United States - MLS Next ProSeatGeek StadiumData current as of 23 July 2026

Chicago Fire II vs Inter Miami II: match statistics

Chicago Fire II vs Inter Miami II: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Chicago Fire II play Inter Miami II in MLS Next Pro (United States). The match date is 14 June 2026 at 22:00. Venue: SeatGeek Stadium. Final score: 3:1.

Current form

Chicago Fire II: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match. Inter Miami II: 0-1-4, 0.20 points/match.

Goal statistics

Chicago Fire II scores 1.56 and concedes 1.56 goals per match. Inter Miami II scores 0.88 and concedes 2.56. League average: 3.22 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Chicago Fire II 67%, Inter Miami II 63%. Over 2.5: Chicago Fire II 83%, Inter Miami II 63%. League level: BTTS 61%, Over 2.5 65%.

xG, shots and style

Chicago Fire II has higher xG: 1.49 vs 1.34. Chicago Fire II: 12.4 shots per match, Inter Miami II: 10.8.

Match halves

Chicago Fire II: half-time lead 39%, second-half goals 0.67. Inter Miami II: half-time lead 19%, second-half goals 0.44.

Goals by minute

Chicago Fire II: 31-45+ (10 goals). Inter Miami II: 0-15 (3 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

MLS Next Pro: 3.22 goals per match, BTTS 61%, Over 2.5 65%.

Head-to-head

2 H2H matches: 1-1-0. Average goals 3.00, BTTS 100%.

Match description

Chicago Fire II possess a clear defensive edge and superior form: at home they concede on average 1.5 goals per game with xG against 1.48 and have a positive home goal differential of +1, while Inter Miami II concede 3.0 goals on average away with xG against 2.07 and carry an away goal differential of -11. Offensively the hosts score 1.67 goals per home game (xG 1.63) and record a 50% win rate at home, whereas the visitors score 1.17 goals away (xG 1.43) and have no away wins (0%). In their last five matches Chicago have scored 9 goals and average 1.2 points per game, while Inter have shipped 18 goals in their last five and have 0 points in that period. Additionally the hosts are more efficient in finishing chances – home shot conversion is 13% with an average of 3.17 shots on target, while Inter convert 10% despite 4.67 shots on target and have 0% clean sheets on the road. Given the gap in average goals conceded (1.5 vs 3.0), the visitors’ worse defensive xG (2.07 vs 1.48) and Inter’s poor recent form (5 straight defeats, 18 goals conceded), I forecast a home win.

Half-by-half

1 : 0
1st half
2 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

49Possession (%)51
Chicago Fire IIInter Miami II
15Shots7
Chicago Fire IIInter Miami II
4Shots on target4
Chicago Fire IIInter Miami II
1.61xG1.05
Chicago Fire IIInter Miami II
3Corners2
Chicago Fire IIInter Miami II
53Dangerous attacks44
Chicago Fire IIInter Miami II
10Fouls11
Chicago Fire IIInter Miami II
1Cards2
Chicago Fire IIInter Miami II

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Chicago Fire IIInter Miami II
1.56Goals scored / match0.88
Chicago Fire IIInter Miami II
1.56Goals conceded / match2.56
Chicago Fire IIInter Miami II
50%Average possession54%
Chicago Fire IIInter Miami II
4.11Shots on target / match4.56
Chicago Fire IIInter Miami II

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

12.39Shots per match10.81
Chicago Fire IIInter Miami II
4.11Shots on target4.56
Chicago Fire IIInter Miami II
12.6%Shot conversion8.1%
Chicago Fire IIInter Miami II
50%Possession54%
Chicago Fire IIInter Miami II
1.49xG for1.34
Chicago Fire IIInter Miami II
1.51xG against1.91
Chicago Fire IIInter Miami II

Shooting quality

Chicago Fire II: BalancedInter Miami II: Balanced
Chicago Fire IIInter Miami II
Accuracy (shots on target)33%42%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.380.19

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Chicago Fire II is 700% better for: last-5 form.

1.6 pts / match - Chicago Fire II · 0.2 pts / match - Inter Miami II

Chicago Fire II
WDDWL
Season result split
33% W28% R39% P
Season (W-D-L)
6-5-7
1.28 pts / match · goal difference 0
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-2-1
1.60 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
5-1-2
Last 5 at home
4-0-1
LWWWW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.2Goals conceded: 1.6xG: 1.39Opponent xG: 1.83BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 100%
Inter Miami II
LDLLL
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
0% W25% R75% P
Season (W-D-L)
0-4-12
0.25 pts / match · goal difference -27
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-1-4
0.20 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
0-2-8
Last 5 away
0-0-5
LLLLL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.4Goals conceded: 1.8xG: 1.22Opponent xG: 1.70BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 40%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Chicago Fire II is 77% better for: goals scored per match.

1.56 goals / match - Chicago Fire II · 0.88 goals / match - Inter Miami II

Chicago Fire II is 64% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.56 goals / match - Chicago Fire II · 2.56 goals / match - Inter Miami II

Chicago Fire II scoring profile: very strong

Chicago Fire II scores in 78% of matches (14 of 18 matches), while Inter Miami II keeps a clean sheet in 6% (1 of 16 matches).

Inter Miami II scoring profile: strong

Inter Miami II scores in 63% of matches (10 of 16 matches), while Chicago Fire II keeps a clean sheet in 22% (4 of 18 matches).

28Goals scored (season)14
Chicago Fire IIInter Miami II
28Goals conceded (season)41
Chicago Fire IIInter Miami II
3.11Average goals in match3.44
Chicago Fire IIInter Miami II
11Goals scored (last 5)2
Chicago Fire IIInter Miami II
8Goals conceded (last 5)9
Chicago Fire IIInter Miami II

How often they score at least...

78%1 goal63%
Chicago Fire IIInter Miami II
50%2 goals13%
Chicago Fire IIInter Miami II
22%3 goals6%
Chicago Fire IIInter Miami II
6%4 goals6%
Chicago Fire IIInter Miami II

How often they concede at least...

78%1 goal94%
Chicago Fire IIInter Miami II
56%2 goals69%
Chicago Fire IIInter Miami II
22%3 goals56%
Chicago Fire IIInter Miami II
0%4 goals31%
Chicago Fire IIInter Miami II

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

61%
League average

Goal patterns

28%BTTS at half-time19%
Chicago Fire IIInter Miami II
17%BTTS in both halves13%
Chicago Fire IIInter Miami II
39%Scored in both halves13%
Chicago Fire IIInter Miami II

BTTS and goal count

61%Min. 3 goals and BTTS50%
Chicago Fire IIInter Miami II
22%Min. 3 goals without BTTS13%
Chicago Fire IIInter Miami II
80%BTTS - last 540%
Chicago Fire IIInter Miami II

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

78%Min. 1 goal before half-time81%
Chicago Fire IIInter Miami II
50%Min. 2 goals before half-time31%
Chicago Fire IIInter Miami II
17%Min. 3 goals before half-time19%
Chicago Fire IIInter Miami II

2nd half

89%Min. 1 goal after half-time88%
Chicago Fire IIInter Miami II
61%Min. 2 goals after half-time69%
Chicago Fire IIInter Miami II
17%Min. 3 goals after half-time25%
Chicago Fire IIInter Miami II

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Chicago Fire II is 77% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.56 pts / match - Chicago Fire II · 0.88 pts / match - Inter Miami II

Chicago Fire II - half-time state
39% leading39% draw22% trailing
Inter Miami II - half-time state
19% leading31% draw50% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.56Points per match (1st half)0.88
Chicago Fire IIInter Miami II
0.89Goals scored (1st half)0.44
Chicago Fire IIInter Miami II
0.56Goals conceded (1st half)1
Chicago Fire IIInter Miami II
1.44Average goals (1st half)1.44
Chicago Fire IIInter Miami II
56%Clean sheet before half-time31%
Chicago Fire IIInter Miami II
39%No goal before half-time69%
Chicago Fire IIInter Miami II

After half-time (2nd half)

1.11Points per match (2nd half)0.31
Chicago Fire IIInter Miami II
0.67Goals scored (2nd half)0.44
Chicago Fire IIInter Miami II
1Goals conceded (2nd half)1.56
Chicago Fire IIInter Miami II
1.67Average goals (2nd half)2
Chicago Fire IIInter Miami II
22%Clean sheet after half-time13%
Chicago Fire IIInter Miami II
44%No goal after half-time56%
Chicago Fire IIInter Miami II

Chicago Fire II - second-half results

22% W44% R33% P
28
Half-time points
16
Half-time goals
+6
Goal difference (1st half)
20
Second-half points
-6
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.56
PPG before half-time
Lead holding85%

Leads at half-time in 39% of matches and wins 33%. Usually protects the lead until full-time.

Defence after half-time+0.4

Concedes 0.4 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Inter Miami II - second-half results

0% W31% R69% P
14
Half-time points
7
Half-time goals
-9
Goal difference (1st half)
5
Second-half points
-18
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.88
PPG before half-time
Lead holding0%

Leads at half-time in 19% of matches and wins 0%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.

Defence after half-time+0.6

Concedes 0.6 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Chicago Fire II - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.401.60
Goals scored / match1.21.0
Goals conceded / match0.80.8
Average goals in match2.01.8
1 goal100%100%
2 goals80%60%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet40%20%
No goal20%20%
Goal difference+2+1
Half-time: 40% leading - 20% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 40% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 6
Inter Miami II - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.400.40
Goals scored / match0.00.4
Goals conceded / match0.61.2
Average goals in match0.61.6
1 goal60%60%
2 goals0%40%
3 goals0%40%
Clean sheet40%40%
No goal100%60%
Goal difference-3-4
Half-time: 0% leading - 40% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 40% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 0

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Chicago Fire II
ScoredConceded
4
4
0-15
2
1
16-30
10
5
31-45
7
8
46-60
2
4
61-75
3
6
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (10 goli). Concedes most in 46-60 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.

Inter Miami II
ScoredConceded
3
3
0-15
1
5
16-30
3
8
31-45
2
11
46-60
2
8
61-75
3
6
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (3 goli). Concedes most in 46-60 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

3.28
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
2.1 : 1.2
Estimated goal split
home : away
102%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
65%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-8%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
49%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
8%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 13 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Chicago Fire II

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.02
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.02
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-4.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.07
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.05
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
86%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
111%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.32
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.2
Late goals
11% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 14% come in the first quarter-hour.
11%

Inter Miami II

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.57
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-1.11
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-1.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.46
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.65
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
62%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
141%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.05
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
0.0
Late goals
21% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 21% come in the first quarter-hour.
21%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (MLS Next Pro).

Teams vs league

Chicago Fire IILigaInter Miami II
Average goals in match 3.113.22 3.44
Both teams scored 67%61% 63%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 83%65% 63%
Clean sheets 22%22% 6%
Goal before half-time 78%75% 81%
Goal after half-time 89%84% 88%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.22
Average goals per match
61%
Both teams scored
65%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
22%
Clean sheets
1.81
Home goals / match
1.41
Away goals / match
+28%
Home attack advantage
+22%
Home defence advantage
+20%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
75%
1 goal
42%
2 goals
18%
3 goals
4%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
84%
1 goal
59%
2 goals
27%
3 goals
9%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (2): Chicago Fire II 1 - 1 - 0 Inter Miami II. Average goals 3.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.

Inter Miami II
1 : 1
Chicago Fire II
Club Internacional de Fútbol Miami II
1 : 3
Chicago Fire Premier FC II

FAQ

What was the result of Chicago Fire II vs Inter Miami II?

The MLS Next Pro match finished Chicago Fire II 3:1 Inter Miami II. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Chicago Fire II and Inter Miami II?

In the last 2 head-to-head matches Chicago Fire II won 1, Inter Miami II won 0 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 3.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Chicago Fire II vs Inter Miami II?

Chicago Fire II score 1.56 goals per game on average and Inter Miami II 0.88. The MLS Next Pro average is 3.22 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 65% of games. Both teams score in 67% of Chicago Fire II's matches and 63% of Inter Miami II's.

What form are Chicago Fire II and Inter Miami II in?

Over the last 5 games Chicago Fire II have a 2-2-1 record (1.60 points per game) and Inter Miami II 0-1-4 (0.20 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Chicago Fire II vs Inter Miami II?

The statistical background for Chicago Fire II vs Inter Miami II — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.