Ethiopia - Ethiopia Premier LeagueData current as of 23 July 2026

Fasil Ketema vs Mekelle Kenema: match statistics

Fasil Ketema crest
Fasil Ketema
0 : 3half-time 0:0
Mekelle Kenema crest
Mekelle Kenema

Fasil Ketema vs Mekelle Kenema: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Fasil Ketema play Mekelle Kenema in Ethiopia Premier League (Ethiopia). The match date is 18 April 2026 at 14:00. Final score: 0:3.

Current form

Fasil Ketema: 3-0-2, 1.80 points/match. Mekelle Kenema: 1-3-1, 1.20 points/match.

Goal statistics

Fasil Ketema scores 0.74 and concedes 0.74 goals per match. Mekelle Kenema scores 0.79 and concedes 0.95. League average: 1.78 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Fasil Ketema 26%, Mekelle Kenema 37%. Over 2.5: Fasil Ketema 18%, Mekelle Kenema 34%. League level: BTTS 40%, Over 2.5 28%.

xG, shots and style

Fasil Ketema has higher xG: 1.14 vs 1.10. Fasil Ketema: 7.2 shots per match, Mekelle Kenema: 6.4.

Match halves

Fasil Ketema: half-time lead 24%, second-half goals 0.42. Mekelle Kenema: half-time lead 21%, second-half goals 0.42.

Goals by minute

Fasil Ketema: 76-90+ (7 goals). Mekelle Kenema: 46-60 (9 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Ethiopia Premier League: 1.78 goals per match, BTTS 40%, Over 2.5 28%.

Head-to-head

1 H2H matches: 0-1-0. Average goals 2.00, BTTS 100%.

Match description

Fasil Ketema are favorites in this match: they sit 4th in the table versus Mekelle Kenema’s 19th place, and over the last 5 matches they have a record of 2 wins and 3 draws (dddww), averaging 1.8 points per match in that period, while Mekelle have 1 win, 1 draw and 3 losses (ldllw) and average 0.8 points per match. In home metrics Fasil score 0.69 goals per game and concede only 0.54, keeping a clean sheet in 62% of home matches; Mekelle on the road average 0.46 goals scored and concede 0.85 per game, and fail to score in 69% of away fixtures. Quality of chances is similar — average xG is 1.07 for the hosts versus 1.11 for the visitors — but the hosts convert better at home: a conversion rate of 10% and 2.69 shots on target per match versus 7% and 2.31 for Mekelle, which explains the higher actual goal output. Additionally, Fasil have conceded only 1 goal in their last 5 matches while Mekelle have conceded 6, confirming the hosts’ defensive edge and increasing the probability of a narrow home win. On that basis I tip a home victory, with the chance of a draw limited by the visitors’ poor away efficiency.

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
0 : 3
2nd half

Match statistics

57Possession (%)43
Fasil KetemaMekelle Kenema
7Shots6
Fasil KetemaMekelle Kenema
0Shots on target3
Fasil KetemaMekelle Kenema
1.24xG1.2
Fasil KetemaMekelle Kenema
6Corners3
Fasil KetemaMekelle Kenema
109Dangerous attacks84
Fasil KetemaMekelle Kenema
-1Fouls-1
Fasil KetemaMekelle Kenema
-1Cards-1
Fasil KetemaMekelle Kenema

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Fasil KetemaMekelle Kenema
0.74Goals scored / match0.79
Fasil KetemaMekelle Kenema
0.74Goals conceded / match0.95
Fasil KetemaMekelle Kenema
46%Average possession49%
Fasil KetemaMekelle Kenema
2.24Shots on target / match2.42
Fasil KetemaMekelle Kenema

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

7.24Shots per match6.37
Fasil KetemaMekelle Kenema
2.24Shots on target2.42
Fasil KetemaMekelle Kenema
10.2%Shot conversion12.4%
Fasil KetemaMekelle Kenema
46%Possession49%
Fasil KetemaMekelle Kenema
1.14xG for1.1
Fasil KetemaMekelle Kenema
1.1xG against1.17
Fasil KetemaMekelle Kenema

Shooting quality

Fasil Ketema: BalancedMekelle Kenema: Balanced
Fasil KetemaMekelle Kenema
Accuracy (shots on target)31%38%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.160.17
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.330.33

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Fasil Ketema is 50% better for: last-5 form.

1.8 pts / match - Fasil Ketema · 1.2 pts / match - Mekelle Kenema

Fasil Ketema
LWWLW
Season result split
37% W34% R29% P
Season (W-D-L)
14-13-11
1.45 pts / match · goal difference 0
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-0-2
1.80 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
9-4-6
Last 5 at home
3-0-2
LWLWW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.8Goals conceded: 0.4xG: 1.22Opponent xG: 1.13BTTS: 0%Over 2.5: 0%
Mekelle Kenema
DDDLW
Season result split
21% W45% R34% P
Season (W-D-L)
8-17-13
1.08 pts / match · goal difference -6
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-3-1
1.20 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
4-7-8
Last 5 away
1-2-2
DLWDL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.6Goals conceded: 0.6xG: 1.12Opponent xG: 1.16BTTS: 0%Over 2.5: 40%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Mekelle Kenema is 7% better for: goals scored per match.

0.74 goals / match - Fasil Ketema · 0.79 goals / match - Mekelle Kenema

Fasil Ketema is 28% better for: goals conceded per match.

0.74 goals / match - Fasil Ketema · 0.95 goals / match - Mekelle Kenema

Fasil Ketema scoring profile: mixed

Fasil Ketema scores in 58% of matches (22 of 38 matches), while Mekelle Kenema keeps a clean sheet in 39% (15 of 38 matches).

Mekelle Kenema scoring profile: more difficult

Mekelle Kenema scores in 53% of matches (20 of 38 matches), while Fasil Ketema keeps a clean sheet in 55% (21 of 38 matches).

28Goals scored (season)30
Fasil KetemaMekelle Kenema
28Goals conceded (season)36
Fasil KetemaMekelle Kenema
1.47Average goals in match1.74
Fasil KetemaMekelle Kenema
4Goals scored (last 5)3
Fasil KetemaMekelle Kenema
2Goals conceded (last 5)3
Fasil KetemaMekelle Kenema

How often they score at least...

58%1 goal53%
Fasil KetemaMekelle Kenema
11%2 goals21%
Fasil KetemaMekelle Kenema
5%3 goals5%
Fasil KetemaMekelle Kenema
0%4 goals0%
Fasil KetemaMekelle Kenema

How often they concede at least...

45%1 goal61%
Fasil KetemaMekelle Kenema
21%2 goals26%
Fasil KetemaMekelle Kenema
8%3 goals8%
Fasil KetemaMekelle Kenema
0%4 goals0%
Fasil KetemaMekelle Kenema

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

40%
League average

Goal patterns

8%BTTS at half-time11%
Fasil KetemaMekelle Kenema
3%BTTS in both halves3%
Fasil KetemaMekelle Kenema
8%Scored in both halves16%
Fasil KetemaMekelle Kenema

BTTS and goal count

16%Min. 3 goals and BTTS24%
Fasil KetemaMekelle Kenema
3%Min. 3 goals without BTTS11%
Fasil KetemaMekelle Kenema
0%BTTS - last 50%
Fasil KetemaMekelle Kenema

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

34%Min. 1 goal before half-time55%
Fasil KetemaMekelle Kenema
8%Min. 2 goals before half-time18%
Fasil KetemaMekelle Kenema
3%Min. 3 goals before half-time3%
Fasil KetemaMekelle Kenema

2nd half

61%Min. 1 goal after half-time61%
Fasil KetemaMekelle Kenema
32%Min. 2 goals after half-time32%
Fasil KetemaMekelle Kenema
8%Min. 3 goals after half-time5%
Fasil KetemaMekelle Kenema

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Fasil Ketema is 22% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.42 pts / match - Fasil Ketema · 1.16 pts / match - Mekelle Kenema

Fasil Ketema - half-time state
24% leading71% draw5% trailing
Mekelle Kenema - half-time state
21% leading53% draw26% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.42Points per match (1st half)1.16
Fasil KetemaMekelle Kenema
0.32Goals scored (1st half)0.37
Fasil KetemaMekelle Kenema
0.13Goals conceded (1st half)0.39
Fasil KetemaMekelle Kenema
0.45Average goals (1st half)0.76
Fasil KetemaMekelle Kenema
87%Clean sheet before half-time66%
Fasil KetemaMekelle Kenema
71%No goal before half-time68%
Fasil KetemaMekelle Kenema

After half-time (2nd half)

1.18Points per match (2nd half)1.11
Fasil KetemaMekelle Kenema
0.42Goals scored (2nd half)0.42
Fasil KetemaMekelle Kenema
0.61Goals conceded (2nd half)0.55
Fasil KetemaMekelle Kenema
1.03Average goals (2nd half)0.97
Fasil KetemaMekelle Kenema
63%Clean sheet after half-time58%
Fasil KetemaMekelle Kenema
63%No goal after half-time63%
Fasil KetemaMekelle Kenema

Fasil Ketema - second-half results

24% W47% R29% P
54
Half-time points
12
Half-time goals
+7
Goal difference (1st half)
45
Second-half points
-7
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.42
PPG before half-time
Lead holding154%

Leads at half-time in 24% of matches and wins 37%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.5

Concedes 0.5 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Mekelle Kenema - second-half results

18% W55% R26% P
44
Half-time points
14
Half-time goals
-1
Goal difference (1st half)
42
Second-half points
-5
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.16
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 21% of matches and wins 21%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.2

Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Fasil Ketema - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.601.60
Goals scored / match0.40.4
Goals conceded / match0.20.2
Average goals in match0.60.6
1 goal60%60%
2 goals0%0%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet80%80%
No goal60%60%
Goal difference+1+1
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 40% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 2
Mekelle Kenema - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.201.20
Goals scored / match0.40.2
Goals conceded / match0.20.4
Average goals in match0.60.6
1 goal40%40%
2 goals20%20%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet80%80%
No goal80%80%
Goal difference+1-1
Half-time: 20% leading - 60% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 60% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 2

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Fasil Ketema
ScoredConceded
4
2
0-15
2
3
16-30
6
0
31-45
3
9
46-60
6
6
61-75
7
8
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (7 goli). Concedes most in 46-60 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

Mekelle Kenema
ScoredConceded
3
4
0-15
8
5
16-30
3
6
31-45
9
7
46-60
2
5
61-75
5
9
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (9 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

1.61
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
0.8 : 0.8
Estimated goal split
home : away
90%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
32%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+25%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
31%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
20%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 5 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Fasil Ketema

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.04
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.04
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-2.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.40
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.36
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
81%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
85%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.35
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
25% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 14% come in the first quarter-hour.
25%

Mekelle Kenema

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.07
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.09
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-5.7 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.31
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.22
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
91%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
104%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.12
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.0
Late goals
17% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 10% come in the first quarter-hour.
17%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Ethiopia Premier League).

Teams vs league

Fasil KetemaLigaMekelle Kenema
Average goals in match 1.471.78 1.74
Both teams scored 26%40% 37%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 18%28% 34%
Clean sheets 55%40% 39%
Goal before half-time 34%56% 55%
Goal after half-time 61%59% 61%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

1.78
Average goals per match
40%
Both teams scored
28%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
40%
Clean sheets
0.91
Home goals / match
0.87
Away goals / match
+5%
Home attack advantage
+4%
Home defence advantage
+1%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
56%
1 goal
22%
2 goals
4%
3 goals
1%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
59%
1 goal
27%
2 goals
6%
3 goals
2%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Fasil Ketema 0 - 1 - 0 Mekelle Kenema. Average goals 2.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.

FAQ

What was the result of Fasil Ketema vs Mekelle Kenema?

The Ethiopia Premier League match finished Fasil Ketema 0:3 Mekelle Kenema. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Fasil Ketema vs Mekelle Kenema?

Fasil Ketema score 0.74 goals per game on average and Mekelle Kenema 0.79. The Ethiopia Premier League average is 1.78 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 28% of games. Both teams score in 26% of Fasil Ketema's matches and 37% of Mekelle Kenema's.

What form are Fasil Ketema and Mekelle Kenema in?

Over the last 5 games Fasil Ketema have a 3-0-2 record (1.80 points per game) and Mekelle Kenema 1-3-1 (1.20 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Fasil Ketema vs Mekelle Kenema?

The statistical background for Fasil Ketema vs Mekelle Kenema — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.