Club Brugge vs RAAL La Louvière: match statistics
Club Brugge is the clear favorite for this encounter, sitting in 2nd place with an impressive record of 78% wins at home. The hosts exhibit dominant home form with 8 victories in their last 9 games before their own crowd, averaging 1.89 goals while conceding just 1 goal per match. RAAL La Louvière ranks 13th with disastrous away form – a mere 10% away wins and a streak of 5 matches without a victory. The gap in quality is distinct: Club Brugge dominates possession (66% vs 32%), generates significantly more chances (18.22 vs 8.6 shots per match), and boasts a superior Expected Goals metric (1.99 xG vs 0.96 xG). Considering the hosts' advantage across all statistical aspects and the visitors' poor disposition, a Club Brugge victory is the most likely scenario.
Club Brugge vs RAAL La Louvière: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Club Brugge played against RAAL La Louvière in Pro League (Belgium). The game was played on January 16, 2026. Final score: 2:3.
Recent form
Club Brugge has 3 wins, 0 draws and 2 losses over its last five games, averaging 1.80 points per game. RAAL La Louvière has 0 wins, 3 draws and 2 losses, with 0.60 points per game.
Scoring records
Club Brugge scores 1.80 goals per game and allows 1.10. RAAL La Louvière scores 0.75 and allows 1.05. Games in this league average 2.53 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 50% of Club Brugge's games and 45% of RAAL La Louvière's. The Over 2.5 rates are 45% and 40%, compared with league averages of 55% for BTTS and 44% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Club Brugge has the higher season xG average, 1.87 to 1.14 per game. Club Brugge takes 16.7 shots per game, while RAAL La Louvière takes 9.8.
First-half and second-half trends
Club Brugge leads at halftime in 25% of its games and scores 1.20 goals per game after halftime. RAAL La Louvière leads at halftime in 20% and scores 0.35 after halftime.
When the teams score
Club Brugge's most productive scoring window is minutes 76-90+ (11 goals). For RAAL La Louvière, it is minutes 16-30 (5 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Pro League games average 2.53 goals. Both teams score in 55% of games, and 44% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 0 home wins, 0 draws and 1 away win. Those games averaged 1.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Club Brugge is the clear favorite for this encounter, sitting in 2nd place with an impressive record of 78% wins at home. The hosts exhibit dominant home form with 8 victories in their last 9 games before their own crowd, averaging 1.89 goals while conceding just 1 goal per match. RAAL La Louvière ranks 13th with disastrous away form – a mere 10% away wins and a streak of 5 matches without a victory. The gap in quality is distinct: Club Brugge dominates possession (66% vs 32%), generates significantly more chances (18.22 vs 8.6 shots per match), and boasts a superior Expected Goals metric (1.99 xG vs 0.96 xG). Considering the hosts' advantage across all statistical aspects and the visitors' poor disposition, a Club Brugge victory is the most likely scenario.
View the statistical overviewStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Club Brugge | RAAL La Louvière | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 31% | 29% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.11 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.34 | 0.27 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Club Brugge is 200% better for: last-5 form.
1.8 pts / game - Club Brugge · 0.6 pts / game - RAAL La Louvière
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Club Brugge is 140% better for: goals scored per game.
1.8 goals / game - Club Brugge · 0.75 goals / game - RAAL La Louvière
RAAL La Louvière is 5% better for: goals allowed per game.
1.1 goals / game - Club Brugge · 1.05 goals / game - RAAL La Louvière
Club Brugge scores in 85% of games (17 of 20 meczów), while RAAL La Louvière keeps a clean sheet in 40% (8 of 20 meczów).
RAAL La Louvière scores in 55% of games (11 of 20 meczów), while Club Brugge keeps a clean sheet in 35% (7 of 20 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Club Brugge
Over / Under - RAAL La Louvière
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Club Brugge - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 25% of games and wins 65%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
RAAL La Louvière - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 20% of games and wins 20%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.1 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.60 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / game | 1.2 | 1.6 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.8 | 1.0 |
| Average goals per game | 2.0 | 2.6 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 80% |
| 3 goals | 40% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 20% |
| No goal | 20% | 20% |
| Goal difference | +2 | +3 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 0.80 | 0.80 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.4 | 0.4 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.6 | 0.6 |
| Average goals per game | 1.0 | 1.0 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 40% |
| No goal | 60% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -1 | -1 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (11 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): +6 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (5 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Club Brugge
RAAL La Louvière
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Pro League).
Teams vs league
| Club Brugge | Liga | RAAL La Louvière | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▲ 2.90 | 2.53 | ▼ 1.80 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 50% | 55% | ▼ 45% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | • 45% | 44% | ▼ 40% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 35% | 26% | ▲ 40% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 65% | 71% | ▼ 55% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 85% | 73% | ▼ 45% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Other recorded players
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Referee context
See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.
Head-to-head
Record from Club Brugge's perspective: 0 wins, 0 draws and 1 loss against RAAL La Louvière. Games average 1.00 goals, and both teams scored in 0% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Club Brugge vs RAAL La Louvière?
The Pro League match finished Club Brugge 2:3 RAAL La Louvière. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Club Brugge vs RAAL La Louvière?
Club Brugge score 1.80 goals per game on average and RAAL La Louvière 0.75. The Pro League average is 2.53 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 44% of games. Both teams score in 50% of Club Brugge's matches and 45% of RAAL La Louvière's.
What form are Club Brugge and RAAL La Louvière in?
Over the last 5 games Club Brugge have a 3-0-2 record (1.80 points per game) and RAAL La Louvière 0-3-2 (0.60 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Club Brugge vs RAAL La Louvière?
The statistical background for Club Brugge vs RAAL La Louvière — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.