Ethiopia - Ethiopia Premier LeagueData current as of 23 July 2026

Fasil Ketema vs Bahardar: match statistics

Fasil Ketema crest
Fasil Ketema
0 : 2half-time 0:0
Bahardar crest
Bahardar

Fasil Ketema vs Bahardar: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Fasil Ketema play Bahardar in Ethiopia Premier League (Ethiopia). The match date is 6 May 2026 at 14:00. Final score: 0:2.

Current form

Fasil Ketema: 3-0-2, 1.80 points/match. Bahardar: 0-3-2, 0.60 points/match.

Goal statistics

Fasil Ketema scores 0.74 and concedes 0.74 goals per match. Bahardar scores 0.74 and concedes 0.74. League average: 1.78 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Fasil Ketema 26%, Bahardar 32%. Over 2.5: Fasil Ketema 18%, Bahardar 18%. League level: BTTS 40%, Over 2.5 28%.

xG, shots and style

Bahardar has higher xG: 1.26 vs 1.14. Fasil Ketema: 7.2 shots per match, Bahardar: 8.3.

Match halves

Fasil Ketema: half-time lead 24%, second-half goals 0.42. Bahardar: half-time lead 11%, second-half goals 0.53.

Goals by minute

Fasil Ketema: 76-90+ (7 goals). Bahardar: 46-60 (8 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Ethiopia Premier League: 1.78 goals per match, BTTS 40%, Over 2.5 28%.

Head-to-head

1 H2H matches: 0-1-0. Average goals 0.00, BTTS 0%.

Match description

Fasil Ketema holds a statistical advantage in the table and form: 5th vs 10th for Bahardar, 10 wins this season vs 7 for the visitors, and an average of 1.6 points per game in the last 5 matches vs 1.2 for the opponents. Defensively the hosts are stronger — 18 goals conceded this season (3 in the last 5) and clean sheets in 57% of home games, while Bahardar conceded 22 goals this season (5 in the last 5) and have 50% clean sheets on the road. Attacking numbers are similar: Fasil 19 goals this season vs 21 for the visitors, and in the last 5 matches the hosts scored 2 goals vs 4 for Bahardar; average xG 1.09 (Fasil) vs 1.16 (Bahardar), but the hosts average 2.5 shots on target per game vs 2.07 for the opponents and have better finishing (9% vs 8%) and a lower share of goalless matches (36% vs 50%). Data point to a low-scoring affair with a slight home advantage due to more wins (10 vs 7), better defensive form and higher league position, while the visitors draw frequently (57% of away matches ended in a draw). I therefore project a Fasil Ketema win, though a draw is realistic — estimated probabilities: 55% home win, 30% draw, 15% Bahardar win.

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
0 : 2
2nd half

Match statistics

50Possession (%)50
Fasil KetemaBahardar
9Shots4
Fasil KetemaBahardar
2Shots on target2
Fasil KetemaBahardar
1.31xG1.03
Fasil KetemaBahardar
7Corners3
Fasil KetemaBahardar
82Dangerous attacks88
Fasil KetemaBahardar
19Fouls14
Fasil KetemaBahardar
0Cards0
Fasil KetemaBahardar

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Fasil KetemaBahardar
0.74Goals scored / match0.74
Fasil KetemaBahardar
0.74Goals conceded / match0.74
Fasil KetemaBahardar
46%Average possession51%
Fasil KetemaBahardar
2.24Shots on target / match2.84
Fasil KetemaBahardar

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

7.24Shots per match8.26
Fasil KetemaBahardar
2.24Shots on target2.84
Fasil KetemaBahardar
10.2%Shot conversion8.9%
Fasil KetemaBahardar
46%Possession51%
Fasil KetemaBahardar
1.14xG for1.26
Fasil KetemaBahardar
1.1xG against1.2
Fasil KetemaBahardar

Shooting quality

Fasil Ketema: BalancedBahardar: Balanced
Fasil KetemaBahardar
Accuracy (shots on target)31%34%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.160.15
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.330.26

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Fasil Ketema is 200% better for: last-5 form.

1.8 pts / match - Fasil Ketema · 0.6 pts / match - Bahardar

Fasil Ketema
LWWLW
Season result split
37% W34% R29% P
Season (W-D-L)
14-13-11
1.45 pts / match · goal difference 0
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-0-2
1.80 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
9-4-6
Last 5 at home
3-0-2
LWLWW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.8Goals conceded: 0.4xG: 1.22Opponent xG: 1.13BTTS: 0%Over 2.5: 0%
Bahardar
DLDLD
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
24% W55% R21% P
Season (W-D-L)
9-21-8
1.26 pts / match · goal difference 0
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-3-2
0.60 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
5-11-3
Last 5 away
2-3-0
WWDDD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.4Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.50Opponent xG: 1.31BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 20%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Fasil Ketema scoring profile: mixed

Fasil Ketema scores in 58% of matches (22 of 38 matches), while Bahardar keeps a clean sheet in 53% (20 of 38 matches).

Bahardar scoring profile: more difficult

Bahardar scores in 47% of matches (18 of 38 matches), while Fasil Ketema keeps a clean sheet in 55% (21 of 38 matches).

28Goals scored (season)28
Fasil KetemaBahardar
28Goals conceded (season)28
Fasil KetemaBahardar
1.47Average goals in match1.47
Fasil KetemaBahardar
4Goals scored (last 5)2
Fasil KetemaBahardar
2Goals conceded (last 5)5
Fasil KetemaBahardar

How often they score at least...

58%1 goal47%
Fasil KetemaBahardar
11%2 goals24%
Fasil KetemaBahardar
5%3 goals3%
Fasil KetemaBahardar
0%4 goals0%
Fasil KetemaBahardar

How often they concede at least...

45%1 goal47%
Fasil KetemaBahardar
21%2 goals21%
Fasil KetemaBahardar
8%3 goals5%
Fasil KetemaBahardar
0%4 goals0%
Fasil KetemaBahardar

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

40%
League average

Goal patterns

8%BTTS at half-time11%
Fasil KetemaBahardar
3%BTTS in both halves0%
Fasil KetemaBahardar
8%Scored in both halves8%
Fasil KetemaBahardar

BTTS and goal count

16%Min. 3 goals and BTTS18%
Fasil KetemaBahardar
3%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
Fasil KetemaBahardar
0%BTTS - last 520%
Fasil KetemaBahardar

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

34%Min. 1 goal before half-time39%
Fasil KetemaBahardar
8%Min. 2 goals before half-time16%
Fasil KetemaBahardar
3%Min. 3 goals before half-time3%
Fasil KetemaBahardar

2nd half

61%Min. 1 goal after half-time47%
Fasil KetemaBahardar
32%Min. 2 goals after half-time26%
Fasil KetemaBahardar
8%Min. 3 goals after half-time11%
Fasil KetemaBahardar

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Fasil Ketema is 42% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.42 pts / match - Fasil Ketema · 1 pts / match - Bahardar

Fasil Ketema - half-time state
24% leading71% draw5% trailing
Bahardar - half-time state
11% leading68% draw21% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.42Points per match (1st half)1
Fasil KetemaBahardar
0.32Goals scored (1st half)0.21
Fasil KetemaBahardar
0.13Goals conceded (1st half)0.39
Fasil KetemaBahardar
0.45Average goals (1st half)0.61
Fasil KetemaBahardar
87%Clean sheet before half-time71%
Fasil KetemaBahardar
71%No goal before half-time79%
Fasil KetemaBahardar

After half-time (2nd half)

1.18Points per match (2nd half)1.39
Fasil KetemaBahardar
0.42Goals scored (2nd half)0.53
Fasil KetemaBahardar
0.61Goals conceded (2nd half)0.34
Fasil KetemaBahardar
1.03Average goals (2nd half)0.87
Fasil KetemaBahardar
63%Clean sheet after half-time71%
Fasil KetemaBahardar
63%No goal after half-time66%
Fasil KetemaBahardar

Fasil Ketema - second-half results

24% W47% R29% P
54
Half-time points
12
Half-time goals
+7
Goal difference (1st half)
45
Second-half points
-7
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.42
PPG before half-time
Lead holding154%

Leads at half-time in 24% of matches and wins 37%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.5

Concedes 0.5 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Bahardar - second-half results

26% W61% R13% P
38
Half-time points
8
Half-time goals
-7
Goal difference (1st half)
53
Second-half points
+7
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.00
PPG before half-time
Lead holding218%

Leads at half-time in 11% of matches and wins 24%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Fasil Ketema - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.601.60
Goals scored / match0.40.4
Goals conceded / match0.20.2
Average goals in match0.60.6
1 goal60%60%
2 goals0%0%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet80%80%
No goal60%60%
Goal difference+1+1
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 40% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 2
Bahardar - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.401.20
Goals scored / match0.00.4
Goals conceded / match0.60.4
Average goals in match0.60.8
1 goal60%40%
2 goals0%20%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet40%60%
No goal100%80%
Goal difference-30
Half-time: 0% leading - 40% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 60% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 0

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Fasil Ketema
ScoredConceded
4
2
0-15
2
3
16-30
6
0
31-45
3
9
46-60
6
6
61-75
7
8
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (7 goli). Concedes most in 46-60 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

Bahardar
ScoredConceded
2
3
0-15
1
6
16-30
5
6
31-45
8
3
46-60
5
4
61-75
7
6
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (8 goli). Concedes most in 16-30 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

1.48
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
0.7 : 0.7
Estimated goal split
home : away
83%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
29%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
27%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
22%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 5 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Fasil Ketema

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.04
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.04
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-2.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.40
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.36
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
81%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
85%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.35
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
25% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 14% come in the first quarter-hour.
25%

Bahardar

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.06
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.06
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-9.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.52
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.46
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
85%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
81%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.66
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
25% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 7% come in the first quarter-hour.
25%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Ethiopia Premier League).

Teams vs league

Fasil KetemaLigaBahardar
Average goals in match 1.471.78 1.47
Both teams scored 26%40% 32%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 18%28% 18%
Clean sheets 55%40% 53%
Goal before half-time 34%56% 39%
Goal after half-time 61%59% 47%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

1.78
Average goals per match
40%
Both teams scored
28%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
40%
Clean sheets
0.91
Home goals / match
0.87
Away goals / match
+5%
Home attack advantage
+4%
Home defence advantage
+1%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
56%
1 goal
22%
2 goals
4%
3 goals
1%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
59%
1 goal
27%
2 goals
6%
3 goals
2%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Fasil Ketema 0 - 1 - 0 Bahardar. Average goals 0.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.

FAQ

What was the result of Fasil Ketema vs Bahardar?

The Ethiopia Premier League match finished Fasil Ketema 0:2 Bahardar. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Fasil Ketema vs Bahardar?

Fasil Ketema score 0.74 goals per game on average and Bahardar 0.74. The Ethiopia Premier League average is 1.78 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 28% of games. Both teams score in 26% of Fasil Ketema's matches and 32% of Bahardar's.

What form are Fasil Ketema and Bahardar in?

Over the last 5 games Fasil Ketema have a 3-0-2 record (1.80 points per game) and Bahardar 0-3-2 (0.60 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Fasil Ketema vs Bahardar?

The statistical background for Fasil Ketema vs Bahardar — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.