Italy - Serie AStadio Giuseppe SinigagliaData current as of November 01, 2026

Como vs Venezia: match statistics

Como crest
Como
1 : 0half-time 1:0
Venezia crest
Venezia

Como vs Venezia: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

Como played against Venezia in Serie A (Italy). The game was played on November 1, 2026. Venue: Stadio Giuseppe Sinigaglia. Final score: 1:0.

Recent form

Como has 3 wins, 1 draw and 1 loss over its last five games, averaging 2.00 points per game. Venezia has 1 win, 0 draws and 4 losses, with 0.60 points per game.

Scoring records

Como scores 1.89 goals per game and allows 0.89. Venezia scores 0.67 and allows 2.11. Games in this league average 3.20 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 67% of Como's games and 33% of Venezia's. The Over 2.5 rates are 56% and 33%, compared with league averages of 59% for BTTS and 61% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

Como has the higher season xG average, 2.20 to 1.57 per game. Como takes 20.4 shots per game, while Venezia takes 14.3.

First-half and second-half trends

Como leads at halftime in 44% of its games and scores 1.00 goals per game after halftime. Venezia leads at halftime in 0% and scores 0.44 after halftime.

When the teams score

Como's most productive scoring window is minutes 76-90+ (5 goals). For Venezia, it is minutes 61-75 (2 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

Serie A games average 3.20 goals. Both teams score in 59% of games, and 61% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

There is not enough head-to-head history for a meaningful comparison.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Como have won 4 of their last 5 matches, scoring 14 goals, while Venezia have lost 4 of their 5 games and scored only 4 goals. Home advantage is clear: the hosts have won 67% of their home matches and have yet to lose, while the visitors have been beaten in every away game so far. Como concede an average of just 0.33 goals at home and keep a clean sheet in 67% of matches, whereas Venezia concede an average of 2.25 goals away from home. The hosts also create higher-quality chances, averaging 2.23 xG at home compared with Venezia’s 1.63 away, although their 1.33 goals per game shows they do not always make the most of that advantage. Given the gulf in form and defensive performance, a Como win is the most likely outcome.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

The strongest argument for BTTS - No is Venezia’s scoring record: they failed to score in half of the matches analyzed and averaged just 0.8 goals in their last 5 games. Como conceded an average of 1.2 goals over that period, so an away goal is possible, but Venezia’s poor finishing makes that scenario less certain. The hosts have been far more effective in front of goal, averaging 2.8 goals in their last 5 matches, while Venezia conceded 2.0 goals per game over that span, pointing primarily to a Como goal. Although both teams recorded an xG of around 1.7, their season averages for goals scored stand at 0.75 each, and their BTTS rates are 25% and 50%, respectively. Therefore, it is marginally more likely that at least one team—Venezia in particular—will fail to score.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

In their last 5 matches, Como scored an average of 2.8 goals, while Venezia conceded 2.0, supporting the case for goals from the home side. At the same time, both teams scored only 0.75 goals per game in the home and away matches analyzed, so I do not expect Como’s recent scoring form to continue in full. However, their attacking potential is higher than the goal figures alone suggest: average xG stands at 1.60 for Como and 1.63 for Venezia, while the visitors kept no clean sheets in any of the away matches analyzed. At least 2 goals were scored in 75% of both teams’ matches, whereas the 3-goal mark was reached in 25% of Como’s home games and 50% of Venezia’s away games. Therefore, with a predicted total of 2.90 goals, I prefer Over 1.5 goals as a stronger signal than backing a higher line.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

Como have won 4 of their last 5 matches, scoring an average of 2.8 goals, while Venezia have lost 4 of 5 and conceded an average of 2 goals. Over this period, the hosts held a lead at the break in 40% of matches, while the visitors went into half-time trailing in 60%, pointing to Como taking an early lead. The hosts’ advantage was more pronounced after the break: they scored an average of 2 goals compared with Venezia’s 0.4 and won the second half in 4 of 5 matches. The 1/1 HT/FT outcome is therefore the strongest scenario, although a half-time draw followed by a Como win remains a close alternative, as the hosts were level at half-time in 3 of their 4 home matches.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Stats by half

1 : 0
First half
0 : 0
Second half

Game stats

66Possession (%)34
ComoVenezia
19Shots7
ComoVenezia
4Shots on target1
ComoVenezia
2.02xG0.69
ComoVenezia
8Corners1
ComoVenezia
74Dangerous attacks24
ComoVenezia
5Fouls9
ComoVenezia
1Cards2
ComoVenezia

Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

1.89Goals scored / game0.67
ComoVenezia
0.89Goals allowed / game2.11
ComoVenezia
62%Average possession52%
ComoVenezia
6.56Shots on target / game4.33
ComoVenezia

Team stats— who is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

20.44Shots per game14.33
ComoVenezia
6.56Shots on target4.33
ComoVenezia
9.2%Shot conversion4.7%
ComoVenezia
62%Possession52%
ComoVenezia
2.2xG for1.57
ComoVenezia
1.37xG against1.8
ComoVenezia

Shooting quality

Como: DominantVenezia: Attacking
ComoVenezia
Accuracy (shots on target)32%30%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.110.11
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.290.15

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team form— who is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

Como is 233% better for: last-5 form.

2 pts / game - Como · 0.6 pts / game - Venezia

Como
LDWWW
Season result split
67% W22% D11% L
Season (W-D-L)
6-2-1
2.22 pts / game · goal difference +9
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-1-1
2.00 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
2-1-0
Last 5 at home
2-1-0
WDW
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.6Goals conceded: 0.8xG: 2.06Opponent xG: 1.41BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 40%
Venezia
LLWLL
Season result split
11% W0% D89% L
Season (W-D-L)
1-0-8
0.33 pts / game · goal difference -13
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-0-4
0.60 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
0-0-4
Last 5 away
0-0-4
LLLL
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 0.4Goals conceded: 1.6xG: 1.66Opponent xG: 1.86BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 20%

Goals— how do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Como is 182% better for: goals scored per game.

1.89 goals / game - Como · 0.67 goals / game - Venezia

Como is 137% better for: goals allowed per game.

0.89 goals / game - Como · 2.11 goals / game - Venezia

Como scoring profile: very strong

Como scores in 78% of games (7 of 9 games), while Venezia keeps a clean sheet in 11% (1 of 9 games).

Venezia scoring profile: mixed

Venezia scores in 44% of games (4 of 9 games), while Como keeps a clean sheet in 22% (2 of 9 games).

17Goals scored (season)6
ComoVenezia
8Goals conceded (season)19
ComoVenezia
2.78Average goals per game2.78
ComoVenezia
8Goals scored (last 5)2
ComoVenezia
4Goals conceded (last 5)8
ComoVenezia

How often they score at least...

78%1 goal44%
ComoVenezia
67%2 goals22%
ComoVenezia
33%3 goals0%
ComoVenezia
11%4 goals0%
ComoVenezia

How often they concede at least...

78%1 goal89%
ComoVenezia
11%2 goals78%
ComoVenezia
0%3 goals33%
ComoVenezia
0%4 goals11%
ComoVenezia

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

33%BTTS at half-time22%
ComoVenezia
0%BTTS in both halves11%
ComoVenezia
33%Scored in both halves11%
ComoVenezia

BTTS and goal count

56%Min. 3 goals and BTTS33%
ComoVenezia
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
ComoVenezia
40%BTTS - last 520%
ComoVenezia

Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

78%Min. 1 goal before half-time44%
ComoVenezia
44%Min. 2 goals before half-time33%
ComoVenezia
33%Min. 3 goals before half-time22%
ComoVenezia

2nd half

67%Min. 1 goal after half-time78%
ComoVenezia
33%Min. 2 goals after half-time67%
ComoVenezia
11%Min. 3 goals after half-time22%
ComoVenezia

Game halves— when do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Como is 179% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.56 pts / game - Como · 0.56 pts / game - Venezia

Como - half-time state
44% leading22% draw33% trailing
Venezia - half-time state
0% leading56% draw44% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.56Points per game (1st half)0.56
ComoVenezia
0.89Goals scored (1st half)0.22
ComoVenezia
0.78Goals conceded (1st half)0.89
ComoVenezia
1.67Average goals (1st half)1.11
ComoVenezia
33%Clean sheet before half-time56%
ComoVenezia
56%No goal before half-time78%
ComoVenezia

After half-time (2nd half)

2.11Points per game (2nd half)0.89
ComoVenezia
1Goals scored (2nd half)0.44
ComoVenezia
0.11Goals conceded (2nd half)1.22
ComoVenezia
1.11Average goals (2nd half)1.67
ComoVenezia
89%Clean sheet after half-time33%
ComoVenezia
33%No goal after half-time67%
ComoVenezia

Como - second-half results

56% W44% D0% L
14
Half-time points
8
Half-time goals
+1
Goal difference (1st half)
19
Second-half points
+8
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.56
PPG before half-time
Lead holding152%

Leads at halftime in 44% of games and wins 67%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime-0.7

Defense stays consistent across the full game.

Venezia - second-half results

22% W22% D56% L
5
Half-time points
2
Half-time goals
-6
Goal difference (1st half)
8
Second-half points
-7
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.56
PPG before half-time
Defense after halftime+0.3

Allows 0.3 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

Como - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.002.20
Goals scored / game0.41.2
Goals allowed / game0.80.0
Average goals per game1.21.2
1 goal60%60%
2 goals40%40%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet40%100%
No goal80%40%
Goal difference-2+6
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 40% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 2
Venezia - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game0.601.00
Goals scored / game0.20.2
Goals allowed / game0.80.8
Average goals per game1.01.0
1 goal40%60%
2 goals20%40%
3 goals20%0%
Clean sheet60%60%
No goal80%80%
Goal difference-3-3
Half-time: 0% leading - 60% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 1

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

Como
ScoredConceded
0
1
0-15
4
4
16-30
4
2
31-45
4
0
46-60
0
0
61-75
5
1
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (5 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): +4 - wins late phases.

Venezia
ScoredConceded
0
2
0-15
1
5
16-30
1
1
31-45
1
3
46-60
2
2
61-75
1
6
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (2 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): -5 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

2.78
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
2.0 : 0.8
Estimated goal split
home : away
87%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
50%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
34%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
12%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 8 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

Como

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.83
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.17
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-2.1 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.31
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.48
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
116%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
57%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
-0.22
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
29% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
29%

Venezia

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.23
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-1.21
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+0.6 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.90
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
-0.31
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
43%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
129%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
+0.27
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
17% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
17%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League context— is this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Serie A).

Teams vs league

ComoLigaVenezia
Average goals per game▼ 2.783.20▼ 2.78
Both teams scored▲ 67%59%▼ 33%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)▼ 56%61%▼ 33%
Clean sheets• 22%22%▼ 11%
Goal before half-time▲ 78%70%▼ 44%
Goal after half-time▼ 67%85%▼ 78%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.20
Average goals per game
59%
Both teams scored
61%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
22%
Clean sheets
1.63
Home goals / game
1.57
Away goals / game
+4%
Home attack advantage
+4%
Home defensive advantage
+9%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
70%
1 goal
41%
2 goals
18%
3 goals
11%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
85%
1 goal
53%
2 goals
29%
3 goals
6%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. VeneziaYellow cardSimon Solomon Junior Sohm
  2. VeneziaYellow cardJuan Guilherme Nunes Jesus
  3. ComoSubstitutionOn: Maximo PerroneOff: Samuele Ricci
  4. VeneziaSubstitutionOn: Albion RrahmaniOff: Þórir Jóhann Helgason
  5. ComoSubstitutionOn: Ivan SmolčićOff: Yan Bueno Couto
  6. ComoSubstitutionOn: Álex Valle GómezOff: Martin Baturina
  7. ComoYellow cardKaiki Bruno da Silva

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

FAQ

What was the result of Como vs Venezia?

The Serie A match finished Como 1:0 Venezia. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Como vs Venezia?

Como score 1.89 goals per game on average and Venezia 0.67. The Serie A average is 3.20 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 61% of games. Both teams score in 67% of Como's matches and 33% of Venezia's.

What form are Como and Venezia in?

Over the last 5 games Como have a 3-1-1 record (2.00 points per game) and Venezia 1-0-4 (0.60 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Como vs Venezia?

The statistical background for Como vs Venezia — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.