Uganda - Uganda Premier LeagueData current as of October 13, 2026

Entebbe UPPC vs URA: match statistics

Entebbe UPPC crest
Entebbe UPPC
0 : 0half-time 0:0
URA crest
URA
155%(0.00)
X30%(0.00)
215%(0.00)

Entebbe UPPC displays significantly better home form with a 56% win rate at their own ground and a positive goal difference (+2). The hosts have won 2 of their last 5 matches and hold the advantage in possession (58%) and shot efficiency. URA has not won any away match this season (0% win rate), with a run of 8 draws and defeats in recent away games. The visitors have a negative goal difference (-5) in away matches and fail to score in 75% of games. xG statistics also favor the hosts (1.84 vs 1.45), indicating their superiority in creating scoring chances. Considering all factors, Entebbe UPPC has a real chance of victory, though the poor finishing of both teams could lead to a draw.

Entebbe UPPC vs URA: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

Entebbe UPPC played against URA in Uganda Premier League (Uganda). The game was played on March 7, 2026. Final score: 0:0.

Recent form

Entebbe UPPC has 2 wins, 2 draws and 1 loss over its last five games, averaging 1.60 points per game. URA has 1 win, 4 draws and 0 losses, with 1.40 points per game.

Scoring records

Entebbe UPPC scores 1.00 goals per game and allows 0.61. URA scores 0.89 and allows 1.00. Games in this league average 2.18 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 22% of Entebbe UPPC's games and 33% of URA's. The Over 2.5 rates are 11% and 22%, compared with league averages of 42% for BTTS and 36% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

URA has the higher season xG average, 1.61 to 1.41 per game. Entebbe UPPC takes 5.1 shots per game, while URA takes 11.6.

First-half and second-half trends

Entebbe UPPC leads at halftime in 22% of its games and scores 0.17 goals per game after halftime. URA leads at halftime in 22% and scores 0.44 after halftime.

When the teams score

Entebbe UPPC's most productive scoring window is minutes 0-15 (11 goals). For URA, it is minutes 31-45+ (6 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

Uganda Premier League games average 2.18 goals. Both teams score in 42% of games, and 36% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 1 home win, 0 draws and 0 away wins. Those games averaged 1.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Entebbe UPPC displays significantly better home form with a 56% win rate at their own ground and a positive goal difference (+2). The hosts have won 2 of their last 5 matches and hold the advantage in possession (58%) and shot efficiency. URA has not won any away match this season (0% win rate), with a run of 8 draws and defeats in recent away games. The visitors have a negative goal difference (-5) in away matches and fail to score in 75% of games. xG statistics also favor the hosts (1.84 vs 1.45), indicating their superiority in creating scoring chances. Considering all factors, Entebbe UPPC has a real chance of victory, though the poor finishing of both teams could lead to a draw.

View the statistical overview

Stats by half

0 : 0
First half
0 : 0
Second half

Game stats

56Possession (%)44
Entebbe UPPCURA
15Shots9
Entebbe UPPCURA
3Shots on target1
Entebbe UPPCURA
1.79xG1.1
Entebbe UPPCURA
4Corners2
Entebbe UPPCURA
87Dangerous attacks62
Entebbe UPPCURA
-1Fouls-1
Entebbe UPPCURA
-1Cards-1
Entebbe UPPCURA

Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

1Goals scored / game0.89
Entebbe UPPCURA
0.61Goals allowed / game1
Entebbe UPPCURA
25%Average possession51%
Entebbe UPPCURA
0.56Shots on target / game4.22
Entebbe UPPCURA

Team stats— who is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

5.11Shots per game11.56
Entebbe UPPCURA
0.56Shots on target4.22
Entebbe UPPCURA
19.6%Shot conversion7.7%
Entebbe UPPCURA
25%Possession51%
Entebbe UPPCURA
1.41xG for1.61
Entebbe UPPCURA
1.72xG against1.46
Entebbe UPPCURA

Shooting quality

Entebbe UPPC: Counter-attackingURA: Balanced
Entebbe UPPCURA
Accuracy (shots on target)11%37%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.280.14
Finishing (goals per shot on target)1.790.21

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team form— who is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

Entebbe UPPC is 14% better for: last-5 form.

1.6 pts / game - Entebbe UPPC · 1.4 pts / game - URA

Entebbe UPPC
DWDWL
Season result split
56% W22% D22% L
Season (W-D-L)
10-4-4
1.89 pts / game · goal difference +7
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-2-1
1.60 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
5-1-3
Last 5 at home
3-1-1
LWWDW
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 0.4Goals conceded: 0.4xG: 1.33Opponent xG: 1.46BTTS: 0%Over 2.5: 0%
URA
DDDDW
Unbeaten in the last 5 games
Season result split
17% W50% D33% L
Season (W-D-L)
3-9-6
1.00 pts / game · goal difference -2
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-4-0
1.40 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
0-5-3
Last 5 away
0-2-3
LLLDD
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 0.6Goals conceded: 0.2xG: 1.49Opponent xG: 1.44BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 0%

Goals— how do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Entebbe UPPC is 12% better for: goals scored per game.

1 goals / game - Entebbe UPPC · 0.89 goals / game - URA

Entebbe UPPC is 64% better for: goals allowed per game.

0.61 goals / game - Entebbe UPPC · 1 goals / game - URA

Entebbe UPPC scoring profile: strong

Entebbe UPPC scores in 67% of games (12 of 18 games), while URA keeps a clean sheet in 39% (7 of 18 games).

URA scoring profile: more difficult

URA scores in 39% of games (7 of 18 games), while Entebbe UPPC keeps a clean sheet in 56% (10 of 18 games).

18Goals scored (season)16
Entebbe UPPCURA
11Goals conceded (season)18
Entebbe UPPCURA
1.61Average goals per game1.89
Entebbe UPPCURA
2Goals scored (last 5)3
Entebbe UPPCURA
2Goals conceded (last 5)1
Entebbe UPPCURA

How often they score at least...

67%1 goal39%
Entebbe UPPCURA
22%2 goals17%
Entebbe UPPCURA
6%3 goals11%
Entebbe UPPCURA
6%4 goals6%
Entebbe UPPCURA

How often they concede at least...

44%1 goal61%
Entebbe UPPCURA
17%2 goals28%
Entebbe UPPCURA
0%3 goals11%
Entebbe UPPCURA
0%4 goals0%
Entebbe UPPCURA

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

0%BTTS at half-time6%
Entebbe UPPCURA
0%BTTS in both halves6%
Entebbe UPPCURA
0%Scored in both halves11%
Entebbe UPPCURA

BTTS and goal count

11%Min. 3 goals and BTTS17%
Entebbe UPPCURA
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS6%
Entebbe UPPCURA
0%BTTS - last 520%
Entebbe UPPCURA

Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

28%Min. 1 goal before half-time56%
Entebbe UPPCURA
0%Min. 2 goals before half-time22%
Entebbe UPPCURA
0%Min. 3 goals before half-time11%
Entebbe UPPCURA

2nd half

17%Min. 1 goal after half-time56%
Entebbe UPPCURA
6%Min. 2 goals after half-time17%
Entebbe UPPCURA
0%Min. 3 goals after half-time6%
Entebbe UPPCURA

Game halves— when do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Entebbe UPPC is 25% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.39 pts / game - Entebbe UPPC · 1.11 pts / game - URA

Entebbe UPPC - half-time state
22% leading72% draw6% trailing
URA - half-time state
22% leading44% draw33% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.39Points per game (1st half)1.11
Entebbe UPPCURA
0.22Goals scored (1st half)0.44
Entebbe UPPCURA
0.06Goals conceded (1st half)0.44
Entebbe UPPCURA
0.28Average goals (1st half)0.89
Entebbe UPPCURA
94%Clean sheet before half-time61%
Entebbe UPPCURA
78%No goal before half-time78%
Entebbe UPPCURA

After half-time (2nd half)

1.17Points per game (2nd half)1.17
Entebbe UPPCURA
0.17Goals scored (2nd half)0.44
Entebbe UPPCURA
0.06Goals conceded (2nd half)0.56
Entebbe UPPCURA
0.22Average goals (2nd half)1
Entebbe UPPCURA
94%Clean sheet after half-time61%
Entebbe UPPCURA
89%No goal after half-time72%
Entebbe UPPCURA

Entebbe UPPC - second-half results

11% W83% D6% L
25
Half-time points
4
Half-time goals
+3
Goal difference (1st half)
21
Second-half points
+2
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.39
PPG before half-time
Lead holding255%

Leads at halftime in 22% of games and wins 56%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime0.0

Defense stays consistent across the full game.

URA - second-half results

22% W50% D28% L
20
Half-time points
8
Half-time goals
0
Goal difference (1st half)
21
Second-half points
-2
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.11
PPG before half-time
Lead holding77%

Leads at halftime in 22% of games and wins 17%. Sometimes gives up a halftime lead.

Defense after halftime+0.1

Allows 0.1 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

Entebbe UPPC - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.600.80
Goals scored / game0.40.0
Goals allowed / game0.20.2
Average goals per game0.60.2
1 goal60%20%
2 goals0%0%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet80%80%
No goal60%100%
Goal difference+1-1
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 80% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 2
URA - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.201.40
Goals scored / game0.40.2
Goals allowed / game0.20.0
Average goals per game0.60.2
1 goal40%20%
2 goals20%0%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet80%100%
No goal80%80%
Goal difference+1+1
Half-time: 20% leading - 60% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 80% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 2

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

Entebbe UPPC
ScoredConceded
11
9
0-15
0
0
16-30
4
1
31-45
2
0
46-60
1
0
61-75
0
1
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (11 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

URA
ScoredConceded
0
4
0-15
2
3
16-30
6
1
31-45
1
5
46-60
4
3
61-75
3
2
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (6 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

1.75
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
1.0 : 0.8
Estimated goal split
home : away
80%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
28%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-43%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
26%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
20%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 5 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

Entebbe UPPC

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.31
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.70
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-5.3 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.41
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+1.11
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
73%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
75%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
-0.29
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.0
Late goals
0% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 61% come in the first quarter-hour.
0%

URA

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.15
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.26
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-5.8 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.72
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.46
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
110%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
73%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
+0.40
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
0.0
Late goals
19% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
19%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League context— is this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Uganda Premier League).

Teams vs league

Entebbe UPPCLigaURA
Average goals per game▼ 1.612.18▼ 1.89
Both teams scored▼ 22%42%▼ 33%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)▼ 11%36%▼ 22%
Clean sheets▲ 56%36%▲ 39%
Goal before half-time▼ 28%60%▼ 56%
Goal after half-time▼ 17%60%▼ 56%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.18
Average goals per game
42%
Both teams scored
36%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
36%
Clean sheets
1.37
Home goals / game
0.81
Away goals / game
+69%
Home attack advantage
+41%
Home defensive advantage
+23%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
60%
1 goal
27%
2 goals
11%
3 goals
2%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
60%
1 goal
30%
2 goals
8%
3 goals
2%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Record from Entebbe UPPC's perspective: 1 win, 0 draws and 0 losses against URA. Games average 1.00 goals, and both teams scored in 0% of them.

FAQ

What was the result of Entebbe UPPC vs URA?

The Uganda Premier League match finished Entebbe UPPC 0:0 URA. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Entebbe UPPC vs URA?

Entebbe UPPC score 1.00 goals per game on average and URA 0.89. The Uganda Premier League average is 2.18 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 36% of games. Both teams score in 22% of Entebbe UPPC's matches and 33% of URA's.

What form are Entebbe UPPC and URA in?

Over the last 5 games Entebbe UPPC have a 2-2-1 record (1.60 points per game) and URA 1-4-0 (1.40 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Entebbe UPPC vs URA?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Entebbe UPPC vs URA: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.