Damash Gilanian vs Naft Bandar Abbas: match statistics
Damash Gilanian presents alarming form, occupying the last, 18th place in the table without a single victory in the season. The hosts have not won any of their last five matches, scoring merely 1 goal and conceding as many as 10 in this period. Their efficiency in home matches is dramatic—63% of matches end without a scored goal, and an average of 0.38 goals per match against 1.5 conceded shows a huge disparity. Naft Bandar Abbas, although not impressive in efficiency on the road (13% wins), has a significantly better overall record with 5 victories and a solid defense (0.75 goals conceded per away match). In the last five meetings, the visitors earned 1.2 points per match, which, given the catastrophic form of the hosts (0.2 PPG), gives them a clear advantage. Higher xG values (1.16 vs 0.73) and a better goal difference (+3 difference compared to -19 for the hosts) additionally support the prognosis for a favorable result for Naft Bandar Abbas.
Damash Gilanian vs Naft Bandar Abbas: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Damash Gilanian play Naft Bandar Abbas in Azadegan League (Iran). The match date is 26 January 2026 at 12:00. Final score: 0:1.
Current form
Damash Gilanian: 0-3-2, 0.60 points/match. Naft Bandar Abbas: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match.
Goal statistics
Damash Gilanian scores 0.47 and concedes 1.65 goals per match. Naft Bandar Abbas scores 0.76 and concedes 0.56. League average: 1.59 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Damash Gilanian 41%, Naft Bandar Abbas 35%. Over 2.5: Damash Gilanian 32%, Naft Bandar Abbas 18%. League level: BTTS 30%, Over 2.5 22%.
xG, shots and style
Naft Bandar Abbas has higher xG: 0.96 vs 0.82. Damash Gilanian: 1.5 shots per match, Naft Bandar Abbas: 0.4.
Match halves
Damash Gilanian: half-time lead 3%, second-half goals 0.29. Naft Bandar Abbas: half-time lead 26%, second-half goals 0.32.
Goals by minute
Damash Gilanian: 76-90+ (8 goals). Naft Bandar Abbas: 0-15 (6 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Azadegan League: 1.59 goals per match, BTTS 30%, Over 2.5 22%.
Head-to-head
1 H2H matches: 0-0-1. Average goals 3.00, BTTS 100%.
Match description
Damash Gilanian presents alarming form, occupying the last, 18th place in the table without a single victory in the season. The hosts have not won any of their last five matches, scoring merely 1 goal and conceding as many as 10 in this period. Their efficiency in home matches is dramatic—63% of matches end without a scored goal, and an average of 0.38 goals per match against 1.5 conceded shows a huge disparity. Naft Bandar Abbas, although not impressive in efficiency on the road (13% wins), has a significantly better overall record with 5 victories and a solid defense (0.75 goals conceded per away match). In the last five meetings, the visitors earned 1.2 points per match, which, given the catastrophic form of the hosts (0.2 PPG), gives them a clear advantage. Higher xG values (1.16 vs 0.73) and a better goal difference (+3 difference compared to -19 for the hosts) additionally support the prognosis for a favorable result for Naft Bandar Abbas.
Half-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Damash Gilanian | Naft Bandar Abbas | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 19% | -93% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.55 | 2.18 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 1.62 | 0.00 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Naft Bandar Abbas is 167% better for: last-5 form.
0.6 pts / match - Damash Gilanian · 1.6 pts / match - Naft Bandar Abbas
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Naft Bandar Abbas is 62% better for: goals scored per match.
0.47 goals / match - Damash Gilanian · 0.76 goals / match - Naft Bandar Abbas
Naft Bandar Abbas is 195% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.65 goals / match - Damash Gilanian · 0.56 goals / match - Naft Bandar Abbas
Damash Gilanian scores in 44% of matches (15 of 34 matches), while Naft Bandar Abbas keeps a clean sheet in 50% (17 of 34 matches).
Naft Bandar Abbas scores in 56% of matches (19 of 34 matches), while Damash Gilanian keeps a clean sheet in 21% (7 of 34 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under — Damash Gilanian
Over / Under — Naft Bandar Abbas
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Naft Bandar Abbas is 107% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
0.68 pts / match - Damash Gilanian · 1.41 pts / match - Naft Bandar Abbas
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Damash Gilanian - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 3% of matches and wins 6%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.4 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Naft Bandar Abbas - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 26% of matches and wins 29%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.80 | 0.80 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 0.2 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.2 | 0.8 |
| Average goals in match | 1.6 | 1.0 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 40% |
| No goal | 60% | 80% |
| Goal difference | -4 | -3 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.00 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.0 | 0.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.0 | 0.2 |
| Average goals in match | 0.0 | 0.6 |
| 1 goal | 0% | 40% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 100% | 80% |
| No goal | 100% | 80% |
| Goal difference | 0 | +1 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (8 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (15). Late-goal balance (76-90): -7 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (6 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Damash Gilanian
Naft Bandar Abbas
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Azadegan League).
Teams vs league
| Damash Gilanian | Liga | Naft Bandar Abbas | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▲ 2.12 | 1.59 | ▼ 1.32 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 41% | 30% | ▲ 35% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 32% | 22% | ▼ 18% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 21% | 46% | ▲ 50% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 50% | 46% | ▼ 44% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 74% | 57% | ▼ 53% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: Damash Gilanian 0 - 0 - 1 Naft Bandar Abbas. Average goals 3.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Damash Gilanian vs Naft Bandar Abbas?
The Azadegan League match finished Damash Gilanian 0:1 Naft Bandar Abbas. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Damash Gilanian vs Naft Bandar Abbas?
Damash Gilanian score 0.47 goals per game on average and Naft Bandar Abbas 0.76. The Azadegan League average is 1.59 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 22% of games. Both teams score in 41% of Damash Gilanian's matches and 35% of Naft Bandar Abbas's.
What form are Damash Gilanian and Naft Bandar Abbas in?
Over the last 5 games Damash Gilanian have a 0-3-2 record (0.60 points per game) and Naft Bandar Abbas 2-2-1 (1.60 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Damash Gilanian vs Naft Bandar Abbas?
The statistical background for Damash Gilanian vs Naft Bandar Abbas — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.