
Chattanooga Red WolvesAthletic Club Boise

Game halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Chattanooga Red Wolves - half-time state
30% leading35% draw35% trailing
Athletic Club Boise - half-time state
23% leading55% draw23% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.25Points per game (1st half)1.23
Chattanooga Red WolvesAthletic Club Boise
0.85Goals scored (1st half)0.64
Chattanooga Red WolvesAthletic Club Boise
0.95Goals conceded (1st half)0.5
Chattanooga Red WolvesAthletic Club Boise
1.8Average goals (1st half)1.14
Chattanooga Red WolvesAthletic Club Boise
35%Clean sheet before half-time59%
Chattanooga Red WolvesAthletic Club Boise
45%No goal before half-time55%
Chattanooga Red WolvesAthletic Club Boise

After half-time (2nd half)

1.65Points per game (2nd half)1.5
Chattanooga Red WolvesAthletic Club Boise
1.05Goals scored (2nd half)0.86
Chattanooga Red WolvesAthletic Club Boise
0.65Goals conceded (2nd half)0.91
Chattanooga Red WolvesAthletic Club Boise
1.7Average goals (2nd half)1.77
Chattanooga Red WolvesAthletic Club Boise
55%Clean sheet after half-time36%
Chattanooga Red WolvesAthletic Club Boise
35%No goal after half-time32%
Chattanooga Red WolvesAthletic Club Boise

Chattanooga Red Wolves - second-half results

50% W15% R35% P
25
Half-time points
17
Half-time goals
-2
Goal difference (1st half)
33
Second-half points
+8
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.25
PPG before half-time
Lead holding167%

Leads at halftime in 30% of games and wins 50%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime-0.3

Defense stays consistent across the full game.

Athletic Club Boise - second-half results

45% W14% R41% P
27
Half-time points
14
Half-time goals
+3
Goal difference (1st half)
33
Second-half points
-1
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.23
PPG before half-time
Lead holding196%

Leads at halftime in 23% of games and wins 45%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime+0.4

Allows 0.4 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

Chattanooga Red Wolves - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game0.601.20
Goals scored / game1.01.0
Goals allowed / game1.81.2
Average goals per game2.82.2
1 goal100%100%
2 goals60%80%
3 goals60%40%
Clean sheet0%40%
No goal40%20%
Goal difference-4-1
Half-time: 20% leading - 0% draw - 80% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 0% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 60% - Half-time goals total: 5
Athletic Club Boise - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.201.60
Goals scored / game0.80.8
Goals allowed / game0.80.6
Average goals per game1.61.4
1 goal60%80%
2 goals40%40%
3 goals40%20%
Clean sheet60%40%
No goal40%40%
Goal difference0+1
Half-time: 20% leading - 60% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 40% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 4

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

Chattanooga Red Wolves
ScoredConceded
6
10
0-15
6
2
16-30
5
7
31-45
10
5
46-60
4
4
61-75
7
4
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (10 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): +3 - wins late phases.

Athletic Club Boise
ScoredConceded
6
2
0-15
4
7
16-30
4
2
31-45
6
6
46-60
5
5
61-75
8
9
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (8 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

3.21
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
1.7 : 1.6
Estimated goal split
home : away
109%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
65%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-6%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
77%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
1%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 100 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

Chattanooga Red Wolves

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.39
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.69
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-3.1 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.54
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.15
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
106%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
140%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
-0.80
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
18% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 16% come in the first quarter-hour.
18%

Athletic Club Boise

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.23
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.14
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-0.1 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.14
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
0.00
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
132%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
79%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
+0.01
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
24% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 18% come in the first quarter-hour.
24%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (USL League One).

Teams vs league

Chattanooga Red WolvesLigaAthletic Club Boise
Average goals per game 3.502.93 2.91
Both teams scored 65%58% 64%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 70%60% 64%
Clean sheets 25%24% 27%
Goal before half-time 80%72% 64%
Goal after half-time 90%80% 95%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.93
Average goals per game
58%
Both teams scored
60%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
24%
Clean sheets
1.79
Home goals / game
1.14
Away goals / game
+57%
Home attack advantage
+36%
Home defensive advantage
+32%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
72%
1 goal
39%
2 goals
15%
3 goals
5%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
80%
1 goal
47%
2 goals
18%
3 goals
5%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Athletic Club BoiseGoalTumi MoshobaneAssist: Nick Moon
  2. Athletic Club BoiseYellow cardJacob Crull
  3. Chattanooga Red WolvesYellow cardAngelo Kelly-Rosales
  4. Athletic Club BoiseYellow cardTumi Moshobane
  5. Chattanooga Red WolvesSubstitutionOn: Michael KnappOff: Wynand Wessels
  6. Chattanooga Red WolvesGoalOmar Hernandez
  7. Chattanooga Red WolvesGoalYanis Lelin Vegas
  8. Athletic Club BoiseSubstitutionOn: Thomas Olivier AmangOff: Denys Kostyshyn
  9. Chattanooga Red WolvesSubstitutionOn: Matthew BentleyOff: James Vaughan
  10. Athletic Club BoiseGoalNick Moon
  11. Athletic Club BoiseGoalThomas Olivier AmangAssist: Blake Bodily
  12. Chattanooga Red WolvesYellow cardJordan Ayimbila
  13. Athletic Club BoiseSubstitutionOn: Moussa NdiayeOff: Tumi Moshobane
  14. Chattanooga Red WolvesYellow cardMichael Knapp
  15. Athletic Club BoiseSubstitutionOn: Omar YehyaOff: Jonathan Ricketts
  16. Chattanooga Red WolvesYellow cardJoshua Ramos

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Record from Chattanooga Red Wolves's perspective: 0 wins, 0 draws and 1 loss against Athletic Club Boise. Games average 3.00 goals, and both teams scored in 100% of them.

FAQ

What was the result of Chattanooga Red Wolves vs Athletic Club Boise?

The USL League One match finished Chattanooga Red Wolves 2:3 Athletic Club Boise. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Chattanooga Red Wolves vs Athletic Club Boise?

Chattanooga Red Wolves score 1.90 goals per game on average and Athletic Club Boise 1.50. The USL League One average is 2.93 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 60% of games. Both teams score in 65% of Chattanooga Red Wolves's matches and 64% of Athletic Club Boise's.

What form are Chattanooga Red Wolves and Athletic Club Boise in?

Over the last 5 games Chattanooga Red Wolves have a 1-1-3 record (0.80 points per game) and Athletic Club Boise 2-2-1 (1.60 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Chattanooga Red Wolves vs Athletic Club Boise?

The statistical background for Chattanooga Red Wolves vs Athletic Club Boise — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.