Egersund vs Kongsvinger: match statistics
Egersund vs Kongsvinger: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Egersund played against Kongsvinger in First Division (Norway). The game was played on September 13, 2026. Venue: Egersund Idrettsparken. Final score: 1:1.
Recent form
Egersund has 1 win, 2 draws and 2 losses over its last five games, averaging 1.00 points per game. Kongsvinger has 4 wins, 1 draw and 0 losses, with 2.60 points per game.
Scoring records
Egersund scores 1.62 goals per game and allows 1.81. Kongsvinger scores 2.95 and allows 1.57. Games in this league average 3.85 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 48% of Egersund's games and 81% of Kongsvinger's. The Over 2.5 rates are 71% and 86%, compared with league averages of 63% for BTTS and 72% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Kongsvinger has the higher season xG average, 1.77 to 1.41 per game. Egersund takes 11.1 shots per game, while Kongsvinger takes 14.3.
First-half and second-half trends
Egersund leads at halftime in 38% of its games and scores 0.86 goals per game after halftime. Kongsvinger leads at halftime in 48% and scores 1.76 after halftime.
When the teams score
Egersund's most productive scoring window is minutes 46-60 (8 goals). For Kongsvinger, it is minutes 46-60 (15 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
First Division games average 3.85 goals. Both teams score in 63% of games, and 72% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, 3 previous meetings were available. The record was 0 home wins, 1 draw and 2 away wins. Those games averaged 3.33 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Kongsvinger sit 1st, having won 14 of their 21 matches and remaining unbeaten in their last five games, with 4 wins and 1 draw. Over the same period, Egersund have managed just 1 win, 2 draws and 2 defeats, while their defense has conceded as many as 12 goals in their last five appearances. The visitors are significantly more effective away from home, averaging 2.20 goals with an 18% shot conversion rate, whereas the hosts score 1.64 goals at home and convert 13% of their attempts. Kongsvinger also register more shots on target per match, 5.20 compared with 4.18, and fail to score in just 10% of their away games, compared with 36% of Egersund’s home matches. Although the two teams’ xG figures are similar—1.52 for the visitors and 1.50 for the hosts—the current form and attacking advantage point towards a Kongsvinger victory.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Egersund have recorded BTTS in 91% of their matches, compared with 70% for Kongsvinger and a league average of 64%, clearly supporting goals from both sides. The hosts have failed to keep a clean sheet in 91% of matches and concede an average of 1.82 goals, while the visitors score an average of 2.20 goals with an xG of 1.52. Kongsvinger are also vulnerable defensively, conceding an average of 1.30 goals and keeping a clean sheet in only 20% of matches, while Egersund create an average of 2.00 xG. In their last five matches, Egersund conceded 2.4 goals per game, while Kongsvinger scored as many as 6.2, so the visitors’ attacking form further increases the likelihood of them finding the net. Although the hosts recorded BTTS in only 60% of their last five matches, the combination of their high attacking potential and the defensive vulnerability of both teams makes a goal for each side more likely. In betting terms, this supports BTTS - Yes / Goal-Goal rather than BTTS - No, which only requires at least one team to fail to score and does not automatically mean a 0:0 draw or that neither team will score.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
The strongest pick is Over 1.5 goals, as Egersund cleared this line in 100% of their matches this season, while Kongsvinger did so in 90%. The hosts have an average xG of 2.00, whereas the visitors’ defense concedes an average of 1.63 xG, supporting a projection of around 1.70 goals for Egersund. Kongsvinger produce an average of 1.52 xG, while Egersund allow opponents 1.47 xG; additionally, the visitors have scored as many as 31 goals in their last 5 matches. Both teams had at least three goals in 80% of their last five matches, but the 1.5 line offers a clearly greater safety margin than higher thresholds.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Kongsvinger are in significantly better current form: they have won 4 of their last 5 matches and remain unbeaten, while Egersund have managed just 1 victory and lost 2 games over the same period. The visitors led at the break in 80% of their last five matches, scoring an average of 2.4 goals before half-time, whereas the hosts conceded 1.2 goals during that period. Kongsvinger’s advantage is also evident after the interval, having scored an average of 3.8 goals in their last five appearances and recording a +14 goal difference, compared with Egersund’s average of just 0.6 goals scored. Although the hosts have very strong home-season statistics, their current defense is conceding an average of 2.4 goals per match, making the most likely scenario a Kongsvinger lead at half-time followed by a win at full-time: HT/FT 2/2.
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Egersund | Kongsvinger | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 36% | 42% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.13 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.41 | 0.50 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Kongsvinger is 160% better for: last-5 form.
1 pts / game - Egersund · 2.6 pts / game - Kongsvinger
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Kongsvinger is 82% better for: goals scored per game.
1.62 goals / game - Egersund · 2.95 goals / game - Kongsvinger
Kongsvinger is 15% better for: goals allowed per game.
1.81 goals / game - Egersund · 1.57 goals / game - Kongsvinger
Egersund scores in 76% of games (16 of 21 games), while Kongsvinger keeps a clean sheet in 14% (3 of 21 games).
Kongsvinger scores in 95% of games (20 of 21 games), while Egersund keeps a clean sheet in 33% (7 of 21 games).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Egersund
Over / Under - Kongsvinger
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Kongsvinger is 21% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.38 pts / game - Egersund · 1.67 pts / game - Kongsvinger
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Egersund - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 38% of games and wins 38%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
Kongsvinger - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 48% of games and wins 67%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.2 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.40 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.6 | 0.4 |
| Goals allowed / game | 1.0 | 1.0 |
| Average goals per game | 1.6 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 40% |
| No goal | 40% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -2 | -3 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 2.20 | 1.80 |
| Goals scored / game | 1.4 | 2.4 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.4 | 1.2 |
| Average goals per game | 1.8 | 3.6 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 80% |
| 3 goals | 40% | 80% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 20% |
| No goal | 20% | 20% |
| Goal difference | +5 | +6 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (8 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): -5 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (15 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): +4 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Egersund
Kongsvinger
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (First Division).
Teams vs league
| Egersund | Liga | Kongsvinger | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▼ 3.43 | 3.85 | ▲ 4.52 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 48% | 63% | ▲ 81% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | • 71% | 72% | ▲ 86% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 33% | 19% | ▼ 14% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 81% | 77% | ▲ 86% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 86% | 89% | • 90% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Record from Egersund's perspective: 0 wins, 1 draw and 2 losses against Kongsvinger. Games average 3.33 goals, and both teams scored in 100% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Egersund vs Kongsvinger?
The First Division match finished Egersund 1:1 Kongsvinger. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Egersund and Kongsvinger?
In the last 3 head-to-head matches Egersund won 0, Kongsvinger won 2 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 3.33 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Egersund vs Kongsvinger?
Egersund score 1.62 goals per game on average and Kongsvinger 2.95. The First Division average is 3.85 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 72% of games. Both teams score in 48% of Egersund's matches and 81% of Kongsvinger's.
What form are Egersund and Kongsvinger in?
Over the last 5 games Egersund have a 1-2-2 record (1.00 points per game) and Kongsvinger 4-1-0 (2.60 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Egersund vs Kongsvinger?
The statistical background for Egersund vs Kongsvinger — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.