Džiugas Telšiai vs Sūduva: match statistics
Džiugas Telšiai vs Sūduva: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Džiugas Telšiai played against Sūduva in A Lyga (Lithuania). The game was played on August 17, 2026. Venue: Telšių centrinis stadionas. Final score: 0:2.
Recent form
Džiugas Telšiai has 2 wins, 2 draws and 1 loss over its last five games, averaging 1.60 points per game. Sūduva has 4 wins, 1 draw and 0 losses, with 2.60 points per game.
Scoring records
Džiugas Telšiai scores 1.48 goals per game and allows 1.08. Sūduva scores 1.61 and allows 0.74. Games in this league average 2.66 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 44% of Džiugas Telšiai's games and 52% of Sūduva's. The Over 2.5 rates are 44% and 52%, compared with league averages of 50% for BTTS and 54% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Sūduva has the higher season xG average, 1.45 to 1.31 per game. Džiugas Telšiai takes 11.5 shots per game, while Sūduva takes 12.0.
First-half and second-half trends
Džiugas Telšiai leads at halftime in 20% of its games and scores 0.92 goals per game after halftime. Sūduva leads at halftime in 35% and scores 0.91 after halftime.
When the teams score
Džiugas Telšiai's most productive scoring window is minutes 76-90+ (10 goals). For Sūduva, it is minutes 76-90+ (11 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
A Lyga games average 2.66 goals. Both teams score in 50% of games, and 54% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, 6 previous meetings were available. The record was 1 home win, 2 draws and 3 away wins. Those games averaged 2.67 goals, with both teams scoring in 67% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Sūduva arrive in significantly better current form: they have collected 13 points from their last five matches, winning 4 and drawing 1, with a 12:4 goal difference. Over the same period, Džiugas Telšiai picked up 8 points and scored just 6 goals, although their defense also conceded only 5. The visitors create more high-quality chances away from home, averaging 1.44 xG compared with the hosts’ 1.20, and also register more shots on target per match: 5.09 versus 3.31. Džiugas’ home advantage is significant, as the hosts win 54% of such matches and keep a clean sheet in 54% of them, but Sūduva have lost only 3 of their 23 league matches across the entire season. Similar scoring averages at home and away—1.46 and 1.45 goals respectively—increase the likelihood of a draw; however, Sūduva’s current efficiency and attacking edge slightly favor the visitors.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
The “No” pick is primarily supported by Džiugas Telšiai’s highly solid defense, conceding just 0.50 goals per match on average and keeping a clean sheet in 58% of their games. Sūduva do average 1.45 goals, and as many as 2.4 across their last five matches, but their xG over that period is only 1.29, while the hosts allow opponents an xG of 1.00. Džiugas are also not guaranteed to score themselves: BTTS occurred in only 42% of their matches, while the team failed to score in 33% of games this season. Sūduva have a higher seasonal BTTS rate of 64%, but their defense has conceded just 0.8 goals per match over the last five league fixtures and allowed opponents an xG of 0.94. As a result, the most likely scenario is that at least one team fails to score.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
The strongest signal is Under 3.5 goals, as 75% of Džiugas Telšiai’s matches and as many as 91% of Sūduva’s matches have finished below this line. The hosts concede just 0.50 goals per match on average and keep a clean sheet in 58% of their appearances, limiting the opponent’s attacking potential despite their average of 1.45 goals scored. Both teams create chances of a similar quality, with average xG figures of 1.47 for Džiugas and 1.44 for Sūduva, but their last five matches point to lower-quality chances: 1.18 and 1.29 xG, respectively. Sūduva have scored 12 goals in their last five matches, while Džiugas have managed only 6, and the projected total of 2.40 goals remains clearly below the four-goal line.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
A draw at half-time is a realistic scenario, as Džiugas were level after 45 minutes in 8 of their 12 home matches, or 67% of the time, while their average first-half goal tally is just 0.75. Sūduva are clearly the stronger side based on their current form, however, having won 4 of their last 5 matches, scoring an average of 2.4 goals and conceding just 0.8. The visitors tend to start matches well, holding a lead at the break in 60% of their last five appearances, but Džiugas’ solid defense, which has conceded just 0.17 goals before half-time this season, increases the likelihood of a level score after the first half. After the break, Sūduva’s form advantage should become more apparent, as they average 1.2 goals in the second halves of their last five matches, compared with just 0.4 for the hosts. Therefore, the most likely HT/FT outcome is a draw at half-time and a Sūduva win at full-time (X/2).
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Džiugas Telšiai | Sūduva | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 32% | 39% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.11 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.40 | 0.35 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Sūduva is 63% better for: last-5 form.
1.6 pts / game - Džiugas Telšiai · 2.6 pts / game - Sūduva
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Sūduva is 9% better for: goals scored per game.
1.48 goals / game - Džiugas Telšiai · 1.61 goals / game - Sūduva
Sūduva is 46% better for: goals allowed per game.
1.08 goals / game - Džiugas Telšiai · 0.74 goals / game - Sūduva
Džiugas Telšiai scores in 76% of games (19 of 25 games), while Sūduva keeps a clean sheet in 43% (10 of 23 games).
Sūduva scores in 74% of games (17 of 23 games), while Džiugas Telšiai keeps a clean sheet in 44% (11 of 25 games).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Džiugas Telšiai
Over / Under - Sūduva
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Sūduva is 31% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.2 pts / game - Džiugas Telšiai · 1.57 pts / game - Sūduva
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Džiugas Telšiai - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 20% of games and wins 48%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.2 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
Sūduva - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 35% of games and wins 48%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.2 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.60 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.8 | 0.4 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.4 | 0.6 |
| Average goals per game | 1.2 | 1.0 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 60% |
| No goal | 60% | 60% |
| Goal difference | +2 | -1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 2.00 | 2.20 |
| Goals scored / game | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.2 | 0.4 |
| Average goals per game | 1.4 | 1.6 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 60% |
| No goal | 40% | 20% |
| Goal difference | +5 | +4 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (10 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): +5 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (11 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): +7 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Džiugas Telšiai
Sūduva
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (A Lyga).
Teams vs league
| Džiugas Telšiai | Liga | Sūduva | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▼ 2.56 | 2.66 | ▼ 2.35 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 44% | 50% | ▲ 52% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 44% | 54% | ▼ 52% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 44% | 31% | ▲ 43% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 56% | 71% | ▼ 61% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 84% | 76% | ▼ 70% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Record from Džiugas Telšiai's perspective: 1 win, 2 draws and 3 losses against Sūduva. Games average 2.67 goals, and both teams scored in 67% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Džiugas Telšiai vs Sūduva?
The A Lyga match finished Džiugas Telšiai 0:2 Sūduva. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Džiugas Telšiai and Sūduva?
In the last 6 head-to-head matches Džiugas Telšiai won 1, Sūduva won 3 and 2 ended level. These games averaged 2.67 goals, with both teams scoring in 67% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Džiugas Telšiai vs Sūduva?
Džiugas Telšiai score 1.48 goals per game on average and Sūduva 1.61. The A Lyga average is 2.66 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 54% of games. Both teams score in 44% of Džiugas Telšiai's matches and 52% of Sūduva's.
What form are Džiugas Telšiai and Sūduva in?
Over the last 5 games Džiugas Telšiai have a 2-2-1 record (1.60 points per game) and Sūduva 4-1-0 (2.60 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Džiugas Telšiai vs Sūduva?
The statistical background for Džiugas Telšiai vs Sūduva — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.