Cuiabá vs Londrina: match statistics
Cuiabá vs Londrina: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Cuiabá played against Londrina in Serie B (Brazil). The game was played on June 25, 2026. Venue: Arena Pantanal. Final score: 2:2.
Recent form
Cuiabá has 3 wins, 0 draws and 2 losses over its last five games, averaging 1.80 points per game. Londrina has 2 wins, 0 draws and 3 losses, with 1.20 points per game.
Scoring records
Cuiabá scores 0.64 goals per game and allows 0.50. Londrina scores 1.21 and allows 1.57. Games in this league average 2.31 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 21% of Cuiabá's games and 50% of Londrina's. The Over 2.5 rates are 7% and 64%, compared with league averages of 49% for BTTS and 43% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Cuiabá has the higher season xG average, 1.30 to 1.29 per game. Cuiabá takes 11.6 shots per game, while Londrina takes 12.1.
First-half and second-half trends
Cuiabá leads at halftime in 14% of its games and scores 0.36 goals per game after halftime. Londrina leads at halftime in 14% and scores 0.93 after halftime.
When the teams score
Cuiabá's most productive scoring window is minutes 31-45+ (3 goals). For Londrina, it is minutes 76-90+ (7 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Serie B games average 2.31 goals. Both teams score in 49% of games, and 43% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
There is not enough head-to-head history for a meaningful comparison.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Cuiabá are favorites in this matchup based on superiority in key metrics. At home they average 14 shots with 5.71 on target and an xG of 1.56, while Londrina on the road average 11 shots, 3.29 on target and an xG of 1.18. Defensively the hosts are better — Cuiabá concede only 0.57 goals per home match and have 57% clean sheets, whereas Londrina concede 1.71 goals away and have recorded 0% clean sheets. Cuiabá’s issue is finishing: despite an xG of 1.56 they score only 0.71 goals at home with a conversion rate of 5% and a 43% share of matches without a goal, while Londrina have a higher conversion of 10% and average 1.14 goals away. Considering the higher xG for the hosts, superior defense and form (Cuiabá averaging 1.8 points in the last 5 matches versus Londrina’s 1.2), I predict a home win.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
I assess BTTS probability at 35% for "Yes" and 65% for "No", therefore I pick "No". The strongest signal is that Londrina failed to score in 57% of season matches and has 0% clean sheets, while conceding 22 goals this season, which greatly reduces their scoring likelihood. Cuiabá scores in 71% of matches (100%−29% matches without a goal) and has a season BTTS rate of 57%, but a simple season estimate of 71%×43% yields only about a 31% probability that both teams score simultaneously. In the last 5 matches BTTS occurred in only 20% of games for both teams, and the last-5 balances are: Cuiabá 5 scored and 3 conceded (avg 0.6 conceded), Londrina 5 scored and 7 conceded (avg 1.4 conceded), which confirms the low BTTS trend. Although the home side creates more chances (xG 1.39 vs 1.18, 13.14 shots vs 11.0 and 3.71 shots on target vs 3.29), Londrina’s dominant share of goal-less matches and the low BTTS frequency in form favor the "No" scenario (clean sheet expected/No Goal).
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
I estimate Cuiabá will generate 1.55 xG and Londrina 1.26 xG, totaling 2.81 expected goals, clearly above the league average of 2.31. Season-long indicators show both teams have 71% of matches over 1.5 goals (Cuiabá 71%, Londrina 71%), while Over 2.5 occurs in 57% of home matches and 71% of away matches, suggesting a moderately high chance of at least 2–3 goals. Cuiabá averages 13.14 shots with 3.71 on target, Londrina 11.0 and 3.29; with a 10% conversion rate these figures support the 1.55 and 1.26 xG projections. However, the last 5 matches show a decline in games over 2.5 goals (last 5: 20% for the home side, 40% for the away side) and both defenses concede on average 1.43 (Cuiabá) and 1.71 (Londrina) goals, which limits the likelihood of a very high scoreline over 3.5. Based on these data I select Over 1.5 as the strongest signal (probability Over 1.5 ~84%), rate Over 2.5 as moderately likely (~62%), and Over 3.5 as unlikely (~30%).
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Half-time statistics show a clear draw trend: the home side were level at the break in 71% of the season’s matches and in 60% of their last 5 games; average first-half goals are 0.43 for the hosts versus 0.14 for the visitors. After the break the hosts’ advantage increases — their season xG is 1.39 compared to 1.18 for the visitors, their average points per game are 1.14 versus 0.86 for Londrina, and the visitors concede on average 1.71 goals per match. Data on second-half goals confirm that HT draws are often resolved: 86% of the hosts’ matches see at least one goal after the break, while for the visitors this share is 71%. Combined with the hosts’ better form in the last 5 matches (60% wins vs. 40% for the visitors), the safest scenario is a draw at half-time and a Cuiabá win after 90 minutes, so I assign the highest probability to the X/1 outcome (33%), with 1/1 (22%) and X/X (15%) as alternatives.
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Cuiabá | Londrina | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 37% | 29% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.11 | 0.11 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.15 | 0.35 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Cuiabá is 50% better for: last-5 form.
1.8 pts / game - Cuiabá · 1.2 pts / game - Londrina
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Londrina is 89% better for: goals scored per game.
0.64 goals / game - Cuiabá · 1.21 goals / game - Londrina
Cuiabá is 214% better for: goals allowed per game.
0.5 goals / game - Cuiabá · 1.57 goals / game - Londrina
Cuiabá scores in 43% of games (6 of 14 meczów), while Londrina keeps a clean sheet in 14% (2 of 14 meczów).
Londrina scores in 57% of games (8 of 14 meczów), while Cuiabá keeps a clean sheet in 57% (8 of 14 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Cuiabá
Over / Under - Londrina
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Cuiabá is 41% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.21 pts / game - Cuiabá · 0.86 pts / game - Londrina
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Cuiabá - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 14% of games and wins 29%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.2 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
Londrina - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 14% of games and wins 29%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.2 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.20 | 1.60 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.6 | 0.4 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.4 | 0.2 |
| Average goals per game | 1.0 | 0.6 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 0% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 80% |
| No goal | 60% | 60% |
| Goal difference | +1 | +1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 0.60 | 1.40 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.2 | 0.8 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.6 | 0.8 |
| Average goals per game | 0.8 | 1.6 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 40% |
| No goal | 80% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -2 | 0 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (3 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (7 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Cuiabá
Londrina
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Serie B).
Teams vs league
| Cuiabá | Liga | Londrina | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▼ 1.14 | 2.31 | ▲ 2.79 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 21% | 49% | • 50% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 7% | 43% | ▲ 64% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 57% | 31% | ▼ 14% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 29% | 63% | ▲ 71% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 50% | 76% | ▲ 79% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
FAQ
What was the result of Cuiabá vs Londrina?
The Serie B match finished Cuiabá 2:2 Londrina. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Cuiabá vs Londrina?
Cuiabá score 0.64 goals per game on average and Londrina 1.21. The Serie B average is 2.31 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 43% of games. Both teams score in 21% of Cuiabá's matches and 50% of Londrina's.
What form are Cuiabá and Londrina in?
Over the last 5 games Cuiabá have a 3-0-2 record (1.80 points per game) and Londrina 2-0-3 (1.20 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Cuiabá vs Londrina?
The statistical background for Cuiabá vs Londrina — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.


