Finland - YkkösliigaEkenäs CentrumplanData current as of October 14, 2026

EIF vs KäPa: match statistics

Reasoning:

Full analysis and pick in the app

Check the betting analysis, pick, value bet and full reasoning for this match.

Check analysis and pick

EIF vs KäPa: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

EIF plays KäPa in Ykkösliiga (Finland). The game is scheduled for October 17, 2026. Venue: Ekenäs Centrumplan.

Recent form

EIF has 0 wins, 3 draws and 2 losses over its last five games, averaging 0.60 points per game. KäPa has 2 wins, 2 draws and 1 loss, with 1.60 points per game.

Scoring records

EIF scores 1.12 goals per game and allows 1.69. KäPa scores 1.19 and allows 1.77. Games in this league average 2.65 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 38% of EIF's games and 69% of KäPa's. The Over 2.5 rates are 46% and 69%, compared with league averages of 45% for BTTS and 48% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

EIF has the higher season xG average, 1.45 to 1.40 per game. EIF takes 11.5 shots per game, while KäPa takes 11.1.

First-half and second-half trends

EIF leads at halftime in 23% of its games and scores 0.58 goals per game after halftime. KäPa leads at halftime in 19% and scores 0.65 after halftime.

When the teams score

EIF's most productive scoring window is minutes 76-90+ (9 goals). For KäPa, it is minutes 0-15 (7 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

Ykkösliiga games average 2.65 goals. Both teams score in 45% of games, and 48% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

Before this game, 5 previous meetings were available. The record was 5 home wins, 0 draws and 0 away wins. Those games averaged 3.40 goals, with both teams scoring in 60% of them.

Before kickoff

1X2 odds

(2.95)
(3.40)
(1.97)

Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

1.12Goals scored / game1.19
EIFKäPa
1.69Goals allowed / game1.77
EIFKäPa
51%Average possession51%
EIFKäPa
4.31Shots on target / game3.96
EIFKäPa

Team stats— who is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

11.54Shots per game11.12
EIFKäPa
4.31Shots on target3.96
EIFKäPa
9.7%Shot conversion10.7%
EIFKäPa
51%Possession51%
EIFKäPa
1.45xG for1.4
EIFKäPa
1.51xG against1.63
EIFKäPa

Shooting quality

EIF: BalancedKäPa: Balanced
EIFKäPa
Accuracy (shots on target)37%36%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.130.13
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.260.30

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team form— who is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

KäPa is 167% better for: last-5 form.

0.6 pts / game - EIF · 1.6 pts / game - KäPa

EIF
DDLDL
No win in the last 5 games
Season result split
31% W19% D50% L
Season (W-D-L)
8-5-13
1.12 pts / game · goal difference -15
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-3-2
0.60 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
6-2-5
Last 5 at home
1-2-2
WLLDD
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 0.6Goals conceded: 2.2xG: 1.50Opponent xG: 1.61BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 40%
KäPa
DLWWD
Season result split
23% W27% D50% L
Season (W-D-L)
6-7-13
0.96 pts / game · goal difference -15
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-2-1
1.60 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
3-3-7
Last 5 away
1-2-2
LLDDW
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 2.0Goals conceded: 2.2xG: 1.55Opponent xG: 1.68BTTS: 100%Over 2.5: 80%

Goals— how do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

KäPa is 6% better for: goals scored per game.

1.12 goals / game - EIF · 1.19 goals / game - KäPa

EIF is 5% better for: goals allowed per game.

1.69 goals / game - EIF · 1.77 goals / game - KäPa

EIF scoring profile: very strong

EIF scores in 62% of games (16 of 26 games), while KäPa keeps a clean sheet in 12% (3 of 26 games).

KäPa scoring profile: strong

KäPa scores in 73% of games (19 of 26 games), while EIF keeps a clean sheet in 31% (8 of 26 games).

29Goals scored (season)31
EIFKäPa
44Goals conceded (season)46
EIFKäPa
2.81Average goals per game2.96
EIFKäPa
3Goals scored (last 5)10
EIFKäPa
11Goals conceded (last 5)11
EIFKäPa

How often they score at least...

62%1 goal73%
EIFKäPa
31%2 goals35%
EIFKäPa
12%3 goals12%
EIFKäPa
4%4 goals0%
EIFKäPa

How often they concede at least...

69%1 goal88%
EIFKäPa
42%2 goals65%
EIFKäPa
27%3 goals19%
EIFKäPa
15%4 goals4%
EIFKäPa

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

19%BTTS at half-time27%
EIFKäPa
15%BTTS in both halves4%
EIFKäPa
19%Scored in both halves15%
EIFKäPa

BTTS and goal count

31%Min. 3 goals and BTTS65%
EIFKäPa
15%Min. 3 goals without BTTS4%
EIFKäPa
40%BTTS - last 5100%
EIFKäPa

Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

54%Min. 1 goal before half-time73%
EIFKäPa
38%Min. 2 goals before half-time58%
EIFKäPa
19%Min. 3 goals before half-time12%
EIFKäPa

2nd half

81%Min. 1 goal after half-time73%
EIFKäPa
42%Min. 2 goals after half-time46%
EIFKäPa
27%Min. 3 goals after half-time23%
EIFKäPa

Game halves— when do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

EIF is 19% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.19 pts / game - EIF · 1 pts / game - KäPa

EIF - half-time state
23% leading50% draw27% trailing
KäPa - half-time state
19% leading42% draw38% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.19Points per game (1st half)1
EIFKäPa
0.54Goals scored (1st half)0.54
EIFKäPa
0.65Goals conceded (1st half)0.92
EIFKäPa
1.19Average goals (1st half)1.46
EIFKäPa
65%Clean sheet before half-time46%
EIFKäPa
62%No goal before half-time54%
EIFKäPa

After half-time (2nd half)

1.08Points per game (2nd half)0.88
EIFKäPa
0.58Goals scored (2nd half)0.65
EIFKäPa
1.04Goals conceded (2nd half)0.85
EIFKäPa
1.62Average goals (2nd half)1.5
EIFKäPa
38%Clean sheet after half-time38%
EIFKäPa
58%No goal after half-time58%
EIFKäPa

EIF - second-half results

27% W27% D46% L
31
Half-time points
14
Half-time goals
-3
Goal difference (1st half)
28
Second-half points
-12
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.19
PPG before half-time
Lead holding135%

Leads at halftime in 23% of games and wins 31%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime+0.4

Allows 0.4 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

KäPa - second-half results

15% W42% D42% L
26
Half-time points
14
Half-time goals
-10
Goal difference (1st half)
23
Second-half points
-5
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.00
PPG before half-time
Lead holding121%

Leads at halftime in 19% of games and wins 23%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime-0.1

Defense stays consistent across the full game.

EIF - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.200.40
Goals scored / game0.40.2
Goals allowed / game1.21.0
Average goals per game1.61.2
1 goal60%80%
2 goals40%40%
3 goals20%0%
Clean sheet60%20%
No goal60%80%
Goal difference-4-4
Half-time: 20% leading - 60% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 40% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 2
KäPa - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game0.402.00
Goals scored / game0.61.4
Goals allowed / game1.80.4
Average goals per game2.41.8
1 goal100%80%
2 goals100%60%
3 goals20%40%
Clean sheet0%60%
No goal40%40%
Goal difference-6+5
Half-time: 0% leading - 40% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 20% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 60% - Half-time goals total: 3

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

EIF
ScoredConceded
3
5
0-15
5
5
16-30
6
7
31-45
4
10
46-60
2
6
61-75
9
11
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (9 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.

KäPa
ScoredConceded
7
6
0-15
3
10
16-30
4
8
31-45
6
6
46-60
7
3
61-75
4
13
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (7 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (13). Late-goal balance (76-90): -9 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

2.88
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
1.4 : 1.4
Estimated goal split
home : away
109%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
54%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+18%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
45%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
10%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 10 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

EIF

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.06
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.51
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+5.4 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.33
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
-0.18
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
81%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
135%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
-0.52
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.0
Late goals
31% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 10% come in the first quarter-hour.
31%

KäPa

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.23
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.35
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+0.6 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.21
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
-0.14
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
95%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
127%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
+0.64
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
13% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 23% come in the first quarter-hour.
13%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League context— is this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Ykkösliiga).

Teams vs league

EIFLigaKäPa
Average goals per game▲ 2.812.65▲ 2.96
Both teams scored▼ 38%45%▲ 69%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)▼ 46%48%▲ 69%
Clean sheets• 31%31%▼ 12%
Goal before half-time▼ 54%67%▲ 73%
Goal after half-time▲ 81%74%• 73%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.65
Average goals per game
45%
Both teams scored
48%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
31%
Clean sheets
1.39
Home goals / game
1.25
Away goals / game
+11%
Home attack advantage
+10%
Home defensive advantage
+7%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
67%
1 goal
31%
2 goals
12%
3 goals
3%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
74%
1 goal
42%
2 goals
21%
3 goals
10%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Record from EIF's perspective: 5 wins, 0 draws and 0 losses against KäPa. Games average 3.40 goals, and both teams scored in 60% of them.

KäPa
0 : 1
EIF
EIF
1 : 0
KäPa
Ekenäs IF
4 : 1
Käpylän Pallo
Käpylän Pallo
1 : 3
Ekenäs IF
Ekenäs IF
4 : 2
Käpylän Pallo

FAQ

When do EIF and KäPa play?

EIF face KäPa on October 17, 2026 in Ykkösliiga at Ekenäs Centrumplan. The exact kick-off time in your timezone is shown at the top of the match page.

What is the head-to-head record between EIF and KäPa?

In the last 5 head-to-head matches EIF won 5, KäPa won 0 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 3.40 goals, with both teams scoring in 60% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before EIF vs KäPa?

EIF score 1.12 goals per game on average and KäPa 1.19. The Ykkösliiga average is 2.65 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 48% of games. Both teams score in 38% of EIF's matches and 69% of KäPa's.

What form are EIF and KäPa in?

Over the last 5 games EIF have a 0-3-2 record (0.60 points per game) and KäPa 2-2-1 (1.60 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for EIF vs KäPa?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.