Cyprus - Second DivisionData current as of 17 July 2026

Ethnikos Latsion vs APEA: match statistics

Ethnikos Latsion crest
Ethnikos Latsion
0 : 1half-time 0:1
APEA crest
APEA
125%(2.45)
X30%(3.40)
245%(2.45)

APEA presents a clear advantage in key offensive and defensive statistics. The visitors average 1.0 goal per away match with higher shot conversion (11% vs 6%) and better xG (1.3 vs 1.04 for the hosts). Ethnikos Latsion is in terrible form, with only 11% home wins and an average of 1.89 goals conceded per home match. Additionally, the hosts have not won any of their last 5 matches (0W-2D-3L) and fail to score in 44% of home games. Despite unstable recent form (0.8 PPG), APEA shows a 33% away win rate and a better goal difference (-3 vs -12). Taking all data into account, a victory for the visitors is the most likely scenario, though the poor form of both teams increases the chance of a draw.

Ethnikos Latsion vs APEA: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Ethnikos Latsion play APEA in Second Division (Cyprus). The match date is 28 February 2026 at 14:00. Final score: 0:1.

Current form

Ethnikos Latsion: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match. APEA: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match.

Goal statistics

Ethnikos Latsion scores 0.97 and concedes 1.59 goals per match. APEA scores 1.31 and concedes 1.31. League average: 2.72 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Ethnikos Latsion 48%, APEA 48%. Over 2.5: Ethnikos Latsion 41%, APEA 52%. League level: BTTS 49%, Over 2.5 49%.

xG, shots and style

APEA has higher xG: 1.31 vs 1.21. Ethnikos Latsion: 7.2 shots per match, APEA: 7.3.

Match halves

Ethnikos Latsion: half-time lead 28%, second-half goals 0.45. APEA: half-time lead 28%, second-half goals 0.76.

Goals by minute

Ethnikos Latsion: 31-45+ (7 goals). APEA: 76-90+ (9 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Second Division: 2.72 goals per match, BTTS 49%, Over 2.5 49%.

Head-to-head

2 H2H matches: 0-0-2. Average goals 3.00, BTTS 50%.

Match description

APEA presents a clear advantage in key offensive and defensive statistics. The visitors average 1.0 goal per away match with higher shot conversion (11% vs 6%) and better xG (1.3 vs 1.04 for the hosts). Ethnikos Latsion is in terrible form, with only 11% home wins and an average of 1.89 goals conceded per home match. Additionally, the hosts have not won any of their last 5 matches (0W-2D-3L) and fail to score in 44% of home games. Despite unstable recent form (0.8 PPG), APEA shows a 33% away win rate and a better goal difference (-3 vs -12). Taking all data into account, a victory for the visitors is the most likely scenario, though the poor form of both teams increases the chance of a draw.

Half-by-half

0 : 1
1st half
0 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

-1Possession (%)-1
Ethnikos LatsionAPEA
-1Shots-1
Ethnikos LatsionAPEA
-1Shots on target-1
Ethnikos LatsionAPEA
0xG0
Ethnikos LatsionAPEA
-1Corners-1
Ethnikos LatsionAPEA
0Dangerous attacks0
Ethnikos LatsionAPEA
-1Fouls-1
Ethnikos LatsionAPEA
-1Cards-1
Ethnikos LatsionAPEA

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Ethnikos LatsionAPEA
0.97Goals scored / match1.31
Ethnikos LatsionAPEA
1.59Goals conceded / match1.31
Ethnikos LatsionAPEA
38%Average possession37%
Ethnikos LatsionAPEA
2.97Shots on target / match3.21
Ethnikos LatsionAPEA

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

7.21Shots per match7.31
Ethnikos LatsionAPEA
2.97Shots on target3.21
Ethnikos LatsionAPEA
13.4%Shot conversion17.9%
Ethnikos LatsionAPEA
38%Possession37%
Ethnikos LatsionAPEA
1.21xG for1.31
Ethnikos LatsionAPEA
1.61xG against1.17
Ethnikos LatsionAPEA

Shooting quality

Ethnikos Latsion: Counter-attackingAPEA: Counter-attacking
Ethnikos LatsionAPEA
Accuracy (shots on target)41%44%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.170.18
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.330.41

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

APEA is 43% better for: last-5 form.

1.4 pts / match - Ethnikos Latsion · 2 pts / match - APEA

Ethnikos Latsion
DWLWL
Season result split
28% W21% R52% P
Season (W-D-L)
8-6-15
1.03 pts / match · goal difference -18
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
4-4-6
Last 5 at home
3-1-1
LWDWW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.19Opponent xG: 1.15BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%
APEA
DLWWW
Season result split
38% W21% R41% P
Season (W-D-L)
11-6-12
1.34 pts / match · goal difference 0
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-1-1
2.00 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
5-4-5
Last 5 away
2-2-1
WDDLW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.0Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.03Opponent xG: 1.08BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

APEA is 35% better for: goals scored per match.

0.97 goals / match - Ethnikos Latsion · 1.31 goals / match - APEA

APEA is 21% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.59 goals / match - Ethnikos Latsion · 1.31 goals / match - APEA

Ethnikos Latsion scoring profile: strong

Ethnikos Latsion scores in 62% of matches (18 of 29 matches), while APEA keeps a clean sheet in 28% (8 of 29 matches).

APEA scoring profile: very strong

APEA scores in 72% of matches (21 of 29 matches), while Ethnikos Latsion keeps a clean sheet in 17% (5 of 29 matches).

28Goals scored (season)38
Ethnikos LatsionAPEA
46Goals conceded (season)38
Ethnikos LatsionAPEA
2.55Average goals in match2.62
Ethnikos LatsionAPEA
6Goals scored (last 5)10
Ethnikos LatsionAPEA
5Goals conceded (last 5)5
Ethnikos LatsionAPEA

How often they score at least...

62%1 goal72%
Ethnikos LatsionAPEA
24%2 goals38%
Ethnikos LatsionAPEA
10%3 goals17%
Ethnikos LatsionAPEA
0%4 goals3%
Ethnikos LatsionAPEA

How often they concede at least...

83%1 goal72%
Ethnikos LatsionAPEA
48%2 goals34%
Ethnikos LatsionAPEA
21%3 goals21%
Ethnikos LatsionAPEA
7%4 goals3%
Ethnikos LatsionAPEA

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

48%
Ethnikos Latsion - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.14 of 29 matches
49%
League average

Goal patterns

17%BTTS at half-time24%
Ethnikos LatsionAPEA
0%BTTS in both halves7%
Ethnikos LatsionAPEA
14%Scored in both halves24%
Ethnikos LatsionAPEA

BTTS and goal count

31%Min. 3 goals and BTTS34%
Ethnikos LatsionAPEA
10%Min. 3 goals without BTTS17%
Ethnikos LatsionAPEA
60%BTTS - last 560%
Ethnikos LatsionAPEA

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

83%Min. 1 goal before half-time86%
Ethnikos LatsionAPEA
38%Min. 2 goals before half-time38%
Ethnikos LatsionAPEA
14%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
Ethnikos LatsionAPEA

2nd half

76%Min. 1 goal after half-time72%
Ethnikos LatsionAPEA
31%Min. 2 goals after half-time41%
Ethnikos LatsionAPEA
10%Min. 3 goals after half-time21%
Ethnikos LatsionAPEA

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

APEA is 10% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.1 pts / match - Ethnikos Latsion · 1.21 pts / match - APEA

Ethnikos Latsion - half-time state
28% leading28% draw45% trailing
APEA - half-time state
28% leading38% draw34% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.1Points per match (1st half)1.21
Ethnikos LatsionAPEA
0.52Goals scored (1st half)0.55
Ethnikos LatsionAPEA
0.86Goals conceded (1st half)0.69
Ethnikos LatsionAPEA
1.38Average goals (1st half)1.24
Ethnikos LatsionAPEA
41%Clean sheet before half-time41%
Ethnikos LatsionAPEA
59%No goal before half-time48%
Ethnikos LatsionAPEA

After half-time (2nd half)

1.21Points per match (2nd half)1.38
Ethnikos LatsionAPEA
0.45Goals scored (2nd half)0.76
Ethnikos LatsionAPEA
0.72Goals conceded (2nd half)0.62
Ethnikos LatsionAPEA
1.17Average goals (2nd half)1.38
Ethnikos LatsionAPEA
48%Clean sheet after half-time59%
Ethnikos LatsionAPEA
66%No goal after half-time55%
Ethnikos LatsionAPEA

Ethnikos Latsion - second-half results

31% W28% R41% P
32
Half-time points
15
Half-time goals
-10
Goal difference (1st half)
35
Second-half points
-8
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.10
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 28% of matches and wins 28%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

APEA - second-half results

34% W34% R31% P
35
Half-time points
16
Half-time goals
-4
Goal difference (1st half)
40
Second-half points
+4
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.21
PPG before half-time
Lead holding136%

Leads at half-time in 28% of matches and wins 38%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Ethnikos Latsion - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match2.200.80
Goals scored / match0.80.4
Goals conceded / match0.01.0
Average goals in match0.81.4
1 goal60%80%
2 goals20%40%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet100%20%
No goal40%80%
Goal difference+4-3
Half-time: 60% leading - 40% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 20% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 4
APEA - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match2.001.60
Goals scored / match1.01.0
Goals conceded / match0.40.6
Average goals in match1.41.6
1 goal100%60%
2 goals40%60%
3 goals0%40%
Clean sheet60%80%
No goal20%60%
Goal difference+3+2
Half-time: 60% leading - 20% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 40% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 5

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Ethnikos Latsion
ScoredConceded
3
8
0-15
5
8
16-30
7
9
31-45
1
3
46-60
7
9
61-75
5
9
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (7 goli). Concedes most in 31-45 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.

APEA
ScoredConceded
6
2
0-15
5
11
16-30
5
7
31-45
8
6
46-60
5
5
61-75
9
7
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (9 goli). Concedes most in 16-30 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.59
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.1 : 1.5
Estimated goal split
home : away
95%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
48%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+16%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
45%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
11%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 9 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Ethnikos Latsion

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.40
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.22
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+6.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.24
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.02
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
70%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
120%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.37
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.1
Late goals
18% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 11% come in the first quarter-hour.
18%

APEA

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.14
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.14
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-4.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
0.00
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.14
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
98%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
94%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.66
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
24% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 16% come in the first quarter-hour.
24%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Second Division).

Teams vs league

Ethnikos LatsionLigaAPEA
Average goals in match 2.552.72 2.62
Both teams scored 48%49% 48%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 41%49% 52%
Clean sheets 17%30% 28%
Goal before half-time 83%72% 86%
Goal after half-time 76%77% 72%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.72
Average goals per match
49%
Both teams scored
49%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
30%
Clean sheets
1.39
Home goals / match
1.33
Away goals / match
+5%
Home attack advantage
+4%
Home defence advantage
+0%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
72%
1 goal
40%
2 goals
12%
3 goals
5%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
77%
1 goal
40%
2 goals
17%
3 goals
5%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (2): Ethnikos Latsion 0 - 0 - 2 APEA. Average goals 3.00, both teams scored in 50% matches.

FAQ

What was the result of Ethnikos Latsion vs APEA?

The Second Division match finished Ethnikos Latsion 0:1 APEA. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Ethnikos Latsion and APEA?

In the last 2 head-to-head matches Ethnikos Latsion won 0, APEA won 2 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 3.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Ethnikos Latsion vs APEA?

Ethnikos Latsion score 0.97 goals per game on average and APEA 1.31. The Second Division average is 2.72 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 49% of games. Both teams score in 48% of Ethnikos Latsion's matches and 48% of APEA's.

What form are Ethnikos Latsion and APEA in?

Over the last 5 games Ethnikos Latsion have a 2-1-2 record (1.40 points per game) and APEA 3-1-1 (2.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Ethnikos Latsion vs APEA?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.