Chicago Fire II vs Inter Miami II: match statistics
Chicago Fire II vs Inter Miami II: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Chicago Fire II played against Inter Miami II in MLS Next Pro (United States). The game was played on August 23, 2026. Venue: SeatGeek Stadium. Final score: 3:1.
Recent form
Chicago Fire II has 3 wins, 0 draws and 2 losses over its last five games, averaging 1.80 points per game. Inter Miami II has 2 wins, 0 draws and 3 losses, with 1.20 points per game.
Scoring records
Chicago Fire II scores 1.96 goals per game and allows 1.61. Inter Miami II scores 0.91 and allows 2.41. Games in this league average 3.28 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 70% of Chicago Fire II's games and 55% of Inter Miami II's. The Over 2.5 rates are 83% and 59%, compared with league averages of 61% for BTTS and 66% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Chicago Fire II has the higher season xG average, 1.62 to 1.40 per game. Chicago Fire II takes 13.2 shots per game, while Inter Miami II takes 11.8.
First-half and second-half trends
Chicago Fire II leads at halftime in 43% of its games and scores 0.87 goals per game after halftime. Inter Miami II leads at halftime in 18% and scores 0.41 after halftime.
When the teams score
Chicago Fire II's most productive scoring window is minutes 31-45+ (13 goals). For Inter Miami II, it is minutes 0-15 (4 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
MLS Next Pro games average 3.28 goals. Both teams score in 61% of games, and 66% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, 3 previous meetings were available. The record was 2 home wins, 1 draw and 0 away wins. Those games averaged 3.33 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Chicago Fire II win 64% of their home matches, scoring an average of 2.45 goals per game, while Inter Miami II are yet to win away from home and lose as many as 83% of such matches. The hosts are in strong attacking form, having scored 17 goals in their last five games, whereas the visitors have managed just 2 goals over the same period and suffered 4 defeats. Miami II’s away defense concedes an average of 2.75 goals, has kept no clean sheets, and allows an average xG against of 1.93. At home, Chicago create chances worth an average of 1.79 xG and register 5 shots on target per match, giving them a clear advantage against such a vulnerable defense. The draw risk is also reduced by the fact that Inter Miami II fail to score in 50% of their away matches, compared with just 18% for Chicago Fire II.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
The BTTS - No scenario is slightly more likely, primarily due to Inter Miami II’s poor current scoring form: the team has scored just 2 goals in its last 5 matches, averaging 0.4 per game, while BTTS occurred in only 20% of those fixtures. The visitors have failed to score in 50% of their season matches, whereas Chicago Fire II have kept a clean sheet in just 11%, which still leaves room for an away goal. Chicago are, however, in excellent attacking form, scoring 17 goals in their last five appearances at an average of 3.4 per game, so the most realistic No Goal outcome is a home win to nil. Inter’s latest xG is 1.64, while Chicago have conceded an average of 1.8 goals in their last five matches, but the visitors’ actual goal output clearly does not confirm this potential. The teams’ season BTTS rates—56% for Chicago and 50% for Miami—are below the league average of 61%, and the visitors’ very poor scoring run shifts the prediction towards BTTS - No.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
The strongest signal is Over 1.5 goals, as at least 2 goals were scored in 78% of Chicago Fire II matches and 83% of Inter Miami II fixtures. Inter Miami II have kept no clean sheets, concede an average of 2.75 goals per match, and have a high average xG against of 1.93. Chicago averaged 3.4 goals scored across their last five appearances and created an average of 2.08 xG, which clearly strengthens the case for at least two goals. The visitors have been offensively weak, averaging 0.4 goals in their last five matches, but Chicago have conceded an average of 1.8 goals during this period, so Inter’s contribution to the scoreline remains realistic. The 2.5 line offers a moderate edge towards the Over, while Over 1.5 is clearly the safer option with a projected 2.90 goals.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Chicago Fire II have clearly improved their form, winning 3 of their last 5 matches and averaging 3.4 goals, while Inter Miami II have lost 4 of their last 5 and scored just 0.4 goals per match. The hosts held a lead at the break in 60% of their last five matches, averaging 1.8 goals before half-time, whereas the visitors failed to lead at the break on every occasion and scored only 0.2 goals in the first half. Chicago’s advantage should increase after the interval, as they have averaged 1.6 second-half goals in their last five matches, compared with Inter’s 0.2. The visitors’ season-long defensive record also provides a strong argument in favor of the hosts, with Inter conceding an average of 2.75 goals per match and keeping no clean sheets. The most likely scenario is therefore Chicago Fire II leading at half-time and maintaining their victory through to the end of the match, corresponding to the HT/FT outcome 1/1.
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Chicago Fire II | Inter Miami II | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 37% | 38% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.40 | 0.20 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Chicago Fire II is 50% better for: last-5 form.
1.8 pts / game - Chicago Fire II · 1.2 pts / game - Inter Miami II
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Chicago Fire II is 115% better for: goals scored per game.
1.96 goals / game - Chicago Fire II · 0.91 goals / game - Inter Miami II
Chicago Fire II is 50% better for: goals allowed per game.
1.61 goals / game - Chicago Fire II · 2.41 goals / game - Inter Miami II
Chicago Fire II scores in 83% of games (19 of 23 meczów), while Inter Miami II keeps a clean sheet in 5% (1 of 22 meczów).
Inter Miami II scores in 55% of games (12 of 22 meczów), while Chicago Fire II keeps a clean sheet in 22% (5 of 23 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Chicago Fire II
Over / Under - Inter Miami II
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Chicago Fire II is 87% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.61 pts / game - Chicago Fire II · 0.86 pts / game - Inter Miami II
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Chicago Fire II - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 43% of games and wins 39%. Usually protects a halftime lead through the final whistle.
Allows 0.2 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
Inter Miami II - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 18% of games and wins 9%. Sometimes gives up a halftime lead.
Allows 0.4 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.80 | 2.40 |
| Goals scored / game | 1.8 | 1.6 |
| Goals allowed / game | 1.2 | 0.6 |
| Average goals per game | 3.0 | 2.2 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 80% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 60% | 60% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 60% |
| No goal | 20% | 0% |
| Goal difference | +3 | +5 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.00 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.8 | 0.4 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.8 | 0.8 |
| Average goals per game | 1.6 | 1.2 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 20% | 40% |
| No goal | 60% | 60% |
| Goal difference | 0 | -2 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (13 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (4 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (12). Late-goal balance (76-90): -6 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Chicago Fire II
Inter Miami II
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (MLS Next Pro).
Teams vs league
| Chicago Fire II | Liga | Inter Miami II | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▲ 3.57 | 3.28 | • 3.32 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 70% | 61% | ▼ 55% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 83% | 66% | ▼ 59% |
| Clean sheets | • 22% | 21% | ▼ 5% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 83% | 76% | ▲ 82% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 91% | 84% | ▲ 86% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
- Chicago Fire IIGoalBrody Williams
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Record from Chicago Fire II's perspective: 2 wins, 1 draw and 0 losses against Inter Miami II. Games average 3.33 goals, and both teams scored in 100% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Chicago Fire II vs Inter Miami II?
The MLS Next Pro match finished Chicago Fire II 3:1 Inter Miami II. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Chicago Fire II and Inter Miami II?
In the last 3 head-to-head matches Chicago Fire II won 2, Inter Miami II won 0 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 3.33 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Chicago Fire II vs Inter Miami II?
Chicago Fire II score 1.96 goals per game on average and Inter Miami II 0.91. The MLS Next Pro average is 3.28 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 66% of games. Both teams score in 70% of Chicago Fire II's matches and 55% of Inter Miami II's.
What form are Chicago Fire II and Inter Miami II in?
Over the last 5 games Chicago Fire II have a 3-0-2 record (1.80 points per game) and Inter Miami II 2-0-3 (1.20 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Chicago Fire II vs Inter Miami II?
The statistical background for Chicago Fire II vs Inter Miami II — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.