Cuiabá vs Novorizontino: match statistics
Cuiabá vs Novorizontino: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Cuiabá played against Novorizontino in Serie B (Brazil). The game was played on May 16, 2026. Final score: 0:0.
Recent form
Cuiabá has 1 win, 4 draws and 0 losses over its last five games, averaging 1.40 points per game. Novorizontino has 3 wins, 1 draw and 1 loss, with 2.00 points per game.
Scoring records
Cuiabá scores 0.50 goals per game and allows 0.50. Novorizontino scores 1.38 and allows 1.13. Games in this league average 2.23 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 25% of Cuiabá's games and 50% of Novorizontino's. The Over 2.5 rates are 0% and 50%, compared with league averages of 48% for BTTS and 42% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Novorizontino has the higher season xG average, 1.55 to 1.16 per game. Cuiabá takes 11.0 shots per game, while Novorizontino takes 14.5.
First-half and second-half trends
Cuiabá leads at halftime in 13% of its games and scores 0.38 goals per game after halftime. Novorizontino leads at halftime in 0% and scores 1.25 after halftime.
When the teams score
Cuiabá's most productive scoring window is minutes 61-75 (2 goals). For Novorizontino, it is minutes 61-75 (5 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Serie B games average 2.23 goals. Both teams score in 48% of games, and 42% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, 2 previous meetings were available. The record was 0 home wins, 0 draws and 2 away wins. Those games averaged 2.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
I back the draw: the hosts have as many as 75% draws at home and 0% home wins, substantially increasing the likelihood of a points split. Cuiabá generates on average 1.5 xG at home and 13.75 shots per match with 53% possession, but scores only 0.5 goals per match — a -1.0 difference versus xG, indicating clear inefficiency. Novorizontino arrives with better efficiency: 11 goals this season, averaging 1.5 goals away and a conversion rate of around 14%, while the hosts have 4 goals and a 4% conversion. Both teams concede about 1 goal per match (Cuiabá 1.0 at home, Novorizontino 1.0 away) and have 50% of games without scoring, so I expect a low, controlled game (most likely 0-0 or 1-1), hence a 55% chance of a draw, 35% for an away win and 10% for a home win.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
I project BTTS is more likely — 65% for 'Yes' and 35% for 'No'. Cuiabá generates on average xG 1.9 with 18 shots and 5.5 shots on target per match, while Novorizontino concedes xG 1.21, which favors a home goal. Novorizontino averages xG 1.2, a seasonal goals average of 1.5 and has scored 9 goals in the last 5 matches (1.8 per game), so the visitors can find the net. On the other hand the picture is mixed: Cuiabá at home records 75% BTTS, whereas Novorizontino away has 50% clean sheets and only 25% BTTS, which reduces confidence in the tip. Considering the hosts' creative edge (xG 1.9, 18 shots) and the visitors' recent finishing form (9 goals in 5 matches), the Goal/Goal scenario appears stronger.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Based on xG I project approximately 1.56 goals for Cuiabá (attacking xG 1.90 vs opponents’ xG conceded 1.21) and 1.07 for Novorizontino (attacking xG 1.20 vs hosts’ xG conceded 0.94), giving a total of 2.63 expected goals. The 2.63 total is above the league average of 2.18 and exceeds the 2.5 threshold, so I assign a 60% probability to Over 2.5 (40% Under 2.5). Seasonally Cuiabá’s matches finish above 1.5 goals in 75% of cases, Novorizontino in 50%; the hosts average 18 shots and 5.5 on target with 7% conversion, while the visitors have 11 shots and 4 on target with 14% conversion — this supports a high 88% probability for Over 1.5. I rate Over 3.5 at about 25% (Under 75%), since seasonal Over 3.5 is only 25% for both teams and the expected 2.63 is well below 3.5. The strongest betting signal is Over 1.5, confirmed by xG 1.56/1.07 and seasonal rates 75%/50%.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
At HT the most likely outcome is a draw: the home team have been level at the break in 4 of 4 matches (drawingAtHT_home = 4.0, drawingAtHTPercentage_home = 100.0), and the visitors in 3 of 4 (drawingAtHT_away = 3.0, drawingAtHTPercentage_away = 75.0); the home side have never led at the break (leadingAtHTPercentage_home = 0.0), so HT draw predominates. After the break I expect greater activity from Cuiabá – their xG is 1.9 versus Novorizontino’s 1.2 (difference +0.7), average shots 18.0 vs 11.0 and shots on target 5.5 vs 4.0 (difference +7 shots, +1.5 SOT). The home team also have higher average points 1.75 vs 1.25 and a league home attack advantage (league_homeAttackAdvantagePercentage = 22.0), and the second half often produces goals (over05_2hg_percentage_home = 100.0, over05_2hg_percentage_away = 75.0), which favors a turnaround after the break. Despite the visitors’ better form over the last 5 (last5_winPercentage_overall_away = 60.0 vs home = 20.0), Novorizontino’s low first-half efficiency (scoredAVGHT_away = 0.0) makes the scenario of a draw at half-time and a home win (X/1) the strongest.
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Cuiabá | Novorizontino | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 31% | 33% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.11 | 0.11 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.15 | 0.29 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Novorizontino is 43% better for: last-5 form.
1.4 pts / game - Cuiabá · 2 pts / game - Novorizontino
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Novorizontino is 176% better for: goals scored per game.
0.5 goals / game - Cuiabá · 1.38 goals / game - Novorizontino
Cuiabá is 126% better for: goals allowed per game.
0.5 goals / game - Cuiabá · 1.13 goals / game - Novorizontino
Cuiabá scores in 38% of games (3 of 8 meczów), while Novorizontino keeps a clean sheet in 38% (3 of 8 meczów).
Novorizontino scores in 75% of games (6 of 8 meczów), while Cuiabá keeps a clean sheet in 63% (5 of 8 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Cuiabá
Over / Under - Novorizontino
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Cuiabá is 42% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.25 pts / game - Cuiabá · 0.88 pts / game - Novorizontino
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Cuiabá - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 13% of games and wins 13%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.5 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
Novorizontino - second-half results
Allows 0.6 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.40 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.2 | 0.6 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.0 | 0.4 |
| Average goals per game | 0.2 | 1.0 |
| 1 goal | 20% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 100% | 60% |
| No goal | 80% | 60% |
| Goal difference | +1 | +1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 0.80 | 2.40 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.2 | 1.6 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.4 | 0.6 |
| Average goals per game | 0.6 | 2.2 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 60% |
| No goal | 80% | 20% |
| Goal difference | -1 | +5 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (2 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (5 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Cuiabá
Novorizontino
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Serie B).
Teams vs league
| Cuiabá | Liga | Novorizontino | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▼ 1.00 | 2.23 | ▲ 2.50 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 25% | 48% | ▲ 50% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 0% | 42% | ▲ 50% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 63% | 33% | ▲ 38% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 13% | 58% | ▼ 25% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 50% | 75% | ▲ 88% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Record from Cuiabá's perspective: 0 wins, 0 draws and 2 losses against Novorizontino. Games average 2.00 goals, and both teams scored in 0% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Cuiabá vs Novorizontino?
The Serie B match finished Cuiabá 0:0 Novorizontino. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Cuiabá and Novorizontino?
In the last 2 head-to-head matches Cuiabá won 0, Novorizontino won 2 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 2.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Cuiabá vs Novorizontino?
Cuiabá score 0.50 goals per game on average and Novorizontino 1.38. The Serie B average is 2.23 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 42% of games. Both teams score in 25% of Cuiabá's matches and 50% of Novorizontino's.
What form are Cuiabá and Novorizontino in?
Over the last 5 games Cuiabá have a 1-4-0 record (1.40 points per game) and Novorizontino 3-1-1 (2.00 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Cuiabá vs Novorizontino?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.


