Csákvári TK vs Karcag SE: match statistics
Full analysis and pick in the app
Check the betting analysis, pick, value bet and full reasoning for this match.
Csákvári TK vs Karcag SE: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Csákvári TK plays Karcag SE in NB II (Hungary). The game is scheduled for November 8, 2026. Venue: Tersztyánszky Ödön Sportközpont.
Recent form
Csákvári TK has 0 wins, 0 draws and 5 losses over its last five games, averaging 0.00 points per game. Karcag SE has 0 wins, 1 draw and 4 losses, with 0.20 points per game.
Scoring records
Csákvári TK scores 0.75 goals per game and allows 2.25. Karcag SE scores 1.33 and allows 2.00. Games in this league average 2.91 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 42% of Csákvári TK's games and 67% of Karcag SE's. The Over 2.5 rates are 58% and 67%, compared with league averages of 55% for BTTS and 56% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Csákvári TK has the higher season xG average, 1.22 to 1.14 per game. Csákvári TK takes 6.9 shots per game, while Karcag SE takes 8.3.
First-half and second-half trends
Csákvári TK leads at halftime in 17% of its games and scores 0.25 goals per game after halftime. Karcag SE leads at halftime in 17% and scores 0.83 after halftime.
When the teams score
Csákvári TK's most productive scoring window is minutes 0-15 (3 goals). For Karcag SE, it is minutes 76-90+ (5 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
NB II games average 2.91 goals. Both teams score in 55% of games, and 56% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, 2 previous meetings were available. The record was 0 home wins, 0 draws and 2 away wins. Those games averaged 2.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.
Before kickoff
1X2 odds
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Csákvári TK | Karcag SE | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 46% | 34% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.18 | 0.14 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.24 | 0.47 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Karcag SE is 77% better for: goals scored per game.
0.75 goals / game - Csákvári TK · 1.33 goals / game - Karcag SE
Karcag SE is 13% better for: goals allowed per game.
2.25 goals / game - Csákvári TK · 2 goals / game - Karcag SE
Csákvári TK scores in 50% of games (6 of 12 games), while Karcag SE keeps a clean sheet in 8% (1 of 12 games).
Karcag SE scores in 67% of games (8 of 12 games), while Csákvári TK keeps a clean sheet in 8% (1 of 12 games).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Csákvári TK
Over / Under - Karcag SE
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Karcag SE is 20% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
0.83 pts / game - Csákvári TK · 1 pts / game - Karcag SE
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Csákvári TK - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 17% of games and wins 8%. Sometimes gives up a halftime lead.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
Karcag SE - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 17% of games and wins 17%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.2 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.00 | 0.20 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.2 | 0.0 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.8 | 1.0 |
| Average goals per game | 1.0 | 1.0 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 20% |
| No goal | 80% | 100% |
| Goal difference | -3 | -5 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 0.80 | 0.20 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.4 | 0.4 |
| Goals allowed / game | 1.2 | 1.6 |
| Average goals per game | 1.6 | 2.0 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 40% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 20% |
| No goal | 60% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -4 | -6 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (3 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (5 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Csákvári TK
Karcag SE
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (NB II).
Teams vs league
| Csákvári TK | Liga | Karcag SE | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | • 3.00 | 2.91 | ▲ 3.33 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 42% | 55% | ▲ 67% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 58% | 56% | ▲ 67% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 8% | 24% | ▼ 8% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 83% | 71% | ▼ 67% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 92% | 82% | ▼ 67% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Head-to-head
Record from Csákvári TK's perspective: 0 wins, 0 draws and 2 losses against Karcag SE. Games average 2.00 goals, and both teams scored in 50% of them.
FAQ
When do Csákvári TK and Karcag SE play?
Csákvári TK face Karcag SE on November 8, 2026 in NB II at Tersztyánszky Ödön Sportközpont. The exact kick-off time in your timezone is shown at the top of the match page.
What is the head-to-head record between Csákvári TK and Karcag SE?
In the last 2 head-to-head matches Csákvári TK won 0, Karcag SE won 2 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 2.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Csákvári TK vs Karcag SE?
Csákvári TK score 0.75 goals per game on average and Karcag SE 1.33. The NB II average is 2.91 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 56% of games. Both teams score in 42% of Csákvári TK's matches and 67% of Karcag SE's.
What form are Csákvári TK and Karcag SE in?
Over the last 5 games Csákvári TK have a 0-0-5 record (0.00 points per game) and Karcag SE 0-1-4 (0.20 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Csákvári TK vs Karcag SE?
The statistical background for Csákvári TK vs Karcag SE — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.