Como vs Pisa: match statistics
Como is clearly in better form, occupying 4th place in the standings with an impressive record of 15 wins and a +15 goal difference at home. The hosts are in excellent form, winning 4 of their last 5 matches and averaging 1.73 goals per home match while conceding just 0.73 goals. Pisa is in 19th place, has not won a single away match this season, and has a disastrous goal difference of -15 on the road. The visitors have lost 4 of their last 5 matches, conceding an average of 2.21 goals per away match. The xG statistics (1.81 vs 1.04) and possession (64% vs 38%) further confirm Como's superiority, making the hosts' victory the most likely scenario.
Como vs Pisa: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Como played against Pisa in Serie A (Italy). The game was played on March 22, 2026. Final score: 5:0.
Recent form
Como has 4 wins, 1 draw and 0 losses over its last five games, averaging 2.60 points per game. Pisa has 1 win, 0 draws and 4 losses, with 0.60 points per game.
Scoring records
Como scores 1.66 goals per game and allows 0.76. Pisa scores 0.79 and allows 1.69. Games in this league average 2.45 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 45% of Como's games and 45% of Pisa's. The Over 2.5 rates are 45% and 45%, compared with league averages of 47% for BTTS and 47% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Como has the higher season xG average, 1.59 to 1.11 per game. Como takes 14.3 shots per game, while Pisa takes 9.9.
First-half and second-half trends
Como leads at halftime in 41% of its games and scores 0.97 goals per game after halftime. Pisa leads at halftime in 10% and scores 0.45 after halftime.
When the teams score
Como's most productive scoring window is minutes 76-90+ (12 goals). For Pisa, it is minutes 0-15 (5 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Serie A games average 2.45 goals. Both teams score in 47% of games, and 47% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 1 home win, 0 draws and 0 away wins. Those games averaged 3.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Como is clearly in better form, occupying 4th place in the standings with an impressive record of 15 wins and a +15 goal difference at home. The hosts are in excellent form, winning 4 of their last 5 matches and averaging 1.73 goals per home match while conceding just 0.73 goals. Pisa is in 19th place, has not won a single away match this season, and has a disastrous goal difference of -15 on the road. The visitors have lost 4 of their last 5 matches, conceding an average of 2.21 goals per away match. The xG statistics (1.81 vs 1.04) and possession (64% vs 38%) further confirm Como's superiority, making the hosts' victory the most likely scenario.
View the statistical overviewStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Como | Pisa | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 36% | 28% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.11 | 0.11 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.33 | 0.28 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Como is 333% better for: last-5 form.
2.6 pts / game - Como · 0.6 pts / game - Pisa
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Como is 110% better for: goals scored per game.
1.66 goals / game - Como · 0.79 goals / game - Pisa
Como is 122% better for: goals allowed per game.
0.76 goals / game - Como · 1.69 goals / game - Pisa
Como scores in 76% of games (22 of 29 meczów), while Pisa keeps a clean sheet in 17% (5 of 29 meczów).
Pisa scores in 48% of games (14 of 29 meczów), while Como keeps a clean sheet in 45% (13 of 29 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Como
Over / Under - Pisa
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Como is 97% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.69 pts / game - Como · 0.86 pts / game - Pisa
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Como - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 41% of games and wins 52%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.1 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
Pisa - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 10% of games and wins 7%. Sometimes gives up a halftime lead.
Allows 0.3 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 2.40 | 1.60 |
| Goals scored / game | 1.2 | 0.8 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.4 | 0.4 |
| Average goals per game | 1.6 | 1.2 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 60% |
| No goal | 20% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +4 | +2 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.00 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.2 | 0.6 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.4 | 1.4 |
| Average goals per game | 0.6 | 2.0 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 20% |
| No goal | 80% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -1 | -4 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (12 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): +8 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (5 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (14). Late-goal balance (76-90): -9 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Como
Pisa
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Serie A).
Teams vs league
| Como | Liga | Pisa | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | • 2.41 | 2.45 | • 2.48 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 45% | 47% | ▼ 45% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 45% | 47% | ▼ 45% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 45% | 31% | ▼ 17% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 69% | 65% | ▼ 55% |
| Goal after half-time | • 76% | 77% | ▼ 69% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Referee context
See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.
Head-to-head
Record from Como's perspective: 1 win, 0 draws and 0 losses against Pisa. Games average 3.00 goals, and both teams scored in 0% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Como vs Pisa?
The Serie A match finished Como 5:0 Pisa. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Como vs Pisa?
Como score 1.66 goals per game on average and Pisa 0.79. The Serie A average is 2.45 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 47% of games. Both teams score in 45% of Como's matches and 45% of Pisa's.
What form are Como and Pisa in?
Over the last 5 games Como have a 4-1-0 record (2.60 points per game) and Pisa 1-0-4 (0.60 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Como vs Pisa?
The statistical background for Como vs Pisa — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.