Morocco - Botola ProData current as of 23 July 2026

CR Khemis Zemamra vs Ittihad Tanger: match statistics

130%(0.00)
X40%(0.00)
230%(0.00)

Statistical analysis points to a closely contested match with a slight edge for a draw. CR Khemis Zemamra occupies a lower position in the table (12th place) and has not won any home matches this season (0% Win%), although they have shown improved form recently with two wins in their last five games. Ittihad Tanger (7th place) demonstrates more consistent form with 50% draws away from home and a better points-per-game average (1.6 PPG vs 1.2 PPG). A key factor is both teams' propensity for draws – the hosts have a 67% draw rate at home, while the visitors have a substantial 50% draw rate on the road. Additionally, both teams have an identical home goal difference (-1), which further confirms the balanced nature of this encounter. Considering the hosts' poor efficiency in front of their own fans and the visitors' defensive approach, the most probable outcome is a share of the points.

CR Khemis Zemamra vs Ittihad Tanger: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

CR Khemis Zemamra play Ittihad Tanger in Botola Pro (Morocco). The match date is 8 February 2026 at 16:00. Final score: 1:0.

Current form

CR Khemis Zemamra: 0-4-1, 0.80 points/match. Ittihad Tanger: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match.

Goal statistics

CR Khemis Zemamra scores 0.97 and concedes 1.20 goals per match. Ittihad Tanger scores 0.90 and concedes 1.03. League average: 2.17 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: CR Khemis Zemamra 53%, Ittihad Tanger 53%. Over 2.5: CR Khemis Zemamra 43%, Ittihad Tanger 27%. League level: BTTS 52%, Over 2.5 38%.

xG, shots and style

CR Khemis Zemamra has higher xG: 1.32 vs 1.30. CR Khemis Zemamra: 10.4 shots per match, Ittihad Tanger: 10.4.

Match halves

CR Khemis Zemamra: half-time lead 13%, second-half goals 0.67. Ittihad Tanger: half-time lead 20%, second-half goals 0.57.

Goals by minute

CR Khemis Zemamra: 61-75 (8 goals). Ittihad Tanger: 76-90+ (9 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Botola Pro: 2.17 goals per match, BTTS 52%, Over 2.5 38%.

Head-to-head

1 H2H matches: 0-0-1. Average goals 1.00, BTTS 0%.

Match description

Statistical analysis points to a closely contested match with a slight edge for a draw. CR Khemis Zemamra occupies a lower position in the table (12th place) and has not won any home matches this season (0% Win%), although they have shown improved form recently with two wins in their last five games. Ittihad Tanger (7th place) demonstrates more consistent form with 50% draws away from home and a better points-per-game average (1.6 PPG vs 1.2 PPG). A key factor is both teams' propensity for draws – the hosts have a 67% draw rate at home, while the visitors have a substantial 50% draw rate on the road. Additionally, both teams have an identical home goal difference (-1), which further confirms the balanced nature of this encounter. Considering the hosts' poor efficiency in front of their own fans and the visitors' defensive approach, the most probable outcome is a share of the points.

Half-by-half

1 : 0
1st half
0 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

33Possession (%)67
CR Khemis ZemamraIttihad Tanger
5Shots14
CR Khemis ZemamraIttihad Tanger
2Shots on target2
CR Khemis ZemamraIttihad Tanger
0.9xG2.26
CR Khemis ZemamraIttihad Tanger
1Corners7
CR Khemis ZemamraIttihad Tanger
59Dangerous attacks169
CR Khemis ZemamraIttihad Tanger
14Fouls6
CR Khemis ZemamraIttihad Tanger
5Cards1
CR Khemis ZemamraIttihad Tanger

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

CR Khemis ZemamraIttihad Tanger
0.97Goals scored / match0.9
CR Khemis ZemamraIttihad Tanger
1.2Goals conceded / match1.03
CR Khemis ZemamraIttihad Tanger
47%Average possession49%
CR Khemis ZemamraIttihad Tanger
3.4Shots on target / match3.27
CR Khemis ZemamraIttihad Tanger

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

10.4Shots per match10.4
CR Khemis ZemamraIttihad Tanger
3.4Shots on target3.27
CR Khemis ZemamraIttihad Tanger
9.3%Shot conversion8.7%
CR Khemis ZemamraIttihad Tanger
47%Possession49%
CR Khemis ZemamraIttihad Tanger
1.32xG for1.3
CR Khemis ZemamraIttihad Tanger
1.29xG against1.48
CR Khemis ZemamraIttihad Tanger

Shooting quality

CR Khemis Zemamra: BalancedIttihad Tanger: Balanced
CR Khemis ZemamraIttihad Tanger
Accuracy (shots on target)33%31%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.130.13
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.290.28

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Ittihad Tanger is 75% better for: last-5 form.

0.8 pts / match - CR Khemis Zemamra · 1.4 pts / match - Ittihad Tanger

CR Khemis Zemamra
LDDDD
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
30% W30% R40% P
Season (W-D-L)
9-9-12
1.20 pts / match · goal difference -7
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-4-1
0.80 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
4-7-4
Last 5 at home
1-2-2
WLLDD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.6Goals conceded: 0.8xG: 1.61Opponent xG: 0.92BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 0%
Ittihad Tanger
WLDLW
Season result split
30% W40% R30% P
Season (W-D-L)
9-12-9
1.30 pts / match · goal difference -4
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
4-4-7
Last 5 away
2-0-3
WLWLL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.8Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.17Opponent xG: 1.58BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 20%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

CR Khemis Zemamra is 8% better for: goals scored per match.

0.97 goals / match - CR Khemis Zemamra · 0.9 goals / match - Ittihad Tanger

Ittihad Tanger is 17% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.2 goals / match - CR Khemis Zemamra · 1.03 goals / match - Ittihad Tanger

CR Khemis Zemamra scoring profile: strong

CR Khemis Zemamra scores in 63% of matches (19 of 30 matches), while Ittihad Tanger keeps a clean sheet in 20% (6 of 30 matches).

Ittihad Tanger scoring profile: strong

Ittihad Tanger scores in 67% of matches (20 of 30 matches), while CR Khemis Zemamra keeps a clean sheet in 27% (8 of 30 matches).

29Goals scored (season)27
CR Khemis ZemamraIttihad Tanger
36Goals conceded (season)31
CR Khemis ZemamraIttihad Tanger
2.17Average goals in match1.93
CR Khemis ZemamraIttihad Tanger
3Goals scored (last 5)4
CR Khemis ZemamraIttihad Tanger
4Goals conceded (last 5)5
CR Khemis ZemamraIttihad Tanger

How often they score at least...

63%1 goal67%
CR Khemis ZemamraIttihad Tanger
27%2 goals23%
CR Khemis ZemamraIttihad Tanger
7%3 goals0%
CR Khemis ZemamraIttihad Tanger
0%4 goals0%
CR Khemis ZemamraIttihad Tanger

How often they concede at least...

73%1 goal80%
CR Khemis ZemamraIttihad Tanger
30%2 goals20%
CR Khemis ZemamraIttihad Tanger
13%3 goals3%
CR Khemis ZemamraIttihad Tanger
3%4 goals0%
CR Khemis ZemamraIttihad Tanger

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

53%
CR Khemis Zemamra - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.16 of 30 matches
52%
League average

Goal patterns

13%BTTS at half-time10%
CR Khemis ZemamraIttihad Tanger
3%BTTS in both halves0%
CR Khemis ZemamraIttihad Tanger
17%Scored in both halves10%
CR Khemis ZemamraIttihad Tanger

BTTS and goal count

40%Min. 3 goals and BTTS23%
CR Khemis ZemamraIttihad Tanger
3%Min. 3 goals without BTTS3%
CR Khemis ZemamraIttihad Tanger
60%BTTS - last 540%
CR Khemis ZemamraIttihad Tanger

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

63%Min. 1 goal before half-time63%
CR Khemis ZemamraIttihad Tanger
17%Min. 2 goals before half-time20%
CR Khemis ZemamraIttihad Tanger
3%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
CR Khemis ZemamraIttihad Tanger

2nd half

70%Min. 1 goal after half-time73%
CR Khemis ZemamraIttihad Tanger
40%Min. 2 goals after half-time27%
CR Khemis ZemamraIttihad Tanger
20%Min. 3 goals after half-time10%
CR Khemis ZemamraIttihad Tanger

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Ittihad Tanger is 19% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

0.9 pts / match - CR Khemis Zemamra · 1.07 pts / match - Ittihad Tanger

CR Khemis Zemamra - half-time state
13% leading50% draw37% trailing
Ittihad Tanger - half-time state
20% leading47% draw33% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

0.9Points per match (1st half)1.07
CR Khemis ZemamraIttihad Tanger
0.3Goals scored (1st half)0.33
CR Khemis ZemamraIttihad Tanger
0.57Goals conceded (1st half)0.5
CR Khemis ZemamraIttihad Tanger
0.87Average goals (1st half)0.83
CR Khemis ZemamraIttihad Tanger
50%Clean sheet before half-time57%
CR Khemis ZemamraIttihad Tanger
73%No goal before half-time70%
CR Khemis ZemamraIttihad Tanger

After half-time (2nd half)

1.33Points per match (2nd half)1.37
CR Khemis ZemamraIttihad Tanger
0.67Goals scored (2nd half)0.57
CR Khemis ZemamraIttihad Tanger
0.63Goals conceded (2nd half)0.53
CR Khemis ZemamraIttihad Tanger
1.3Average goals (2nd half)1.1
CR Khemis ZemamraIttihad Tanger
50%Clean sheet after half-time53%
CR Khemis ZemamraIttihad Tanger
47%No goal after half-time53%
CR Khemis ZemamraIttihad Tanger

CR Khemis Zemamra - second-half results

30% W43% R27% P
27
Half-time points
9
Half-time goals
-8
Goal difference (1st half)
40
Second-half points
+1
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.90
PPG before half-time
Lead holding231%

Leads at half-time in 13% of matches and wins 30%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Ittihad Tanger - second-half results

33% W37% R30% P
32
Half-time points
10
Half-time goals
-5
Goal difference (1st half)
41
Second-half points
+1
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.07
PPG before half-time
Lead holding150%

Leads at half-time in 20% of matches and wins 30%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

CR Khemis Zemamra - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.801.20
Goals scored / match0.20.4
Goals conceded / match0.40.4
Average goals in match0.60.8
1 goal40%60%
2 goals20%20%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet60%60%
No goal80%60%
Goal difference-10
Half-time: 0% leading - 80% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 60% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 1
Ittihad Tanger - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.001.40
Goals scored / match0.40.4
Goals conceded / match0.60.4
Average goals in match1.00.8
1 goal60%80%
2 goals40%0%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet60%60%
No goal80%60%
Goal difference-10
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 20% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 2

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

CR Khemis Zemamra
ScoredConceded
0
2
0-15
4
4
16-30
5
11
31-45
4
1
46-60
8
6
61-75
8
12
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (8 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (12). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.

Ittihad Tanger
ScoredConceded
3
1
0-15
3
3
16-30
4
11
31-45
3
6
46-60
5
5
61-75
9
5
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (9 goli). Concedes most in 31-45 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): +4 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.05
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.0 : 1.1
Estimated goal split
home : away
94%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
53%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-51%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
42%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
12%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 8 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

CR Khemis Zemamra

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.03
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.26
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+0.6 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.35
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.09
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
84%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
118%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.40
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.4
Late goals
28% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
28%

Ittihad Tanger

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.18
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.05
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+0.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.40
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.45
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
88%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
90%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.10
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
33% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 11% come in the first quarter-hour.
33%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Botola Pro).

Teams vs league

CR Khemis ZemamraLigaIttihad Tanger
Average goals in match 2.172.17 1.93
Both teams scored 53%52% 53%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 43%38% 27%
Clean sheets 27%30% 20%
Goal before half-time 63%63% 63%
Goal after half-time 70%73% 73%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.17
Average goals per match
52%
Both teams scored
38%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
30%
Clean sheets
1.15
Home goals / match
1.02
Away goals / match
+13%
Home attack advantage
+11%
Home defence advantage
+11%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
63%
1 goal
25%
2 goals
8%
3 goals
2%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
73%
1 goal
35%
2 goals
10%
3 goals
0%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: CR Khemis Zemamra 0 - 0 - 1 Ittihad Tanger. Average goals 1.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.

FAQ

What was the result of CR Khemis Zemamra vs Ittihad Tanger?

The Botola Pro match finished CR Khemis Zemamra 1:0 Ittihad Tanger. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before CR Khemis Zemamra vs Ittihad Tanger?

CR Khemis Zemamra score 0.97 goals per game on average and Ittihad Tanger 0.90. The Botola Pro average is 2.17 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 38% of games. Both teams score in 53% of CR Khemis Zemamra's matches and 53% of Ittihad Tanger's.

What form are CR Khemis Zemamra and Ittihad Tanger in?

Over the last 5 games CR Khemis Zemamra have a 0-4-1 record (0.80 points per game) and Ittihad Tanger 2-1-2 (1.40 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for CR Khemis Zemamra vs Ittihad Tanger?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.