Chicago Fire vs Atlanta United FC: match statistics
Chicago Fire vs Atlanta United FC: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Chicago Fire played against Atlanta United FC in MLS (United States). The game was played on April 12, 2026. Final score: 1:0.
Recent form
Chicago Fire has 3 wins, 1 draw and 1 loss over its last five games, averaging 2.00 points per game. Atlanta United FC has 1 win, 1 draw and 3 losses, with 0.80 points per game.
Scoring records
Chicago Fire scores 1.33 goals per game and allows 0.83. Atlanta United FC scores 1.00 and allows 1.83. Games in this league average 3.08 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 50% of Chicago Fire's games and 50% of Atlanta United FC's. The Over 2.5 rates are 67% and 50%, compared with league averages of 55% for BTTS and 63% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Chicago Fire has the higher season xG average, 1.32 to 1.06 per game. Chicago Fire takes 11.2 shots per game, while Atlanta United FC takes 9.3.
First-half and second-half trends
Chicago Fire leads at halftime in 50% of its games and scores 0.67 goals per game after halftime. Atlanta United FC leads at halftime in 17% and scores 0.67 after halftime.
When the teams score
Chicago Fire's most productive scoring window is minutes 76-90+ (3 goals). For Atlanta United FC, it is minutes 46-60 (2 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
MLS games average 3.08 goals. Both teams score in 55% of games, and 63% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
There is not enough head-to-head history for a meaningful comparison.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Chicago Fire have a clear home advantage: at home they average 1.67 goals scored and 0.67 conceded per game, with an average xG of 1.57 and 5.33 shots on target. Atlanta United are almost barren away — 0.0 goals scored and 2.0 conceded on average per away match, xG 0.86, just 2 shots on target and 100% of matches without a goal (FTS 100%). In the last 5 fixtures Chicago scored 7 goals and hold a 3-1-1 record (PPG 2.0), while Atlanta have 1 win in their last 5 and PPG 0.8, conceding 9 goals in that period. Additionally, hosts have 67% wins and 67% clean sheets at home, whereas visitors have 0% wins and 0% clean sheets on the road; the superiority in shot conversion (12% vs 0%) and higher xG strongly favor Chicago.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Analysis indicates BTTS - Yes: Chicago has a season BTTS rate of 75% and at home averages 1.5 goals scored while conceding 1.75 per match, whereas Atlanta concedes 2.0 goals on the road and has not recorded a clean sheet away (0%), increasing the likelihood of a home goal. Atlanta has 0.0 goals on the road for the season, but in the last 5 matches scored 6 goals (1.2 avg) and has BTTS of 60% in that span, while Chicago had BTTS of 40% in their last 5 and conceded only 3 goals (0.6 avg), which is a mixed signal but shows Atlanta can score. Chicago creates more chances: attacking xG 1.17 vs Atlanta 0.86, on average 10 vs 8 shots and 4.0 vs 2.0 shots on target, increasing the probability that the home side will convert at least one opportunity. Atlanta’s poor defense (11 goals conceded this season and 2.0 conceded on the road) and the lack of away clean sheets (0%) argue that the opponent will concede; the league records BTTS 53%, which further supports the both-teams-to-score scenario. Considering Chicago’s 75% BTTS, Atlanta’s 0% away clean sheets, Atlanta’s 60% BTTS in the last 5, and Chicago’s advantage in xG and shots, I assign 68% to 'yes' and 32% to 'no'.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
I estimated expected goals at 1.33 for Chicago and 1.07 for Atlanta (total 2.40). Offensive xG are 1.17 for Chicago and 0.86 for Atlanta, and over the last 5 matches xG rose to 1.40 and 1.09 respectively, supporting a higher home potential. Chicago scored 7 goals in the last 5 matches (1.4) and conceded 3 (0.6), while Atlanta has 6 scored and 9 conceded in the last 5 (1.2/1.8); shot stats 10/4 vs 8/2 indicate Chicago’s advantage. With an expected total of 2.40 the Poisson model gives P(Over1.5)≈69%, P(Over2.5)≈43% and P(Over3.5)≈22%; additionally seasonal Over1.5 rates are 75% for Chicago and 100% for Atlanta, which further supports Over 1.5 as the best line to play.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
The most likely scenario is X/1 (draw at half-time, Chicago win at full-time) with a probability of 24%. In Chicago’s last 5 matches they were level at the break in 60% of cases (3 of 5), and they also won 60% of their matches (3 of 5), which suggests frequent turnarounds after a draw at the break. The home side shows superior offensive metrics: xG 1.17 versus Atlanta’s 0.86, on average 4 shots on target vs 2 and a conversion rate of 15% vs 0%, and they have scored 2 goals in minutes 46–60 and 2 goals in minutes 61–75 (4 second-half goals in total), which increases the chance of scoring after the break. Atlanta’s away season average goals is 0.0 and they have only a 20% win rate in their last 5 matches, so the visitors rarely produce a turnaround, hence X/1 as the strongest signal (24%) with 1/1 as the main alternative (22%).
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Chicago Fire | Atlanta United FC | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 39% | 36% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.11 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.31 | 0.30 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Chicago Fire is 150% better for: last-5 form.
2 pts / game - Chicago Fire · 0.8 pts / game - Atlanta United FC
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Chicago Fire is 33% better for: goals scored per game.
1.33 goals / game - Chicago Fire · 1 goals / game - Atlanta United FC
Chicago Fire is 120% better for: goals allowed per game.
0.83 goals / game - Chicago Fire · 1.83 goals / game - Atlanta United FC
Chicago Fire scores in 83% of games (5 of 6 meczów), while Atlanta United FC keeps a clean sheet in 17% (1 of 6 meczów).
Atlanta United FC scores in 50% of games (3 of 6 meczów), while Chicago Fire keeps a clean sheet in 50% (3 of 6 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Chicago Fire
Over / Under - Atlanta United FC
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Chicago Fire is 100% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
2 pts / game - Chicago Fire · 1 pts / game - Atlanta United FC
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Chicago Fire - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 50% of games and wins 50%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.5 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
Atlanta United FC - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 17% of games and wins 17%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.5 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.80 | 1.60 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.6 | 0.8 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.2 | 0.4 |
| Average goals per game | 0.8 | 1.2 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 80% |
| No goal | 40% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +2 | +2 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.00 | 1.40 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.4 | 0.8 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.8 | 1.0 |
| Average goals per game | 1.2 | 1.8 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 40% |
| No goal | 60% | 40% |
| Goal difference | -2 | -1 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (3 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (2 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Chicago Fire
Atlanta United FC
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (MLS).
Teams vs league
| Chicago Fire | Liga | Atlanta United FC | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▼ 2.17 | 3.08 | ▼ 2.83 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 50% | 55% | ▼ 50% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 67% | 63% | ▼ 50% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 50% | 26% | ▼ 17% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 67% | 73% | ▼ 50% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 67% | 82% | • 83% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Referee context
See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.
FAQ
What was the result of Chicago Fire vs Atlanta United FC?
The MLS match finished Chicago Fire 1:0 Atlanta United FC. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Chicago Fire vs Atlanta United FC?
Chicago Fire score 1.33 goals per game on average and Atlanta United FC 1.00. The MLS average is 3.08 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 63% of games. Both teams score in 50% of Chicago Fire's matches and 50% of Atlanta United FC's.
What form are Chicago Fire and Atlanta United FC in?
Over the last 5 games Chicago Fire have a 3-1-1 record (2.00 points per game) and Atlanta United FC 1-1-3 (0.80 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Chicago Fire vs Atlanta United FC?
The statistical background for Chicago Fire vs Atlanta United FC — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.


