United States - MLS Next ProSeatGeek StadiumData current as of September 19, 2026

Chicago Fire II vs Chattanooga FC: match statistics

Reasoning:

Full analysis and pick in the app

Check the betting analysis, pick, value bet and full reasoning for this match.

Check analysis and pick

Chicago Fire II vs Chattanooga FC: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

Chicago Fire II plays Chattanooga FC in MLS Next Pro (United States). The game is scheduled for September 20, 2026. Venue: SeatGeek Stadium.

Recent form

Chicago Fire II has 1 win, 0 draws and 4 losses over its last five games, averaging 0.60 points per game. Chattanooga FC has 3 wins, 1 draw and 1 loss, with 2.00 points per game.

Scoring records

Chicago Fire II scores 1.81 goals per game and allows 1.78. Chattanooga FC scores 2.04 and allows 1.44. Games in this league average 3.33 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 67% of Chicago Fire II's games and 67% of Chattanooga FC's. The Over 2.5 rates are 85% and 63%, compared with league averages of 63% for BTTS and 66% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

Chattanooga FC has the higher season xG average, 1.74 to 1.67 per game. Chicago Fire II takes 13.6 shots per game, while Chattanooga FC takes 14.6.

First-half and second-half trends

Chicago Fire II leads at halftime in 41% of its games and scores 0.85 goals per game after halftime. Chattanooga FC leads at halftime in 48% and scores 1.07 after halftime.

When the teams score

Chicago Fire II's most productive scoring window is minutes 31-45+ (13 goals). For Chattanooga FC, it is minutes 31-45+ (12 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

MLS Next Pro games average 3.33 goals. Both teams score in 63% of games, and 66% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

Before this game, 3 previous meetings were available. The record was 2 home wins, 1 draw and 0 away wins. Those games averaged 2.67 goals, with both teams scoring in 67% of them.

Before kickoff

1X2 odds

(-)
(-)
(-)

Pre-game profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

Chicago Fire IIChattanooga FC
1.81Goals scored / game2.04
Chicago Fire IIChattanooga FC
1.78Goals allowed / game1.44
Chicago Fire IIChattanooga FC
52%Average possession46%
Chicago Fire IIChattanooga FC
5.04Shots on target / game6
Chicago Fire IIChattanooga FC

Team statswho is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

13.59Shots per game14.59
Chicago Fire IIChattanooga FC
5.04Shots on target6
Chicago Fire IIChattanooga FC
13.4%Shot conversion14%
Chicago Fire IIChattanooga FC
52%Possession46%
Chicago Fire IIChattanooga FC
1.67xG for1.74
Chicago Fire IIChattanooga FC
1.52xG against1.43
Chicago Fire IIChattanooga FC

Shooting quality

Chicago Fire II: Efficient finishingChattanooga FC: Counter-attacking
Chicago Fire IIChattanooga FC
Accuracy (shots on target)37%41%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.360.34

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

Chattanooga FC is 233% better for: last-5 form.

0.6 pts / game - Chicago Fire II · 2 pts / game - Chattanooga FC

Chicago Fire II
LWLLL
Season result split
37% W19% D44% L
Season (W-D-L)
10-5-12
1.30 pts / game · goal difference +1
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-0-4
0.60 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
8-1-4
Last 5 at home
3-0-2
WLWWL
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 2.6xG: 1.95Opponent xG: 1.67BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 100%
Chattanooga FC
DLWWW
Season result split
52% W26% D22% L
Season (W-D-L)
14-7-6
1.81 pts / game · goal difference +16
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-1-1
2.00 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
4-5-4
Last 5 away
2-2-1
DWDLW
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 2.8Goals conceded: 1.8xG: 2.16Opponent xG: 1.26BTTS: 100%Over 2.5: 100%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Chattanooga FC is 13% better for: goals scored per game.

1.81 goals / game - Chicago Fire II · 2.04 goals / game - Chattanooga FC

Chattanooga FC is 24% better for: goals allowed per game.

1.78 goals / game - Chicago Fire II · 1.44 goals / game - Chattanooga FC

Chicago Fire II scoring profile: very strong

Chicago Fire II scores in 78% of games (21 of 27 games), while Chattanooga FC keeps a clean sheet in 26% (7 of 27 games).

Chattanooga FC scoring profile: very strong

Chattanooga FC scores in 93% of games (25 of 27 games), while Chicago Fire II keeps a clean sheet in 19% (5 of 27 games).

49Goals scored (season)55
Chicago Fire IIChattanooga FC
48Goals conceded (season)39
Chicago Fire IIChattanooga FC
3.59Average goals per game3.48
Chicago Fire IIChattanooga FC
5Goals scored (last 5)14
Chicago Fire IIChattanooga FC
13Goals conceded (last 5)9
Chicago Fire IIChattanooga FC

How often they score at least...

78%1 goal93%
Chicago Fire IIChattanooga FC
52%2 goals56%
Chicago Fire IIChattanooga FC
26%3 goals30%
Chicago Fire IIChattanooga FC
11%4 goals22%
Chicago Fire IIChattanooga FC

How often they concede at least...

81%1 goal74%
Chicago Fire IIChattanooga FC
59%2 goals41%
Chicago Fire IIChattanooga FC
26%3 goals15%
Chicago Fire IIChattanooga FC
11%4 goals11%
Chicago Fire IIChattanooga FC

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

63%
League average

Goal patterns

26%BTTS at half-time26%
Chicago Fire IIChattanooga FC
15%BTTS in both halves7%
Chicago Fire IIChattanooga FC
41%Scored in both halves41%
Chicago Fire IIChattanooga FC

BTTS and goal count

63%Min. 3 goals and BTTS56%
Chicago Fire IIChattanooga FC
22%Min. 3 goals without BTTS7%
Chicago Fire IIChattanooga FC
60%BTTS - last 5100%
Chicago Fire IIChattanooga FC

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

85%Min. 1 goal before half-time81%
Chicago Fire IIChattanooga FC
52%Min. 2 goals before half-time41%
Chicago Fire IIChattanooga FC
22%Min. 3 goals before half-time19%
Chicago Fire IIChattanooga FC

2nd half

93%Min. 1 goal after half-time89%
Chicago Fire IIChattanooga FC
67%Min. 2 goals after half-time59%
Chicago Fire IIChattanooga FC
30%Min. 3 goals after half-time26%
Chicago Fire IIChattanooga FC

Game halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Chattanooga FC is 18% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.48 pts / game - Chicago Fire II · 1.74 pts / game - Chattanooga FC

Chicago Fire II - half-time state
41% leading26% draw33% trailing
Chattanooga FC - half-time state
48% leading30% draw22% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.48Points per game (1st half)1.74
Chicago Fire IIChattanooga FC
0.96Goals scored (1st half)0.96
Chicago Fire IIChattanooga FC
0.74Goals conceded (1st half)0.48
Chicago Fire IIChattanooga FC
1.7Average goals (1st half)1.44
Chicago Fire IIChattanooga FC
48%Clean sheet before half-time59%
Chicago Fire IIChattanooga FC
41%No goal before half-time33%
Chicago Fire IIChattanooga FC

After half-time (2nd half)

1.3Points per game (2nd half)1.56
Chicago Fire IIChattanooga FC
0.85Goals scored (2nd half)1.07
Chicago Fire IIChattanooga FC
1.04Goals conceded (2nd half)0.96
Chicago Fire IIChattanooga FC
1.89Average goals (2nd half)2.04
Chicago Fire IIChattanooga FC
30%Clean sheet after half-time44%
Chicago Fire IIChattanooga FC
41%No goal after half-time33%
Chicago Fire IIChattanooga FC

Chicago Fire II - second-half results

33% W30% D37% L
40
Half-time points
26
Half-time goals
+6
Goal difference (1st half)
35
Second-half points
-5
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.48
PPG before half-time
Lead holding90%

Leads at halftime in 41% of games and wins 37%. Usually protects a halftime lead through the final whistle.

Defense after halftime+0.3

Allows 0.3 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

Chattanooga FC - second-half results

44% W22% D33% L
47
Half-time points
26
Half-time goals
+13
Goal difference (1st half)
42
Second-half points
+3
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.74
PPG before half-time
Lead holding108%

Leads at halftime in 48% of games and wins 52%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime+0.5

Allows 0.5 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

Chicago Fire II - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game0.601.20
Goals scored / game0.20.8
Goals allowed / game1.21.4
Average goals per game1.42.2
1 goal100%100%
2 goals40%80%
3 goals0%40%
Clean sheet20%40%
No goal80%60%
Goal difference-5-3
Half-time: 20% leading - 0% draw - 80% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 0% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 1
Chattanooga FC - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.602.00
Goals scored / game0.82.0
Goals allowed / game0.61.2
Average goals per game1.43.2
1 goal100%100%
2 goals40%80%
3 goals0%60%
Clean sheet40%20%
No goal20%0%
Goal difference+1+4
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 20% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 4

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

Chicago Fire II
ScoredConceded
6
5
0-15
7
3
16-30
13
12
31-45
12
8
46-60
3
7
61-75
8
13
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (13 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (13). Late-goal balance (76-90): -5 - late phases are a weakness.

Chattanooga FC
ScoredConceded
8
4
0-15
6
6
16-30
12
3
31-45
11
8
46-60
10
9
61-75
8
9
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (12 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

3.54
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
1.6 : 1.9
Estimated goal split
home : away
106%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
67%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-24%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
73%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
2%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 50 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

Chicago Fire II

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.15
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.12
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-6.3 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.14
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
-0.26
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
95%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
125%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
-0.70
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.1
Late goals
16% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 12% come in the first quarter-hour.
16%

Chattanooga FC

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.31
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.29
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-4.9 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.30
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
-0.01
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
144%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
75%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
+0.19
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
15% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 15% come in the first quarter-hour.
15%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (MLS Next Pro).

Teams vs league

Chicago Fire IILigaChattanooga FC
Average goals per game 3.593.33 3.48
Both teams scored 67%63% 67%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 85%66% 63%
Clean sheets 19%21% 26%
Goal before half-time 85%76% 81%
Goal after half-time 93%85% 89%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.33
Average goals per game
63%
Both teams scored
66%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
21%
Clean sheets
1.91
Home goals / game
1.42
Away goals / game
+35%
Home attack advantage
+26%
Home defensive advantage
+20%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
76%
1 goal
45%
2 goals
18%
3 goals
5%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
85%
1 goal
58%
2 goals
28%
3 goals
10%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Record from Chicago Fire II's perspective: 2 wins, 1 draw and 0 losses against Chattanooga FC. Games average 2.67 goals, and both teams scored in 67% of them.

Chattanooga FC
2 : 2
Chicago Fire II
Chicago Fire II
2 : 1
Chattanooga FC
Chattanooga FC
0 : 1
Chicago Fire Premier FC II

FAQ

When do Chicago Fire II and Chattanooga FC play?

Chicago Fire II face Chattanooga FC on September 20, 2026 in MLS Next Pro at SeatGeek Stadium. The exact kick-off time in your timezone is shown at the top of the match page.

What is the head-to-head record between Chicago Fire II and Chattanooga FC?

In the last 3 head-to-head matches Chicago Fire II won 2, Chattanooga FC won 0 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 2.67 goals, with both teams scoring in 67% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Chicago Fire II vs Chattanooga FC?

Chicago Fire II score 1.81 goals per game on average and Chattanooga FC 2.04. The MLS Next Pro average is 3.33 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 66% of games. Both teams score in 67% of Chicago Fire II's matches and 67% of Chattanooga FC's.

What form are Chicago Fire II and Chattanooga FC in?

Over the last 5 games Chicago Fire II have a 1-0-4 record (0.60 points per game) and Chattanooga FC 3-1-1 (2.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Chicago Fire II vs Chattanooga FC?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.