England - Premier LeagueData current as of September 11, 2026

Crystal Palace vs Wolverhampton Wanderers: match statistics

155%(1.64)
X30%(3.50)
215%(4.30)

Crystal Palace are displaying significantly better form than Wolverhampton Wanderers, making them the favorite for this fixture. The hosts boast a positive xG balance in home matches (1.51 xG For vs 1.23 xG Against) and far superior offensive efficiency, scoring an average of 1 goal per game at home, while Wolves average just 0.38 goals away. Wolverhampton sit bottom of the table with a disastrous away record – 0% wins, 69% defeats, and as many as 62% of matches without scoring a goal. Crystal Palace have a 31% clean sheet rate at home and an advantage in possession (45% vs 42%), which, combined with the visitors' poor efficiency (5% shot conversion), gives them a real chance to secure all three points. The form of both sides over the last five matches is similar (1 point per match each), but the significant disparity in the quality of the hosts' home performances and the visitors' away displays points to a Crystal Palace victory, though a draw also remains in play due to Palace's high percentage of home draws (46%).

Crystal Palace vs Wolverhampton Wanderers: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

Crystal Palace played against Wolverhampton Wanderers in Premier League (England). The game was played on February 22, 2026. Final score: 1:0.

Recent form

Crystal Palace has 1 win, 1 draw and 3 losses over its last five games, averaging 0.80 points per game. Wolverhampton Wanderers has 0 wins, 2 draws and 3 losses, with 0.40 points per game.

Scoring records

Crystal Palace scores 1.08 goals per game and allows 1.23. Wolverhampton Wanderers scores 0.67 and allows 1.85. Games in this league average 2.76 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 50% of Crystal Palace's games and 44% of Wolverhampton Wanderers's. The Over 2.5 rates are 46% and 44%, compared with league averages of 56% for BTTS and 54% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

Crystal Palace has the higher season xG average, 1.34 to 1.09 per game. Crystal Palace takes 11.8 shots per game, while Wolverhampton Wanderers takes 9.2.

First-half and second-half trends

Crystal Palace leads at halftime in 35% of its games and scores 0.54 goals per game after halftime. Wolverhampton Wanderers leads at halftime in 7% and scores 0.30 after halftime.

When the teams score

Crystal Palace's most productive scoring window is minutes 31-45+ (8 goals). For Wolverhampton Wanderers, it is minutes 31-45+ (6 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

Premier League games average 2.76 goals. Both teams score in 56% of games, and 54% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 1 home win, 0 draws and 0 away wins. Those games averaged 2.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Crystal Palace are displaying significantly better form than Wolverhampton Wanderers, making them the favorite for this fixture. The hosts boast a positive xG balance in home matches (1.51 xG For vs 1.23 xG Against) and far superior offensive efficiency, scoring an average of 1 goal per game at home, while Wolves average just 0.38 goals away. Wolverhampton sit bottom of the table with a disastrous away record – 0% wins, 69% defeats, and as many as 62% of matches without scoring a goal. Crystal Palace have a 31% clean sheet rate at home and an advantage in possession (45% vs 42%), which, combined with the visitors' poor efficiency (5% shot conversion), gives them a real chance to secure all three points. The form of both sides over the last five matches is similar (1 point per match each), but the significant disparity in the quality of the hosts' home performances and the visitors' away displays points to a Crystal Palace victory, though a draw also remains in play due to Palace's high percentage of home draws (46%).

View the statistical overview

Stats by half

0 : 0
First half
1 : 0
Second half

Game stats

61Possession (%)39
Crystal PalaceWolverhampton Wanderers
14Shots12
Crystal PalaceWolverhampton Wanderers
3Shots on target7
Crystal PalaceWolverhampton Wanderers
1.51xG1.54
Crystal PalaceWolverhampton Wanderers
7Corners3
Crystal PalaceWolverhampton Wanderers
58Dangerous attacks39
Crystal PalaceWolverhampton Wanderers
19Fouls13
Crystal PalaceWolverhampton Wanderers
5Cards3
Crystal PalaceWolverhampton Wanderers

Pre-game profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

Crystal PalaceWolverhampton Wanderers
1.08Goals scored / game0.67
Crystal PalaceWolverhampton Wanderers
1.23Goals allowed / game1.85
Crystal PalaceWolverhampton Wanderers
Crystal PalaceWolverhampton Wanderers
45%Average possession44%
Crystal PalaceWolverhampton Wanderers
3.85Shots on target / game3.15
Crystal PalaceWolverhampton Wanderers
Crystal PalaceWolverhampton Wanderers

Team statswho is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

11.81Shots per game9.19
Crystal PalaceWolverhampton Wanderers
3.85Shots on target3.15
Crystal PalaceWolverhampton Wanderers
9.1%Shot conversion7.3%
Crystal PalaceWolverhampton Wanderers
45%Possession44%
Crystal PalaceWolverhampton Wanderers
1.34xG for1.09
Crystal PalaceWolverhampton Wanderers
1.33xG against1.63
Crystal PalaceWolverhampton Wanderers

Shooting quality

Crystal Palace: BalancedWolverhampton Wanderers: Balanced
Crystal PalaceWolverhampton Wanderers
Accuracy (shots on target)33%34%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.110.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.280.21

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

Crystal Palace is 100% better for: last-5 form.

0.8 pts / game - Crystal Palace · 0.4 pts / game - Wolverhampton Wanderers

Crystal Palace
LLDWL
Season result split
31% W31% D38% L
Season (W-D-L)
8-8-10
1.23 pts / game · goal difference -4
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-1-3
0.80 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
2-6-5
Last 5 at home
0-2-3
LDDLL
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 1.8xG: 1.41Opponent xG: 1.18BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 60%
Wolverhampton Wanderers
LLLDD
No win in the last 5 games
Season result split
4% W26% D70% L
Season (W-D-L)
1-7-19
0.37 pts / game · goal difference -32
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-2-3
0.40 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
0-4-9
Last 5 away
0-3-2
LDDLD
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 0.6Goals conceded: 1.8xG: 1.13Opponent xG: 1.81BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 40%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Crystal Palace is 61% better for: goals scored per game.

1.08 goals / game - Crystal Palace · 0.67 goals / game - Wolverhampton Wanderers

Crystal Palace is 50% better for: goals allowed per game.

1.23 goals / game - Crystal Palace · 1.85 goals / game - Wolverhampton Wanderers

Crystal Palace scoring profile: very strong

Crystal Palace scores in 69% of games (18 of 26 meczów), while Wolverhampton Wanderers keeps a clean sheet in 11% (3 of 27 meczów).

Wolverhampton Wanderers scoring profile: mixed

Wolverhampton Wanderers scores in 48% of games (13 of 27 meczów), while Crystal Palace keeps a clean sheet in 35% (9 of 26 meczów).

28Goals scored (season)18
Crystal PalaceWolverhampton Wanderers
32Goals conceded (season)50
Crystal PalaceWolverhampton Wanderers
2.31Average goals per game2.52
Crystal PalaceWolverhampton Wanderers
6Goals scored (last 5)3
Crystal PalaceWolverhampton Wanderers
9Goals conceded (last 5)9
Crystal PalaceWolverhampton Wanderers

How often they score at least...

69%1 goal48%
Crystal PalaceWolverhampton Wanderers
31%2 goals15%
Crystal PalaceWolverhampton Wanderers
8%3 goals4%
Crystal PalaceWolverhampton Wanderers
0%4 goals0%
Crystal PalaceWolverhampton Wanderers

How often they concede at least...

65%1 goal89%
Crystal PalaceWolverhampton Wanderers
35%2 goals59%
Crystal PalaceWolverhampton Wanderers
19%3 goals30%
Crystal PalaceWolverhampton Wanderers
4%4 goals7%
Crystal PalaceWolverhampton Wanderers

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

44%
Wolverhampton Wanderers - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.12 of 27 meczów
56%
League average

Goal patterns

15%BTTS at half-time19%
Crystal PalaceWolverhampton Wanderers
0%BTTS in both halves4%
Crystal PalaceWolverhampton Wanderers
19%Scored in both halves4%
Crystal PalaceWolverhampton Wanderers

BTTS and goal count

38%Min. 3 goals and BTTS30%
Crystal PalaceWolverhampton Wanderers
8%Min. 3 goals without BTTS15%
Crystal PalaceWolverhampton Wanderers
80%BTTS - last 540%
Crystal PalaceWolverhampton Wanderers

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

Full game - team comparison (Over)

Crystal PalaceWolverhampton Wanderers

1st half

73%Min. 1 goal before half-time67%
Crystal PalaceWolverhampton Wanderers
23%Min. 2 goals before half-time37%
Crystal PalaceWolverhampton Wanderers
4%Min. 3 goals before half-time19%
Crystal PalaceWolverhampton Wanderers

2nd half

65%Min. 1 goal after half-time70%
Crystal PalaceWolverhampton Wanderers
42%Min. 2 goals after half-time37%
Crystal PalaceWolverhampton Wanderers
12%Min. 3 goals after half-time15%
Crystal PalaceWolverhampton Wanderers

Game halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Crystal Palace is 112% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.42 pts / game - Crystal Palace · 0.67 pts / game - Wolverhampton Wanderers

Crystal Palace - half-time state
35% leading38% draw27% trailing
Wolverhampton Wanderers - half-time state
7% leading44% draw48% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.42Points per game (1st half)0.67
Crystal PalaceWolverhampton Wanderers
0.54Goals scored (1st half)0.37
Crystal PalaceWolverhampton Wanderers
0.54Goals conceded (1st half)0.93
Crystal PalaceWolverhampton Wanderers
1.08Average goals (1st half)1.3
Crystal PalaceWolverhampton Wanderers
62%Clean sheet before half-time41%
Crystal PalaceWolverhampton Wanderers
50%No goal before half-time74%
Crystal PalaceWolverhampton Wanderers

After half-time (2nd half)

1.12Points per game (2nd half)0.81
Crystal PalaceWolverhampton Wanderers
0.54Goals scored (2nd half)0.3
Crystal PalaceWolverhampton Wanderers
0.69Goals conceded (2nd half)0.93
Crystal PalaceWolverhampton Wanderers
1.23Average goals (2nd half)1.22
Crystal PalaceWolverhampton Wanderers
54%Clean sheet after half-time41%
Crystal PalaceWolverhampton Wanderers
62%No goal after half-time74%
Crystal PalaceWolverhampton Wanderers

Crystal Palace - second-half results

23% W42% D35% L
37
Half-time points
14
Half-time goals
0
Goal difference (1st half)
29
Second-half points
-4
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.42
PPG before half-time
Lead holding89%

Leads at halftime in 35% of games and wins 31%. Usually protects a halftime lead through the final whistle.

Defense after halftime+0.1

Allows 0.1 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

Wolverhampton Wanderers - second-half results

15% W37% D48% L
18
Half-time points
10
Half-time goals
-15
Goal difference (1st half)
22
Second-half points
-17
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.67
PPG before half-time
Lead holding57%

Leads at halftime in 7% of games and wins 4%. Sometimes gives up a halftime lead.

Defense after halftime0.0

Defense stays consistent across the full game.

Crystal Palace - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game0.601.00
Goals scored / game0.80.4
Goals allowed / game1.20.6
Average goals per game2.01.0
1 goal80%60%
2 goals60%20%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet20%60%
No goal40%60%
Goal difference-2-1
Half-time: 0% leading - 60% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 60% - Half-time goals total: 4
Wolverhampton Wanderers - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game0.201.60
Goals scored / game0.00.6
Goals allowed / game1.40.4
Average goals per game1.41.0
1 goal80%60%
2 goals40%20%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet20%60%
No goal100%60%
Goal difference-7+1
Half-time: 0% leading - 20% draw - 80% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 40% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 0

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

Crystal Palace
ScoredConceded
1
2
0-15
5
0
16-30
8
12
31-45
1
5
46-60
7
5
61-75
6
8
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (8 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (12). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.

Wolverhampton Wanderers
ScoredConceded
2
7
0-15
2
6
16-30
6
12
31-45
3
4
46-60
2
12
61-75
3
9
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (6 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (12). Late-goal balance (76-90): -6 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

2.42
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
1.5 : 0.9
Estimated goal split
home : away
88%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
47%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-17%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
33%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
16%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 6 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

Crystal Palace

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.01
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.16
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-1.8 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.26
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.10
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
71%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
100%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
-0.43
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
0.0
Late goals
21% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 4% come in the first quarter-hour.
21%

Wolverhampton Wanderers

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.54
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.64
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+0.7 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.42
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
-0.22
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
54%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
121%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
+0.03
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.1
Late goals
17% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 11% come in the first quarter-hour.
17%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Premier League).

Teams vs league

Crystal PalaceLigaWolverhampton Wanderers
Average goals per game 2.312.76 2.52
Both teams scored 50%56% 44%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 46%54% 44%
Clean sheets 35%26% 11%
Goal before half-time 73%72% 67%
Goal after half-time 65%80% 70%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.76
Average goals per game
56%
Both teams scored
54%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
26%
Clean sheets
1.53
Home goals / game
1.23
Away goals / game
+24%
Home attack advantage
+20%
Home defensive advantage
+12%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
72%
1 goal
33%
2 goals
12%
3 goals
3%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
80%
1 goal
49%
2 goals
19%
3 goals
6%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Crystal PalaceYellow cardWilliam James Hughes
  2. Crystal PalaceYellow cardJaydee Canvot
  3. Crystal PalaceYellow cardAdam Wharton
  4. Crystal PalaceSubstitutionOn: Daichi KamadaOff: William James Hughes
  5. Wolverhampton WanderersYellow cardLadislav Krejčí
  6. Wolverhampton WanderersYellow cardLadislav Krejčí
  7. Wolverhampton WanderersSubstitutionOn: David Møller WolfeOff: Adam James Armstrong
  8. Crystal PalaceYellow cardChadi Riad Dnanou
  9. Crystal PalaceSubstitutionOn: Evann GuessandOff: Chadi Riad Dnanou
  10. Crystal PalaceSubstitutionOn: Brennan Price JohnsonOff: Yeremi Jesús Pino Santos
  11. Wolverhampton WanderersSubstitutionOn: João Victor Gomes da SilvaOff: Jeanricner Bellegarde
  12. Crystal PalaceGoalEvann GuessandAssist: Tyrick Kwon Mitchell
  13. Wolverhampton WanderersSubstitutionOn: Angel GomesOff: Yerson Mosquera
  14. Wolverhampton WanderersYellow cardAndré Trindade da Costa Neto
  15. Crystal PalaceYellow cardIsmaïla Sarr

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Record from Crystal Palace's perspective: 1 win, 0 draws and 0 losses against Wolverhampton Wanderers. Games average 2.00 goals, and both teams scored in 0% of them.

FAQ

What was the result of Crystal Palace vs Wolverhampton Wanderers?

The Premier League match finished Crystal Palace 1:0 Wolverhampton Wanderers. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Crystal Palace vs Wolverhampton Wanderers?

Crystal Palace score 1.08 goals per game on average and Wolverhampton Wanderers 0.67. The Premier League average is 2.76 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 54% of games. Both teams score in 50% of Crystal Palace's matches and 44% of Wolverhampton Wanderers's.

What form are Crystal Palace and Wolverhampton Wanderers in?

Over the last 5 games Crystal Palace have a 1-1-3 record (0.80 points per game) and Wolverhampton Wanderers 0-2-3 (0.40 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Crystal Palace vs Wolverhampton Wanderers?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Crystal Palace vs Wolverhampton Wanderers: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.