Scotland - League TwoNew Douglas ParkData current as of August 31, 2026

Clyde vs Forfar Athletic: match statistics

Clyde crest
Clyde
3 : 0half-time 2:0
Forfar Athletic crest
Forfar Athletic

Clyde vs Forfar Athletic: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

Clyde played against Forfar Athletic in League Two (Scotland). The game was played on August 22, 2026. Venue: New Douglas Park. Final score: 3:0.

Recent form

Clyde has 2 wins, 0 draws and 1 loss over its last five games, averaging 2.00 points per game. Forfar Athletic has 2 wins, 1 draw and 0 losses, with 2.33 points per game.

Scoring records

Clyde scores 1.67 goals per game and allows 1.00. Forfar Athletic scores 1.67 and allows 0.33. Games in this league average 3.07 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 67% of Clyde's games and 33% of Forfar Athletic's. The Over 2.5 rates are 67% and 33%, compared with league averages of 47% for BTTS and 60% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

Clyde has the higher season xG average, 1.49 to 0.97 per game. Clyde takes 12.7 shots per game, while Forfar Athletic takes 6.0.

First-half and second-half trends

Clyde leads at halftime in 33% of its games and scores 0.33 goals per game after halftime. Forfar Athletic leads at halftime in 67% and scores 0.33 after halftime.

When the teams score

Clyde's most productive scoring window is minutes 31-45+ (3 goals). For Forfar Athletic, it is minutes 0-15 (2 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

League Two games average 3.07 goals. Both teams score in 47% of games, and 60% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

Before this game, 4 previous meetings were available. The record was 0 home wins, 4 draws and 0 away wins. Those games averaged 1.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Clyde have a clearly stronger attacking profile at home: they average 3 goals, create chances worth 2.07 xG and register 18 shots per match, compared with Forfar’s 1 goal, 0.88 xG and 5 shots away from home. The hosts won their only home match so far, while their 7 shots on target per game indicate that their advantage in chance creation is no coincidence. Forfar remain unbeaten this season, with a record of 2 wins and 1 draw and just 1 goal conceded, while they have collected 10 points from their last five matches compared with Clyde’s 6. The visitors’ away defense allows opponents just 0.78 xG, which significantly increases the likelihood of a closely contested match. Despite Clyde’s weaker recent run, during which they conceded 11 goals in five matches, home advantage and a significantly higher quality of chances created give the hosts a slight edge.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

Clyde have conceded an average of 2.2 goals over their last 5 matches, while their opponents created chances worth 1.76 xG against them, clearly increasing Forfar Athletic’s chances of scoring. Forfar averaged 1.6 goals per game during this period and scored 8 goals in total, so they should be able to exploit the hosts’ weaker current defensive form. Clyde also have attacking arguments: they average 4.5 shots on target per match, while Forfar have kept a clean sheet in 0% of their games. The latest BTTS figures stand at 60% for Clyde and 40% for Forfar, compared with a league average of 47%, so the signal for both teams to score is moderately positive. The main risk is Clyde’s excellent season-long defense, which has not conceded a goal so far; however, their current defensive form supports the BTTS - Yes scenario more strongly.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

The strongest selection is Over 1.5 goals, as Clyde averaged 3.4 total goals in their last five matches, scoring 1.2 and conceding 2.2 goals per game. During the same period, Forfar Athletic scored 1.6 goals per match, while 60% of their games went Over 2.5 goals. Clyde’s defense allowed opponents an xG of 1.76, clearly above Forfar’s attacking xG of 0.92, which supports the visitors’ chances of scoring. A total projection of 2.55 goals, combined with the fact that both teams went Over 1.5 goals in 50% and 100% of their matches so far this season, respectively, gives a clear edge to Over 1.5.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

The strongest scenario is a draw at half-time followed by a Forfar Athletic victory at full-time, as Clyde were level at the break in 4 of their last 5 matches, while Forfar led at half-time in 3 of their 5 games during the same period. The visitors are clearly more stable in terms of current form: they have averaged 2.0 points per match and won 60% of their last five games, whereas Clyde have averaged 1.2 points and suffered defeats in 60% of those matches. The second half is crucial, with Clyde conceding an average of 1.8 goals recently, while Forfar have allowed opponents just 0.2 goals and finished the second half level in 80% of their matches. Although Clyde have won both of their home games so far without conceding, this is a very small sample; more recent data suggests that, after an even first half, the visitors have stronger grounds to turn the result in their favor.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Stats by half

2 : 0
First half
1 : 0
Second half

Game stats

50Possession (%)50
ClydeForfar Athletic
13Shots6
ClydeForfar Athletic
5Shots on target4
ClydeForfar Athletic
1.58xG0.9
ClydeForfar Athletic
4Corners4
ClydeForfar Athletic
58Dangerous attacks33
ClydeForfar Athletic
8Fouls11
ClydeForfar Athletic
0Cards2
ClydeForfar Athletic

Pre-game profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

ClydeForfar Athletic
1.67Goals scored / game1.67
ClydeForfar Athletic
1Goals allowed / game0.33
ClydeForfar Athletic
72%Average possession54%
ClydeForfar Athletic
4.67Shots on target / game4.67
ClydeForfar Athletic

Team statswho is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

12.67Shots per game6
ClydeForfar Athletic
4.67Shots on target4.67
ClydeForfar Athletic
13.2%Shot conversion27.8%
ClydeForfar Athletic
72%Possession54%
ClydeForfar Athletic
1.49xG for0.97
ClydeForfar Athletic
1.17xG against0.68
ClydeForfar Athletic

Shooting quality

Clyde: Efficient finishingForfar Athletic: Efficient finishing
ClydeForfar Athletic
Accuracy (shots on target)37%78%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.16
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.360.36

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

Forfar Athletic is 17% better for: last-5 form.

2 pts / game - Clyde · 2.33 pts / game - Forfar Athletic

Clyde
WLW
Season result split
67% W0% R33% P
Season (W-D-L)
2-0-1
2.00 pts / game · goal difference +2
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-0-1
2.00 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
1-0-0
Last 5 at home
1-0-0
W
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.7Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.49Opponent xG: 1.17BTTS: 67%Over 2.5: 67%
Forfar Athletic
WDW
Unbeaten in the last 5 games
Season result split
67% W33% R0% P
Season (W-D-L)
2-1-0
2.33 pts / game · goal difference +4
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-0
2.33 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
0-1-0
Last 5 away
0-1-0
D
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.7Goals conceded: 0.3xG: 0.97Opponent xG: 0.68BTTS: 33%Over 2.5: 33%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Forfar Athletic is 203% better for: goals allowed per game.

1 goals / game - Clyde · 0.33 goals / game - Forfar Athletic

Clyde scoring profile: mixed

Clyde scores in 67% of games (2 of 3 meczów), while Forfar Athletic keeps a clean sheet in 67% (2 of 3 meczów).

Forfar Athletic scoring profile: very strong

Forfar Athletic scores in 100% of games (3 of 3 meczów), while Clyde keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 3 meczów).

5Goals scored (season)5
ClydeForfar Athletic
3Goals conceded (season)1
ClydeForfar Athletic
2.67Average goals per game2
ClydeForfar Athletic
5Goals scored (last 5)5
ClydeForfar Athletic
3Goals conceded (last 5)1
ClydeForfar Athletic

How often they score at least...

67%1 goal100%
ClydeForfar Athletic
67%2 goals33%
ClydeForfar Athletic
33%3 goals33%
ClydeForfar Athletic
0%4 goals0%
ClydeForfar Athletic

How often they concede at least...

100%1 goal33%
ClydeForfar Athletic
0%2 goals0%
ClydeForfar Athletic
0%3 goals0%
ClydeForfar Athletic
0%4 goals0%
ClydeForfar Athletic

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

47%
League average

Goal patterns

67%BTTS at half-time33%
ClydeForfar Athletic
0%BTTS in both halves0%
ClydeForfar Athletic
33%Scored in both halves33%
ClydeForfar Athletic

BTTS and goal count

67%Min. 3 goals and BTTS0%
ClydeForfar Athletic
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS33%
ClydeForfar Athletic
67%BTTS - last 533%
ClydeForfar Athletic

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

67%Min. 1 goal before half-time100%
ClydeForfar Athletic
67%Min. 2 goals before half-time67%
ClydeForfar Athletic
33%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
ClydeForfar Athletic

2nd half

67%Min. 1 goal after half-time33%
ClydeForfar Athletic
0%Min. 2 goals after half-time0%
ClydeForfar Athletic
0%Min. 3 goals after half-time0%
ClydeForfar Athletic

Game halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Forfar Athletic is 40% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.67 pts / game - Clyde · 2.33 pts / game - Forfar Athletic

Clyde - half-time state
33% leading67% draw0% trailing
Forfar Athletic - half-time state
67% leading33% draw0% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.67Points per game (1st half)2.33
ClydeForfar Athletic
1.33Goals scored (1st half)1.33
ClydeForfar Athletic
0.67Goals conceded (1st half)0.33
ClydeForfar Athletic
2Average goals (1st half)1.67
ClydeForfar Athletic
33%Clean sheet before half-time67%
ClydeForfar Athletic
33%No goal before half-time0%
ClydeForfar Athletic

After half-time (2nd half)

1.33Points per game (2nd half)1.67
ClydeForfar Athletic
0.33Goals scored (2nd half)0.33
ClydeForfar Athletic
0.33Goals conceded (2nd half)0
ClydeForfar Athletic
0.67Average goals (2nd half)0.33
ClydeForfar Athletic
67%Clean sheet after half-time100%
ClydeForfar Athletic
67%No goal after half-time67%
ClydeForfar Athletic

Clyde - second-half results

33% W33% R33% P
5
Half-time points
4
Half-time goals
+2
Goal difference (1st half)
4
Second-half points
0
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.67
PPG before half-time
Lead holding203%

Leads at halftime in 33% of games and wins 67%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime-0.3

Defense stays consistent across the full game.

Forfar Athletic - second-half results

33% W67% R0% P
7
Half-time points
4
Half-time goals
+3
Goal difference (1st half)
5
Second-half points
+1
Goal difference (2nd half)
2.33
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at halftime in 67% of games and wins 67%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime-0.3

Defense stays consistent across the full game.

Clyde - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.671.33
Goals scored / game1.30.3
Goals allowed / game0.70.3
Average goals per game2.00.7
1 goal67%67%
2 goals67%0%
3 goals33%0%
Clean sheet33%67%
No goal33%67%
Goal difference+20
Half-time: 33% leading - 67% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 33% won - 33% draw - 33% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 67% - Half-time goals total: 4
Forfar Athletic - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game2.331.67
Goals scored / game1.30.3
Goals allowed / game0.30.0
Average goals per game1.70.3
1 goal100%33%
2 goals67%0%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet67%100%
No goal0%67%
Goal difference+3+1
Half-time: 67% leading - 33% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 33% won - 67% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 33% - Half-time goals total: 4

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

Clyde
ScoredConceded
0
0
0-15
1
1
16-30
3
1
31-45
0
1
46-60
0
0
61-75
1
0
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (3 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (1). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

Forfar Athletic
ScoredConceded
2
0
0-15
0
1
16-30
2
0
31-45
0
0
46-60
1
0
61-75
0
0
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (2 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (1). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

2.33
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
1.0 : 1.3
Estimated goal split
home : away
76%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
50%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-57%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
67%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
0%
0:0 risk
practically zero
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

Clyde

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.32
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.35
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-0.6 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.18
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.17
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
104%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
68%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-1.0
Late goals
20% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
20%

Forfar Athletic

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.29
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+1.05
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-1.7 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.70
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.35
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
114%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
21%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-1.0
Late goals
0% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 40% come in the first quarter-hour.
0%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (League Two).

Teams vs league

ClydeLigaForfar Athletic
Average goals per game 2.673.07 2.00
Both teams scored 67%47% 33%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 67%60% 33%
Clean sheets 0%27% 67%
Goal before half-time 67%80% 100%
Goal after half-time 67%80% 33%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.07
Average goals per game
47%
Both teams scored
60%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
27%
Clean sheets
1.60
Home goals / game
1.47
Away goals / game
+9%
Home attack advantage
+8%
Home defensive advantage
+20%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
80%
1 goal
47%
2 goals
13%
3 goals
7%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
80%
1 goal
33%
2 goals
27%
3 goals
13%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. ClydeGoalJames HiltonAssist: Kyle Connell
  2. Forfar AthleticSubstitutionOn: Jake DolzanskiOff: Matty Allan
  3. Forfar AthleticSubstitutionOn: Blair AlstonOff: Aiden Haddow
  4. Forfar AthleticSubstitutionOn: Adam LivingstoneOff: Mackenzie Lemon
  5. ClydeSubstitutionOn: Christopher InglisOff: Liam Rooney
  6. ClydeSubstitutionOn: Keir GilliganOff: Timam Scott
  7. Forfar AthleticSubstitutionOn: Callum WilsonOff: Adam Brown
  8. Forfar AthleticSubstitutionOn: Ross MacLeanOff: Martin Rennie
  9. ClydeSubstitutionOn: Jack AndersonOff: Kyle Connell
  10. Forfar AthleticYellow cardCallum Wilson
  11. Forfar AthleticYellow cardScott Shepherd

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Record from Clyde's perspective: 0 wins, 4 draws and 0 losses against Forfar Athletic. Games average 1.00 goals, and both teams scored in 50% of them.

Forfar Athletic FC
1 : 1
Clyde FC
Clyde FC
1 : 1
Forfar Athletic FC
Forfar Athletic FC
0 : 0
Clyde FC
Clyde FC
0 : 0
Forfar Athletic FC

FAQ

What was the result of Clyde vs Forfar Athletic?

The League Two match finished Clyde 3:0 Forfar Athletic. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Clyde and Forfar Athletic?

In the last 4 head-to-head matches Clyde won 0, Forfar Athletic won 0 and 4 ended level. These games averaged 1.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Clyde vs Forfar Athletic?

Clyde score 1.67 goals per game on average and Forfar Athletic 1.67. The League Two average is 3.07 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 60% of games. Both teams score in 67% of Clyde's matches and 33% of Forfar Athletic's.

What form are Clyde and Forfar Athletic in?

Over the last 5 games Clyde have a 2-0-1 record (2.00 points per game) and Forfar Athletic 2-1-0 (2.33 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Clyde vs Forfar Athletic?

The statistical background for Clyde vs Forfar Athletic — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.