Ghana - Ghana Premier LeagueData current as of 16 July 2026

Dreams vs Medeama: match statistics

Dreams crest
Dreams
2 : 1half-time 1:0
Medeama crest
Medeama
155%(0.00)
X30%(0.00)
215%(0.00)

Dreams display impressive home form with a 62% win rate at home and a +11 goal difference, making them a formidable opponent on their own turf. Medeama, despite leading the table, is experiencing a clear form crisis – in the last 5 matches, they haven't won a single game, averaging just 0.8 points per match. The visitors struggle with efficiency away from home (42% of matches without scoring, only 0.92 goals on average), while the hosts score an average of 1.54 goals in home matches. The difference in xG (1.4 for Dreams vs 1.15 for Medeama away) and the current form of both teams point to a home victory. Medeama's high draw percentage away (50%) suggests that the visitors may focus on defense, hence a draw is also a realistic scenario.

Dreams vs Medeama: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Dreams play Medeama in Ghana Premier League (Ghana). The match date is 22 March 2026 at 16:00. Final score: 2:1.

Current form

Dreams: 4-0-1, 2.40 points/match. Medeama: 3-0-2, 1.80 points/match.

Goal statistics

Dreams scores 1.45 and concedes 0.94 goals per match. Medeama scores 1.53 and concedes 0.82. League average: 2.03 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Dreams 45%, Medeama 53%. Over 2.5: Dreams 39%, Medeama 47%. League level: BTTS 34%, Over 2.5 34%.

xG, shots and style

Medeama has higher xG: 1.43 vs 1.31. Dreams: 7.1 shots per match, Medeama: 9.5.

Match halves

Dreams: half-time lead 33%, second-half goals 0.76. Medeama: half-time lead 38%, second-half goals 0.76.

Goals by minute

Dreams: 0-15 (10 goals). Medeama: 16-30 (14 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Ghana Premier League: 2.03 goals per match, BTTS 34%, Over 2.5 34%.

Head-to-head

1 H2H matches: 0-0-1. Average goals 3.00, BTTS 100%.

Match description

Dreams display impressive home form with a 62% win rate at home and a +11 goal difference, making them a formidable opponent on their own turf. Medeama, despite leading the table, is experiencing a clear form crisis – in the last 5 matches, they haven't won a single game, averaging just 0.8 points per match. The visitors struggle with efficiency away from home (42% of matches without scoring, only 0.92 goals on average), while the hosts score an average of 1.54 goals in home matches. The difference in xG (1.4 for Dreams vs 1.15 for Medeama away) and the current form of both teams point to a home victory. Medeama's high draw percentage away (50%) suggests that the visitors may focus on defense, hence a draw is also a realistic scenario.

Half-by-half

1 : 0
1st half
1 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

50Possession (%)50
DreamsMedeama
6Shots5
DreamsMedeama
2Shots on target4
DreamsMedeama
0.97xG1.3
DreamsMedeama
1Corners5
DreamsMedeama
61Dangerous attacks97
DreamsMedeama
-1Fouls-1
DreamsMedeama
1Cards2
DreamsMedeama

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1.45Goals scored / match1.53
DreamsMedeama
0.94Goals conceded / match0.82
DreamsMedeama
44%Average possession45%
DreamsMedeama
3.73Shots on target / match3.59
DreamsMedeama

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

7.12Shots per match9.5
DreamsMedeama
3.73Shots on target3.59
DreamsMedeama
20.4%Shot conversion16.1%
DreamsMedeama
44%Possession45%
DreamsMedeama
1.31xG for1.43
DreamsMedeama
1.38xG against1.07
DreamsMedeama

Shooting quality

Dreams: Counter-attackingMedeama: Counter-attacking
DreamsMedeama
Accuracy (shots on target)52%38%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.180.15
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.390.43

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Dreams is 33% better for: last-5 form.

2.4 pts / match - Dreams · 1.8 pts / match - Medeama

Dreams
WWLWW
Season result split
45% W21% R33% P
Season (W-D-L)
15-7-11
1.58 pts / match · goal difference +17
Last 5 (W-D-L)
4-0-1
2.40 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
12-2-3
Last 5 at home
5-0-0
WWWWW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.2Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.43Opponent xG: 0.87BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%
Medeama
WLWWL
Season result split
50% W32% R18% P
Season (W-D-L)
17-11-6
1.82 pts / match · goal difference +24
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-0-2
1.80 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
5-7-5
Last 5 away
1-1-3
LDLWL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.2Goals conceded: 1.6xG: 0.99Opponent xG: 0.69BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Medeama is 6% better for: goals scored per match.

1.45 goals / match - Dreams · 1.53 goals / match - Medeama

Medeama is 15% better for: goals conceded per match.

0.94 goals / match - Dreams · 0.82 goals / match - Medeama

Dreams scoring profile: strong

Dreams scores in 70% of matches (23 of 33 matches), while Medeama keeps a clean sheet in 44% (15 of 34 matches).

Medeama scoring profile: very strong

Medeama scores in 82% of matches (28 of 34 matches), while Dreams keeps a clean sheet in 30% (10 of 33 matches).

48Goals scored (season)52
DreamsMedeama
31Goals conceded (season)28
DreamsMedeama
2.39Average goals in match2.35
DreamsMedeama
11Goals scored (last 5)11
DreamsMedeama
5Goals conceded (last 5)8
DreamsMedeama

How often they score at least...

70%1 goal82%
DreamsMedeama
48%2 goals44%
DreamsMedeama
18%3 goals15%
DreamsMedeama
6%4 goals9%
DreamsMedeama

How often they concede at least...

70%1 goal56%
DreamsMedeama
18%2 goals21%
DreamsMedeama
6%3 goals3%
DreamsMedeama
0%4 goals3%
DreamsMedeama

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

15%BTTS at half-time18%
DreamsMedeama
0%BTTS in both halves3%
DreamsMedeama
27%Scored in both halves26%
DreamsMedeama

BTTS and goal count

33%Min. 3 goals and BTTS38%
DreamsMedeama
6%Min. 3 goals without BTTS9%
DreamsMedeama
60%BTTS - last 560%
DreamsMedeama

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

64%Min. 1 goal before half-time68%
DreamsMedeama
21%Min. 2 goals before half-time35%
DreamsMedeama
9%Min. 3 goals before half-time12%
DreamsMedeama

2nd half

79%Min. 1 goal after half-time71%
DreamsMedeama
27%Min. 2 goals after half-time32%
DreamsMedeama
12%Min. 3 goals after half-time9%
DreamsMedeama

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Medeama is 8% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.45 pts / match - Dreams · 1.56 pts / match - Medeama

Dreams - half-time state
33% leading45% draw21% trailing
Medeama - half-time state
38% leading41% draw21% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.45Points per match (1st half)1.56
DreamsMedeama
0.58Goals scored (1st half)0.76
DreamsMedeama
0.39Goals conceded (1st half)0.38
DreamsMedeama
0.97Average goals (1st half)1.15
DreamsMedeama
64%Clean sheet before half-time65%
DreamsMedeama
58%No goal before half-time50%
DreamsMedeama

After half-time (2nd half)

1.58Points per match (2nd half)1.65
DreamsMedeama
0.76Goals scored (2nd half)0.76
DreamsMedeama
0.48Goals conceded (2nd half)0.44
DreamsMedeama
1.24Average goals (2nd half)1.21
DreamsMedeama
58%Clean sheet after half-time68%
DreamsMedeama
48%No goal after half-time41%
DreamsMedeama

Dreams - second-half results

42% W30% R27% P
48
Half-time points
19
Half-time goals
+6
Goal difference (1st half)
52
Second-half points
+9
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.45
PPG before half-time
Lead holding136%

Leads at half-time in 33% of matches and wins 45%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Medeama - second-half results

41% W41% R18% P
53
Half-time points
26
Half-time goals
+13
Goal difference (1st half)
56
Second-half points
+11
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.56
PPG before half-time
Lead holding132%

Leads at half-time in 38% of matches and wins 50%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Dreams - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.602.20
Goals scored / match0.60.8
Goals conceded / match0.40.2
Average goals in match1.01.0
1 goal80%60%
2 goals20%20%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet60%80%
No goal40%40%
Goal difference+1+3
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 40% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 3
Medeama - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.601.40
Goals scored / match1.01.2
Goals conceded / match0.61.0
Average goals in match1.62.2
1 goal80%80%
2 goals60%40%
3 goals20%40%
Clean sheet40%40%
No goal40%40%
Goal difference+2+1
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 20% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 5

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Dreams
ScoredConceded
10
4
0-15
8
5
16-30
5
6
31-45
10
2
46-60
10
5
61-75
5
9
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (10 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.

Medeama
ScoredConceded
5
3
0-15
14
5
16-30
7
5
31-45
3
6
46-60
9
4
61-75
14
5
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (14 goli). Concedes most in 46-60 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): +9 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.37
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.1 : 1.2
Estimated goal split
home : away
117%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
49%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+27%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
57%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
5%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 20 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Dreams

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.07
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.58
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-17.9 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.14
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.44
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
106%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
142%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.82
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
10% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 21% come in the first quarter-hour.
10%

Medeama

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.36
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.35
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-17.1 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.10
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.25
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
232%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
60%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.02
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
0.0
Late goals
27% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 10% come in the first quarter-hour.
27%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Ghana Premier League).

Teams vs league

DreamsLigaMedeama
Average goals in match 2.392.03 2.35
Both teams scored 45%34% 53%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 39%34% 47%
Clean sheets 30%41% 44%
Goal before half-time 64%62% 68%
Goal after half-time 79%59% 71%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.03
Average goals per match
34%
Both teams scored
34%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
41%
Clean sheets
1.37
Home goals / match
0.66
Away goals / match
+108%
Home attack advantage
+52%
Home defence advantage
+42%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
62%
1 goal
26%
2 goals
8%
3 goals
1%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
59%
1 goal
28%
2 goals
9%
3 goals
3%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Dreams 0 - 0 - 1 Medeama. Average goals 3.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.

Medeama SC
2 : 1
Dreams FC

FAQ

What was the result of Dreams vs Medeama?

The Ghana Premier League match finished Dreams 2:1 Medeama. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Dreams vs Medeama?

Dreams score 1.45 goals per game on average and Medeama 1.53. The Ghana Premier League average is 2.03 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 34% of games. Both teams score in 45% of Dreams's matches and 53% of Medeama's.

What form are Dreams and Medeama in?

Over the last 5 games Dreams have a 4-0-1 record (2.40 points per game) and Medeama 3-0-2 (1.80 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Dreams vs Medeama?

The statistical background for Dreams vs Medeama — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.