Esbjerg vs HB Køge: match statistics
Esbjerg vs HB Køge: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Esbjerg played against HB Køge in 1st Division (Denmark). The game was played on September 12, 2026. Venue: Blue Water Arena. Final score: 2:2.
Recent form
Esbjerg has 0 wins, 0 draws and 5 losses over its last five games, averaging 0.00 points per game. HB Køge has 0 wins, 3 draws and 2 losses, with 0.60 points per game.
Scoring records
Esbjerg scores 1.14 goals per game and allows 2.00. HB Køge scores 0.57 and allows 1.86. Games in this league average 2.65 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 71% of Esbjerg's games and 43% of HB Køge's. The Over 2.5 rates are 57% and 43%, compared with league averages of 61% for BTTS and 52% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
HB Køge has the higher season xG average, 1.51 to 1.46 per game. Esbjerg takes 12.7 shots per game, while HB Køge takes 14.1.
First-half and second-half trends
Esbjerg leads at halftime in 14% of its games and scores 0.57 goals per game after halftime. HB Køge leads at halftime in 14% and scores 0.29 after halftime.
When the teams score
Esbjerg's most productive scoring window is minutes 46-60 (3 goals). For HB Køge, it is minutes 31-45+ (2 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
1st Division games average 2.65 goals. Both teams score in 61% of games, and 52% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, 2 previous meetings were available. The record was 2 home wins, 0 draws and 0 away wins. Those games averaged 3.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Esbjerg have a slight home advantage: they average 1.36 xG and score 0.67 goals in home matches, while HB Køge manage only 1.11 xG and 0.33 goals away from home. The visitors have not won any of their 7 matches this season, and their last five produced three draws and two defeats, confirming their struggles to turn their performances into victories. HB Køge’s away defense concedes an average of 2.00 goals and allows 1.79 xG, while Esbjerg concede 1.67 goals at home with the same xG against figure. The hosts also register more shots per match, 12.67 compared with 9.67, and enjoy more possession, 56% versus 47%. Both teams are in poor form, and Esbjerg have lost 4 of their last 5 matches, so a draw remains a realistic outcome; however, HB Køge’s poor away finishing makes a narrow home win the preferred selection.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Seasonal BTTS indicators are moderate: Esbjerg has recorded BTTS in 50% of matches, while HB Køge has done so in only 33%, well below the league average of 64%. The strongest argument for a BTTS - No scenario is the visitors’ poor scoring efficiency, as they average just 0.33 goals per match and have failed to score in 67% of their appearances. Esbjerg have not kept a clean sheet yet, but HB Køge average only 2.67 shots on target and have a low shot-to-goal conversion rate of 3%. The hosts create significantly more chances, with an average xG of 1.81 and 17.5 shots per match, compared with the visitors’ 1.11 xG and 9.67 shots. Therefore, the more likely scenario is one in which Esbjerg do most of the scoring. The last five matches for both teams produced BTTS in 60% of cases, but HB Køge’s output during this period was only 0.8 goals per match, which limits confidence in a goal from the visitors.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Esbjerg create chances worth an average of 1.81 xG at home and register 17.5 shots per match, while HB Køge concede an average of 2.00 goals and 1.79 xG away from home. The hosts have yet to keep a clean sheet, while their defense allows an average of 1.76 xG, giving the visitors a realistic route to scoring despite averaging just 0.33 goals away from home. In their last five matches, Esbjerg scored 1.6 goals and conceded 2.0, while the teams’ matches produced Over 2.5 goals in 60% and 40% of cases, respectively. However, the 1.5 line offers a clearer edge: it was covered in 100% of Esbjerg’s matches and 67% of HB Køge’s, while the projected total of 2.80 goals further supports a scenario with at least two goals. The strongest pick is Over 1.5, as the defensive weaknesses of both sides offset the visitors’ low historical scoring rate.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
The strongest scenario is a draw at half-time followed by an Esbjerg win at full-time, as HB Køge have yet to score before the break away from home and have been level at half-time in 67% of such matches. Esbjerg also tend to start cautiously: a half-time draw occurred in 60% of their last five matches, with just 0.4 goals conceded on average in the first half. After the interval, however, the hosts should be able to exploit their clear offensive superiority, with an average xG of 1.81 compared with the visitors’ 1.11, while their average number of shots is 17.5 versus HB Køge’s 9.67. The visitors score only 0.33 goals per away match on average, while conceding 2.00, strengthening the forecast of a balanced game turning in Esbjerg’s favor in the second half. The risk remains significant, as the hosts concede an average of 1.75 goals at home; therefore, the scenario of a full-time draw and an away win still retains a noticeable probability.
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Esbjerg | HB Køge | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 36% | 23% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.11 | 0.11 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.25 | 0.17 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Esbjerg is 100% better for: goals scored per game.
1.14 goals / game - Esbjerg · 0.57 goals / game - HB Køge
HB Køge is 8% better for: goals allowed per game.
2 goals / game - Esbjerg · 1.86 goals / game - HB Køge
Esbjerg scores in 71% of games (5 of 7 games), while HB Køge keeps a clean sheet in 14% (1 of 7 games).
HB Køge scores in 43% of games (3 of 7 games), while Esbjerg keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 7 games).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Esbjerg
Over / Under - HB Køge
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Esbjerg is 33% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.14 pts / game - Esbjerg · 0.86 pts / game - HB Køge
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Esbjerg - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 14% of games and wins 14%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 1.1 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
HB Køge - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 14% of games and wins 0%. Sometimes gives up a halftime lead.
Allows 0.4 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 0.80 | 0.00 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.2 | 0.6 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.4 | 1.8 |
| Average goals per game | 0.6 | 2.4 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 60% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 0% |
| No goal | 80% | 40% |
| Goal difference | -1 | -6 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.00 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.4 | 0.4 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.8 | 0.8 |
| Average goals per game | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 40% |
| No goal | 80% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -2 | -2 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (3 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): -5 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (2 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Esbjerg
HB Køge
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (1st Division).
Teams vs league
| Esbjerg | Liga | HB Køge | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▲ 3.14 | 2.65 | ▼ 2.43 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 71% | 61% | ▼ 43% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 57% | 52% | ▼ 43% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 0% | 25% | ▼ 14% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 57% | 72% | ▼ 57% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 86% | 74% | ▲ 86% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Record from Esbjerg's perspective: 2 wins, 0 draws and 0 losses against HB Køge. Games average 3.00 goals, and both teams scored in 50% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Esbjerg vs HB Køge?
The 1st Division match finished Esbjerg 2:2 HB Køge. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Esbjerg and HB Køge?
In the last 2 head-to-head matches Esbjerg won 2, HB Køge won 0 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 3.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Esbjerg vs HB Køge?
Esbjerg score 1.14 goals per game on average and HB Køge 0.57. The 1st Division average is 2.65 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 52% of games. Both teams score in 71% of Esbjerg's matches and 43% of HB Køge's.
What form are Esbjerg and HB Køge in?
Over the last 5 games Esbjerg have a 0-0-5 record (0.00 points per game) and HB Køge 0-3-2 (0.60 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Esbjerg vs HB Køge?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Esbjerg vs HB Køge: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.


