Ethiopia - Ethiopia Premier LeagueAddis Ababa StadiumData current as of 23 July 2026

Ethiopia Bunna vs Fasil Ketema: match statistics

Ethiopia Bunna crest
Ethiopia Bunna
2 : 1half-time 0:1
Fasil Ketema crest
Fasil Ketema

Ethiopia Bunna vs Fasil Ketema: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Ethiopia Bunna play Fasil Ketema in Ethiopia Premier League (Ethiopia). The match date is 20 May 2026 at 14:00. Venue: Addis Ababa Stadium. Final score: 2:1.

Current form

Ethiopia Bunna: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match. Fasil Ketema: 3-0-2, 1.80 points/match.

Goal statistics

Ethiopia Bunna scores 1.05 and concedes 1.03 goals per match. Fasil Ketema scores 0.74 and concedes 0.74. League average: 1.78 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Ethiopia Bunna 47%, Fasil Ketema 26%. Over 2.5: Ethiopia Bunna 37%, Fasil Ketema 18%. League level: BTTS 40%, Over 2.5 28%.

xG, shots and style

Ethiopia Bunna has higher xG: 1.22 vs 1.14. Ethiopia Bunna: 7.5 shots per match, Fasil Ketema: 7.2.

Match halves

Ethiopia Bunna: half-time lead 24%, second-half goals 0.47. Fasil Ketema: half-time lead 24%, second-half goals 0.42.

Goals by minute

Ethiopia Bunna: 31-45+ (9 goals). Fasil Ketema: 76-90+ (7 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Ethiopia Premier League: 1.78 goals per match, BTTS 40%, Over 2.5 28%.

Head-to-head

1 H2H matches: 1-0-0. Average goals 2.00, BTTS 0%.

Match description

I project a draw as the most likely outcome, because Fasil Ketema records as many as 56% draws away and maintains 63% clean sheets, which increases the likelihood of a shared result. Ethiopia Bunna have the home offensive edge – scoring 1.19 goals per match, registering 3.0 on-target shots and a 15% conversion rate from 8.13 average shots, while Fasil away score only 0.69 goals with 2.33 on-target shots and 9% conversion. xG values are similar (home xG 1.26 vs away xG 1.17), but xG against shows a defensive advantage for the visitors (1.31 for the hosts vs 1.10 for Fasil), and 50% of away matches with no goals scored by the visitors favors low totals. In the last 5 matches the hosts have scored 6 and conceded 7 (avg 1.2–1.4), while the visitors have scored 4 and conceded 9 (0.8–1.8); Ethiopia Bunna have 1.0 point per match in the last 5, Fasil 0.8, indicating poor form for both sides. Therefore I assign approximately 45% probability to a draw, 35% to a home win (attacking edge: 1.19 goals and 15% conversion) and 20% to an away win (strong defence: 0.69 goals conceded and 63% clean sheets).

Half-by-half

0 : 1
1st half
2 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

56Possession (%)44
Ethiopia BunnaFasil Ketema
5Shots4
Ethiopia BunnaFasil Ketema
2Shots on target1
Ethiopia BunnaFasil Ketema
1.18xG0.82
Ethiopia BunnaFasil Ketema
4Corners2
Ethiopia BunnaFasil Ketema
99Dangerous attacks66
Ethiopia BunnaFasil Ketema
9Fouls8
Ethiopia BunnaFasil Ketema
0Cards0
Ethiopia BunnaFasil Ketema

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Ethiopia BunnaFasil Ketema
1.05Goals scored / match0.74
Ethiopia BunnaFasil Ketema
1.03Goals conceded / match0.74
Ethiopia BunnaFasil Ketema
50%Average possession46%
Ethiopia BunnaFasil Ketema
2.82Shots on target / match2.24
Ethiopia BunnaFasil Ketema

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

7.47Shots per match7.24
Ethiopia BunnaFasil Ketema
2.82Shots on target2.24
Ethiopia BunnaFasil Ketema
14.1%Shot conversion10.2%
Ethiopia BunnaFasil Ketema
50%Possession46%
Ethiopia BunnaFasil Ketema
1.22xG for1.14
Ethiopia BunnaFasil Ketema
1.15xG against1.1
Ethiopia BunnaFasil Ketema

Shooting quality

Ethiopia Bunna: Efficient finishingFasil Ketema: Balanced
Ethiopia BunnaFasil Ketema
Accuracy (shots on target)38%31%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.160.16
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.370.33

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Fasil Ketema is 80% better for: last-5 form.

1 pts / match - Ethiopia Bunna · 1.8 pts / match - Fasil Ketema

Ethiopia Bunna
LLDWD
Season result split
34% W32% R34% P
Season (W-D-L)
13-12-13
1.34 pts / match · goal difference +1
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-2-2
1.00 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
7-4-8
Last 5 at home
2-1-2
LDWLW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.8Goals conceded: 0.6xG: 1.27Opponent xG: 0.95BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 40%
Fasil Ketema
LWWLW
Season result split
37% W34% R29% P
Season (W-D-L)
14-13-11
1.45 pts / match · goal difference 0
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-0-2
1.80 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
5-9-5
Last 5 away
1-1-3
DLLWL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.8Goals conceded: 0.4xG: 1.22Opponent xG: 1.13BTTS: 0%Over 2.5: 0%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Ethiopia Bunna is 42% better for: goals scored per match.

1.05 goals / match - Ethiopia Bunna · 0.74 goals / match - Fasil Ketema

Fasil Ketema is 39% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.03 goals / match - Ethiopia Bunna · 0.74 goals / match - Fasil Ketema

Ethiopia Bunna scoring profile: mixed

Ethiopia Bunna scores in 68% of matches (26 of 38 matches), while Fasil Ketema keeps a clean sheet in 55% (21 of 38 matches).

Fasil Ketema scoring profile: mixed

Fasil Ketema scores in 58% of matches (22 of 38 matches), while Ethiopia Bunna keeps a clean sheet in 34% (13 of 38 matches).

40Goals scored (season)28
Ethiopia BunnaFasil Ketema
39Goals conceded (season)28
Ethiopia BunnaFasil Ketema
2.08Average goals in match1.47
Ethiopia BunnaFasil Ketema
4Goals scored (last 5)4
Ethiopia BunnaFasil Ketema
3Goals conceded (last 5)2
Ethiopia BunnaFasil Ketema

How often they score at least...

68%1 goal58%
Ethiopia BunnaFasil Ketema
29%2 goals11%
Ethiopia BunnaFasil Ketema
8%3 goals5%
Ethiopia BunnaFasil Ketema
0%4 goals0%
Ethiopia BunnaFasil Ketema

How often they concede at least...

66%1 goal45%
Ethiopia BunnaFasil Ketema
24%2 goals21%
Ethiopia BunnaFasil Ketema
11%3 goals8%
Ethiopia BunnaFasil Ketema
3%4 goals0%
Ethiopia BunnaFasil Ketema

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

40%
League average

Goal patterns

29%BTTS at half-time8%
Ethiopia BunnaFasil Ketema
0%BTTS in both halves3%
Ethiopia BunnaFasil Ketema
16%Scored in both halves8%
Ethiopia BunnaFasil Ketema

BTTS and goal count

32%Min. 3 goals and BTTS16%
Ethiopia BunnaFasil Ketema
5%Min. 3 goals without BTTS3%
Ethiopia BunnaFasil Ketema
20%BTTS - last 50%
Ethiopia BunnaFasil Ketema

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

66%Min. 1 goal before half-time34%
Ethiopia BunnaFasil Ketema
32%Min. 2 goals before half-time8%
Ethiopia BunnaFasil Ketema
13%Min. 3 goals before half-time3%
Ethiopia BunnaFasil Ketema

2nd half

68%Min. 1 goal after half-time61%
Ethiopia BunnaFasil Ketema
24%Min. 2 goals after half-time32%
Ethiopia BunnaFasil Ketema
0%Min. 3 goals after half-time8%
Ethiopia BunnaFasil Ketema

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Fasil Ketema is 10% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.29 pts / match - Ethiopia Bunna · 1.42 pts / match - Fasil Ketema

Ethiopia Bunna - half-time state
24% leading58% draw18% trailing
Fasil Ketema - half-time state
24% leading71% draw5% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.29Points per match (1st half)1.42
Ethiopia BunnaFasil Ketema
0.58Goals scored (1st half)0.32
Ethiopia BunnaFasil Ketema
0.58Goals conceded (1st half)0.13
Ethiopia BunnaFasil Ketema
1.16Average goals (1st half)0.45
Ethiopia BunnaFasil Ketema
55%Clean sheet before half-time87%
Ethiopia BunnaFasil Ketema
50%No goal before half-time71%
Ethiopia BunnaFasil Ketema

After half-time (2nd half)

1.29Points per match (2nd half)1.18
Ethiopia BunnaFasil Ketema
0.47Goals scored (2nd half)0.42
Ethiopia BunnaFasil Ketema
0.45Goals conceded (2nd half)0.61
Ethiopia BunnaFasil Ketema
0.92Average goals (2nd half)1.03
Ethiopia BunnaFasil Ketema
63%Clean sheet after half-time63%
Ethiopia BunnaFasil Ketema
66%No goal after half-time63%
Ethiopia BunnaFasil Ketema

Ethiopia Bunna - second-half results

32% W34% R34% P
49
Half-time points
22
Half-time goals
0
Goal difference (1st half)
49
Second-half points
+1
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.29
PPG before half-time
Lead holding142%

Leads at half-time in 24% of matches and wins 34%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Fasil Ketema - second-half results

24% W47% R29% P
54
Half-time points
12
Half-time goals
+7
Goal difference (1st half)
45
Second-half points
-7
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.42
PPG before half-time
Lead holding154%

Leads at half-time in 24% of matches and wins 37%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.5

Concedes 0.5 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Ethiopia Bunna - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.401.00
Goals scored / match0.40.4
Goals conceded / match0.20.4
Average goals in match0.60.8
1 goal40%60%
2 goals20%20%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet80%60%
No goal60%80%
Goal difference+10
Half-time: 20% leading - 80% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 2
Fasil Ketema - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.601.60
Goals scored / match0.40.4
Goals conceded / match0.20.2
Average goals in match0.60.6
1 goal60%60%
2 goals0%0%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet80%80%
No goal60%60%
Goal difference+1+1
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 40% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 2

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Ethiopia Bunna
ScoredConceded
7
8
0-15
6
7
16-30
9
7
31-45
7
6
46-60
7
3
61-75
4
8
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (9 goli). Concedes most in 0-15 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.

Fasil Ketema
ScoredConceded
4
2
0-15
2
3
16-30
6
0
31-45
3
9
46-60
6
6
61-75
7
8
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (7 goli). Concedes most in 46-60 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

1.78
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
0.9 : 0.9
Estimated goal split
home : away
100%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
37%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+13%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
39%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
13%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 8 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Ethiopia Bunna

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.07
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.05
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-7.4 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.17
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.12
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
115%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
118%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.34
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.1
Late goals
10% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 18% come in the first quarter-hour.
10%

Fasil Ketema

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.04
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.04
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-2.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.40
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.36
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
85%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
81%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.35
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
25% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 14% come in the first quarter-hour.
25%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Ethiopia Premier League).

Teams vs league

Ethiopia BunnaLigaFasil Ketema
Average goals in match 2.081.78 1.47
Both teams scored 47%40% 26%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 37%28% 18%
Clean sheets 34%40% 55%
Goal before half-time 66%56% 34%
Goal after half-time 68%59% 61%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

1.78
Average goals per match
40%
Both teams scored
28%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
40%
Clean sheets
0.91
Home goals / match
0.87
Away goals / match
+5%
Home attack advantage
+4%
Home defence advantage
+1%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
56%
1 goal
22%
2 goals
4%
3 goals
1%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
59%
1 goal
27%
2 goals
6%
3 goals
2%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Ethiopia Bunna 1 - 0 - 0 Fasil Ketema. Average goals 2.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.

FAQ

What was the result of Ethiopia Bunna vs Fasil Ketema?

The Ethiopia Premier League match finished Ethiopia Bunna 2:1 Fasil Ketema. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Ethiopia Bunna vs Fasil Ketema?

Ethiopia Bunna score 1.05 goals per game on average and Fasil Ketema 0.74. The Ethiopia Premier League average is 1.78 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 28% of games. Both teams score in 47% of Ethiopia Bunna's matches and 26% of Fasil Ketema's.

What form are Ethiopia Bunna and Fasil Ketema in?

Over the last 5 games Ethiopia Bunna have a 1-2-2 record (1.00 points per game) and Fasil Ketema 3-0-2 (1.80 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Ethiopia Bunna vs Fasil Ketema?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.