Türkiye - 1. LigData current as of September 06, 2026

Erokspor vs Amed: match statistics

Erokspor crest
Erokspor
1 : 1half-time 1:0
Amed crest
Amed

Erokspor vs Amed: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

Erokspor played against Amed in 1. Lig (Türkiye). The game was played on April 9, 2026. Final score: 1:1.

Recent form

Erokspor has 2 wins, 1 draw and 2 losses over its last five games, averaging 1.40 points per game. Amed has 5 wins, 0 draws and 0 losses, with 3.00 points per game.

Scoring records

Erokspor scores 2.30 goals per game and allows 0.94. Amed scores 2.24 and allows 1.00. Games in this league average 2.93 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 58% of Erokspor's games and 52% of Amed's. The Over 2.5 rates are 61% and 61%, compared with league averages of 49% for BTTS and 55% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

Amed has the higher season xG average, 1.71 to 1.52 per game. Erokspor takes 12.8 shots per game, while Amed takes 15.3.

First-half and second-half trends

Erokspor leads at halftime in 36% of its games and scores 1.45 goals per game after halftime. Amed leads at halftime in 48% and scores 1.21 after halftime.

When the teams score

Erokspor's most productive scoring window is minutes 76-90+ (22 goals). For Amed, it is minutes 76-90+ (18 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

1. Lig games average 2.93 goals. Both teams score in 49% of games, and 55% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 0 home wins, 0 draws and 1 away win. Those games averaged 3.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Amed is the favorite based on form — they have won 5 of their last 5 matches and scored 16 goals in that period (avg 3.2 per match), conceding only 1 goal. Erokspor over their last 5 matches have a 2-1-2 record, scored 9 goals (1.8 per match) and conceded 9 (1.8 per match), indicating defensive issues in the short term. This season the home side score on average 2.25 goals with an xG of 1.59 and concede 0.94 goals, and they also post higher possession (59%) and more shots on target (5.19) than the visitors, which reflects the quality of chances created at home. The visitors away average 2.00 goals with an xG of 1.46 and concede 1.38 goals, but their recent run is an average of 3 points per match over the last 5, whereas Erokspor have 1.4 points per match, showing a clear form advantage for Amed. Considering the guests’ 5-match winning streak and the 9 goals conceded by Erokspor in their last five games, I back an away win, although I expect an open, high-scoring match.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

Data analysis favors a BTTS 'Yes' scenario. Erokspor at home averages 2.47 goals scored per match (xG 1.94) and has a season BTTS rate of 53%, with BTTS in 80% of the last 5 matches while conceding on average 1.8 goals. Amed away averages 2.00 goals (xG 1.46), scored 16 goals in the last 5 matches (3.2 per match) and conceded only 0.2 goals, producing a 5-game winning streak but a low recent BTTS rate of 20%. xG comparison shows Erokspor creates 1.94 xG versus the 1.22 xG Amed typically allows away, while Amed creates 1.46 xG versus the 1.07 xG Erokspor typically allows at home — both teams have realistic scoring potential. Considering Erokspor’s 17.82 shots (6.59 on target), Amed’s strong offensive form and the hosts’ recent defensive results, I assign a 65% probability to BTTS 'Yes' and 35% to 'No'.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

Expected goals calculated from xG and seasonal averages are 1.68 for Erokspor and 1.28 for Amed, totaling 2.96 expected goals. Erokspor has xG 1.94 and scores 2.47 goals/match on average with 6.59 SOT, Amed has xG 1.46 and scores 2.00 goals/match with 4.75 SOT; opponents' xG (1.07 for home, 1.22 for away) give preliminary forecasts of 1.58/1.27 before adjustment. Seasonal indicators support the over: Over 1.5 occurred in 76% of Erokspor matches and 94% of Amed matches, Over 2.5 in 59% and 63%, and Over 3.5 only in 29% and 31% of cases, so the strongest signal is for over 1.5 goals. A Poisson model with lambda=2.96 projects roughly an 80% probability of >1.5 (about 20% under), around 57% for >2.5 and about 35% for >3.5, which aligns with seasonal shares. Additionally, Amed scored 16 goals (3.2 avg) and conceded 1 (0.2) in the last 5 matches, while Erokspor is 9-9 (1.8 avg) in that period, therefore I recommend playing the over at the 1.5 line as the strongest and most justified pick.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

The favorite to be leading at half-time and to win the match is Erokspor: they led at the break in 9 matches this season (53%) and average 1.12 goals scored by half-time while conceding only 0.24, which strongly supports the hosts leading at the interval. Their xG is 1.94 versus Amed’s 1.46, and their average shots on target are 6.59 versus 4.75; combined with an average points per game of 2.65 for Erokspor versus 1.56 for Amed, this increases the likelihood of a full-time victory for the hosts. Erokspor keep a clean sheet in the first half in 76% of matches, while Amed concede an average of 0.63 goals by half-time, which limits the probability of the visitors leading at 45 minutes. One should note Amed’s current form: 5 wins in a row (last 5 matches) and they led at the break in 60% of those games, so scenarios with a draw at half-time or a later turnaround have a visible, albeit smaller, chance. As a result I rate the '1/1' HT/FT option highest, with a secondary possibility of 'X/1' and a moderate probability of a draw or a turnaround after half-time.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Stats by half

1 : 0
First half
0 : 1
Second half

Game stats

66Possession (%)34
EroksporAmed
14Shots7
EroksporAmed
5Shots on target2
EroksporAmed
1.7xG0.78
EroksporAmed
4Corners2
EroksporAmed
64Dangerous attacks27
EroksporAmed
11Fouls14
EroksporAmed
2Cards2
EroksporAmed

Pre-game profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

2.3Goals scored / game2.24
EroksporAmed
0.94Goals allowed / game1
EroksporAmed
58%Average possession53%
EroksporAmed
5.03Shots on target / game5.7
EroksporAmed

Team statswho is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

12.85Shots per game15.3
EroksporAmed
5.03Shots on target5.7
EroksporAmed
17.9%Shot conversion14.7%
EroksporAmed
58%Possession53%
EroksporAmed
1.52xG for1.71
EroksporAmed
0.92xG against1.14
EroksporAmed

Shooting quality

Erokspor: Efficient finishingAmed: Attacking
EroksporAmed
Accuracy (shots on target)39%37%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.11
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.460.39

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

Amed is 114% better for: last-5 form.

1.4 pts / game - Erokspor · 3 pts / game - Amed

Erokspor
WDLLW
Season result split
58% W27% R15% P
Season (W-D-L)
19-9-5
2.00 pts / game · goal difference +45
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
9-5-2
Last 5 at home
3-1-1
WWWDL
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.8Goals conceded: 1.8xG: 1.70Opponent xG: 0.84BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 60%
Amed
WWWWW
5 wins in a row
Season result split
64% W21% R15% P
Season (W-D-L)
21-7-5
2.12 pts / game · goal difference +41
Last 5 (W-D-L)
5-0-0
3.00 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
7-4-5
Last 5 away
3-2-0
WDDWW
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 3.2Goals conceded: 0.2xG: 2.15Opponent xG: 0.95BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Erokspor is 6% better for: goals allowed per game.

0.94 goals / game - Erokspor · 1 goals / game - Amed

Erokspor scoring profile: very strong

Erokspor scores in 85% of games (28 of 33 meczów), while Amed keeps a clean sheet in 39% (13 of 33 meczów).

Amed scoring profile: very strong

Amed scores in 85% of games (28 of 33 meczów), while Erokspor keeps a clean sheet in 36% (12 of 33 meczów).

76Goals scored (season)74
EroksporAmed
31Goals conceded (season)33
EroksporAmed
3.24Average goals per game3.24
EroksporAmed
9Goals scored (last 5)16
EroksporAmed
9Goals conceded (last 5)1
EroksporAmed

How often they score at least...

85%1 goal85%
EroksporAmed
61%2 goals61%
EroksporAmed
45%3 goals30%
EroksporAmed
27%4 goals21%
EroksporAmed

How often they concede at least...

64%1 goal61%
EroksporAmed
21%2 goals27%
EroksporAmed
9%3 goals9%
EroksporAmed
0%4 goals3%
EroksporAmed

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

30%BTTS at half-time24%
EroksporAmed
9%BTTS in both halves6%
EroksporAmed
52%Scored in both halves36%
EroksporAmed

BTTS and goal count

42%Min. 3 goals and BTTS42%
EroksporAmed
18%Min. 3 goals without BTTS18%
EroksporAmed
80%BTTS - last 520%
EroksporAmed

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

70%Min. 1 goal before half-time70%
EroksporAmed
42%Min. 2 goals before half-time42%
EroksporAmed
15%Min. 3 goals before half-time24%
EroksporAmed

2nd half

82%Min. 1 goal after half-time85%
EroksporAmed
73%Min. 2 goals after half-time52%
EroksporAmed
27%Min. 3 goals after half-time21%
EroksporAmed

Game halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Amed is 15% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.61 pts / game - Erokspor · 1.85 pts / game - Amed

Erokspor - half-time state
36% leading52% draw12% trailing
Amed - half-time state
48% leading39% draw12% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.61Points per game (1st half)1.85
EroksporAmed
0.85Goals scored (1st half)1.03
EroksporAmed
0.45Goals conceded (1st half)0.42
EroksporAmed
1.3Average goals (1st half)1.45
EroksporAmed
64%Clean sheet before half-time67%
EroksporAmed
36%No goal before half-time39%
EroksporAmed

After half-time (2nd half)

1.97Points per game (2nd half)1.79
EroksporAmed
1.45Goals scored (2nd half)1.21
EroksporAmed
0.48Goals conceded (2nd half)0.58
EroksporAmed
1.94Average goals (2nd half)1.79
EroksporAmed
61%Clean sheet after half-time58%
EroksporAmed
27%No goal after half-time39%
EroksporAmed

Erokspor - second-half results

55% W33% R12% P
53
Half-time points
28
Half-time goals
+13
Goal difference (1st half)
65
Second-half points
+32
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.61
PPG before half-time
Lead holding161%

Leads at halftime in 36% of games and wins 58%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime+0.0

Defense stays consistent across the full game.

Amed - second-half results

52% W24% R24% P
61
Half-time points
34
Half-time goals
+20
Goal difference (1st half)
59
Second-half points
+21
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.85
PPG before half-time
Lead holding133%

Leads at halftime in 48% of games and wins 64%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime+0.2

Allows 0.2 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

Erokspor - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.201.20
Goals scored / game1.00.8
Goals allowed / game0.81.0
Average goals per game1.81.8
1 goal80%80%
2 goals60%80%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet40%20%
No goal40%40%
Goal difference+1-1
Half-time: 20% leading - 60% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 60% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 5
Amed - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game2.203.00
Goals scored / game1.41.8
Goals allowed / game0.00.2
Average goals per game1.42.0
1 goal60%100%
2 goals60%60%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet100%80%
No goal40%0%
Goal difference+7+8
Half-time: 60% leading - 40% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 100% won - 0% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 7

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

Erokspor
ScoredConceded
7
6
0-15
10
5
16-30
11
4
31-45
12
6
46-60
14
3
61-75
22
7
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (22 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): +15 - wins late phases.

Amed
ScoredConceded
7
2
0-15
10
5
16-30
17
7
31-45
14
1
46-60
8
7
61-75
18
11
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (18 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): +7 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

3.24
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
1.6 : 1.6
Estimated goal split
home : away
111%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
55%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-7%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
72%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
2%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 50 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

Erokspor

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.60
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.76
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-18.9 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.78
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
-0.02
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
138%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
75%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
-0.60
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.6
Late goals
29% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 9% come in the first quarter-hour.
29%

Amed

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.57
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.67
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-12.6 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.53
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.14
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
178%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
60%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
+0.88
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
24% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 9% come in the first quarter-hour.
24%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (1. Lig).

Teams vs league

EroksporLigaAmed
Average goals per game 3.242.93 3.24
Both teams scored 58%49% 52%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 61%55% 61%
Clean sheets 36%29% 39%
Goal before half-time 70%72% 70%
Goal after half-time 82%79% 85%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.93
Average goals per game
49%
Both teams scored
55%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
29%
Clean sheets
1.67
Home goals / game
1.26
Away goals / game
+33%
Home attack advantage
+25%
Home defensive advantage
+15%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
72%
1 goal
40%
2 goals
13%
3 goals
4%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
79%
1 goal
51%
2 goals
21%
3 goals
9%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. EroksporGoalRyan JackAssist: Guélor Kanga Kaku
  2. EroksporYellow cardHamza Čataković
  3. AmedYellow cardCelal Hanalp
  4. AmedSubstitutionOn: Dia Sabi'AOff: Felix Ohene Afena-Gyan
  5. AmedGoalMbaye DiagneAssist: Sinan Kurt
  6. AmedYellow cardErce Kardeşler
  7. AmedSubstitutionOn: Hasan Ali KaldırımOff: Celal Hanalp
  8. EroksporYellow cardGuélor Kanga Kaku
  9. AmedSubstitutionOn: Tarkan SerbestOff: Cem Üstündag
  10. EroksporSubstitutionOn: Recep NiyazOff: Mikail Okyar
  11. AmedSubstitutionOn: Adama TraoréOff: Sinan Kurt

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Referee context

See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.

Gürcan HasovaMatches officiated: 10
4.7Cards per match
0Penalties per match
1 / X / 250%Home wins30%Draws20%Away wins

Head-to-head

Record from Erokspor's perspective: 0 wins, 0 draws and 1 loss against Amed. Games average 3.00 goals, and both teams scored in 100% of them.

FAQ

What was the result of Erokspor vs Amed?

The 1. Lig match finished Erokspor 1:1 Amed. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Erokspor vs Amed?

Erokspor score 2.30 goals per game on average and Amed 2.24. The 1. Lig average is 2.93 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 55% of games. Both teams score in 58% of Erokspor's matches and 52% of Amed's.

What form are Erokspor and Amed in?

Over the last 5 games Erokspor have a 2-1-2 record (1.40 points per game) and Amed 5-0-0 (3.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Erokspor vs Amed?

The statistical background for Erokspor vs Amed — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.