El Salvador - Salvadoran Primera DivisiónData current as of September 23, 2026

FAS vs Municipal Limeño: match statistics

FAS crest
FAS
2 : 0half-time 1:0
Municipal Limeño crest
Municipal Limeño

FAS vs Municipal Limeño: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

FAS played against Municipal Limeño in Salvadoran Primera División (El Salvador). The game was played on April 2, 2026. Final score: 2:0.

Recent form

FAS has 4 wins, 0 draws and 1 loss over its last five games, averaging 2.40 points per game. Municipal Limeño has 3 wins, 1 draw and 1 loss, with 2.00 points per game.

Scoring records

FAS scores 2.13 goals per game and allows 1.02. Municipal Limeño scores 1.33 and allows 1.18. Games in this league average 2.70 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 55% of FAS's games and 56% of Municipal Limeño's. The Over 2.5 rates are 57% and 46%, compared with league averages of 54% for BTTS and 52% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

FAS has the higher season xG average, 1.55 to 1.45 per game. FAS takes 11.1 shots per game, while Municipal Limeño takes 9.8.

First-half and second-half trends

FAS leads at halftime in 40% of its games and scores 1.18 goals per game after halftime. Municipal Limeño leads at halftime in 33% and scores 0.87 after halftime.

When the teams score

FAS's most productive scoring window is minutes 76-90+ (27 goals). For Municipal Limeño, it is minutes 76-90+ (15 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

Salvadoran Primera División games average 2.70 goals. Both teams score in 54% of games, and 52% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

Before this game, 3 previous meetings were available. The record was 2 home wins, 1 draw and 0 away wins. Those games averaged 3.33 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

The favorite is FAS: at home they average 2.35 goals scored and 0.80 conceded per match, have an 80% home win rate and a +31 home goal differential, whereas Municipal Limeño on the road average 1.00 goals scored, 1.32 conceded and a -6 away goal differential with only a 21% win rate. Offensively the hosts average 12.25 shots and 5.5 shots on target per home match with a 19% conversion rate, while the visitors average 8.42 shots and 3.21 on target with a 12% conversion; additionally FAS fail to score in only 5% of home matches, versus Municipal failing to score in 26% of away games. Quality of chances also favors FAS: average xG for the hosts is 1.57 compared to 1.27 for the visitors, and xG against is 1.09 for FAS versus 1.45 for Municipal, suggesting FAS creates more high-value chances while allowing fewer quality opportunities to opponents. Recent form over the last 5 matches also favors the hosts (4 wins, 1 loss, averaging 2.4 points per match) versus the visitors (3 wins, 1 draw, 1 loss, averaging 2.0 points per match). Given the advantage in shots on target (5.5 vs 3.21), conversion rates (19% vs 12%) and the lower share of matches without scoring (5% vs 26%), I expect a FAS victory.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

Season-long indicators strongly favor BTTS: the home side has a seasonal BTTS rate of 60%, the visitors 53%, and the league average is 55%, pointing to a higher probability of a Goal/Goal scenario. Both teams create and concede chances — FAS has xG 1.60 with xG against 1.44 and averages 4.25 on-target shots from 11.05 attempts with a conversion rate of 15%, while Municipal has xG 1.27 with xG against 1.45 and 3.21 on-target shots from 8.42 attempts with a 12% conversion. However, BTTS has dropped to 40% for both sides over the last 5 matches; in that period FAS scored 2.6 and conceded 1.2 on average, while Municipal scored 2.0 and conceded only 0.6, which increases forecast uncertainty. Considering the stronger seasonal signals (average goals 1.65 for home and 1.00 for away and average goals conceded 1.05 and 1.32) and similar xG for both teams, I assign 62% to BTTS - Yes and 38% to No Goal.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

Statistical analysis indicates FAS scores on average 1.65 goals per match (xG 1.60), while Municipal Limeño scores 1.00 goal (xG 1.27), yielding a combined xG of 2.87. Seasonally both teams show a high Over 1.5 rate: FAS 70% and Municipal 68%; additionally FAS has 90% of matches with at least one goal (over 0.5) and in the last 5 matches had 100% of games over 2.5 goals. Both sides also register frequent BTTS: FAS 60% and Municipal 53%, which increases the likelihood of at least 2 goals in the match. Based on the total xG of 2.87 and current form (FAS 13 goals in the last 5 matches, avg 2.6; Municipal 10 goals, avg 2.0), I project 1.70 expected goals for FAS and 1.17 for Municipal, total 2.87. The best pick is Over 1.5 — it provides the strongest, most coherent signal: I estimate its probability at 74%, while Over 2.5 is riskier (53%) and Over 3.5 has a low chance (18%).

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

FAS is the favorite: they have a 55% win rate this season and an average of 1.85 points per match compared to Municipal Limeño’s 21% win rate and 0.89 points per match, with average goals 1.65 for the home side vs 1.00 for the visitors. The home team leads at the break in 45% of matches, while the visitors do so in only 21%, and FAS scores an average of 0.6 goals by half-time vs 0.32 for Municipal Limeño, indicating a home advantage in the first half. After the break FAS adds on average 1.05 goals and keeps a clean sheet in 50% of second halves, while the visitors score 0.68 after the break and concede on average 0.68, so the home side is better positioned to hold a lead. Considering the points and scoring advantage (seasonPPG_home 1.85 vs seasonPPG_away 0.89) and FAS’s high effectiveness after half-time, I applied an HT-to-FT conversion rate of approximately 75%, which makes the 1/1 scenario the most likely at around 33%.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Stats by half

1 : 0
First half
1 : 0
Second half

Game stats

52Possession (%)48
FASMunicipal Limeño
14Shots3
FASMunicipal Limeño
6Shots on target0
FASMunicipal Limeño
1.86xG0.56
FASMunicipal Limeño
1Corners4
FASMunicipal Limeño
77Dangerous attacks49
FASMunicipal Limeño
-1Fouls-1
FASMunicipal Limeño
-1Cards-1
FASMunicipal Limeño

Pre-game profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

FASMunicipal Limeño
2.13Goals scored / game1.33
FASMunicipal Limeño
1.02Goals allowed / game1.18
FASMunicipal Limeño
53%Average possession52%
FASMunicipal Limeño
5.15Shots on target / game3.74
FASMunicipal Limeño

Team statswho is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

11.08Shots per game9.77
FASMunicipal Limeño
5.15Shots on target3.74
FASMunicipal Limeño
19.2%Shot conversion13.6%
FASMunicipal Limeño
53%Possession52%
FASMunicipal Limeño
1.55xG for1.45
FASMunicipal Limeño
1.2xG against1.44
FASMunicipal Limeño

Shooting quality

FAS: Efficient finishingMunicipal Limeño: Efficient finishing
FASMunicipal Limeño
Accuracy (shots on target)46%38%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.140.15
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.410.36

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

FAS is 20% better for: last-5 form.

2.4 pts / game - FAS · 2 pts / game - Municipal Limeño

FAS
WWWWL
Season result split
63% W23% D15% L
Season (W-D-L)
25-9-6
2.10 pts / game · goal difference +44
Last 5 (W-D-L)
4-0-1
2.40 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
16-2-2
Last 5 at home
5-0-0
WWWWW
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 2.6Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 1.64Opponent xG: 1.18BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 100%
Municipal Limeño
WWWLD
Season result split
38% W23% D38% L
Season (W-D-L)
15-9-15
1.38 pts / game · goal difference +6
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-1-1
2.00 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
4-5-10
Last 5 away
1-1-3
DLLWL
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 2.0Goals conceded: 0.6xG: 1.40Opponent xG: 1.57BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 40%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

FAS is 60% better for: goals scored per game.

2.13 goals / game - FAS · 1.33 goals / game - Municipal Limeño

FAS is 16% better for: goals allowed per game.

1.02 goals / game - FAS · 1.18 goals / game - Municipal Limeño

FAS scoring profile: very strong

FAS scores in 88% of games (35 of 40 games), while Municipal Limeño keeps a clean sheet in 28% (11 of 39 games).

Municipal Limeño scoring profile: strong

Municipal Limeño scores in 79% of games (31 of 39 games), while FAS keeps a clean sheet in 35% (14 of 40 games).

85Goals scored (season)52
FASMunicipal Limeño
41Goals conceded (season)46
FASMunicipal Limeño
3.15Average goals per game2.51
FASMunicipal Limeño
13Goals scored (last 5)10
FASMunicipal Limeño
6Goals conceded (last 5)3
FASMunicipal Limeño

How often they score at least...

88%1 goal79%
FASMunicipal Limeño
63%2 goals26%
FASMunicipal Limeño
40%3 goals10%
FASMunicipal Limeño
13%4 goals10%
FASMunicipal Limeño

How often they concede at least...

65%1 goal72%
FASMunicipal Limeño
28%2 goals31%
FASMunicipal Limeño
10%3 goals13%
FASMunicipal Limeño
0%4 goals3%
FASMunicipal Limeño

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

54%
League average

Goal patterns

18%BTTS at half-time5%
FASMunicipal Limeño
8%BTTS in both halves0%
FASMunicipal Limeño
45%Scored in both halves15%
FASMunicipal Limeño

BTTS and goal count

43%Min. 3 goals and BTTS38%
FASMunicipal Limeño
15%Min. 3 goals without BTTS8%
FASMunicipal Limeño
40%BTTS - last 540%
FASMunicipal Limeño

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

75%Min. 1 goal before half-time67%
FASMunicipal Limeño
38%Min. 2 goals before half-time18%
FASMunicipal Limeño
15%Min. 3 goals before half-time8%
FASMunicipal Limeño

2nd half

85%Min. 1 goal after half-time82%
FASMunicipal Limeño
53%Min. 2 goals after half-time51%
FASMunicipal Limeño
25%Min. 3 goals after half-time15%
FASMunicipal Limeño

Game halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

FAS is 20% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.63 pts / game - FAS · 1.36 pts / game - Municipal Limeño

FAS - half-time state
40% leading43% draw18% trailing
Municipal Limeño - half-time state
33% leading36% draw31% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.63Points per game (1st half)1.36
FASMunicipal Limeño
0.93Goals scored (1st half)0.46
FASMunicipal Limeño
0.43Goals conceded (1st half)0.46
FASMunicipal Limeño
1.35Average goals (1st half)0.92
FASMunicipal Limeño
65%Clean sheet before half-time64%
FASMunicipal Limeño
43%No goal before half-time64%
FASMunicipal Limeño

After half-time (2nd half)

1.78Points per game (2nd half)1.33
FASMunicipal Limeño
1.18Goals scored (2nd half)0.87
FASMunicipal Limeño
0.57Goals conceded (2nd half)0.72
FASMunicipal Limeño
1.75Average goals (2nd half)1.59
FASMunicipal Limeño
55%Clean sheet after half-time44%
FASMunicipal Limeño
28%No goal after half-time41%
FASMunicipal Limeño

FAS - second-half results

48% W35% D18% L
65
Half-time points
37
Half-time goals
+20
Goal difference (1st half)
71
Second-half points
+24
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.63
PPG before half-time
Lead holding158%

Leads at halftime in 40% of games and wins 63%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime+0.1

Allows 0.1 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

Municipal Limeño - second-half results

31% W41% D28% L
53
Half-time points
18
Half-time goals
0
Goal difference (1st half)
52
Second-half points
+6
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.36
PPG before half-time
Lead holding115%

Leads at halftime in 33% of games and wins 38%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime+0.3

Allows 0.3 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

FAS - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.602.00
Goals scored / game1.01.6
Goals allowed / game0.60.6
Average goals per game1.62.2
1 goal80%80%
2 goals60%60%
3 goals20%40%
Clean sheet60%60%
No goal40%40%
Goal difference+2+5
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 20% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 5
Municipal Limeño - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game2.201.40
Goals scored / game1.20.8
Goals allowed / game0.00.6
Average goals per game1.21.4
1 goal60%100%
2 goals40%40%
3 goals20%0%
Clean sheet100%40%
No goal40%40%
Goal difference+6+1
Half-time: 60% leading - 40% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 20% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 6

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

FAS
ScoredConceded
11
4
0-15
14
3
16-30
13
11
31-45
7
9
46-60
13
4
61-75
27
10
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (27 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): +17 - wins late phases.

Municipal Limeño
ScoredConceded
3
6
0-15
6
4
16-30
9
8
31-45
10
5
46-60
9
13
61-75
15
10
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (15 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (13). Late-goal balance (76-90): +5 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

2.83
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
1.7 : 1.2
Estimated goal split
home : away
105%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
56%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+18%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
70%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
3%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 33 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

FAS

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.35
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.76
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-13.4 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.58
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.18
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
155%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
77%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
+0.30
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
32% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 13% come in the first quarter-hour.
32%

Municipal Limeño

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.01
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.14
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-11.6 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.12
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.26
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
100%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
86%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
+0.62
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.4
Late goals
29% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 6% come in the first quarter-hour.
29%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Salvadoran Primera División).

Teams vs league

FASLigaMunicipal Limeño
Average goals per game 3.152.70 2.51
Both teams scored 55%54% 56%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 57%52% 46%
Clean sheets 35%27% 28%
Goal before half-time 75%67% 67%
Goal after half-time 85%77% 82%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.70
Average goals per game
54%
Both teams scored
52%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
27%
Clean sheets
1.37
Home goals / game
1.33
Away goals / game
+3%
Home attack advantage
+3%
Home defensive advantage
+4%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
67%
1 goal
33%
2 goals
13%
3 goals
5%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
77%
1 goal
47%
2 goals
21%
3 goals
5%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Home team

Other recorded players

José Portillo⚽ 1
Nelson Wilfredo Bonilla Sánchez⚽ 1

Away team

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. FASGoalJosé Portillo
  2. FASGoalNelson Wilfredo Bonilla Sánchez

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Referee context

See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.

Jesús AguirreMatches officiated: 14
-Cards per match
0Penalties per match
1 / X / 243%Home wins21%Draws36%Away wins

Head-to-head

Record from FAS's perspective: 2 wins, 1 draw and 0 losses against Municipal Limeño. Games average 3.33 goals, and both teams scored in 100% of them.

Municipal Limeño
1 : 1
FAS
FAS
2 : 1
Municipal Limeño
Municipal Limeño
1 : 4
FAS

FAQ

What was the result of FAS vs Municipal Limeño?

The Salvadoran Primera División match finished FAS 2:0 Municipal Limeño. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between FAS and Municipal Limeño?

In the last 3 head-to-head matches FAS won 2, Municipal Limeño won 0 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 3.33 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before FAS vs Municipal Limeño?

FAS score 2.13 goals per game on average and Municipal Limeño 1.33. The Salvadoran Primera División average is 2.70 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 52% of games. Both teams score in 55% of FAS's matches and 56% of Municipal Limeño's.

What form are FAS and Municipal Limeño in?

Over the last 5 games FAS have a 4-0-1 record (2.40 points per game) and Municipal Limeño 3-1-1 (2.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for FAS vs Municipal Limeño?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.