Edinburgh City vs Clyde: match statistics
Full analysis and pick in the app
Check the betting analysis, pick, value bet and full reasoning for this match.
Edinburgh City vs Clyde: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Edinburgh City plays Clyde in League Two (Scotland). The game is scheduled for November 14, 2026. Venue: Meadowbank Stadium.
Recent form
Edinburgh City has 1 win, 3 draws and 1 loss over its last five games, averaging 1.20 points per game. Clyde has 3 wins, 1 draw and 1 loss, with 2.00 points per game.
Scoring records
Edinburgh City scores 1.77 goals per game and allows 1.54. Clyde scores 2.31 and allows 1.54. Games in this league average 3.32 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 62% of Edinburgh City's games and 77% of Clyde's. The Over 2.5 rates are 62% and 77%, compared with league averages of 58% for BTTS and 63% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Clyde has the higher season xG average, 1.57 to 1.26 per game. Edinburgh City takes 9.2 shots per game, while Clyde takes 12.8.
First-half and second-half trends
Edinburgh City leads at halftime in 38% of its games and scores 0.62 goals per game after halftime. Clyde leads at halftime in 54% and scores 1.23 after halftime.
When the teams score
Edinburgh City's most productive scoring window is minutes 31-45+ (6 goals). For Clyde, it is minutes 76-90+ (7 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
League Two games average 3.32 goals. Both teams score in 58% of games, and 63% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, 5 previous meetings were available. The record was 0 home wins, 0 draws and 5 away wins. Those games averaged 4.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 60% of them.
Before kickoff
1X2 odds
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Edinburgh City | Clyde | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 56% | 38% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.14 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.34 | 0.48 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Clyde is 67% better for: last-5 form.
1.2 pts / game - Edinburgh City · 2 pts / game - Clyde
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Clyde is 31% better for: goals scored per game.
1.77 goals / game - Edinburgh City · 2.31 goals / game - Clyde
Edinburgh City scores in 77% of games (10 of 13 games), while Clyde keeps a clean sheet in 15% (2 of 13 games).
Clyde scores in 85% of games (11 of 13 games), while Edinburgh City keeps a clean sheet in 31% (4 of 13 games).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Edinburgh City
Over / Under - Clyde
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Clyde is 14% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.69 pts / game - Edinburgh City · 1.92 pts / game - Clyde
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Edinburgh City - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 38% of games and wins 38%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.6 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
Clyde - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 54% of games and wins 62%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.6 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.00 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.6 | 0.2 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.6 | 0.4 |
| Average goals per game | 1.2 | 0.6 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 40% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 80% |
| No goal | 40% | 80% |
| Goal difference | 0 | -1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 2.00 | 1.40 |
| Goals scored / game | 1.0 | 1.2 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.4 | 1.6 |
| Average goals per game | 1.4 | 2.8 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 40% |
| No goal | 20% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +3 | -2 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (6 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (7 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Edinburgh City
Clyde
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (League Two).
Teams vs league
| Edinburgh City | Liga | Clyde | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | • 3.31 | 3.32 | ▲ 3.85 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 62% | 58% | ▲ 77% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | • 62% | 63% | ▲ 77% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 31% | 23% | ▼ 15% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 69% | 82% | ▲ 85% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 77% | 85% | ▼ 77% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Head-to-head
Record from Edinburgh City's perspective: 0 wins, 0 draws and 5 losses against Clyde. Games average 4.00 goals, and both teams scored in 60% of them.
FAQ
When do Edinburgh City and Clyde play?
Edinburgh City face Clyde on November 14, 2026 in League Two at Meadowbank Stadium. The exact kick-off time in your timezone is shown at the top of the match page.
What is the head-to-head record between Edinburgh City and Clyde?
In the last 5 head-to-head matches Edinburgh City won 0, Clyde won 5 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 4.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 60% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Edinburgh City vs Clyde?
Edinburgh City score 1.77 goals per game on average and Clyde 2.31. The League Two average is 3.32 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 63% of games. Both teams score in 62% of Edinburgh City's matches and 77% of Clyde's.
What form are Edinburgh City and Clyde in?
Over the last 5 games Edinburgh City have a 1-3-1 record (1.20 points per game) and Clyde 3-1-1 (2.00 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Edinburgh City vs Clyde?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Edinburgh City vs Clyde: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.


