South Africa - Premier Soccer LeagueData current as of 17 July 2026

Chippa United vs Polokwane City: match statistics

Chippa United crest
Chippa United
1 : 1half-time 1:0
Polokwane City crest
Polokwane City

Chippa United vs Polokwane City: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Chippa United play Polokwane City in Premier Soccer League (South Africa). The match date is 11 April 2026 at 20:00. Final score: 1:1.

Current form

Chippa United: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match. Polokwane City: 0-3-2, 0.60 points/match.

Goal statistics

Chippa United scores 0.80 and concedes 1.47 goals per match. Polokwane City scores 0.70 and concedes 0.70. League average: 2.02 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Chippa United 47%, Polokwane City 33%. Over 2.5: Chippa United 43%, Polokwane City 23%. League level: BTTS 39%, Over 2.5 30%.

xG, shots and style

Polokwane City has higher xG: 1.36 vs 1.10. Chippa United: 8.9 shots per match, Polokwane City: 11.8.

Match halves

Chippa United: half-time lead 27%, second-half goals 0.40. Polokwane City: half-time lead 30%, second-half goals 0.30.

Goals by minute

Chippa United: 31-45+ (10 goals). Polokwane City: 31-45+ (7 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Premier Soccer League: 2.02 goals per match, BTTS 39%, Over 2.5 30%.

Head-to-head

1 H2H matches: 0-0-1. Average goals 3.00, BTTS 100%.

Match description

Polokwane City holds a clear defensive and form advantage: the visitors concede just 0.64 goals per away game compared to Chippa’s 1.25 conceded at home, and Chippa have shipped 11 goals in their last 5 matches versus 4 conceded by Polokwane in the same period. The visitors also produce higher away xG per game (xG 1.29) than the hosts do at home (xG 1.14), despite Chippa having a slightly better average of shots on target (3.33 vs 2.91). Over the last 5 fixtures Polokwane are averaging 1.4 points per game (2 wins, 1 draw, 2 losses), while Chippa manage only 0.8 points (1 win, 1 draw, 3 losses), reflecting superior form for the visitors. Chippa can benefit from a higher shot conversion rate (10% vs 7%) and 50% of home games without conceding, but their negative home goal difference (-4) and greater defensive instability favor a Polokwane win.

Half-by-half

1 : 0
1st half
0 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

52Possession (%)48
Chippa UnitedPolokwane City
9Shots14
Chippa UnitedPolokwane City
2Shots on target4
Chippa UnitedPolokwane City
1.22xG1.72
Chippa UnitedPolokwane City
3Corners7
Chippa UnitedPolokwane City
69Dangerous attacks77
Chippa UnitedPolokwane City
8Fouls13
Chippa UnitedPolokwane City
1Cards2
Chippa UnitedPolokwane City

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Chippa UnitedPolokwane City
0.8Goals scored / match0.7
Chippa UnitedPolokwane City
1.47Goals conceded / match0.7
Chippa UnitedPolokwane City
49%Average possession44%
Chippa UnitedPolokwane City
2.7Shots on target / match2.97
Chippa UnitedPolokwane City

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

8.87Shots per match11.83
Chippa UnitedPolokwane City
2.7Shots on target2.97
Chippa UnitedPolokwane City
9%Shot conversion5.9%
Chippa UnitedPolokwane City
49%Possession44%
Chippa UnitedPolokwane City
1.1xG for1.36
Chippa UnitedPolokwane City
1.76xG against1.4
Chippa UnitedPolokwane City

Shooting quality

Chippa United: BalancedPolokwane City: Balanced
Chippa UnitedPolokwane City
Accuracy (shots on target)30%25%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.11
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.300.24

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Chippa United is 33% better for: last-5 form.

0.8 pts / match - Chippa United · 0.6 pts / match - Polokwane City

Chippa United
LLDLW
Season result split
20% W33% R47% P
Season (W-D-L)
6-10-14
0.93 pts / match · goal difference -20
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-1-3
0.80 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
4-5-6
Last 5 at home
1-1-3
LWDLL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.8Goals conceded: 2.2xG: 1.15Opponent xG: 1.99BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 40%
Polokwane City
LLDDD
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
30% W43% R27% P
Season (W-D-L)
9-13-8
1.33 pts / match · goal difference 0
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-3-2
0.60 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
5-5-5
Last 5 away
1-3-1
WDLDD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.2Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.07Opponent xG: 1.57BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 20%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Chippa United is 14% better for: goals scored per match.

0.8 goals / match - Chippa United · 0.7 goals / match - Polokwane City

Polokwane City is 110% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.47 goals / match - Chippa United · 0.7 goals / match - Polokwane City

Chippa United scoring profile: mixed

Chippa United scores in 63% of matches (19 of 30 matches), while Polokwane City keeps a clean sheet in 43% (13 of 30 matches).

Polokwane City scoring profile: mixed

Polokwane City scores in 50% of matches (15 of 30 matches), while Chippa United keeps a clean sheet in 33% (10 of 30 matches).

24Goals scored (season)21
Chippa UnitedPolokwane City
44Goals conceded (season)21
Chippa UnitedPolokwane City
2.27Average goals in match1.4
Chippa UnitedPolokwane City
4Goals scored (last 5)1
Chippa UnitedPolokwane City
11Goals conceded (last 5)5
Chippa UnitedPolokwane City

How often they score at least...

63%1 goal50%
Chippa UnitedPolokwane City
13%2 goals20%
Chippa UnitedPolokwane City
3%3 goals0%
Chippa UnitedPolokwane City
0%4 goals0%
Chippa UnitedPolokwane City

How often they concede at least...

67%1 goal57%
Chippa UnitedPolokwane City
43%2 goals10%
Chippa UnitedPolokwane City
23%3 goals3%
Chippa UnitedPolokwane City
10%4 goals0%
Chippa UnitedPolokwane City

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

39%
League average

Goal patterns

13%BTTS at half-time3%
Chippa UnitedPolokwane City
0%BTTS in both halves0%
Chippa UnitedPolokwane City
13%Scored in both halves10%
Chippa UnitedPolokwane City

BTTS and goal count

33%Min. 3 goals and BTTS20%
Chippa UnitedPolokwane City
10%Min. 3 goals without BTTS3%
Chippa UnitedPolokwane City
60%BTTS - last 520%
Chippa UnitedPolokwane City

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

63%Min. 1 goal before half-time50%
Chippa UnitedPolokwane City
27%Min. 2 goals before half-time10%
Chippa UnitedPolokwane City
10%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
Chippa UnitedPolokwane City

2nd half

73%Min. 1 goal after half-time57%
Chippa UnitedPolokwane City
37%Min. 2 goals after half-time20%
Chippa UnitedPolokwane City
17%Min. 3 goals after half-time3%
Chippa UnitedPolokwane City

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Polokwane City is 16% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.23 pts / match - Chippa United · 1.43 pts / match - Polokwane City

Chippa United - half-time state
27% leading43% draw30% trailing
Polokwane City - half-time state
30% leading53% draw17% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.23Points per match (1st half)1.43
Chippa UnitedPolokwane City
0.4Goals scored (1st half)0.4
Chippa UnitedPolokwane City
0.6Goals conceded (1st half)0.2
Chippa UnitedPolokwane City
1Average goals (1st half)0.6
Chippa UnitedPolokwane City
63%Clean sheet before half-time80%
Chippa UnitedPolokwane City
60%No goal before half-time67%
Chippa UnitedPolokwane City

After half-time (2nd half)

1.03Points per match (2nd half)1
Chippa UnitedPolokwane City
0.4Goals scored (2nd half)0.3
Chippa UnitedPolokwane City
0.87Goals conceded (2nd half)0.5
Chippa UnitedPolokwane City
1.27Average goals (2nd half)0.8
Chippa UnitedPolokwane City
50%Clean sheet after half-time60%
Chippa UnitedPolokwane City
63%No goal after half-time73%
Chippa UnitedPolokwane City

Chippa United - second-half results

23% W33% R43% P
37
Half-time points
12
Half-time goals
-6
Goal difference (1st half)
31
Second-half points
-14
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.23
PPG before half-time
Lead holding74%

Leads at half-time in 27% of matches and wins 20%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.

Defence after half-time+0.3

Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Polokwane City - second-half results

17% W50% R33% P
43
Half-time points
12
Half-time goals
+6
Goal difference (1st half)
30
Second-half points
-6
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.43
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 30% of matches and wins 30%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.3

Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Chippa United - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.201.00
Goals scored / match0.60.2
Goals conceded / match1.40.8
Average goals in match2.01.0
1 goal100%60%
2 goals60%20%
3 goals40%20%
Clean sheet40%60%
No goal40%80%
Goal difference-4-3
Half-time: 40% leading - 0% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 3
Polokwane City - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.200.40
Goals scored / match0.20.0
Goals conceded / match0.20.8
Average goals in match0.40.8
1 goal40%60%
2 goals0%20%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet80%40%
No goal80%100%
Goal difference0-4
Half-time: 20% leading - 60% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 40% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 1

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Chippa United
ScoredConceded
2
3
0-15
0
2
16-30
10
13
31-45
5
5
46-60
3
6
61-75
4
15
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (10 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (15). Late-goal balance (76-90): -11 - late phases are a weakness.

Polokwane City
ScoredConceded
1
2
0-15
4
2
16-30
7
2
31-45
1
6
46-60
3
2
61-75
5
7
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (7 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

1.83
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
0.8 : 1.1
Estimated goal split
home : away
91%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
40%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+63%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
32%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
19%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 5 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Chippa United

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.66
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.01
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+7.4 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.30
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.29
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
71%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
163%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.13
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
0.0
Late goals
17% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 8% come in the first quarter-hour.
17%

Polokwane City

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.04
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.04
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-5.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.66
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.70
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
78%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
62%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.73
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.1
Late goals
24% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 5% come in the first quarter-hour.
24%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Premier Soccer League).

Teams vs league

Chippa UnitedLigaPolokwane City
Average goals in match 2.272.02 1.40
Both teams scored 47%39% 33%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 43%30% 23%
Clean sheets 33%37% 43%
Goal before half-time 63%60% 50%
Goal after half-time 73%70% 57%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.02
Average goals per match
39%
Both teams scored
30%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
37%
Clean sheets
1.13
Home goals / match
0.90
Away goals / match
+26%
Home attack advantage
+20%
Home defence advantage
+14%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
60%
1 goal
24%
2 goals
5%
3 goals
2%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
70%
1 goal
29%
2 goals
9%
3 goals
2%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Chippa United 0 - 0 - 1 Polokwane City. Average goals 3.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.

Polokwane City FC
2 : 1
Chippa United FC

FAQ

What was the result of Chippa United vs Polokwane City?

The Premier Soccer League match finished Chippa United 1:1 Polokwane City. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Chippa United vs Polokwane City?

Chippa United score 0.80 goals per game on average and Polokwane City 0.70. The Premier Soccer League average is 2.02 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 30% of games. Both teams score in 47% of Chippa United's matches and 33% of Polokwane City's.

What form are Chippa United and Polokwane City in?

Over the last 5 games Chippa United have a 1-1-3 record (0.80 points per game) and Polokwane City 0-3-2 (0.60 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Chippa United vs Polokwane City?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.