El Salvador - Salvadoran Primera DivisiónEstadio Óscar Alberto QuiteñoData current as of October 22, 2026

FAS vs INCA-Aruba: match statistics

FAS crest
FAS
1 : 1half-time 1:0
INCA-Aruba crest
INCA-Aruba

FAS vs INCA-Aruba: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

FAS played against INCA-Aruba in Salvadoran Primera División (El Salvador). The game was played on October 5, 2026. Venue: Estadio Óscar Alberto Quiteño. Final score: 1:1.

Recent form

FAS has 4 wins, 1 draw and 0 losses over its last five games, averaging 2.60 points per game. INCA-Aruba has 3 wins, 1 draw and 1 loss, with 2.00 points per game.

Scoring records

FAS scores 1.91 goals per game and allows 0.91. INCA-Aruba scores 0.85 and allows 1.69. Games in this league average 2.59 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 55% of FAS's games and 54% of INCA-Aruba's. The Over 2.5 rates are 55% and 46%, compared with league averages of 53% for BTTS and 49% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

FAS has the higher season xG average, 1.77 to 1.30 per game. FAS takes 12.6 shots per game, while INCA-Aruba takes 8.5.

First-half and second-half trends

FAS leads at halftime in 36% of its games and scores 1.09 goals per game after halftime. INCA-Aruba leads at halftime in 15% and scores 0.62 after halftime.

When the teams score

FAS's most productive scoring window is minutes 76-90+ (9 goals). For INCA-Aruba, it is minutes 76-90+ (5 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

Salvadoran Primera División games average 2.59 goals. Both teams score in 53% of games, and 49% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 1 home win, 0 draws and 0 away wins. Those games averaged 4.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

FAS are the favorites: they have won 4 of their last 5 matches and remain unbeaten, scoring 11 goals in that run. They win 75% of their home games and average 2 goals, while INCA-Aruba lose 67% of their away matches and concede an average of 2 goals in them. The hosts also create more chances: their home xG is 1.82 compared with the visitors’ away xG of 1.11, and they average 6 shots on target against 2.83. FAS concede an average of 0.75 goals at home, while INCA-Aruba score just 0.67 goals per away game and fail to score in 33% of those matches. The visitors have improved recently, winning 3 of their last 5 matches, but FAS’s advantage at both ends of the pitch points to a home win.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

Both teams scored in 50% of their matches this season, and that figure has risen to 60% for each side across their last five games, so BTTS - Yes cannot be ruled out. However, the stronger signal points towards BTTS - No, which means at least one team is expected not to score—not necessarily a 0-0 draw. The visitors average just 0.67 goals and 2.83 shots on target per match, while the hosts average 0.83 goals and 5 shots on target. INCA-Aruba have failed to score in 33% of their matches, and FAS have kept a clean sheet in 33%, increasing the risk of the visitors ending the game without a goal. FAS’s recent defensive form also lends cautious support to this outcome, with an average of 0.8 goals conceded across their last five matches, although the visitors’ average of 1.2 goals scored over that period limits confidence in the prediction.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

The strongest pick is Over 1.5 goals: this line has been cleared in 67% of FAS matches and 83% of INCA-Aruba matches. The hosts have the edge in chance creation, averaging 1.51 xG compared with their opponents’ 1.11, while the visitors concede an average of 2.0 goals per match. FAS have averaged 2.2 goals across their last five matches, further supporting a scenario with at least two goals. Higher lines are less convincing: Over 2.5 goals has landed in 50% of the hosts’ matches and 33% of the visitors’ matches, while Over 3.5 goals has landed in 33% of matches for both sides.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

The most likely HT/FT outcome is a draw at half-time followed by a FAS win: across the 6 home matches considered, the hosts have not led at the break and have been level on 3 occasions. Their recent form, however, points to a win—they have won 4 of their last 5 matches, while INCA-Aruba have lost 67% of the matches included in the season statistics. FAS average 5 shots on target per match compared with the visitors’ 2.83, and their xG stands at 1.51 versus their opponents’ 1.11, indicating greater attacking potential. A second-half decision is all the more likely given that FAS average 0.83 goals after the break, while INCA-Aruba concede 1.5. The case for a half-time draw is not clear-cut, as FAS led at the break in 3 of their last 5 matches, making a scenario in which the hosts lead from half-time a significant alternative.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Stats by half

1 : 0
First half
0 : 1
Second half

Game stats

61Possession (%)39
FASINCA-Aruba
7Shots7
FASINCA-Aruba
2Shots on target3
FASINCA-Aruba
1.23xG1.1
FASINCA-Aruba
5Corners4
FASINCA-Aruba
88Dangerous attacks62
FASINCA-Aruba
11Fouls16
FASINCA-Aruba
0Cards0
FASINCA-Aruba

Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

1.91Goals scored / game0.85
FASINCA-Aruba
0.91Goals allowed / game1.69
FASINCA-Aruba
57%Average possession45%
FASINCA-Aruba
8.27Shots on target / game3.92
FASINCA-Aruba

Team stats— who is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

12.55Shots per game8.54
FASINCA-Aruba
8.27Shots on target3.92
FASINCA-Aruba
15.2%Shot conversion9.9%
FASINCA-Aruba
57%Possession45%
FASINCA-Aruba
1.77xG for1.3
FASINCA-Aruba
1.49xG against1.8
FASINCA-Aruba

Shooting quality

FAS: Efficient finishingINCA-Aruba: Balanced
FASINCA-Aruba
Accuracy (shots on target)66%46%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.140.15
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.230.22

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team form— who is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

FAS is 30% better for: last-5 form.

2.6 pts / game - FAS · 2 pts / game - INCA-Aruba

FAS
WWDWW
Unbeaten in the last 5 games
Season result split
64% W18% D18% L
Season (W-D-L)
7-2-2
2.09 pts / game · goal difference +11
Last 5 (W-D-L)
4-1-0
2.60 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
3-1-0
Last 5 at home
3-1-0
WDWW
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 2.2Goals conceded: 0.8xG: 1.67Opponent xG: 1.67BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%
INCA-Aruba
WLWDW
Season result split
31% W23% D46% L
Season (W-D-L)
4-3-6
1.15 pts / game · goal difference -11
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-1-1
2.00 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
1-1-4
Last 5 away
1-1-3
LLWLD
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 1.40Opponent xG: 1.37BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 60%

Goals— how do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

FAS is 125% better for: goals scored per game.

1.91 goals / game - FAS · 0.85 goals / game - INCA-Aruba

FAS is 86% better for: goals allowed per game.

0.91 goals / game - FAS · 1.69 goals / game - INCA-Aruba

FAS scoring profile: very strong

FAS scores in 91% of games (10 of 11 games), while INCA-Aruba keeps a clean sheet in 23% (3 of 13 games).

INCA-Aruba scoring profile: strong

INCA-Aruba scores in 69% of games (9 of 13 games), while FAS keeps a clean sheet in 36% (4 of 11 games).

21Goals scored (season)11
FASINCA-Aruba
10Goals conceded (season)22
FASINCA-Aruba
2.82Average goals per game2.54
FASINCA-Aruba
11Goals scored (last 5)7
FASINCA-Aruba
4Goals conceded (last 5)6
FASINCA-Aruba

How often they score at least...

91%1 goal69%
FASINCA-Aruba
55%2 goals15%
FASINCA-Aruba
36%3 goals0%
FASINCA-Aruba
9%4 goals0%
FASINCA-Aruba

How often they concede at least...

64%1 goal77%
FASINCA-Aruba
27%2 goals46%
FASINCA-Aruba
0%3 goals31%
FASINCA-Aruba
0%4 goals15%
FASINCA-Aruba

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

18%BTTS at half-time8%
FASINCA-Aruba
0%BTTS in both halves0%
FASINCA-Aruba
18%Scored in both halves0%
FASINCA-Aruba

BTTS and goal count

45%Min. 3 goals and BTTS38%
FASINCA-Aruba
9%Min. 3 goals without BTTS8%
FASINCA-Aruba
60%BTTS - last 580%
FASINCA-Aruba

Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

64%Min. 1 goal before half-time62%
FASINCA-Aruba
45%Min. 2 goals before half-time15%
FASINCA-Aruba
18%Min. 3 goals before half-time8%
FASINCA-Aruba

2nd half

82%Min. 1 goal after half-time77%
FASINCA-Aruba
36%Min. 2 goals after half-time54%
FASINCA-Aruba
27%Min. 3 goals after half-time23%
FASINCA-Aruba

Game halves— when do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

FAS is 82% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.55 pts / game - FAS · 0.85 pts / game - INCA-Aruba

FAS - half-time state
36% leading45% draw18% trailing
INCA-Aruba - half-time state
15% leading38% draw46% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.55Points per game (1st half)0.85
FASINCA-Aruba
0.82Goals scored (1st half)0.23
FASINCA-Aruba
0.45Goals conceded (1st half)0.62
FASINCA-Aruba
1.27Average goals (1st half)0.85
FASINCA-Aruba
64%Clean sheet before half-time46%
FASINCA-Aruba
55%No goal before half-time85%
FASINCA-Aruba

After half-time (2nd half)

1.82Points per game (2nd half)1
FASINCA-Aruba
1.09Goals scored (2nd half)0.62
FASINCA-Aruba
0.45Goals conceded (2nd half)1.08
FASINCA-Aruba
1.55Average goals (2nd half)1.69
FASINCA-Aruba
64%Clean sheet after half-time46%
FASINCA-Aruba
36%No goal after half-time46%
FASINCA-Aruba

FAS - second-half results

55% W18% D27% L
17
Half-time points
9
Half-time goals
+4
Goal difference (1st half)
20
Second-half points
+7
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.55
PPG before half-time
Lead holding178%

Leads at halftime in 36% of games and wins 64%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime0.0

Defense stays consistent across the full game.

INCA-Aruba - second-half results

23% W31% D46% L
11
Half-time points
3
Half-time goals
-5
Goal difference (1st half)
13
Second-half points
-6
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.85
PPG before half-time
Lead holding207%

Leads at halftime in 15% of games and wins 31%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime+0.5

Allows 0.5 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

FAS - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game2.201.80
Goals scored / game1.21.0
Goals allowed / game0.20.6
Average goals per game1.41.6
1 goal60%100%
2 goals40%20%
3 goals40%20%
Clean sheet80%40%
No goal40%40%
Goal difference+5+2
Half-time: 60% leading - 40% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 0% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 6
INCA-Aruba - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game0.802.00
Goals scored / game0.41.0
Goals allowed / game0.80.4
Average goals per game1.21.4
1 goal80%80%
2 goals20%40%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet20%80%
No goal80%20%
Goal difference-2+3
Half-time: 20% leading - 20% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 20% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 2

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

FAS
ScoredConceded
3
3
0-15
2
2
16-30
4
0
31-45
0
3
46-60
3
1
61-75
9
1
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (9 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): +8 - wins late phases.

INCA-Aruba
ScoredConceded
0
2
0-15
1
2
16-30
2
4
31-45
1
2
46-60
2
3
61-75
5
9
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (5 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

2.68
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
1.8 : 0.9
Estimated goal split
home : away
103%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
55%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+49%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
63%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
3%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 33 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

FAS

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.28
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.72
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-3.9 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.14
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.58
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
132%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
80%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
+0.51
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
43% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 14% come in the first quarter-hour.
43%

INCA-Aruba

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.50
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.34
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+7.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.45
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.11
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
75%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
117%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
+0.85
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.4
Late goals
45% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
45%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League context— is this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Salvadoran Primera División).

Teams vs league

FASLigaINCA-Aruba
Average goals per game▲ 2.822.59• 2.54
Both teams scored▲ 55%53%• 54%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)▲ 55%49%▼ 46%
Clean sheets▲ 36%30%▼ 23%
Goal before half-time• 64%65%▼ 62%
Goal after half-time▲ 82%75%▲ 77%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.59
Average goals per game
53%
Both teams scored
49%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
30%
Clean sheets
1.45
Home goals / game
1.14
Away goals / game
+27%
Home attack advantage
+21%
Home defensive advantage
+19%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
65%
1 goal
29%
2 goals
10%
3 goals
1%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
75%
1 goal
45%
2 goals
24%
3 goals
6%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Home team

Other recorded players

—Edgar José Medrano Ayarza⚽ 1

Away team

Other recorded players

—Juan Alfredo Barahona Peña⚽ 1

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. FASGoalEdgar José Medrano Ayarza
  2. INCA-ArubaGoalJuan Alfredo Barahona Peña

Head-to-head

Record from FAS's perspective: 1 win, 0 draws and 0 losses against INCA-Aruba. Games average 4.00 goals, and both teams scored in 0% of them.

FAQ

What was the result of FAS vs INCA-Aruba?

The Salvadoran Primera División match finished FAS 1:1 INCA-Aruba. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before FAS vs INCA-Aruba?

FAS score 1.91 goals per game on average and INCA-Aruba 0.85. The Salvadoran Primera División average is 2.59 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 49% of games. Both teams score in 55% of FAS's matches and 54% of INCA-Aruba's.

What form are FAS and INCA-Aruba in?

Over the last 5 games FAS have a 4-1-0 record (2.60 points per game) and INCA-Aruba 3-1-1 (2.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for FAS vs INCA-Aruba?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for FAS vs INCA-Aruba: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.