Ethiopia - Ethiopia Premier LeaguePolisportivo Comunale di TarvisioData current as of 23 July 2026

Fasil Ketema vs Arba Minch Kenema: match statistics

Fasil Ketema vs Arba Minch Kenema: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Fasil Ketema play Arba Minch Kenema in Ethiopia Premier League (Ethiopia). The match date is 22 June 2026 at 14:00. Venue: Polisportivo Comunale di Tarvisio. Final score: 2:0.

Current form

Fasil Ketema: 3-0-2, 1.80 points/match. Arba Minch Kenema: 2-0-3, 1.20 points/match.

Goal statistics

Fasil Ketema scores 0.74 and concedes 0.74 goals per match. Arba Minch Kenema scores 0.79 and concedes 1.21. League average: 1.78 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Fasil Ketema 26%, Arba Minch Kenema 42%. Over 2.5: Fasil Ketema 18%, Arba Minch Kenema 29%. League level: BTTS 40%, Over 2.5 28%.

xG, shots and style

Fasil Ketema has higher xG: 1.14 vs 1.12. Fasil Ketema: 7.2 shots per match, Arba Minch Kenema: 7.3.

Match halves

Fasil Ketema: half-time lead 24%, second-half goals 0.42. Arba Minch Kenema: half-time lead 24%, second-half goals 0.39.

Goals by minute

Fasil Ketema: 76-90+ (7 goals). Arba Minch Kenema: 31-45+ (8 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Ethiopia Premier League: 1.78 goals per match, BTTS 40%, Over 2.5 28%.

Head-to-head

1 H2H matches: 1-0-0. Average goals 5.00, BTTS 100%.

Match description

Fasil Ketema sit 5th in the table while Arba Minch are 20th. This season Fasil have 12 wins, 13 draws and 10 losses, versus Arba’s 7 wins, 14 draws and 14 losses; the hosts have conceded 27 goals compared to 41 for the visitors. In the last 5 matches both teams have scored 6 goals and conceded 7, but Arba average 1.4 points per game over that span against Fasil’s 1.2, indicating slightly better short-term form for the visitors. At home Fasil average 0.71 goals per match, generate 7.24 shots (2.47 on target) with a 10% conversion rate and xG 1.09, whereas Arba away average 1.00 goal, 7.59 shots (2.88 on target), 13% conversion and xG 1.13 — offensively the visitors are marginally more efficient. Defensively however the hosts look more solid: Fasil concede 0.82 goals per home match and have 47% clean sheets at home, while Arba have 41% clean sheets away and 41 goals conceded in the season overall. Considering the higher league position, fewer losses (10 vs 14) and generally superior defensive numbers, I tip the hosts to win; probabilities: home 55%, draw 25%, away 20%.

Half-by-half

1 : 0
1st half
1 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

49Possession (%)51
Fasil KetemaArba Minch Kenema
10Shots12
Fasil KetemaArba Minch Kenema
3Shots on target2
Fasil KetemaArba Minch Kenema
1.37xG1.52
Fasil KetemaArba Minch Kenema
2Corners7
Fasil KetemaArba Minch Kenema
72Dangerous attacks86
Fasil KetemaArba Minch Kenema
7Fouls9
Fasil KetemaArba Minch Kenema
0Cards0
Fasil KetemaArba Minch Kenema

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Fasil KetemaArba Minch Kenema
0.74Goals scored / match0.79
Fasil KetemaArba Minch Kenema
0.74Goals conceded / match1.21
Fasil KetemaArba Minch Kenema
46%Average possession49%
Fasil KetemaArba Minch Kenema
2.24Shots on target / match2.29
Fasil KetemaArba Minch Kenema

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

7.24Shots per match7.26
Fasil KetemaArba Minch Kenema
2.24Shots on target2.29
Fasil KetemaArba Minch Kenema
10.2%Shot conversion10.9%
Fasil KetemaArba Minch Kenema
46%Possession49%
Fasil KetemaArba Minch Kenema
1.14xG for1.12
Fasil KetemaArba Minch Kenema
1.1xG against1.2
Fasil KetemaArba Minch Kenema

Shooting quality

Fasil Ketema: BalancedArba Minch Kenema: Balanced
Fasil KetemaArba Minch Kenema
Accuracy (shots on target)31%32%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.160.15
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.330.34

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Fasil Ketema is 50% better for: last-5 form.

1.8 pts / match - Fasil Ketema · 1.2 pts / match - Arba Minch Kenema

Fasil Ketema
LWWLW
Season result split
37% W34% R29% P
Season (W-D-L)
14-13-11
1.45 pts / match · goal difference 0
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-0-2
1.80 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
9-4-6
Last 5 at home
3-0-2
LWLWW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.8Goals conceded: 0.4xG: 1.22Opponent xG: 1.13BTTS: 0%Over 2.5: 0%
Arba Minch Kenema
WWLLL
Season result split
18% W37% R45% P
Season (W-D-L)
7-14-17
0.92 pts / match · goal difference -16
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-0-3
1.20 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
6-7-6
Last 5 away
2-1-2
WDWLL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 1.20Opponent xG: 1.32BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 40%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Arba Minch Kenema is 7% better for: goals scored per match.

0.74 goals / match - Fasil Ketema · 0.79 goals / match - Arba Minch Kenema

Fasil Ketema is 64% better for: goals conceded per match.

0.74 goals / match - Fasil Ketema · 1.21 goals / match - Arba Minch Kenema

Fasil Ketema scoring profile: strong

Fasil Ketema scores in 58% of matches (22 of 38 matches), while Arba Minch Kenema keeps a clean sheet in 29% (11 of 38 matches).

Arba Minch Kenema scoring profile: more difficult

Arba Minch Kenema scores in 53% of matches (20 of 38 matches), while Fasil Ketema keeps a clean sheet in 55% (21 of 38 matches).

28Goals scored (season)30
Fasil KetemaArba Minch Kenema
28Goals conceded (season)46
Fasil KetemaArba Minch Kenema
1.47Average goals in match2
Fasil KetemaArba Minch Kenema
4Goals scored (last 5)5
Fasil KetemaArba Minch Kenema
2Goals conceded (last 5)6
Fasil KetemaArba Minch Kenema

How often they score at least...

58%1 goal53%
Fasil KetemaArba Minch Kenema
11%2 goals26%
Fasil KetemaArba Minch Kenema
5%3 goals0%
Fasil KetemaArba Minch Kenema
0%4 goals0%
Fasil KetemaArba Minch Kenema

How often they concede at least...

45%1 goal71%
Fasil KetemaArba Minch Kenema
21%2 goals32%
Fasil KetemaArba Minch Kenema
8%3 goals16%
Fasil KetemaArba Minch Kenema
0%4 goals3%
Fasil KetemaArba Minch Kenema

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

42%
Arba Minch Kenema - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.16 of 38 matches
40%
League average

Goal patterns

8%BTTS at half-time11%
Fasil KetemaArba Minch Kenema
3%BTTS in both halves3%
Fasil KetemaArba Minch Kenema
8%Scored in both halves16%
Fasil KetemaArba Minch Kenema

BTTS and goal count

16%Min. 3 goals and BTTS26%
Fasil KetemaArba Minch Kenema
3%Min. 3 goals without BTTS3%
Fasil KetemaArba Minch Kenema
0%BTTS - last 540%
Fasil KetemaArba Minch Kenema

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

34%Min. 1 goal before half-time71%
Fasil KetemaArba Minch Kenema
8%Min. 2 goals before half-time24%
Fasil KetemaArba Minch Kenema
3%Min. 3 goals before half-time8%
Fasil KetemaArba Minch Kenema

2nd half

61%Min. 1 goal after half-time58%
Fasil KetemaArba Minch Kenema
32%Min. 2 goals after half-time26%
Fasil KetemaArba Minch Kenema
8%Min. 3 goals after half-time11%
Fasil KetemaArba Minch Kenema

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Fasil Ketema is 35% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.42 pts / match - Fasil Ketema · 1.05 pts / match - Arba Minch Kenema

Fasil Ketema - half-time state
24% leading71% draw5% trailing
Arba Minch Kenema - half-time state
24% leading34% draw42% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.42Points per match (1st half)1.05
Fasil KetemaArba Minch Kenema
0.32Goals scored (1st half)0.39
Fasil KetemaArba Minch Kenema
0.13Goals conceded (1st half)0.63
Fasil KetemaArba Minch Kenema
0.45Average goals (1st half)1.03
Fasil KetemaArba Minch Kenema
87%Clean sheet before half-time53%
Fasil KetemaArba Minch Kenema
71%No goal before half-time66%
Fasil KetemaArba Minch Kenema

After half-time (2nd half)

1.18Points per match (2nd half)1.11
Fasil KetemaArba Minch Kenema
0.42Goals scored (2nd half)0.39
Fasil KetemaArba Minch Kenema
0.61Goals conceded (2nd half)0.58
Fasil KetemaArba Minch Kenema
1.03Average goals (2nd half)0.97
Fasil KetemaArba Minch Kenema
63%Clean sheet after half-time58%
Fasil KetemaArba Minch Kenema
63%No goal after half-time66%
Fasil KetemaArba Minch Kenema

Fasil Ketema - second-half results

24% W47% R29% P
54
Half-time points
12
Half-time goals
+7
Goal difference (1st half)
45
Second-half points
-7
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.42
PPG before half-time
Lead holding154%

Leads at half-time in 24% of matches and wins 37%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.5

Concedes 0.5 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Arba Minch Kenema - second-half results

18% W55% R26% P
40
Half-time points
15
Half-time goals
-9
Goal difference (1st half)
42
Second-half points
-7
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.05
PPG before half-time
Lead holding75%

Leads at half-time in 24% of matches and wins 18%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.

Defence after half-time-0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Fasil Ketema - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.601.60
Goals scored / match0.40.4
Goals conceded / match0.20.2
Average goals in match0.60.6
1 goal60%60%
2 goals0%0%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet80%80%
No goal60%60%
Goal difference+1+1
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 40% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 2
Arba Minch Kenema - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.801.00
Goals scored / match0.60.4
Goals conceded / match0.40.8
Average goals in match1.01.2
1 goal100%80%
2 goals0%40%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet60%40%
No goal40%60%
Goal difference+1-2
Half-time: 60% leading - 0% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 3

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Fasil Ketema
ScoredConceded
4
2
0-15
2
3
16-30
6
0
31-45
3
9
46-60
6
6
61-75
7
8
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (7 goli). Concedes most in 46-60 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

Arba Minch Kenema
ScoredConceded
3
9
0-15
4
9
16-30
8
6
31-45
5
8
46-60
2
4
61-75
8
10
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (8 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

1.74
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.0 : 0.8
Estimated goal split
home : away
98%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
34%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+188%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
31%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
20%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 5 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Fasil Ketema

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.04
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.04
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-2.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.40
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.36
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
81%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
85%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.35
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
25% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 14% come in the first quarter-hour.
25%

Arba Minch Kenema

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.08
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.34
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+1.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.33
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.01
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
91%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
133%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.28
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
0.0
Late goals
27% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 10% come in the first quarter-hour.
27%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Ethiopia Premier League).

Teams vs league

Fasil KetemaLigaArba Minch Kenema
Average goals in match 1.471.78 2.00
Both teams scored 26%40% 42%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 18%28% 29%
Clean sheets 55%40% 29%
Goal before half-time 34%56% 71%
Goal after half-time 61%59% 58%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

1.78
Average goals per match
40%
Both teams scored
28%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
40%
Clean sheets
0.91
Home goals / match
0.87
Away goals / match
+5%
Home attack advantage
+4%
Home defence advantage
+1%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
56%
1 goal
22%
2 goals
4%
3 goals
1%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
59%
1 goal
27%
2 goals
6%
3 goals
2%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Fasil Ketema 1 - 0 - 0 Arba Minch Kenema. Average goals 5.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.

FAQ

What was the result of Fasil Ketema vs Arba Minch Kenema?

The Ethiopia Premier League match finished Fasil Ketema 2:0 Arba Minch Kenema. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Fasil Ketema vs Arba Minch Kenema?

Fasil Ketema score 0.74 goals per game on average and Arba Minch Kenema 0.79. The Ethiopia Premier League average is 1.78 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 28% of games. Both teams score in 26% of Fasil Ketema's matches and 42% of Arba Minch Kenema's.

What form are Fasil Ketema and Arba Minch Kenema in?

Over the last 5 games Fasil Ketema have a 3-0-2 record (1.80 points per game) and Arba Minch Kenema 2-0-3 (1.20 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Fasil Ketema vs Arba Minch Kenema?

The statistical background for Fasil Ketema vs Arba Minch Kenema — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.