United States - MLSData current as of September 01, 2026

Chicago Fire vs Atlanta United FC: match statistics

Chicago Fire vs Atlanta United FC: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

Chicago Fire played against Atlanta United FC in MLS (United States). The game was played on April 12, 2026. Final score: 1:0.

Recent form

Chicago Fire has 3 wins, 1 draw and 1 loss over its last five games, averaging 2.00 points per game. Atlanta United FC has 1 win, 1 draw and 3 losses, with 0.80 points per game.

Scoring records

Chicago Fire scores 1.33 goals per game and allows 0.83. Atlanta United FC scores 1.00 and allows 1.83. Games in this league average 3.08 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 50% of Chicago Fire's games and 50% of Atlanta United FC's. The Over 2.5 rates are 67% and 50%, compared with league averages of 55% for BTTS and 63% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

Chicago Fire has the higher season xG average, 1.32 to 1.06 per game. Chicago Fire takes 11.2 shots per game, while Atlanta United FC takes 9.3.

First-half and second-half trends

Chicago Fire leads at halftime in 50% of its games and scores 0.67 goals per game after halftime. Atlanta United FC leads at halftime in 17% and scores 0.67 after halftime.

When the teams score

Chicago Fire's most productive scoring window is minutes 76-90+ (3 goals). For Atlanta United FC, it is minutes 46-60 (2 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

MLS games average 3.08 goals. Both teams score in 55% of games, and 63% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

There is not enough head-to-head history for a meaningful comparison.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Chicago Fire have a clear home advantage: at home they average 1.67 goals scored and 0.67 conceded per game, with an average xG of 1.57 and 5.33 shots on target. Atlanta United are almost barren away — 0.0 goals scored and 2.0 conceded on average per away match, xG 0.86, just 2 shots on target and 100% of matches without a goal (FTS 100%). In the last 5 fixtures Chicago scored 7 goals and hold a 3-1-1 record (PPG 2.0), while Atlanta have 1 win in their last 5 and PPG 0.8, conceding 9 goals in that period. Additionally, hosts have 67% wins and 67% clean sheets at home, whereas visitors have 0% wins and 0% clean sheets on the road; the superiority in shot conversion (12% vs 0%) and higher xG strongly favor Chicago.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

Analysis indicates BTTS - Yes: Chicago has a season BTTS rate of 75% and at home averages 1.5 goals scored while conceding 1.75 per match, whereas Atlanta concedes 2.0 goals on the road and has not recorded a clean sheet away (0%), increasing the likelihood of a home goal. Atlanta has 0.0 goals on the road for the season, but in the last 5 matches scored 6 goals (1.2 avg) and has BTTS of 60% in that span, while Chicago had BTTS of 40% in their last 5 and conceded only 3 goals (0.6 avg), which is a mixed signal but shows Atlanta can score. Chicago creates more chances: attacking xG 1.17 vs Atlanta 0.86, on average 10 vs 8 shots and 4.0 vs 2.0 shots on target, increasing the probability that the home side will convert at least one opportunity. Atlanta’s poor defense (11 goals conceded this season and 2.0 conceded on the road) and the lack of away clean sheets (0%) argue that the opponent will concede; the league records BTTS 53%, which further supports the both-teams-to-score scenario. Considering Chicago’s 75% BTTS, Atlanta’s 0% away clean sheets, Atlanta’s 60% BTTS in the last 5, and Chicago’s advantage in xG and shots, I assign 68% to 'yes' and 32% to 'no'.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

I estimated expected goals at 1.33 for Chicago and 1.07 for Atlanta (total 2.40). Offensive xG are 1.17 for Chicago and 0.86 for Atlanta, and over the last 5 matches xG rose to 1.40 and 1.09 respectively, supporting a higher home potential. Chicago scored 7 goals in the last 5 matches (1.4) and conceded 3 (0.6), while Atlanta has 6 scored and 9 conceded in the last 5 (1.2/1.8); shot stats 10/4 vs 8/2 indicate Chicago’s advantage. With an expected total of 2.40 the Poisson model gives P(Over1.5)≈69%, P(Over2.5)≈43% and P(Over3.5)≈22%; additionally seasonal Over1.5 rates are 75% for Chicago and 100% for Atlanta, which further supports Over 1.5 as the best line to play.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

The most likely scenario is X/1 (draw at half-time, Chicago win at full-time) with a probability of 24%. In Chicago’s last 5 matches they were level at the break in 60% of cases (3 of 5), and they also won 60% of their matches (3 of 5), which suggests frequent turnarounds after a draw at the break. The home side shows superior offensive metrics: xG 1.17 versus Atlanta’s 0.86, on average 4 shots on target vs 2 and a conversion rate of 15% vs 0%, and they have scored 2 goals in minutes 46–60 and 2 goals in minutes 61–75 (4 second-half goals in total), which increases the chance of scoring after the break. Atlanta’s away season average goals is 0.0 and they have only a 20% win rate in their last 5 matches, so the visitors rarely produce a turnaround, hence X/1 as the strongest signal (24%) with 1/1 as the main alternative (22%).

View first-half and second-half statistics

Stats by half

1 : 0
First half
0 : 0
Second half

Game stats

45Possession (%)55
Chicago FireAtlanta United FC
18Shots20
Chicago FireAtlanta United FC
3Shots on target6
Chicago FireAtlanta United FC
1.72xG2.2
Chicago FireAtlanta United FC
6Corners11
Chicago FireAtlanta United FC
52Dangerous attacks73
Chicago FireAtlanta United FC
12Fouls5
Chicago FireAtlanta United FC
2Cards1
Chicago FireAtlanta United FC

Pre-game profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

Chicago FireAtlanta United FC
1.33Goals scored / game1
Chicago FireAtlanta United FC
0.83Goals allowed / game1.83
Chicago FireAtlanta United FC
52%Average possession56%
Chicago FireAtlanta United FC
4.33Shots on target / game3.33
Chicago FireAtlanta United FC

Team statswho is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

11.17Shots per game9.33
Chicago FireAtlanta United FC
4.33Shots on target3.33
Chicago FireAtlanta United FC
11.9%Shot conversion10.7%
Chicago FireAtlanta United FC
52%Possession56%
Chicago FireAtlanta United FC
1.32xG for1.06
Chicago FireAtlanta United FC
1.21xG against1.28
Chicago FireAtlanta United FC

Shooting quality

Chicago Fire: BalancedAtlanta United FC: Balanced
Chicago FireAtlanta United FC
Accuracy (shots on target)39%36%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.11
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.310.30

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

Chicago Fire is 150% better for: last-5 form.

2 pts / game - Chicago Fire · 0.8 pts / game - Atlanta United FC

Chicago Fire
WDLWW
Season result split
50% W17% R33% P
Season (W-D-L)
3-1-2
1.67 pts / game · goal difference +3
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-1-1
2.00 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
2-0-1
Last 5 at home
2-0-1
WLW
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 0.6xG: 1.40Opponent xG: 1.23BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 60%
Atlanta United FC
LLWDL
Season result split
17% W17% R67% P
Season (W-D-L)
1-1-4
0.67 pts / game · goal difference -5
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-1-3
0.80 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
0-0-2
Last 5 away
0-0-2
LL
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 1.8xG: 1.09Opponent xG: 1.29BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Chicago Fire is 33% better for: goals scored per game.

1.33 goals / game - Chicago Fire · 1 goals / game - Atlanta United FC

Chicago Fire is 120% better for: goals allowed per game.

0.83 goals / game - Chicago Fire · 1.83 goals / game - Atlanta United FC

Chicago Fire scoring profile: very strong

Chicago Fire scores in 83% of games (5 of 6 meczów), while Atlanta United FC keeps a clean sheet in 17% (1 of 6 meczów).

Atlanta United FC scoring profile: mixed

Atlanta United FC scores in 50% of games (3 of 6 meczów), while Chicago Fire keeps a clean sheet in 50% (3 of 6 meczów).

8Goals scored (season)6
Chicago FireAtlanta United FC
5Goals conceded (season)11
Chicago FireAtlanta United FC
2.17Average goals per game2.83
Chicago FireAtlanta United FC
7Goals scored (last 5)6
Chicago FireAtlanta United FC
3Goals conceded (last 5)9
Chicago FireAtlanta United FC

How often they score at least...

83%1 goal50%
Chicago FireAtlanta United FC
33%2 goals33%
Chicago FireAtlanta United FC
17%3 goals17%
Chicago FireAtlanta United FC
0%4 goals0%
Chicago FireAtlanta United FC

How often they concede at least...

50%1 goal83%
Chicago FireAtlanta United FC
33%2 goals67%
Chicago FireAtlanta United FC
0%3 goals33%
Chicago FireAtlanta United FC
0%4 goals0%
Chicago FireAtlanta United FC

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

55%
League average

Goal patterns

17%BTTS at half-time17%
Chicago FireAtlanta United FC
0%BTTS in both halves0%
Chicago FireAtlanta United FC
33%Scored in both halves33%
Chicago FireAtlanta United FC

BTTS and goal count

50%Min. 3 goals and BTTS50%
Chicago FireAtlanta United FC
17%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
Chicago FireAtlanta United FC
40%BTTS - last 560%
Chicago FireAtlanta United FC

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

67%Min. 1 goal before half-time50%
Chicago FireAtlanta United FC
17%Min. 2 goals before half-time17%
Chicago FireAtlanta United FC
0%Min. 3 goals before half-time17%
Chicago FireAtlanta United FC

2nd half

67%Min. 1 goal after half-time83%
Chicago FireAtlanta United FC
50%Min. 2 goals after half-time50%
Chicago FireAtlanta United FC
17%Min. 3 goals after half-time33%
Chicago FireAtlanta United FC

Game halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Chicago Fire is 100% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

2 pts / game - Chicago Fire · 1 pts / game - Atlanta United FC

Chicago Fire - half-time state
50% leading50% draw0% trailing
Atlanta United FC - half-time state
17% leading50% draw33% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

2Points per game (1st half)1
Chicago FireAtlanta United FC
0.67Goals scored (1st half)0.33
Chicago FireAtlanta United FC
0.17Goals conceded (1st half)0.67
Chicago FireAtlanta United FC
0.83Average goals (1st half)1
Chicago FireAtlanta United FC
83%Clean sheet before half-time67%
Chicago FireAtlanta United FC
33%No goal before half-time67%
Chicago FireAtlanta United FC

After half-time (2nd half)

1.33Points per game (2nd half)1.17
Chicago FireAtlanta United FC
0.67Goals scored (2nd half)0.67
Chicago FireAtlanta United FC
0.67Goals conceded (2nd half)1.17
Chicago FireAtlanta United FC
1.33Average goals (2nd half)1.83
Chicago FireAtlanta United FC
67%Clean sheet after half-time33%
Chicago FireAtlanta United FC
50%No goal after half-time50%
Chicago FireAtlanta United FC

Chicago Fire - second-half results

33% W33% R33% P
12
Half-time points
4
Half-time goals
+3
Goal difference (1st half)
8
Second-half points
0
Goal difference (2nd half)
2.00
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at halftime in 50% of games and wins 50%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime+0.5

Allows 0.5 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

Atlanta United FC - second-half results

33% W17% R50% P
6
Half-time points
2
Half-time goals
-2
Goal difference (1st half)
7
Second-half points
-3
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.00
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at halftime in 17% of games and wins 17%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime+0.5

Allows 0.5 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

Chicago Fire - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.801.60
Goals scored / game0.60.8
Goals allowed / game0.20.4
Average goals per game0.81.2
1 goal60%60%
2 goals20%40%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet80%80%
No goal40%40%
Goal difference+2+2
Half-time: 40% leading - 60% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 40% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 3
Atlanta United FC - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.001.40
Goals scored / game0.40.8
Goals allowed / game0.81.0
Average goals per game1.21.8
1 goal60%80%
2 goals20%40%
3 goals20%40%
Clean sheet60%40%
No goal60%40%
Goal difference-2-1
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 20% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 2

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

Chicago Fire
ScoredConceded
1
0
0-15
1
0
16-30
2
1
31-45
1
0
46-60
0
1
61-75
3
3
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (3 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

Atlanta United FC
ScoredConceded
0
0
0-15
1
3
16-30
1
1
31-45
2
2
46-60
2
1
61-75
0
4
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (2 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

2.50
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
1.6 : 0.9
Estimated goal split
home : away
81%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
50%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
42%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
9%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 11 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

Chicago Fire

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.11
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.39
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-2.9 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.01
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.38
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
69%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
72%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
+0.33
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
0.0
Late goals
38% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 13% come in the first quarter-hour.
38%

Atlanta United FC

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.22
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.61
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-0.1 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.06
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
-0.55
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
87%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
95%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
+0.13
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
0% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
0%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (MLS).

Teams vs league

Chicago FireLigaAtlanta United FC
Average goals per game 2.173.08 2.83
Both teams scored 50%55% 50%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 67%63% 50%
Clean sheets 50%26% 17%
Goal before half-time 67%73% 50%
Goal after half-time 67%82% 83%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.08
Average goals per game
55%
Both teams scored
63%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
26%
Clean sheets
1.93
Home goals / game
1.15
Away goals / game
+68%
Home attack advantage
+40%
Home defensive advantage
+26%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
73%
1 goal
39%
2 goals
21%
3 goals
6%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
82%
1 goal
53%
2 goals
20%
3 goals
9%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Atlanta United FCYellow cardTomás Jacob
  2. Chicago FireYellow cardPhilip Aksel Frigast Zinckernagel
  3. Chicago FireGoalMaren Haile-SelassieAssist: Jonathan Bamba
  4. Chicago FireYellow cardLeonardo José Caetano Barroso
  5. Atlanta United FCSubstitutionOn: Steven AlzateOff: Cooper Sanchez
  6. Atlanta United FCSubstitutionOn: Ajani FortuneOff: Matías Galarza Fonda

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Referee context

See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.

Drew FischerMatches officiated: 11
5.09Cards per match
0Penalties per match
1 / X / 255%Home wins18%Draws27%Away wins

FAQ

What was the result of Chicago Fire vs Atlanta United FC?

The MLS match finished Chicago Fire 1:0 Atlanta United FC. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Chicago Fire vs Atlanta United FC?

Chicago Fire score 1.33 goals per game on average and Atlanta United FC 1.00. The MLS average is 3.08 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 63% of games. Both teams score in 50% of Chicago Fire's matches and 50% of Atlanta United FC's.

What form are Chicago Fire and Atlanta United FC in?

Over the last 5 games Chicago Fire have a 3-1-1 record (2.00 points per game) and Atlanta United FC 1-1-3 (0.80 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Chicago Fire vs Atlanta United FC?

The statistical background for Chicago Fire vs Atlanta United FC — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.