Čukarički vs Radnički Kragujevac: match statistics

Čukarički sit higher in the table (6th vs 12th) and in the last 5 matches have a record of 1 win, 2 draws, 2 losses (1.0 point per game) versus Radnički’s 0 wins, 4 draws, 1 loss (0.8 ppd), giving the hosts a marginal edge. This season Čukarički scored 2 goals and Radnički 0, although hosts average 0 goals per home game with a goal difference of -1, and visitors also average 0 goals per away game — both teams therefore struggle with finishing. xG metrics show similar offensive potential: hosts 1.60 xG per match vs guests 1.72 xG, but xG against is higher for the hosts (1.79 vs 1.66), suggesting Radnički generates slightly better quality chances while Čukarički more often concedes situations in front of their goal. Both sides attempt a comparable number of shots (14 vs 13) and the same average of shots on target (4 vs 4), and the combined goals per game average is just 1.0, so I expect a low tempo and few goals. Considering the higher league position, slightly better points return in the last five matches and home advantage, I favor the home win, although both teams’ finishing problems also make a draw a realistic outcome.

I back BTTS 'No' — both teams failing to score is more likely, as the home side have 0% BTTS for the season and 0% in their last 5 matches. In their last 5 matches Čukarički scored only 2 goals (0.4 per match) with xG_for 1.04 over that period, indicating low finishing efficiency from created chances. Radnički show better offensive metrics (xG_for around 1.69–1.72, averaging 13 shots and 4 on target per match) with 4 goals in their last 5 matches (0.8 per match) and 40% BTTS in those fixtures, but they are mainly the candidate for the single goal. Additionally, only 38% of league matches finish BTTS, while clean sheet expected occurrences are as high as 77%, reinforcing a single-goal scenario rather than both teams scoring. Based on this I assess BTTS 'No' at 80% and 'Yes' at 20%.

xG analysis from the last 5 matches shows Čukarički with xG_for 1.04 and xG_against 2.19, while Radnički has xG_for 1.69 and xG_against 1.20. Averaging the home attack with the away defense yields an expected ~1.12 goals for Čukarički and ~1.94 goals for Radnički, totaling 3.06 expected goals. A Poisson model with λ=3.06 translates to approximately 81% probability for Over 1.5, 59% for Over 2.5 and 37% for Over 3.5, so the strongest signal is Over 2.5. Additionally, Radnički averages 13 shots and 4 on target per game, and scored 4 goals in the last 5 matches (0.8 average) while Čukarički, despite an xG of 1.04, has scored only 2 goals (0.4 average), which suggests a goals game with an edge to the away attack; for these reasons I recommend Over 2.5.

The strongest signal is a draw at half-time and a draw at full-time (X/X). In the last 5 matches Radnički finished 4 of 5 games as draws (80%), while Čukarički had 2 draws in 5 (40%); the average share of draws at the break from both sides is (60% + 40%)/2 = 50%, and the average share of draws in the match is (80% + 40%)/2 = 60%, yielding approximately 30% for X/X. Radnički has the higher xG (1.72) and in the last 5 matches they averaged 1.0 second-half goals versus 0.0 for the hosts, therefore I assess the scenario of a draw at half-time followed by an away win after the break (X/2) at 20%. The visitors have not won in their last 5 matches (0% wins), so variants with dominant away wins are less likely (2/1 and 2/2 at 6% each). Considering an average of 0.4 goals scored before the break by each team (0.4 and 0.4), a drawn first half appears most probable.