EIF vs Klubi-04: match statistics
EIF vs Klubi-04: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
EIF played against Klubi-04 in Ykkösliiga (Finland). The game was played on July 31, 2026. Venue: Ekenäs Centrumplan. Final score: 2:0.
Recent form
EIF has 0 wins, 2 draws and 3 losses over its last five games, averaging 0.40 points per game. Klubi-04 has 2 wins, 1 draw and 2 losses, with 1.40 points per game.
Scoring records
EIF scores 1.31 goals per game and allows 1.88. Klubi-04 scores 0.88 and allows 1.25. Games in this league average 2.48 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 50% of EIF's games and 50% of Klubi-04's. The Over 2.5 rates are 63% and 25%, compared with league averages of 45% for BTTS and 44% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
EIF has the higher season xG average, 1.36 to 1.28 per game. EIF takes 10.5 shots per game, while Klubi-04 takes 9.8.
First-half and second-half trends
EIF leads at halftime in 19% of its games and scores 0.81 goals per game after halftime. Klubi-04 leads at halftime in 25% and scores 0.50 after halftime.
When the teams score
EIF's most productive scoring window is minutes 76-90+ (8 goals). For Klubi-04, it is minutes 31-45+ (3 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Ykkösliiga games average 2.48 goals. Both teams score in 45% of games, and 44% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, 4 previous meetings were available. The record was 2 home wins, 1 draw and 1 away win. Those games averaged 4.25 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
The favorite is EIF due to markedly superior home metrics: 63% of home matches end in wins and a +4 goal differential at their stadium, while Klubi-04 has only 13% away wins and a -2 away goal differential. EIF scores 1.63 goals at home on 10.25 shots with a 16% conversion rate, whereas Klubi-04 averages 1.00 goal away on 9.38 shots and 11% conversion, giving the hosts a qualitative and efficiency edge. Conversely, form over the last 5 matches favors the visitors: Klubi-04 are 2-1-2, scoring 6 goals and averaging 1.4 points per game, while EIF have not won in their last 5 (0-2-3), scoring just 2 goals and 0.4 points per game. Defensively the hosts also perform better at home (1.13 conceded on average and 38% clean sheets) versus 1.25 conceded and 13% clean sheets for the visitors away, but xG shows the visitors concede 1.62 xG on the road compared to 1.38 xG generated by EIF at home, indicating some risk of dangerous chances for the home defense. Balancing the seasonal home advantage and the visitors’ weak away efficiency against EIF’s poor recent form, I project a home win as the most probable outcome.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
EIF has a seasonal goals-per-game average of 0.75 and only 0.4 across the last 5 matches (2 goals in 5), while Klubi-04 records 1.0 for the season and 1.2 in the last 5 (6 goals in 5). EIF concedes 1.25 goals per game on average and 1.6 in the last 5 (8 goals), while Klubi-04 concedes 1.25 for the season and 1.2 in the last 5 (6 goals), indicating hosts are more prone to conceding but are themselves weak offensively. Season BTTS rate is 38% for EIF and 63% for Klubi-04, however the last 5 matches show 40% vs 20%, i.e. Klubi-04 has cooled off on BTTS. xG indicates EIF generates 1.32 xG versus 1.23 for Klubi-04, with xG against 1.43 vs 1.62, and shot conversion of 8% for EIF versus 11% for Klubi-04, meaning EIF creates chances but fails to convert. Given the hosts’ low efficiency (0.4 goals in the last 5) and the drop in BTTS for the visitors, it is more likely that both teams will not score; I assess a 38% probability for BTTS - Yes and 62% for No Goal, and I back No Goal.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
xG analysis shows 1.32 for EIF and 1.23 for Klubi-04; accounting for xG conceded (1.43 for EIF and 1.62 for Klubi-04) a simple average yields roughly 1.47 for the home side and 1.33 for the visitors, i.e. ~2.80 total xG. Actual season goals are lower (EIF 0.75, Klubi-04 1.00) and shot conversion rates are 8% and 11%, so I adjusted expected goals to 1.20 (home) and 1.05 (away), totaling 2.25. With a combined expectation of 2.25, Poisson probabilities give roughly 66% for Over 1.5 goals, 39% for Over 2.5 goals and 19% for Over 3.5 goals. Considering seasonal Over 1.5 rates (EIF 63%, Klubi-04 88%) alongside the projected 2.25 goals, the strongest signal is the Over 1.5 line.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
The strongest signal is the visitors’ form: in their last 5 matches Klubi-04 led at the break in 60% of cases (3 of 5) and averaged 1.0 goals by half-time, while hosts EIF did not lead at the break in those 5 matches (0%). First-half statistics also favor the visitors — the hosts concede an average of 0.88 goals by half-time versus just 0.25 conceded by Klubi-04, and the hosts were trailing at the break in 50% of their seasonal matches. Over the season EIF have only 0.63 points per game and lose 63% of matches, whereas Klubi-04 show better short-term form (40% wins in the last 5) along with more shots on target (4.25 vs 3.38) and higher finishing efficiency (11% vs 8%). Taking this into account, I expect the visitors to take the lead at the break and maintain that advantage until full-time, therefore the most confident HT/FT pick is 2/2. Consequently the 2/2 scenario receives the highest probability (40%), with moderate probability for draws or turnarounds in the second half.
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| EIF | Klubi-04 | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 38% | 40% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.13 | 0.13 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.33 | 0.23 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Klubi-04 is 250% better for: last-5 form.
0.4 pts / game - EIF · 1.4 pts / game - Klubi-04
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
EIF is 49% better for: goals scored per game.
1.31 goals / game - EIF · 0.88 goals / game - Klubi-04
Klubi-04 is 50% better for: goals allowed per game.
1.88 goals / game - EIF · 1.25 goals / game - Klubi-04
EIF scores in 69% of games (11 of 16 games), while Klubi-04 keeps a clean sheet in 13% (2 of 16 games).
Klubi-04 scores in 63% of games (10 of 16 games), while EIF keeps a clean sheet in 25% (4 of 16 games).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - EIF
Over / Under - Klubi-04
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Klubi-04 is 13% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1 pts / game - EIF · 1.13 pts / game - Klubi-04
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
EIF - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 19% of games and wins 31%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.5 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
Klubi-04 - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 25% of games and wins 13%. Sometimes gives up a halftime lead.
Allows 0.1 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 0.80 | 0.80 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.0 | 0.4 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.2 | 1.4 |
| Average goals per game | 0.2 | 1.8 |
| 1 goal | 20% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 40% |
| No goal | 100% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -1 | -5 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.80 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / game | 1.0 | 0.2 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.8 | 0.4 |
| Average goals per game | 1.8 | 0.6 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 0% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 60% |
| No goal | 40% | 80% |
| Goal difference | +1 | -1 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (8 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (3 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): -6 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
EIF
Klubi-04
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Ykkösliiga).
Teams vs league
| EIF | Liga | Klubi-04 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▲ 3.19 | 2.48 | ▼ 2.13 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 50% | 45% | ▲ 50% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 63% | 44% | ▼ 25% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 25% | 31% | ▼ 13% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 56% | 61% | ▲ 63% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 88% | 73% | ▼ 69% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Head-to-head
Record from EIF's perspective: 2 wins, 1 draw and 1 loss against Klubi-04. Games average 4.25 goals, and both teams scored in 100% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of EIF vs Klubi-04?
The Ykkösliiga match finished EIF 2:0 Klubi-04. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between EIF and Klubi-04?
In the last 4 head-to-head matches EIF won 2, Klubi-04 won 1 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 4.25 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before EIF vs Klubi-04?
EIF score 1.31 goals per game on average and Klubi-04 0.88. The Ykkösliiga average is 2.48 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 44% of games. Both teams score in 50% of EIF's matches and 50% of Klubi-04's.
What form are EIF and Klubi-04 in?
Over the last 5 games EIF have a 0-2-3 record (0.40 points per game) and Klubi-04 2-1-2 (1.40 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for EIF vs Klubi-04?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.