Iran - Azadegan LeagueEnghelab StadiumData current as of September 07, 2026

Fard Alborz vs Sanat Naft: match statistics

Fard Alborz crest
Fard Alborz
1 : 2half-time 0:0
Sanat Naft crest
Sanat Naft

Fard Alborz vs Sanat Naft: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

Fard Alborz played against Sanat Naft in Azadegan League (Iran). The game was played on June 15, 2026. Venue: Enghelab Stadium. Final score: 1:2.

Recent form

Fard Alborz has 2 wins, 1 draw and 2 losses over its last five games, averaging 1.40 points per game. Sanat Naft has 1 win, 2 draws and 2 losses, with 1.00 points per game.

Scoring records

Fard Alborz scores 0.61 goals per game and allows 0.39. Sanat Naft scores 0.96 and allows 0.64. Games in this league average 1.51 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 14% of Fard Alborz's games and 36% of Sanat Naft's. The Over 2.5 rates are 7% and 25%, compared with league averages of 29% for BTTS and 21% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

Sanat Naft has the higher season xG average, 1.10 to 0.81 per game. Fard Alborz takes 2.7 shots per game, while Sanat Naft takes 4.0.

First-half and second-half trends

Fard Alborz leads at halftime in 21% of its games and scores 0.29 goals per game after halftime. Sanat Naft leads at halftime in 7% and scores 0.75 after halftime.

When the teams score

Fard Alborz's most productive scoring window is minutes 16-30 (5 goals). For Sanat Naft, it is minutes 46-60 (8 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

Azadegan League games average 1.51 goals. Both teams score in 29% of games, and 21% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 0 home wins, 0 draws and 1 away win. Those games averaged 1.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Fard Alborz has a strong home defense — conceding only 0.43 goals per game on average and keeping a clean sheet in 64% of matches, while Sanat Naft concedes 0.69 on the road and records 46% clean sheets. Offensively recent form is skewed: Fard scored 7 goals in the last 5 matches versus Sanat’s 1, and Sanat has a very high share of away matches without scoring — 62%. Sanat, however, generates more chances (averaging 4.6 shots on target and xG 1.15 away), whereas Fard averages 2.45 shots on target and xG 0.87 at home, but the hosts are markedly more efficient in conversion (12% vs 5%). Historically Fard draws frequently at home (50% home draws), yet considering superior recent results (7 points in the last 5, averaging 1.4 points per game), defensive edge and conversion efficiency, the hosts possess a clear advantage. Based on these figures I predict a home win, with an estimated probability distribution: home 50%, draw 35%, away 15%.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

Seasonal metrics indicate a moderate baseline chance for BTTS: Fard Alborz has BTTS in 47% of matches, Sanat Naft in 23%, and the league average is 28%, which by simple averaging yields approximately a 35% base probability. However, the key signals are negative for BTTS — in the last 5 matches both teams have BTTS at 0%, and Sanat Naft averages only 0.2 goals in those five (Fard 1.4). Both sides frequently keep a clean sheet: Fard 47% and Sanat Naft 46%, and season goals conceded averages are 0.6 and 0.69, which increases the likelihood of a No Goal outcome. Despite similar xG (Fard 1.08 vs Sanat Naft 1.15), the visitors convert chances poorly (shot conversion 5% and season average goals 0.54), therefore I forecast 75% for 'no' and 25% for 'yes' (BTTS - No / BTTS - Yes).

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

I estimate expected goals at 1.10 for Fard Alborz and 0.92 for Sanat Naft (total 2.02), calculated as the average of attacking xG and opponent’s defensive xG: home attack xG 1.08 vs away defense xG 1.12, and away attack xG 1.15 vs home defense xG 0.69. Fard Alborz averages 1.33 goals scored at home and concedes 0.60, registering 9.22 shots with 2.56 on target and a conversion rate of 13%, while Sanat Naft scores 0.54 goals away, concedes 0.69, has 7.4 shots with 4.6 on target and a 5% conversion. Seasonal metrics show home matches finish over 1.5 goals in 60% of games, whereas Sanat Naft away has 38% over 1.5; over 2.5 occurs in 33% of home matches and 15% of away matches, and over 3.5 only in 13% at home and 0% away. A Poisson model with λ=2.02 yields roughly a 60% chance for Over 1.5 goals, ~33% for Over 2.5 and ~15% for Over 3.5, aligning with seasonal proportions and indicating the strongest signal for Over 1.5. Therefore I recommend a bet on Over 1.5 (side: Over), because the combination of xG (1.08/1.15), higher home efficiency (conversion 13% vs 5%) and a seasonal 60% share of Over 1.5 provides the highest probability of success.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

Fard Alborz is the favorite on paper: they average 1.33 goals per match versus Sanat Naft’s 0.54 and have a 60% win rate this season compared to the visitors’ 23%, with average points of 2.13 vs 1.08. However, draws dominate at Half-Time — the home side are level at the break in 80% of matches, the away side in 69%, and Half-Time goals average 0.4 for Fard and 0.0 for Sanat; the hosts led at the break in only 13% of games, the visitors in 0%. In Second-Half performance Fard is more effective: they score an average of 0.93 goals after the break and win Second Halves in 53% of cases, whereas Sanat average 0.54 Second-Half goals and win 31% of Second Halves. Additionally the hosts convert 13% of shots versus 5% for the visitors, while xG is similar (1.08 vs 1.15), suggesting Sanat creates chances but Fard converts them more often; therefore I consider the most likely scenario to be a draw at Half-Time and a home win at Full-Time (X/1).

View first-half and second-half statistics

Stats by half

0 : 0
First half
1 : 2
Second half

Game stats

41Possession (%)59
Fard AlborzSanat Naft
6Shots7
Fard AlborzSanat Naft
3Shots on target3
Fard AlborzSanat Naft
0.94xG0.96
Fard AlborzSanat Naft
4Corners4
Fard AlborzSanat Naft
48Dangerous attacks43
Fard AlborzSanat Naft
-1Fouls-1
Fard AlborzSanat Naft
-1Cards-1
Fard AlborzSanat Naft

Pre-game profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

Fard AlborzSanat Naft
0.61Goals scored / game0.96
Fard AlborzSanat Naft
0.39Goals allowed / game0.64
Fard AlborzSanat Naft
30%Average possession25%
Fard AlborzSanat Naft
0.75Shots on target / game1.14
Fard AlborzSanat Naft

Team statswho is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

2.68Shots per game4.04
Fard AlborzSanat Naft
0.75Shots on target1.14
Fard AlborzSanat Naft
22.7%Shot conversion23.9%
Fard AlborzSanat Naft
30%Possession25%
Fard AlborzSanat Naft
0.81xG for1.1
Fard AlborzSanat Naft
1.07xG against0.84
Fard AlborzSanat Naft

Shooting quality

Fard Alborz: Counter-attackingSanat Naft: Counter-attacking
Fard AlborzSanat Naft
Accuracy (shots on target)28%28%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.300.27
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.810.84

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

Fard Alborz is 40% better for: last-5 form.

1.4 pts / game - Fard Alborz · 1 pts / game - Sanat Naft

Fard Alborz
DWLLW
Season result split
25% W54% R21% P
Season (W-D-L)
7-15-6
1.29 pts / game · goal difference +6
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
5-7-2
Last 5 at home
2-2-1
DDWWL
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 0.6xG: 0.63Opponent xG: 0.94BTTS: 0%Over 2.5: 20%
Sanat Naft
DDWLL
Season result split
43% W36% R21% P
Season (W-D-L)
12-10-6
1.64 pts / game · goal difference +9
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-2-2
1.00 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
3-5-5
Last 5 away
1-1-3
LWLDL
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 0.2Goals conceded: 0.8xG: 0.51Opponent xG: 0.57BTTS: 0%Over 2.5: 0%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Sanat Naft is 57% better for: goals scored per game.

0.61 goals / game - Fard Alborz · 0.96 goals / game - Sanat Naft

Fard Alborz is 64% better for: goals allowed per game.

0.39 goals / game - Fard Alborz · 0.64 goals / game - Sanat Naft

Fard Alborz scoring profile: more difficult

Fard Alborz scores in 36% of games (10 of 28 meczów), while Sanat Naft keeps a clean sheet in 46% (13 of 28 meczów).

Sanat Naft scoring profile: more difficult

Sanat Naft scores in 61% of games (17 of 28 meczów), while Fard Alborz keeps a clean sheet in 64% (18 of 28 meczów).

17Goals scored (season)27
Fard AlborzSanat Naft
11Goals conceded (season)18
Fard AlborzSanat Naft
1Average goals per game1.61
Fard AlborzSanat Naft
7Goals scored (last 5)1
Fard AlborzSanat Naft
3Goals conceded (last 5)4
Fard AlborzSanat Naft

How often they score at least...

36%1 goal61%
Fard AlborzSanat Naft
11%2 goals25%
Fard AlborzSanat Naft
4%3 goals7%
Fard AlborzSanat Naft
4%4 goals4%
Fard AlborzSanat Naft

How often they concede at least...

36%1 goal54%
Fard AlborzSanat Naft
4%2 goals11%
Fard AlborzSanat Naft
0%3 goals0%
Fard AlborzSanat Naft
0%4 goals0%
Fard AlborzSanat Naft

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

29%
League average

Goal patterns

4%BTTS at half-time14%
Fard AlborzSanat Naft
0%BTTS in both halves0%
Fard AlborzSanat Naft
11%Scored in both halves14%
Fard AlborzSanat Naft

BTTS and goal count

4%Min. 3 goals and BTTS21%
Fard AlborzSanat Naft
4%Min. 3 goals without BTTS4%
Fard AlborzSanat Naft
0%BTTS - last 50%
Fard AlborzSanat Naft

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

39%Min. 1 goal before half-time39%
Fard AlborzSanat Naft
7%Min. 2 goals before half-time18%
Fard AlborzSanat Naft
4%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
Fard AlborzSanat Naft

2nd half

32%Min. 1 goal after half-time64%
Fard AlborzSanat Naft
14%Min. 2 goals after half-time29%
Fard AlborzSanat Naft
4%Min. 3 goals after half-time11%
Fard AlborzSanat Naft

Game halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Fard Alborz is 34% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.29 pts / game - Fard Alborz · 0.96 pts / game - Sanat Naft

Fard Alborz - half-time state
21% leading64% draw14% trailing
Sanat Naft - half-time state
7% leading75% draw18% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.29Points per game (1st half)0.96
Fard AlborzSanat Naft
0.32Goals scored (1st half)0.21
Fard AlborzSanat Naft
0.18Goals conceded (1st half)0.36
Fard AlborzSanat Naft
0.5Average goals (1st half)0.57
Fard AlborzSanat Naft
82%Clean sheet before half-time68%
Fard AlborzSanat Naft
75%No goal before half-time79%
Fard AlborzSanat Naft

After half-time (2nd half)

1.18Points per game (2nd half)1.75
Fard AlborzSanat Naft
0.29Goals scored (2nd half)0.75
Fard AlborzSanat Naft
0.21Goals conceded (2nd half)0.29
Fard AlborzSanat Naft
0.5Average goals (2nd half)1.04
Fard AlborzSanat Naft
82%Clean sheet after half-time71%
Fard AlborzSanat Naft
79%No goal after half-time46%
Fard AlborzSanat Naft

Fard Alborz - second-half results

14% W75% R11% P
36
Half-time points
9
Half-time goals
+4
Goal difference (1st half)
33
Second-half points
+2
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.29
PPG before half-time
Lead holding119%

Leads at halftime in 21% of games and wins 25%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime+0.0

Defense stays consistent across the full game.

Sanat Naft - second-half results

43% W46% R11% P
27
Half-time points
6
Half-time goals
-4
Goal difference (1st half)
49
Second-half points
+13
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.96
PPG before half-time
Lead holding614%

Leads at halftime in 7% of games and wins 43%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime-0.1

Defense stays consistent across the full game.

Fard Alborz - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.601.20
Goals scored / game0.80.6
Goals allowed / game0.20.4
Average goals per game1.01.0
1 goal60%40%
2 goals20%40%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet80%80%
No goal60%80%
Goal difference+3+1
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 60% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 4
Sanat Naft - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game0.601.20
Goals scored / game0.00.2
Goals allowed / game0.60.2
Average goals per game0.60.4
1 goal40%40%
2 goals20%0%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet60%80%
No goal100%80%
Goal difference-30
Half-time: 0% leading - 60% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 60% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 0

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

Fard Alborz
ScoredConceded
0
1
0-15
5
2
16-30
4
2
31-45
1
2
46-60
3
2
61-75
4
2
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (5 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.

Sanat Naft
ScoredConceded
0
2
0-15
3
1
16-30
3
7
31-45
8
3
46-60
5
5
61-75
8
0
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (8 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): +8 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

1.30
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
0.6 : 0.7
Estimated goal split
home : away
86%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
25%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-23%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
22%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
25%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 4 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

Fard Alborz

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.26
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.48
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-23.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.20
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.68
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
69%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
63%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
+0.11
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.0
Late goals
24% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
24%

Sanat Naft

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.26
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.06
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-12.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.14
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.20
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
155%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
73%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
-0.64
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.5
Late goals
30% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
30%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Azadegan League).

Teams vs league

Fard AlborzLigaSanat Naft
Average goals per game 1.001.51 1.61
Both teams scored 14%29% 36%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 7%21% 25%
Clean sheets 64%47% 46%
Goal before half-time 39%46% 39%
Goal after half-time 32%54% 64%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

1.51
Average goals per game
29%
Both teams scored
21%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
47%
Clean sheets
0.88
Home goals / game
0.62
Away goals / game
+42%
Home attack advantage
+30%
Home defensive advantage
+20%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
46%
1 goal
13%
2 goals
2%
3 goals
0%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
54%
1 goal
21%
2 goals
6%
3 goals
1%
4 goals

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Record from Fard Alborz's perspective: 0 wins, 0 draws and 1 loss against Sanat Naft. Games average 1.00 goals, and both teams scored in 0% of them.

Sanat Naft
1 : 0
Fard Alborz

FAQ

What was the result of Fard Alborz vs Sanat Naft?

The Azadegan League match finished Fard Alborz 1:2 Sanat Naft. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Fard Alborz vs Sanat Naft?

Fard Alborz score 0.61 goals per game on average and Sanat Naft 0.96. The Azadegan League average is 1.51 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 21% of games. Both teams score in 14% of Fard Alborz's matches and 36% of Sanat Naft's.

What form are Fard Alborz and Sanat Naft in?

Over the last 5 games Fard Alborz have a 2-1-2 record (1.40 points per game) and Sanat Naft 1-2-2 (1.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Fard Alborz vs Sanat Naft?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.