China - Chinese Super LeagueDujiangyan Sports Center StadiumData current as of September 07, 2026

Chengdu Better City FC vs Shanghai SIPG: match statistics

Chengdu Better City FC vs Shanghai SIPG: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

Chengdu Better City FC played against Shanghai SIPG in Chinese Super League (China). The game was played on May 19, 2026. Venue: Dujiangyan Sports Center Stadium. Final score: 0:1.

Recent form

Chengdu Better City FC has 5 wins, 0 draws and 0 losses over its last five games, averaging 3.00 points per game. Shanghai SIPG has 1 win, 3 draws and 1 loss, with 1.20 points per game.

Scoring records

Chengdu Better City FC scores 2.67 goals per game and allows 0.83. Shanghai SIPG scores 1.58 and allows 1.42. Games in this league average 2.98 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 58% of Chengdu Better City FC's games and 75% of Shanghai SIPG's. The Over 2.5 rates are 75% and 67%, compared with league averages of 62% for BTTS and 59% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

Chengdu Better City FC has the higher season xG average, 1.78 to 1.41 per game. Chengdu Better City FC takes 14.8 shots per game, while Shanghai SIPG takes 12.0.

First-half and second-half trends

Chengdu Better City FC leads at halftime in 42% of its games and scores 1.58 goals per game after halftime. Shanghai SIPG leads at halftime in 33% and scores 1.08 after halftime.

When the teams score

Chengdu Better City FC's most productive scoring window is minutes 76-90+ (13 goals). For Shanghai SIPG, it is minutes 46-60 (5 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

Chinese Super League games average 2.98 goals. Both teams score in 62% of games, and 59% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

Before this game, 2 previous meetings were available. The record was 2 home wins, 0 draws and 0 away wins. Those games averaged 4.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Chengdu Better City FC are clear favorites: at home they have 11 wins and 0 losses (100% win rate), average 3.33 goals scored per match and concede only 0.5, and in the last five appearances they have 5 wins and 13 goals scored. Shanghai SIPG perform poorly away — no away wins (0% wins), suffer 60% away defeats, average 0.8 goals per match, register 2.2 shots on target and fail to score in 40% of away games. xG values corroborate the home advantage: Chengdu generates on average xG 2.06 at home and concedes xG 1.10, while Shanghai posts xG 0.99 away and faces xG against 1.53, suggesting more high-quality chances for the hosts and greater vulnerability for the visitors. Additionally Chengdu averages 7.17 shots on target at home with a 19% conversion rate, whereas the visitors have only 2.2 shots on target and 10% conversion, which increases the hosts’ scoring probability. Considering the advantage in average goals (3.33 vs 0.8), shots on target (7.17 vs 2.2), xG (2.06 vs 0.99) and Shanghai’s lack of away wins, I predict a home win.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

I back BTTS - Yes at ~70% vs 30% for No. Chengdu has a seasonal both-teams-to-score rate of 86%, averages 2.14 goals per game (last 5: 2.6), with xG 1.71 and 14.71 shots per game, 4.29 on target — a clear offensive edge. Shanghai's seasonal BTTS is 60% and they have 0% clean sheets, but they only average 0.8 goals per game season-wide (xG 0.99), with 8.2 shots and 2.2 on target; nonetheless they improved to 2.0 goals per game and 80% BTTS in the last 5. Visitors concede 1.6 goals per game on the season (1.6 in last 5), hosts concede 1.29 on the season (0.6 in last 5), so Chengdu has a realistic chance to score and Shanghai frequently allows goals (17 conceded on the season). The combination of the hosts’ high seasonal BTTS (86%), Shanghai’s lack of clean sheets (0%), and the visitors’ attacking improvement in their last 5 matches leads me to select Yes as the strongest signal.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

Chengdu Better City scores an average of 2.14 goals per game this season and has an xG of 1.71 with 14.71 shots and 4.29 on target per game, while Shanghai SIPG as the away side records only 0.8 goals and xG 0.99 with 8.2 shots and 2.2 on target. The home team has 100% of matches with over 1.5 goals and 86% over 2.5, whereas Shanghai has 60% for >1.5 and 40% for >2.5; both teams have scored over 0.5 goals in 100% of games, and both teams to score rates are 86% for Chengdu and 60% for Shanghai. Combined opponent-adjusted xG (attack vs opponent defense) is (1.71+1.53)/2 = 1.62 for Chengdu and (0.99+1.11)/2 = 1.05 for Shanghai; accounting for Chengdu’s higher finishing efficiency (15% conversion vs 10% for Shanghai) and seasonal goals 2.14 vs 0.8, I propose adjusted expected goals of 1.88 for the home side and 0.93 for the away side, total 2.81. In the last 5 matches Chengdu scored 13 goals (2.6 avg) and conceded 3, while Shanghai scored 10 goals (2.0 avg) and conceded 8, which further supports a scenario of at least two goals and involvement from both teams. Based on this, the strongest signal is Over 1.5 (estimated probability ~94%), Over 2.5 also has solid support (~77%), while Over 3.5 is much less certain (~36%).

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

Statistics show the hosts' offensive superiority: Chengdu averages 2.14 goals per match versus 0.80 for Shanghai SIPG, has an xG of 1.71 versus 0.99, and records 14.71 shots per match (visitors 8.2) and 4.29 shots on target (visitors 2.2). Despite this, we often see a draw at the break — the home side are levelled in 43% of matches and the visitors in 40%, and the average goals by half-time are only 1.29 for the hosts and 0.6 for the guests, which increases the probability of an X at Half-Time. The second half favors Chengdu: the hosts scored 4 goals in minutes 46–60 (visitors 1), collected 13 points in second halves and average 1.86 points per match in the second half, and their second-half goal difference is +7, so they have clear strength after the break. The visitors defend poorly (conceding on average 1.6 goals per match, xG against 1.53) and practically do not win on the road this season (winPercentage_away 0%), so a turnaround by Shanghai is unlikely. On this basis the most reliable scenario is a draw at Half-Time and a home win at Full-Time (X/1), indicated as the highest probability at 28%.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Stats by half

0 : 0
First half
0 : 1
Second half

Game stats

56Possession (%)44
Chengdu Better City FCShanghai SIPG
18Shots3
Chengdu Better City FCShanghai SIPG
6Shots on target1
Chengdu Better City FCShanghai SIPG
1.99xG0.49
Chengdu Better City FCShanghai SIPG
6Corners2
Chengdu Better City FCShanghai SIPG
61Dangerous attacks29
Chengdu Better City FCShanghai SIPG
8Fouls21
Chengdu Better City FCShanghai SIPG
3Cards8
Chengdu Better City FCShanghai SIPG

Pre-game profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

Chengdu Better City FCShanghai SIPG
2.67Goals scored / game1.58
Chengdu Better City FCShanghai SIPG
0.83Goals allowed / game1.42
Chengdu Better City FCShanghai SIPG
Chengdu Better City FCShanghai SIPG
56%Average possession59%
Chengdu Better City FCShanghai SIPG
5.83Shots on target / game3.42
Chengdu Better City FCShanghai SIPG
Chengdu Better City FCShanghai SIPG

Team statswho is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

14.75Shots per game12
Chengdu Better City FCShanghai SIPG
5.83Shots on target3.42
Chengdu Better City FCShanghai SIPG
18.1%Shot conversion13.2%
Chengdu Better City FCShanghai SIPG
56%Possession59%
Chengdu Better City FCShanghai SIPG
1.78xG for1.41
Chengdu Better City FCShanghai SIPG
1.18xG against1.28
Chengdu Better City FCShanghai SIPG

Shooting quality

Chengdu Better City FC: DominantShanghai SIPG: Efficient finishing
Chengdu Better City FCShanghai SIPG
Accuracy (shots on target)40%28%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.460.46

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

Chengdu Better City FC is 150% better for: last-5 form.

3 pts / game - Chengdu Better City FC · 1.2 pts / game - Shanghai SIPG

Chengdu Better City FC
WWWWW
5 wins in a row
Season result split
92% W8% R0% P
Season (W-D-L)
11-1-0
2.83 pts / game · goal difference +22
Last 5 (W-D-L)
5-0-0
3.00 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
6-0-0
Last 5 at home
5-0-0
WWWWW
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 2.6Goals conceded: 0.6xG: 1.63Opponent xG: 1.26BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 80%
Shanghai SIPG
WLDDD
Season result split
25% W33% R42% P
Season (W-D-L)
3-4-5
1.08 pts / game · goal difference +2
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-3-1
1.20 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
0-2-3
Last 5 away
0-2-3
LLDLD
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 2.0Goals conceded: 1.6xG: 1.22Opponent xG: 1.13BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 80%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Chengdu Better City FC is 69% better for: goals scored per game.

2.67 goals / game - Chengdu Better City FC · 1.58 goals / game - Shanghai SIPG

Chengdu Better City FC is 71% better for: goals allowed per game.

0.83 goals / game - Chengdu Better City FC · 1.42 goals / game - Shanghai SIPG

Chengdu Better City FC scoring profile: very strong

Chengdu Better City FC scores in 100% of games (12 of 12 meczów), while Shanghai SIPG keeps a clean sheet in 8% (1 of 12 meczów).

Shanghai SIPG scoring profile: strong

Shanghai SIPG scores in 83% of games (10 of 12 meczów), while Chengdu Better City FC keeps a clean sheet in 42% (5 of 12 meczów).

32Goals scored (season)19
Chengdu Better City FCShanghai SIPG
10Goals conceded (season)17
Chengdu Better City FCShanghai SIPG
3.5Average goals per game3
Chengdu Better City FCShanghai SIPG
13Goals scored (last 5)10
Chengdu Better City FCShanghai SIPG
3Goals conceded (last 5)8
Chengdu Better City FCShanghai SIPG

How often they score at least...

100%1 goal83%
Chengdu Better City FCShanghai SIPG
75%2 goals42%
Chengdu Better City FCShanghai SIPG
50%3 goals17%
Chengdu Better City FCShanghai SIPG
25%4 goals17%
Chengdu Better City FCShanghai SIPG

How often they concede at least...

58%1 goal92%
Chengdu Better City FCShanghai SIPG
17%2 goals42%
Chengdu Better City FCShanghai SIPG
8%3 goals8%
Chengdu Better City FCShanghai SIPG
0%4 goals0%
Chengdu Better City FCShanghai SIPG

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

58%
Chengdu Better City FC - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.7 of 12 meczów
62%
League average

Goal patterns

25%BTTS at half-time17%
Chengdu Better City FCShanghai SIPG
0%BTTS in both halves8%
Chengdu Better City FCShanghai SIPG
58%Scored in both halves33%
Chengdu Better City FCShanghai SIPG

BTTS and goal count

58%Min. 3 goals and BTTS58%
Chengdu Better City FCShanghai SIPG
17%Min. 3 goals without BTTS8%
Chengdu Better City FCShanghai SIPG
40%BTTS - last 580%
Chengdu Better City FCShanghai SIPG

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

Full game - team comparison (Over)

Chengdu Better City FCShanghai SIPG

1st half

67%Min. 1 goal before half-time67%
Chengdu Better City FCShanghai SIPG
50%Min. 2 goals before half-time25%
Chengdu Better City FCShanghai SIPG
25%Min. 3 goals before half-time8%
Chengdu Better City FCShanghai SIPG

2nd half

100%Min. 1 goal after half-time92%
Chengdu Better City FCShanghai SIPG
58%Min. 2 goals after half-time58%
Chengdu Better City FCShanghai SIPG
25%Min. 3 goals after half-time33%
Chengdu Better City FCShanghai SIPG

Game halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Chengdu Better City FC is 18% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.67 pts / game - Chengdu Better City FC · 1.42 pts / game - Shanghai SIPG

Chengdu Better City FC - half-time state
42% leading42% draw17% trailing
Shanghai SIPG - half-time state
33% leading42% draw25% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.67Points per game (1st half)1.42
Chengdu Better City FCShanghai SIPG
1.08Goals scored (1st half)0.5
Chengdu Better City FCShanghai SIPG
0.42Goals conceded (1st half)0.5
Chengdu Better City FCShanghai SIPG
1.5Average goals (1st half)1
Chengdu Better City FCShanghai SIPG
67%Clean sheet before half-time67%
Chengdu Better City FCShanghai SIPG
42%No goal before half-time50%
Chengdu Better City FCShanghai SIPG

After half-time (2nd half)

2.75Points per game (2nd half)1.08
Chengdu Better City FCShanghai SIPG
1.58Goals scored (2nd half)1.08
Chengdu Better City FCShanghai SIPG
0.42Goals conceded (2nd half)0.92
Chengdu Better City FCShanghai SIPG
2Average goals (2nd half)2
Chengdu Better City FCShanghai SIPG
75%Clean sheet after half-time25%
Chengdu Better City FCShanghai SIPG
0%No goal after half-time33%
Chengdu Better City FCShanghai SIPG

Chengdu Better City FC - second-half results

92% W0% R8% P
20
Half-time points
13
Half-time goals
+8
Goal difference (1st half)
33
Second-half points
+14
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.67
PPG before half-time
Lead holding219%

Leads at halftime in 42% of games and wins 92%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime0.0

Defense stays consistent across the full game.

Shanghai SIPG - second-half results

25% W33% R42% P
17
Half-time points
6
Half-time goals
0
Goal difference (1st half)
13
Second-half points
+2
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.42
PPG before half-time
Lead holding76%

Leads at halftime in 33% of games and wins 25%. Sometimes gives up a halftime lead.

Defense after halftime+0.4

Allows 0.4 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

Chengdu Better City FC - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.603.00
Goals scored / game1.21.4
Goals allowed / game0.60.0
Average goals per game1.81.4
1 goal80%100%
2 goals60%40%
3 goals40%0%
Clean sheet60%100%
No goal20%0%
Goal difference+3+7
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 100% won - 0% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 6
Shanghai SIPG - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.601.00
Goals scored / game0.61.4
Goals allowed / game0.41.2
Average goals per game1.02.6
1 goal80%100%
2 goals20%100%
3 goals0%60%
Clean sheet60%20%
No goal40%0%
Goal difference+1+1
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 3

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

Chengdu Better City FC
ScoredConceded
1
2
0-15
5
1
16-30
7
2
31-45
2
0
46-60
4
2
61-75
13
3
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (13 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): +10 - wins late phases.

Shanghai SIPG
ScoredConceded
1
3
0-15
1
2
16-30
4
1
31-45
5
4
46-60
3
5
61-75
5
2
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (5 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): +3 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

3.25
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
2.0 : 1.2
Estimated goal split
home : away
109%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
67%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+38%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
83%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
0%
0:0 risk
practically zero
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

Chengdu Better City FC

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.60
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+1.24
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+1.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.89
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.35
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
149%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
70%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
+0.17
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.5
Late goals
41% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 3% come in the first quarter-hour.
41%

Shanghai SIPG

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.13
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.03
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-7.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.17
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
-0.14
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
133%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
79%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
+0.12
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.6
Late goals
26% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 5% come in the first quarter-hour.
26%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Chinese Super League).

Teams vs league

Chengdu Better City FCLigaShanghai SIPG
Average goals per game 3.502.98 3.00
Both teams scored 58%62% 75%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 75%59% 67%
Clean sheets 42%21% 8%
Goal before half-time 67%68% 67%
Goal after half-time 100%89% 92%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.98
Average goals per game
62%
Both teams scored
59%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
21%
Clean sheets
1.79
Home goals / game
1.19
Away goals / game
+50%
Home attack advantage
+34%
Home defensive advantage
+19%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
68%
1 goal
37%
2 goals
14%
3 goals
3%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
89%
1 goal
53%
2 goals
21%
3 goals
10%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Shanghai SIPGYellow cardShimeng Bao
  2. Shanghai SIPGSubstitutionOn: Shuai LiOff: Shimeng Bao
  3. Chengdu Better City FCSubstitutionOn: Abuduwaili BaihelamuOff: Ziming Wang
  4. Chengdu Better City FCYellow cardEgor Sorokin
  5. Shanghai SIPGYellow cardJunling Yan
  6. Shanghai SIPGYellow cardYongtao Lu
  7. Shanghai SIPGYellow cardZhen Wei
  8. Chengdu Better City FCYellow cardShihao Wei
  9. Shanghai SIPGSubstitutionOn: Huan FuOff: Leonardo Nascimento Lopes de Souza
  10. Chengdu Better City FCYellow cardChao Gan
  11. Shanghai SIPGYellow cardYuan Zhang
  12. Shanghai SIPGYellow cardShiyuan Yang
  13. Shanghai SIPGYellow cardShuai Li
  14. Shanghai SIPGYellow cardXin Yue

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Record from Chengdu Better City FC's perspective: 2 wins, 0 draws and 0 losses against Shanghai SIPG. Games average 4.50 goals, and both teams scored in 100% of them.

Chengdu Better City FC
4 : 1
Shanghai SIPG FC
Shanghai SIPG FC
1 : 3
Chengdu Better City FC

FAQ

What was the result of Chengdu Better City FC vs Shanghai SIPG?

The Chinese Super League match finished Chengdu Better City FC 0:1 Shanghai SIPG. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Chengdu Better City FC and Shanghai SIPG?

In the last 2 head-to-head matches Chengdu Better City FC won 2, Shanghai SIPG won 0 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 4.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Chengdu Better City FC vs Shanghai SIPG?

Chengdu Better City FC score 2.67 goals per game on average and Shanghai SIPG 1.58. The Chinese Super League average is 2.98 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 59% of games. Both teams score in 58% of Chengdu Better City FC's matches and 75% of Shanghai SIPG's.

What form are Chengdu Better City FC and Shanghai SIPG in?

Over the last 5 games Chengdu Better City FC have a 5-0-0 record (3.00 points per game) and Shanghai SIPG 1-3-1 (1.20 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Chengdu Better City FC vs Shanghai SIPG?

The statistical background for Chengdu Better City FC vs Shanghai SIPG — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.