Fard Alborz vs Saipa: match statistics
Fard Alborz vs Saipa: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Fard Alborz played against Saipa in Azadegan League (Iran). The game was played on June 27, 2026. Venue: Enghelab Stadium. Final score: 2:1.
Recent form
Fard Alborz has 2 wins, 0 draws and 3 losses over its last five games, averaging 1.20 points per game. Saipa has 3 wins, 2 draws and 0 losses, with 2.20 points per game.
Scoring records
Fard Alborz scores 0.67 goals per game and allows 0.43. Saipa scores 0.83 and allows 0.53. Games in this league average 1.53 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 17% of Fard Alborz's games and 27% of Saipa's. The Over 2.5 rates are 10% and 27%, compared with league averages of 30% for BTTS and 21% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Saipa has the higher season xG average, 1.17 to 0.85 per game. Fard Alborz takes 2.9 shots per game, while Saipa takes 4.3.
First-half and second-half trends
Fard Alborz leads at halftime in 23% of its games and scores 0.33 goals per game after halftime. Saipa leads at halftime in 27% and scores 0.43 after halftime.
When the teams score
Fard Alborz's most productive scoring window is minutes 16-30 (5 goals). For Saipa, it is minutes 76-90+ (6 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Azadegan League games average 1.53 goals. Both teams score in 30% of games, and 21% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 0 home wins, 1 draw and 0 away wins. Those games averaged 0.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Saipa is the favorite: they sit 4th in the table versus Fard Alborz in 9th and have 13 wins this season compared to the home side’s 8. The visitors create significantly more chances — averaging 9.4 shots and 4.4 on target per away match versus 5.33 and 2.5 for the hosts, and their xG per game is 1.30 versus Fard’s 0.88, indicating higher-quality chances. Saipa’s form is clearly superior: 3 wins and 2 draws in the last 5 give them 2.2 points per game, while Fard have 2 wins and 3 losses (1.2 points per game). Still, the hosts have a solid home defense — conceding only 0.53 goals per game, keeping 60% clean sheets and with as many as 47% of home matches ending in a draw, and their shot conversion at home is 13% translating to 0.67 goals per match, so a draw remains a realistic outcome.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
I project a higher probability for "No" (BTTS - No) — given low seasonal BTTS rates: Fard Alborz 27% and Saipa 27%, versus a league average of 30%. Clean sheet metrics strongly signal a no-goal-for-both outcome: Fard has a 73% clean sheet rate at home, Saipa 60% away, and the league shows 94% of matches with at least one clean sheet. Seasonal goals averages are low — Fard scores 0.93 and concedes 0.40 per match, Saipa scores 0.73 and concedes 0.67 — despite xG of 1.12 (Fard) and 1.30 (Saipa), poor finishing (conversion 11% vs 6%) limits actual goals. The last 5 matches don’t change the picture: BTTS in the last five is only 20% for both teams, and Saipa concedes an average of 0.2 goals in the last 5, further reducing their chance of scoring. Considering the league goals average of 1.52 and the above indicators, I estimate BTTS probability at 22% vs 78% for no BTTS, therefore I recommend backing "No".
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Both teams are low-scoring: Fard Alborz averages 0.93 goals per match and has 73% clean sheets, Saipa 0.73 goals and 60% clean sheets. xG is 1.12 for the home side and 1.30 for the visitors, xG against is 0.79 (home) and 1.04 (away); averaging yields expected goals of 1.08 for the home team and 1.05 for the away team (total 2.13). A Poisson model with λ=2.13 indicates ~63% probability for >1.5 goals, ~36% for >2.5 and ~17% for >3.5, while historical Over shares this season are only 33% (1.5), 27% (2.5) and 7% (3.5). Combining the model and season data I suggest over1.5 ≈51%, over2.5 ≈32% and over3.5 ≈13%, therefore the strongest signal is under 2.5 (under ~68%, based on a seasonal 73% under2.5 and the Poisson model).
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
A strong signal for a half-time draw is that the home side are level at the break in 73% of their matches (11 of 15), while the visitors are level at half-time in 53% (8 of 15), which raises the probability of a draw before the break. After the interval, however, Fard Alborz has the edge: the home team scores on average 0.67 goals in the second half and have collected 23 points in second halves (an average of 1.53 points), whereas Saipa have 0.93 goals after the break and 21 points (an average of 1.4). Additionally, the hosts are more efficient at converting chances (shot conversion 11% versus Saipa’s 6%) and concede fewer goals per match on average (0.4 vs 0.67), increasing their chances of turning the game around after half-time. Considering the high proportion of half-time draws and Fard Alborz’s second-half advantage, the most likely scenario is a draw at half-time followed by a home victory (X/1).
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Fard Alborz | Saipa | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 33% | 32% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.29 | 0.27 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.69 | 0.61 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Saipa is 83% better for: last-5 form.
1.2 pts / game - Fard Alborz · 2.2 pts / game - Saipa
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Saipa is 24% better for: goals scored per game.
0.67 goals / game - Fard Alborz · 0.83 goals / game - Saipa
Fard Alborz is 23% better for: goals allowed per game.
0.43 goals / game - Fard Alborz · 0.53 goals / game - Saipa
Fard Alborz scores in 40% of games (12 of 30 meczów), while Saipa keeps a clean sheet in 67% (20 of 30 meczów).
Saipa scores in 63% of games (19 of 30 meczów), while Fard Alborz keeps a clean sheet in 63% (19 of 30 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Fard Alborz
Over / Under - Saipa
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Saipa is 8% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.33 pts / game - Fard Alborz · 1.43 pts / game - Saipa
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Fard Alborz - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 23% of games and wins 27%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
Saipa - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 27% of games and wins 43%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.2 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.60 | 1.40 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.8 | 1.0 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.2 | 0.8 |
| Average goals per game | 1.0 | 1.8 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 60% |
| No goal | 60% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +3 | +1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.40 | 1.80 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.2 | 0.6 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.0 | 0.2 |
| Average goals per game | 0.2 | 0.8 |
| 1 goal | 20% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 100% | 80% |
| No goal | 80% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +1 | +2 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (5 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (6 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Fard Alborz
Saipa
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Azadegan League).
Teams vs league
| Fard Alborz | Liga | Saipa | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▼ 1.10 | 1.53 | ▼ 1.37 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 17% | 30% | ▼ 27% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 10% | 21% | ▲ 27% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 63% | 47% | ▲ 67% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 40% | 45% | ▼ 43% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 37% | 56% | • 57% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Head-to-head
Record from Fard Alborz's perspective: 0 wins, 1 draw and 0 losses against Saipa. Games average 0.00 goals, and both teams scored in 0% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Fard Alborz vs Saipa?
The Azadegan League match finished Fard Alborz 2:1 Saipa. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Fard Alborz vs Saipa?
Fard Alborz score 0.67 goals per game on average and Saipa 0.83. The Azadegan League average is 1.53 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 21% of games. Both teams score in 17% of Fard Alborz's matches and 27% of Saipa's.
What form are Fard Alborz and Saipa in?
Over the last 5 games Fard Alborz have a 2-0-3 record (1.20 points per game) and Saipa 3-2-0 (2.20 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Fard Alborz vs Saipa?
The statistical background for Fard Alborz vs Saipa — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.


