Morocco - Botola ProData current as of 17 July 2026

CR Khemis Zemamra vs Olympic Safi: match statistics

CR Khemis Zemamra vs Olympic Safi: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

CR Khemis Zemamra play Olympic Safi in Botola Pro (Morocco). The match date is 25 June 2026 at 19:00. Final score: 1:1.

Current form

CR Khemis Zemamra: 0-4-1, 0.80 points/match. Olympic Safi: 0-3-2, 0.60 points/match.

Goal statistics

CR Khemis Zemamra scores 0.97 and concedes 1.20 goals per match. Olympic Safi scores 0.80 and concedes 1.40. League average: 2.17 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: CR Khemis Zemamra 53%, Olympic Safi 63%. Over 2.5: CR Khemis Zemamra 43%, Olympic Safi 37%. League level: BTTS 52%, Over 2.5 38%.

xG, shots and style

CR Khemis Zemamra has higher xG: 1.32 vs 1.23. CR Khemis Zemamra: 10.4 shots per match, Olympic Safi: 9.6.

Match halves

CR Khemis Zemamra: half-time lead 13%, second-half goals 0.67. Olympic Safi: half-time lead 27%, second-half goals 0.43.

Goals by minute

CR Khemis Zemamra: 61-75 (8 goals). Olympic Safi: 76-90+ (7 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Botola Pro: 2.17 goals per match, BTTS 52%, Over 2.5 38%.

Head-to-head

1 H2H matches: 1-0-0. Average goals 4.00, BTTS 100%.

Match description

CR Khemis Zemamra holds a clear advantage in seasonal metrics: 9 wins versus 3 for Olympic Safi and more goals scored (26 vs 20) with a smaller negative goal difference (-7 vs -16). In the last 5 matches the home side scored 7 goals while the visitors only 2; the hosts average 1.2 points in that period, the visitors 0.8. Defensively the hosts perform better at home, conceding 0.92 goals per game compared to Safi’s 1.38 away and keeping a clean sheet in 46% of home matches versus 8% of away clean sheets for the visitors. Chance quality is similar (xG 1.22 for hosts vs 1.17 for visitors and on average 9.46 vs 9.62 shots per game), but the hosts’ higher finishing rate (10% vs 8%) suggests better chance conversion. Considering the seasonal results advantage, stronger home defense and higher efficiency, I predict a home win.

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
1 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

54Possession (%)46
CR Khemis ZemamraOlympic Safi
14Shots7
CR Khemis ZemamraOlympic Safi
3Shots on target1
CR Khemis ZemamraOlympic Safi
1.41xG0.69
CR Khemis ZemamraOlympic Safi
5Corners2
CR Khemis ZemamraOlympic Safi
43Dangerous attacks22
CR Khemis ZemamraOlympic Safi
14Fouls17
CR Khemis ZemamraOlympic Safi
1Cards3
CR Khemis ZemamraOlympic Safi

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

CR Khemis ZemamraOlympic Safi
0.97Goals scored / match0.8
CR Khemis ZemamraOlympic Safi
1.2Goals conceded / match1.4
CR Khemis ZemamraOlympic Safi
47%Average possession50%
CR Khemis ZemamraOlympic Safi
3.4Shots on target / match3.43
CR Khemis ZemamraOlympic Safi

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

10.4Shots per match9.6
CR Khemis ZemamraOlympic Safi
3.4Shots on target3.43
CR Khemis ZemamraOlympic Safi
9.3%Shot conversion8.3%
CR Khemis ZemamraOlympic Safi
47%Possession50%
CR Khemis ZemamraOlympic Safi
1.32xG for1.23
CR Khemis ZemamraOlympic Safi
1.29xG against1.35
CR Khemis ZemamraOlympic Safi

Shooting quality

CR Khemis Zemamra: BalancedOlympic Safi: Balanced
CR Khemis ZemamraOlympic Safi
Accuracy (shots on target)33%36%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.130.13
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.290.23

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

CR Khemis Zemamra is 33% better for: last-5 form.

0.8 pts / match - CR Khemis Zemamra · 0.6 pts / match - Olympic Safi

CR Khemis Zemamra
LDDDD
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
30% W30% R40% P
Season (W-D-L)
9-9-12
1.20 pts / match · goal difference -7
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-4-1
0.80 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
4-7-4
Last 5 at home
1-2-2
WLLDD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.6Goals conceded: 0.8xG: 1.61Opponent xG: 0.92BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 0%
Olympic Safi
LDDDL
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
10% W43% R47% P
Season (W-D-L)
3-13-14
0.73 pts / match · goal difference -18
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-3-2
0.60 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
1-8-6
Last 5 away
0-4-1
DLDDD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.8Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 1.10Opponent xG: 1.44BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 20%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

CR Khemis Zemamra is 21% better for: goals scored per match.

0.97 goals / match - CR Khemis Zemamra · 0.8 goals / match - Olympic Safi

CR Khemis Zemamra is 17% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.2 goals / match - CR Khemis Zemamra · 1.4 goals / match - Olympic Safi

CR Khemis Zemamra scoring profile: very strong

CR Khemis Zemamra scores in 63% of matches (19 of 30 matches), while Olympic Safi keeps a clean sheet in 13% (4 of 30 matches).

Olympic Safi scoring profile: strong

Olympic Safi scores in 70% of matches (21 of 30 matches), while CR Khemis Zemamra keeps a clean sheet in 27% (8 of 30 matches).

29Goals scored (season)24
CR Khemis ZemamraOlympic Safi
36Goals conceded (season)42
CR Khemis ZemamraOlympic Safi
2.17Average goals in match2.2
CR Khemis ZemamraOlympic Safi
3Goals scored (last 5)4
CR Khemis ZemamraOlympic Safi
4Goals conceded (last 5)7
CR Khemis ZemamraOlympic Safi

How often they score at least...

63%1 goal70%
CR Khemis ZemamraOlympic Safi
27%2 goals7%
CR Khemis ZemamraOlympic Safi
7%3 goals3%
CR Khemis ZemamraOlympic Safi
0%4 goals0%
CR Khemis ZemamraOlympic Safi

How often they concede at least...

73%1 goal87%
CR Khemis ZemamraOlympic Safi
30%2 goals40%
CR Khemis ZemamraOlympic Safi
13%3 goals10%
CR Khemis ZemamraOlympic Safi
3%4 goals3%
CR Khemis ZemamraOlympic Safi

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

53%
CR Khemis Zemamra - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.16 of 30 matches
52%
League average

Goal patterns

13%BTTS at half-time3%
CR Khemis ZemamraOlympic Safi
3%BTTS in both halves0%
CR Khemis ZemamraOlympic Safi
17%Scored in both halves3%
CR Khemis ZemamraOlympic Safi

BTTS and goal count

40%Min. 3 goals and BTTS30%
CR Khemis ZemamraOlympic Safi
3%Min. 3 goals without BTTS7%
CR Khemis ZemamraOlympic Safi
60%BTTS - last 560%
CR Khemis ZemamraOlympic Safi

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

63%Min. 1 goal before half-time67%
CR Khemis ZemamraOlympic Safi
17%Min. 2 goals before half-time10%
CR Khemis ZemamraOlympic Safi
3%Min. 3 goals before half-time3%
CR Khemis ZemamraOlympic Safi

2nd half

70%Min. 1 goal after half-time83%
CR Khemis ZemamraOlympic Safi
40%Min. 2 goals after half-time43%
CR Khemis ZemamraOlympic Safi
20%Min. 3 goals after half-time13%
CR Khemis ZemamraOlympic Safi

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Olympic Safi is 30% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

0.9 pts / match - CR Khemis Zemamra · 1.17 pts / match - Olympic Safi

CR Khemis Zemamra - half-time state
13% leading50% draw37% trailing
Olympic Safi - half-time state
27% leading37% draw37% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

0.9Points per match (1st half)1.17
CR Khemis ZemamraOlympic Safi
0.3Goals scored (1st half)0.37
CR Khemis ZemamraOlympic Safi
0.57Goals conceded (1st half)0.43
CR Khemis ZemamraOlympic Safi
0.87Average goals (1st half)0.8
CR Khemis ZemamraOlympic Safi
50%Clean sheet before half-time60%
CR Khemis ZemamraOlympic Safi
73%No goal before half-time70%
CR Khemis ZemamraOlympic Safi

After half-time (2nd half)

1.33Points per match (2nd half)0.77
CR Khemis ZemamraOlympic Safi
0.67Goals scored (2nd half)0.43
CR Khemis ZemamraOlympic Safi
0.63Goals conceded (2nd half)0.97
CR Khemis ZemamraOlympic Safi
1.3Average goals (2nd half)1.4
CR Khemis ZemamraOlympic Safi
50%Clean sheet after half-time30%
CR Khemis ZemamraOlympic Safi
47%No goal after half-time57%
CR Khemis ZemamraOlympic Safi

CR Khemis Zemamra - second-half results

30% W43% R27% P
27
Half-time points
9
Half-time goals
-8
Goal difference (1st half)
40
Second-half points
+1
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.90
PPG before half-time
Lead holding231%

Leads at half-time in 13% of matches and wins 30%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Olympic Safi - second-half results

13% W37% R50% P
35
Half-time points
11
Half-time goals
-2
Goal difference (1st half)
23
Second-half points
-16
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.17
PPG before half-time
Lead holding37%

Leads at half-time in 27% of matches and wins 10%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.

Defence after half-time+0.5

Concedes 0.5 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

CR Khemis Zemamra - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.801.20
Goals scored / match0.20.4
Goals conceded / match0.40.4
Average goals in match0.60.8
1 goal40%60%
2 goals20%20%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet60%60%
No goal80%60%
Goal difference-10
Half-time: 0% leading - 80% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 60% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 1
Olympic Safi - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.400.40
Goals scored / match0.40.4
Goals conceded / match0.41.0
Average goals in match0.81.4
1 goal80%80%
2 goals0%40%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet60%20%
No goal60%60%
Goal difference0-3
Half-time: 40% leading - 20% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 40% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 2

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

CR Khemis Zemamra
ScoredConceded
0
2
0-15
4
4
16-30
5
11
31-45
4
1
46-60
8
6
61-75
8
12
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (8 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (12). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.

Olympic Safi
ScoredConceded
3
1
0-15
2
5
16-30
6
7
31-45
2
11
46-60
4
8
61-75
7
10
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (7 goli). Concedes most in 46-60 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.19
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.2 : 1.0
Estimated goal split
home : away
101%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
58%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+83%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
44%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
11%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 9 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

CR Khemis Zemamra

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.03
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.26
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+0.6 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.35
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.09
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
84%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
118%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.40
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.4
Late goals
28% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
28%

Olympic Safi

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.12
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.48
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-0.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.43
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.05
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
78%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
122%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.13
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
29% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 13% come in the first quarter-hour.
29%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Botola Pro).

Teams vs league

CR Khemis ZemamraLigaOlympic Safi
Average goals in match 2.172.17 2.20
Both teams scored 53%52% 63%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 43%38% 37%
Clean sheets 27%30% 13%
Goal before half-time 63%63% 67%
Goal after half-time 70%73% 83%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.17
Average goals per match
52%
Both teams scored
38%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
30%
Clean sheets
1.15
Home goals / match
1.02
Away goals / match
+13%
Home attack advantage
+11%
Home defence advantage
+11%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
63%
1 goal
25%
2 goals
8%
3 goals
2%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
73%
1 goal
35%
2 goals
10%
3 goals
0%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: CR Khemis Zemamra 1 - 0 - 0 Olympic Safi. Average goals 4.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.

FAQ

What was the result of CR Khemis Zemamra vs Olympic Safi?

The Botola Pro match finished CR Khemis Zemamra 1:1 Olympic Safi. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before CR Khemis Zemamra vs Olympic Safi?

CR Khemis Zemamra score 0.97 goals per game on average and Olympic Safi 0.80. The Botola Pro average is 2.17 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 38% of games. Both teams score in 53% of CR Khemis Zemamra's matches and 63% of Olympic Safi's.

What form are CR Khemis Zemamra and Olympic Safi in?

Over the last 5 games CR Khemis Zemamra have a 0-4-1 record (0.80 points per game) and Olympic Safi 0-3-2 (0.60 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for CR Khemis Zemamra vs Olympic Safi?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for CR Khemis Zemamra vs Olympic Safi: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.