United States - USL League OneData current as of 23 July 2026

Chattanooga Red Wolves vs Sarasota Paradise: match statistics

Chattanooga Red Wolves vs Sarasota Paradise: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Chattanooga Red Wolves play Sarasota Paradise in USL League One (United States). The match date is 9 May 2026 at 21:00. Final score: 4:1.

Current form

Chattanooga Red Wolves: 4-0-1, 2.40 points/match. Sarasota Paradise: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match.

Goal statistics

Chattanooga Red Wolves scores 1.93 and concedes 1.21 goals per match. Sarasota Paradise scores 0.94 and concedes 1.56. League average: 2.85 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Chattanooga Red Wolves 57%, Sarasota Paradise 50%. Over 2.5: Chattanooga Red Wolves 64%, Sarasota Paradise 50%. League level: BTTS 55%, Over 2.5 59%.

xG, shots and style

Chattanooga Red Wolves has higher xG: 1.52 vs 1.43. Chattanooga Red Wolves: 12.5 shots per match, Sarasota Paradise: 12.2.

Match halves

Chattanooga Red Wolves: half-time lead 36%, second-half goals 1.07. Sarasota Paradise: half-time lead 11%, second-half goals 0.67.

Goals by minute

Chattanooga Red Wolves: 46-60 (7 goals). Sarasota Paradise: 46-60 (5 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

USL League One: 2.85 goals per match, BTTS 55%, Over 2.5 59%.

Head-to-head

No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.

Match description

The favorite is Chattanooga Red Wolves: at home they record an average xG of 1.78 versus the visitors' 1.05 xG on the road and attempt an average of 13 shots per match compared to Sarasota's 8.5. Defensively the hosts look better — they concede an average of 1.00 goal at home, while Sarasota concedes 2.00 goals away and has conceded 10 goals in the last 5 matches versus 7 for Chattanooga. Both teams, however, have clear finishing issues: the hosts average 0 goals in home matches, the visitors 0 goals away, and both sides have scored 3 goals in their last 5 fixtures. Form is poor on both sides — Chattanooga in the last 5 matches is 0-1-4 with 0.2 pts/match, and Sarasota 1-0-4 with 0.6 pts/match. Considering the advantage in quality of chances (xG 1.78 vs 1.05), higher shot volume (13 vs 8.5) and the better defensive profile (xG against 0.80 vs 1.76), I forecast a home win.

Half-by-half

2 : 1
1st half
2 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

34Possession (%)66
Chattanooga Red WolvesSarasota Paradise
10Shots11
Chattanooga Red WolvesSarasota Paradise
8Shots on target4
Chattanooga Red WolvesSarasota Paradise
1.55xG1.55
Chattanooga Red WolvesSarasota Paradise
8Corners1
Chattanooga Red WolvesSarasota Paradise
48Dangerous attacks77
Chattanooga Red WolvesSarasota Paradise
9Fouls8
Chattanooga Red WolvesSarasota Paradise
1Cards0
Chattanooga Red WolvesSarasota Paradise

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Chattanooga Red WolvesSarasota Paradise
1.93Goals scored / match0.94
Chattanooga Red WolvesSarasota Paradise
1.21Goals conceded / match1.56
Chattanooga Red WolvesSarasota Paradise
Chattanooga Red WolvesSarasota Paradise
38%Average possession49%
Chattanooga Red WolvesSarasota Paradise
4.64Shots on target / match4.06
Chattanooga Red WolvesSarasota Paradise
Chattanooga Red WolvesSarasota Paradise

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

12.5Shots per match12.22
Chattanooga Red WolvesSarasota Paradise
4.64Shots on target4.06
Chattanooga Red WolvesSarasota Paradise
15.4%Shot conversion7.7%
Chattanooga Red WolvesSarasota Paradise
38%Possession49%
Chattanooga Red WolvesSarasota Paradise
1.52xG for1.43
Chattanooga Red WolvesSarasota Paradise
1.56xG against1.32
Chattanooga Red WolvesSarasota Paradise

Shooting quality

Chattanooga Red Wolves: Counter-attackingSarasota Paradise: Balanced
Chattanooga Red WolvesSarasota Paradise
Accuracy (shots on target)37%33%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.420.23

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Chattanooga Red Wolves is 140% better for: last-5 form.

2.4 pts / match - Chattanooga Red Wolves · 1 pts / match - Sarasota Paradise

Chattanooga Red Wolves
WWLWW
Season result split
57% W7% R36% P
Season (W-D-L)
8-1-5
1.79 pts / match · goal difference +10
Last 5 (W-D-L)
4-0-1
2.40 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
5-0-2
Last 5 at home
4-0-1
WLWWW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.8Goals conceded: 0.8xG: 1.52Opponent xG: 1.38BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 40%
Sarasota Paradise
LWLDD
Season result split
28% W17% R56% P
Season (W-D-L)
5-3-10
1.00 pts / match · goal difference -11
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-2-2
1.00 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
1-2-6
Last 5 away
1-2-2
WLLDD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.8Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 1.47Opponent xG: 1.27BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 40%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Chattanooga Red Wolves is 105% better for: goals scored per match.

1.93 goals / match - Chattanooga Red Wolves · 0.94 goals / match - Sarasota Paradise

Chattanooga Red Wolves is 29% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.21 goals / match - Chattanooga Red Wolves · 1.56 goals / match - Sarasota Paradise

Chattanooga Red Wolves scoring profile: very strong

Chattanooga Red Wolves scores in 86% of matches (12 of 14 matches), while Sarasota Paradise keeps a clean sheet in 28% (5 of 18 matches).

Sarasota Paradise scoring profile: strong

Sarasota Paradise scores in 67% of matches (12 of 18 matches), while Chattanooga Red Wolves keeps a clean sheet in 29% (4 of 14 matches).

27Goals scored (season)17
Chattanooga Red WolvesSarasota Paradise
17Goals conceded (season)28
Chattanooga Red WolvesSarasota Paradise
3.14Average goals in match2.5
Chattanooga Red WolvesSarasota Paradise
9Goals scored (last 5)4
Chattanooga Red WolvesSarasota Paradise
4Goals conceded (last 5)7
Chattanooga Red WolvesSarasota Paradise

How often they score at least...

86%1 goal67%
Chattanooga Red WolvesSarasota Paradise
57%2 goals28%
Chattanooga Red WolvesSarasota Paradise
21%3 goals0%
Chattanooga Red WolvesSarasota Paradise
21%4 goals0%
Chattanooga Red WolvesSarasota Paradise

How often they concede at least...

71%1 goal72%
Chattanooga Red WolvesSarasota Paradise
43%2 goals50%
Chattanooga Red WolvesSarasota Paradise
7%3 goals22%
Chattanooga Red WolvesSarasota Paradise
0%4 goals11%
Chattanooga Red WolvesSarasota Paradise

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

57%
Chattanooga Red Wolves - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.8 of 14 matches
50%
Sarasota Paradise - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.9 of 18 matches
55%
League average

Goal patterns

36%BTTS at half-time17%
Chattanooga Red WolvesSarasota Paradise
0%BTTS in both halves0%
Chattanooga Red WolvesSarasota Paradise
29%Scored in both halves11%
Chattanooga Red WolvesSarasota Paradise

BTTS and goal count

57%Min. 3 goals and BTTS50%
Chattanooga Red WolvesSarasota Paradise
7%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
Chattanooga Red WolvesSarasota Paradise
40%BTTS - last 540%
Chattanooga Red WolvesSarasota Paradise

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

Full match - team comparison (Over)

Chattanooga Red WolvesSarasota Paradise
Chattanooga Red WolvesSarasota Paradise
Chattanooga Red WolvesSarasota Paradise
Chattanooga Red WolvesSarasota Paradise

1st half

79%Min. 1 goal before half-time44%
Chattanooga Red WolvesSarasota Paradise
50%Min. 2 goals before half-time28%
Chattanooga Red WolvesSarasota Paradise
21%Min. 3 goals before half-time11%
Chattanooga Red WolvesSarasota Paradise

2nd half

86%Min. 1 goal after half-time83%
Chattanooga Red WolvesSarasota Paradise
43%Min. 2 goals after half-time67%
Chattanooga Red WolvesSarasota Paradise
14%Min. 3 goals after half-time17%
Chattanooga Red WolvesSarasota Paradise

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Chattanooga Red Wolves is 60% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.5 pts / match - Chattanooga Red Wolves · 0.94 pts / match - Sarasota Paradise

Chattanooga Red Wolves - half-time state
36% leading43% draw21% trailing
Sarasota Paradise - half-time state
11% leading61% draw28% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.5Points per match (1st half)0.94
Chattanooga Red WolvesSarasota Paradise
0.86Goals scored (1st half)0.28
Chattanooga Red WolvesSarasota Paradise
0.71Goals conceded (1st half)0.56
Chattanooga Red WolvesSarasota Paradise
1.57Average goals (1st half)0.83
Chattanooga Red WolvesSarasota Paradise
43%Clean sheet before half-time67%
Chattanooga Red WolvesSarasota Paradise
43%No goal before half-time72%
Chattanooga Red WolvesSarasota Paradise

After half-time (2nd half)

1.71Points per match (2nd half)1
Chattanooga Red WolvesSarasota Paradise
1.07Goals scored (2nd half)0.67
Chattanooga Red WolvesSarasota Paradise
0.5Goals conceded (2nd half)1
Chattanooga Red WolvesSarasota Paradise
1.57Average goals (2nd half)1.67
Chattanooga Red WolvesSarasota Paradise
57%Clean sheet after half-time33%
Chattanooga Red WolvesSarasota Paradise
43%No goal after half-time50%
Chattanooga Red WolvesSarasota Paradise

Chattanooga Red Wolves - second-half results

50% W21% R29% P
21
Half-time points
12
Half-time goals
+2
Goal difference (1st half)
24
Second-half points
+8
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.50
PPG before half-time
Lead holding158%

Leads at half-time in 36% of matches and wins 57%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.2

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Sarasota Paradise - second-half results

22% W33% R44% P
17
Half-time points
5
Half-time goals
-5
Goal difference (1st half)
18
Second-half points
-6
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.94
PPG before half-time
Lead holding255%

Leads at half-time in 11% of matches and wins 28%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.4

Concedes 0.4 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Chattanooga Red Wolves - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.202.00
Goals scored / match0.41.4
Goals conceded / match0.40.4
Average goals in match0.81.8
1 goal60%80%
2 goals20%40%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet60%60%
No goal60%40%
Goal difference0+5
Half-time: 20% leading - 60% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 20% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 2
Sarasota Paradise - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.601.20
Goals scored / match0.00.8
Goals conceded / match0.80.6
Average goals in match0.81.4
1 goal40%60%
2 goals40%60%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet60%60%
No goal100%40%
Goal difference-4+1
Half-time: 0% leading - 60% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 60% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 0

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Chattanooga Red Wolves
ScoredConceded
4
8
0-15
5
0
16-30
3
2
31-45
7
3
46-60
3
2
61-75
5
2
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (7 goli). Concedes most in 0-15 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): +3 - wins late phases.

Sarasota Paradise
ScoredConceded
1
2
0-15
1
4
16-30
3
4
31-45
5
5
46-60
5
6
61-75
2
7
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (5 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): -5 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.82
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.7 : 1.1
Estimated goal split
home : away
99%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
54%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
58%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
5%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 20 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Chattanooga Red Wolves

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.04
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.76
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-5.1 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.41
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.35
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
112%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
108%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.61
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
19% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 15% come in the first quarter-hour.
19%

Sarasota Paradise

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.11
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.73
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+3.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.49
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.24
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
84%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
90%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.4
Late goals
12% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 6% come in the first quarter-hour.
12%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (USL League One).

Teams vs league

Chattanooga Red WolvesLigaSarasota Paradise
Average goals in match 3.142.85 2.50
Both teams scored 57%55% 50%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 64%59% 50%
Clean sheets 29%26% 28%
Goal before half-time 79%73% 44%
Goal after half-time 86%80% 83%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.85
Average goals per match
55%
Both teams scored
59%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
26%
Clean sheets
1.73
Home goals / match
1.12
Away goals / match
+54%
Home attack advantage
+35%
Home defence advantage
+30%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
73%
1 goal
42%
2 goals
14%
3 goals
3%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
80%
1 goal
47%
2 goals
19%
3 goals
6%
4 goals

FAQ

What was the result of Chattanooga Red Wolves vs Sarasota Paradise?

The USL League One match finished Chattanooga Red Wolves 4:1 Sarasota Paradise. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Chattanooga Red Wolves vs Sarasota Paradise?

Chattanooga Red Wolves score 1.93 goals per game on average and Sarasota Paradise 0.94. The USL League One average is 2.85 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 59% of games. Both teams score in 57% of Chattanooga Red Wolves's matches and 50% of Sarasota Paradise's.

What form are Chattanooga Red Wolves and Sarasota Paradise in?

Over the last 5 games Chattanooga Red Wolves have a 4-0-1 record (2.40 points per game) and Sarasota Paradise 1-2-2 (1.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Chattanooga Red Wolves vs Sarasota Paradise?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.