Erokspor vs Amed: match statistics
Erokspor vs Amed: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Erokspor played against Amed in 1. Lig (Türkiye). The game was played on April 9, 2026. Final score: 1:1.
Recent form
Erokspor has 2 wins, 1 draw and 2 losses over its last five games, averaging 1.40 points per game. Amed has 5 wins, 0 draws and 0 losses, with 3.00 points per game.
Scoring records
Erokspor scores 2.30 goals per game and allows 0.94. Amed scores 2.24 and allows 1.00. Games in this league average 2.93 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 58% of Erokspor's games and 52% of Amed's. The Over 2.5 rates are 61% and 61%, compared with league averages of 49% for BTTS and 55% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Amed has the higher season xG average, 1.71 to 1.52 per game. Erokspor takes 12.8 shots per game, while Amed takes 15.3.
First-half and second-half trends
Erokspor leads at halftime in 36% of its games and scores 1.45 goals per game after halftime. Amed leads at halftime in 48% and scores 1.21 after halftime.
When the teams score
Erokspor's most productive scoring window is minutes 76-90+ (22 goals). For Amed, it is minutes 76-90+ (18 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
1. Lig games average 2.93 goals. Both teams score in 49% of games, and 55% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 0 home wins, 0 draws and 1 away win. Those games averaged 3.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Amed is the favorite based on form — they have won 5 of their last 5 matches and scored 16 goals in that period (avg 3.2 per match), conceding only 1 goal. Erokspor over their last 5 matches have a 2-1-2 record, scored 9 goals (1.8 per match) and conceded 9 (1.8 per match), indicating defensive issues in the short term. This season the home side score on average 2.25 goals with an xG of 1.59 and concede 0.94 goals, and they also post higher possession (59%) and more shots on target (5.19) than the visitors, which reflects the quality of chances created at home. The visitors away average 2.00 goals with an xG of 1.46 and concede 1.38 goals, but their recent run is an average of 3 points per match over the last 5, whereas Erokspor have 1.4 points per match, showing a clear form advantage for Amed. Considering the guests’ 5-match winning streak and the 9 goals conceded by Erokspor in their last five games, I back an away win, although I expect an open, high-scoring match.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Data analysis favors a BTTS 'Yes' scenario. Erokspor at home averages 2.47 goals scored per match (xG 1.94) and has a season BTTS rate of 53%, with BTTS in 80% of the last 5 matches while conceding on average 1.8 goals. Amed away averages 2.00 goals (xG 1.46), scored 16 goals in the last 5 matches (3.2 per match) and conceded only 0.2 goals, producing a 5-game winning streak but a low recent BTTS rate of 20%. xG comparison shows Erokspor creates 1.94 xG versus the 1.22 xG Amed typically allows away, while Amed creates 1.46 xG versus the 1.07 xG Erokspor typically allows at home — both teams have realistic scoring potential. Considering Erokspor’s 17.82 shots (6.59 on target), Amed’s strong offensive form and the hosts’ recent defensive results, I assign a 65% probability to BTTS 'Yes' and 35% to 'No'.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Expected goals calculated from xG and seasonal averages are 1.68 for Erokspor and 1.28 for Amed, totaling 2.96 expected goals. Erokspor has xG 1.94 and scores 2.47 goals/match on average with 6.59 SOT, Amed has xG 1.46 and scores 2.00 goals/match with 4.75 SOT; opponents' xG (1.07 for home, 1.22 for away) give preliminary forecasts of 1.58/1.27 before adjustment. Seasonal indicators support the over: Over 1.5 occurred in 76% of Erokspor matches and 94% of Amed matches, Over 2.5 in 59% and 63%, and Over 3.5 only in 29% and 31% of cases, so the strongest signal is for over 1.5 goals. A Poisson model with lambda=2.96 projects roughly an 80% probability of >1.5 (about 20% under), around 57% for >2.5 and about 35% for >3.5, which aligns with seasonal shares. Additionally, Amed scored 16 goals (3.2 avg) and conceded 1 (0.2) in the last 5 matches, while Erokspor is 9-9 (1.8 avg) in that period, therefore I recommend playing the over at the 1.5 line as the strongest and most justified pick.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
The favorite to be leading at half-time and to win the match is Erokspor: they led at the break in 9 matches this season (53%) and average 1.12 goals scored by half-time while conceding only 0.24, which strongly supports the hosts leading at the interval. Their xG is 1.94 versus Amed’s 1.46, and their average shots on target are 6.59 versus 4.75; combined with an average points per game of 2.65 for Erokspor versus 1.56 for Amed, this increases the likelihood of a full-time victory for the hosts. Erokspor keep a clean sheet in the first half in 76% of matches, while Amed concede an average of 0.63 goals by half-time, which limits the probability of the visitors leading at 45 minutes. One should note Amed’s current form: 5 wins in a row (last 5 matches) and they led at the break in 60% of those games, so scenarios with a draw at half-time or a later turnaround have a visible, albeit smaller, chance. As a result I rate the '1/1' HT/FT option highest, with a secondary possibility of 'X/1' and a moderate probability of a draw or a turnaround after half-time.
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Erokspor | Amed | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 39% | 37% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.11 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.46 | 0.39 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Amed is 114% better for: last-5 form.
1.4 pts / game - Erokspor · 3 pts / game - Amed
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Erokspor is 6% better for: goals allowed per game.
0.94 goals / game - Erokspor · 1 goals / game - Amed
Erokspor scores in 85% of games (28 of 33 meczów), while Amed keeps a clean sheet in 39% (13 of 33 meczów).
Amed scores in 85% of games (28 of 33 meczów), while Erokspor keeps a clean sheet in 36% (12 of 33 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Erokspor
Over / Under - Amed
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Amed is 15% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.61 pts / game - Erokspor · 1.85 pts / game - Amed
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Erokspor - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 36% of games and wins 58%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
Amed - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 48% of games and wins 64%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.2 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.20 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / game | 1.0 | 0.8 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.8 | 1.0 |
| Average goals per game | 1.8 | 1.8 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 80% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 20% |
| No goal | 40% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +1 | -1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 2.20 | 3.00 |
| Goals scored / game | 1.4 | 1.8 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.0 | 0.2 |
| Average goals per game | 1.4 | 2.0 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 100% | 80% |
| No goal | 40% | 0% |
| Goal difference | +7 | +8 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (22 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): +15 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (18 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): +7 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Erokspor
Amed
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (1. Lig).
Teams vs league
| Erokspor | Liga | Amed | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▲ 3.24 | 2.93 | ▲ 3.24 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 58% | 49% | ▲ 52% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 61% | 55% | ▲ 61% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 36% | 29% | ▲ 39% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 70% | 72% | ▼ 70% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 82% | 79% | ▲ 85% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Referee context
See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.
Head-to-head
Record from Erokspor's perspective: 0 wins, 0 draws and 1 loss against Amed. Games average 3.00 goals, and both teams scored in 100% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Erokspor vs Amed?
The 1. Lig match finished Erokspor 1:1 Amed. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Erokspor vs Amed?
Erokspor score 2.30 goals per game on average and Amed 2.24. The 1. Lig average is 2.93 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 55% of games. Both teams score in 58% of Erokspor's matches and 52% of Amed's.
What form are Erokspor and Amed in?
Over the last 5 games Erokspor have a 2-1-2 record (1.40 points per game) and Amed 5-0-0 (3.00 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Erokspor vs Amed?
The statistical background for Erokspor vs Amed — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.


