Dila vs Rustavi: match statistics
Dila vs Rustavi: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Dila played against Rustavi in Erovnuli Liga (Georgia). The game was played on June 22, 2026. Venue: Stadioni Tengiz Burjanadze. Final score: 3:0.
Recent form
Dila has 1 win, 1 draw and 3 losses over its last five games, averaging 0.80 points per game. Rustavi has 4 wins, 0 draws and 1 loss, with 2.40 points per game.
Scoring records
Dila scores 1.00 goals per game and allows 1.06. Rustavi scores 1.22 and allows 0.83. Games in this league average 2.57 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 39% of Dila's games and 56% of Rustavi's. The Over 2.5 rates are 33% and 44%, compared with league averages of 58% for BTTS and 51% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Dila has the higher season xG average, 1.36 to 1.35 per game. Dila takes 10.8 shots per game, while Rustavi takes 10.8.
First-half and second-half trends
Dila leads at halftime in 22% of its games and scores 0.44 goals per game after halftime. Rustavi leads at halftime in 39% and scores 0.67 after halftime.
When the teams score
Dila's most productive scoring window is minutes 76-90+ (6 goals). For Rustavi, it is minutes 76-90+ (6 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Erovnuli Liga games average 2.57 goals. Both teams score in 58% of games, and 51% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, 2 previous meetings were available. The record was 0 home wins, 0 draws and 2 away wins. Those games averaged 2.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
I back Rustavi to win ('2') because the visitors have won 4 of the last 5 matches versus just 1 win for Dila in that period, and their average points across the last five matches are 2.4 versus 0.8 for the hosts. This season Rustavi have 9 wins and 22 goals scored, while Dila have 7 wins and 18 goals; the visitors have conceded 15 goals versus Dila’s 19 and sit 1st in the table compared to the hosts’ 7th. In terms of chance quality xG is effectively level: Rustavi have xG 1.43 away, Dila xG 1.41 at home; nonetheless the visitors concede only 0.89 goals on average away versus Dila’s 1.00 at home, which favors Rustavi’s superior defensive record. Dila have an edge in on-target shots at home (3.89 vs 3.33) and possession (49% vs 46%), but conversion rates are similar (9% vs 8%) and both teams fail to score in 33% of such matches. Considering form (Rustavi 4/5 wins), better defensive efficiency over the last 5 matches (Rustavi conceded 3 goals vs 9 for Dila) and nearly identical xG, I assess probabilities as 58% for Rustavi, 24% for a draw and 18% for Dila.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Rustavi has a seasonal away BTTS rate of 67% and an xG for 1.43, while xG against Dila is 1.23, suggesting the visitors create scoring opportunities. Dila scores 1.56 goals seasonally and concedes 0.78 with 56% clean sheets at home, but in the last 5 matches Dila conceded an average of 1.8 goals and had BTTS in 60% of games, indicating increasing vulnerability. Rustavi averages 0.89 goals this season and has a low shot conversion of 8%, yet in the last 5 matches they scored 6 goals (1.2 per game), pointing to improved finishing. xG comparison (Dila 1.28 vs Rustavi 1.43 and xG against 1.23 vs 1.21) shows both teams generate around 1.2–1.4 xG, and the league BTTS level is 56%, which further favors a both teams to score scenario. Considering Rustavi’s high BTTS rate (67%), Dila’s recent defensive issues (1.8 conceded in the last 5) and the overall league BTTS level, I assign a higher probability to the “yes” option (BTTS - Yes).
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Based on xG: expected goals (xG) are 1.28 for Dila and 1.43 for Rustavi; xG against are 1.23 for Dila and 1.21 for Rustavi. Averaging attack xG and defense xG yields about 1.25 goals for Dila and 1.33 for Rustavi, totalling 2.58 goals. Seasonal averages show Dila scores 1.56 goals at home, while Rustavi scores 0.89 away, but Rustavi is in better form (last 5: 'wlwww') and their opponents in the last five matches averaged only 0.6 goals, whereas Dila conceded an average of 1.8 goals. Over 1.5 lands in home matches 56% and in away matches 67%, and the league averages 2.57 goals per match — therefore I assign 72% to Over 1.5 as the strongest signal. Over 2.5 is more uncertain (seasonal Over 2.5: 56% vs 33%, forecast ~54%), and Over 3.5 is unlikely (11% and 0%).
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Dila led at the break in 4 of 9 home matches (44%), while the half-time draw occurred in 5 of 9 (56%), so HT is most often a draw. Over the full match the hosts have a strong home record (78% wins), although in the last 5 games Dila have won only 20% while Rustavi have 80% wins in their last 5, which weakens the home advantage. In the first half Dila average 0.78 goals scored and concede 0.33, Rustavi score 0.33 and concede 0.11, and in the second half Dila have the better numbers (score 0.78 and concede 0.44 versus Rustavi 0.56/0.78), suggesting a decision after the break. xG is 1.28 for Dila versus 1.43 for Rustavi, but shot conversion 16% vs 8% favors the hosts’ finishing, so the most reliable scenario is a draw at half-time and a Dila victory at full-time (X/1).
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Dila | Rustavi | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 33% | 32% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.13 | 0.13 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.28 | 0.35 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Rustavi is 200% better for: last-5 form.
0.8 pts / game - Dila · 2.4 pts / game - Rustavi
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Rustavi is 22% better for: goals scored per game.
1 goals / game - Dila · 1.22 goals / game - Rustavi
Rustavi is 28% better for: goals allowed per game.
1.06 goals / game - Dila · 0.83 goals / game - Rustavi
Dila scores in 67% of games (12 of 18 meczów), while Rustavi keeps a clean sheet in 39% (7 of 18 meczów).
Rustavi scores in 83% of games (15 of 18 meczów), while Dila keeps a clean sheet in 33% (6 of 18 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Dila
Over / Under - Rustavi
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Rustavi is 34% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.28 pts / game - Dila · 1.72 pts / game - Rustavi
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Dila - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 22% of games and wins 39%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.2 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
Rustavi - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 39% of games and wins 50%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.4 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.20 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.8 | 0.6 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.8 | 1.0 |
| Average goals per game | 1.6 | 1.6 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 80% |
| 3 goals | 40% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 40% |
| No goal | 40% | 60% |
| Goal difference | 0 | -2 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.60 | 1.60 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.4 | 0.8 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.2 | 0.4 |
| Average goals per game | 0.6 | 1.2 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 60% |
| No goal | 60% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +1 | +2 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (6 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (6 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Dila
Rustavi
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Erovnuli Liga).
Teams vs league
| Dila | Liga | Rustavi | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▼ 2.06 | 2.57 | ▼ 2.06 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 39% | 58% | ▼ 56% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 33% | 51% | ▼ 44% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 33% | 26% | ▲ 39% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 56% | 68% | ▼ 56% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 67% | 72% | ▲ 78% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Record from Dila's perspective: 0 wins, 0 draws and 2 losses against Rustavi. Games average 2.00 goals, and both teams scored in 50% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Dila vs Rustavi?
The Erovnuli Liga match finished Dila 3:0 Rustavi. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Dila and Rustavi?
In the last 2 head-to-head matches Dila won 0, Rustavi won 2 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 2.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Dila vs Rustavi?
Dila score 1.00 goals per game on average and Rustavi 1.22. The Erovnuli Liga average is 2.57 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 51% of games. Both teams score in 39% of Dila's matches and 56% of Rustavi's.
What form are Dila and Rustavi in?
Over the last 5 games Dila have a 1-1-3 record (0.80 points per game) and Rustavi 4-0-1 (2.40 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Dila vs Rustavi?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Dila vs Rustavi: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.


