Damash Gilanian vs Navad Urmia: match statistics
Statistical analysis points to a very evenly matched encounter between two weak teams in the bottom part of the table. Damash Gilanian has not won a single match this season and has a disastrous attacking efficiency at home (0.4 goals per game, 60% of matches without scoring), however Navad Urmia displays identical away form with an average of just 0.4 goals per match on the road and a 60% loss rate. Both teams have identical form in their last 5 matches (0.4 points per game) and the same record (2 draws, 3 defeats). The key factor arguing for a draw is that Damash has a 50% draw rate at home, and Navad a 30% draw rate away, which combined with both teams' low efficiency makes a points split the most probable scenario. The slight advantage of the hosts stems only from playing in front of their own crowd and a marginally better xG (0.73 vs 1.05 for the visitors), but their zero win percentage at home significantly limits the chances of a victory.
Damash Gilanian vs Navad Urmia: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Damash Gilanian played against Navad Urmia in Azadegan League (Iran). The game was played on February 8, 2026. Final score: 2:1.
Recent form
Damash Gilanian has 0 wins, 2 draws and 3 losses over its last five games, averaging 0.40 points per game. Navad Urmia has 0 wins, 2 draws and 3 losses, with 0.40 points per game.
Scoring records
Damash Gilanian scores 0.45 goals per game and allows 1.45. Navad Urmia scores 0.68 and allows 0.84. Games in this league average 1.55 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 45% of Damash Gilanian's games and 42% of Navad Urmia's. The Over 2.5 rates are 30% and 16%, compared with league averages of 34% for BTTS and 22% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Navad Urmia has the higher season xG average, 1.05 to 0.88 per game. Damash Gilanian takes 1.6 shots per game, while Navad Urmia takes 2.0.
First-half and second-half trends
Damash Gilanian leads at halftime in 0% of its games and scores 0.30 goals per game after halftime. Navad Urmia leads at halftime in 16% and scores 0.42 after halftime.
When the teams score
Damash Gilanian's most productive scoring window is minutes 76-90+ (6 goals). For Navad Urmia, it is minutes 76-90+ (4 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Azadegan League games average 1.55 goals. Both teams score in 34% of games, and 22% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 0 home wins, 1 draw and 0 away wins. Those games averaged 2.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Statistical analysis points to a very evenly matched encounter between two weak teams in the bottom part of the table. Damash Gilanian has not won a single match this season and has a disastrous attacking efficiency at home (0.4 goals per game, 60% of matches without scoring), however Navad Urmia displays identical away form with an average of just 0.4 goals per match on the road and a 60% loss rate. Both teams have identical form in their last 5 matches (0.4 points per game) and the same record (2 draws, 3 defeats). The key factor arguing for a draw is that Damash has a 50% draw rate at home, and Navad a 30% draw rate away, which combined with both teams' low efficiency makes a points split the most probable scenario. The slight advantage of the hosts stems only from playing in front of their own crowd and a marginally better xG (0.73 vs 1.05 for the visitors), but their zero win percentage at home significantly limits the chances of a victory.
View the statistical overviewStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Damash Gilanian | Navad Urmia | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 19% | 13% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.57 | 0.53 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 1.50 | 2.62 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Navad Urmia is 51% better for: goals scored per game.
0.45 goals / game - Damash Gilanian · 0.68 goals / game - Navad Urmia
Navad Urmia is 73% better for: goals allowed per game.
1.45 goals / game - Damash Gilanian · 0.84 goals / game - Navad Urmia
Damash Gilanian scores in 45% of games (9 of 20 meczów), while Navad Urmia keeps a clean sheet in 32% (6 of 19 meczów).
Navad Urmia scores in 58% of games (11 of 19 meczów), while Damash Gilanian keeps a clean sheet in 25% (5 of 20 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Damash Gilanian
Over / Under - Navad Urmia
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Navad Urmia is 67% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
0.6 pts / game - Damash Gilanian · 1 pts / game - Navad Urmia
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Damash Gilanian - second-half results
Allows 0.3 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
Navad Urmia - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 16% of games and wins 16%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 0.80 | 0.40 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.0 | 0.2 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.2 | 1.2 |
| Average goals per game | 0.2 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 20% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 20% |
| No goal | 100% | 80% |
| Goal difference | -1 | -5 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 0.40 | 1.40 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.2 | 0.2 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.8 | 0.0 |
| Average goals per game | 1.0 | 0.2 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 20% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 0% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 20% | 100% |
| No goal | 80% | 80% |
| Goal difference | -3 | +1 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (6 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (4 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Damash Gilanian
Navad Urmia
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Azadegan League).
Teams vs league
| Damash Gilanian | Liga | Navad Urmia | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▲ 1.90 | 1.55 | • 1.53 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 45% | 34% | ▲ 42% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 30% | 22% | ▼ 16% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 25% | 44% | ▼ 32% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 50% | 46% | ▲ 53% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 65% | 58% | ▼ 53% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Other recorded players
Away team
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
- Damash GilanianGoalAli Ramezani Garalkuei
Head-to-head
Record from Damash Gilanian's perspective: 0 wins, 1 draw and 0 losses against Navad Urmia. Games average 2.00 goals, and both teams scored in 100% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Damash Gilanian vs Navad Urmia?
The Azadegan League match finished Damash Gilanian 2:1 Navad Urmia. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Damash Gilanian vs Navad Urmia?
Damash Gilanian score 0.45 goals per game on average and Navad Urmia 0.68. The Azadegan League average is 1.55 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 22% of games. Both teams score in 45% of Damash Gilanian's matches and 42% of Navad Urmia's.
What form are Damash Gilanian and Navad Urmia in?
Over the last 5 games Damash Gilanian have a 0-2-3 record (0.40 points per game) and Navad Urmia 0-2-3 (0.40 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Damash Gilanian vs Navad Urmia?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Damash Gilanian vs Navad Urmia: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.