United States - MLSTQL StadiumData current as of October 14, 2026

FC Cincinnati vs New England Revolution: match statistics

Reasoning:

Full analysis and pick in the app

Check the betting analysis, pick, value bet and full reasoning for this match.

Check analysis and pick

FC Cincinnati vs New England Revolution: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

FC Cincinnati plays New England Revolution in MLS (United States). The game is scheduled for October 14, 2026. Venue: TQL Stadium.

Recent form

FC Cincinnati has 1 win, 2 draws and 2 losses over its last five games, averaging 1.00 points per game. New England Revolution has 3 wins, 0 draws and 2 losses, with 1.80 points per game.

Scoring records

FC Cincinnati scores 2.15 goals per game and allows 2.41. New England Revolution scores 1.61 and allows 1.39. Games in this league average 3.26 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 78% of FC Cincinnati's games and 61% of New England Revolution's. The Over 2.5 rates are 74% and 71%, compared with league averages of 64% for BTTS and 64% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

FC Cincinnati has the higher season xG average, 1.67 to 1.51 per game. FC Cincinnati takes 14.6 shots per game, while New England Revolution takes 12.5.

First-half and second-half trends

FC Cincinnati leads at halftime in 22% of its games and scores 1.26 goals per game after halftime. New England Revolution leads at halftime in 36% and scores 0.93 after halftime.

When the teams score

FC Cincinnati's most productive scoring window is minutes 76-90+ (21 goals). For New England Revolution, it is minutes 76-90+ (14 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

MLS games average 3.26 goals. Both teams score in 64% of games, and 64% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 0 home wins, 0 draws and 1 away win. Those games averaged 7.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.

Before kickoff

1X2 odds

(2.10)
(4.12)
(3.21)

Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

FC CincinnatiNew England Revolution
2.15Goals scored / game1.61
FC CincinnatiNew England Revolution
2.41Goals allowed / game1.39
FC CincinnatiNew England Revolution
FC CincinnatiNew England Revolution
51%Average possession51%
FC CincinnatiNew England Revolution
5.89Shots on target / game4.89
FC CincinnatiNew England Revolution
FC CincinnatiNew England Revolution

Team stats— who is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

14.56Shots per game12.54
FC CincinnatiNew England Revolution
5.89Shots on target4.89
FC CincinnatiNew England Revolution
14.8%Shot conversion12.8%
FC CincinnatiNew England Revolution
51%Possession51%
FC CincinnatiNew England Revolution
1.67xG for1.51
FC CincinnatiNew England Revolution
1.73xG against1.53
FC CincinnatiNew England Revolution

Shooting quality

FC Cincinnati: AttackingNew England Revolution: Balanced
FC CincinnatiNew England Revolution
Accuracy (shots on target)40%39%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.110.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.370.33

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team form— who is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

New England Revolution is 80% better for: last-5 form.

1 pts / game - FC Cincinnati · 1.8 pts / game - New England Revolution

FC Cincinnati
LDDLW
Season result split
33% W33% D33% L
Season (W-D-L)
9-9-9
1.33 pts / game · goal difference -7
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-2-2
1.00 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
7-3-2
Last 5 at home
3-2-0
WWWDD
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.8Goals conceded: 2.8xG: 2.02Opponent xG: 1.46BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 100%
New England Revolution
WWWLL
Season result split
50% W14% D36% L
Season (W-D-L)
14-4-10
1.64 pts / game · goal difference +6
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-0-2
1.80 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
5-2-7
Last 5 away
3-0-2
WLWWL
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.6Goals conceded: 2.0xG: 1.56Opponent xG: 1.65BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 100%

Goals— how do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

FC Cincinnati is 34% better for: goals scored per game.

2.15 goals / game - FC Cincinnati · 1.61 goals / game - New England Revolution

New England Revolution is 73% better for: goals allowed per game.

2.41 goals / game - FC Cincinnati · 1.39 goals / game - New England Revolution

FC Cincinnati scoring profile: very strong

FC Cincinnati scores in 85% of games (23 of 27 games), while New England Revolution keeps a clean sheet in 18% (5 of 28 games).

New England Revolution scoring profile: very strong

New England Revolution scores in 75% of games (21 of 28 games), while FC Cincinnati keeps a clean sheet in 7% (2 of 27 games).

58Goals scored (season)45
FC CincinnatiNew England Revolution
65Goals conceded (season)39
FC CincinnatiNew England Revolution
4.56Average goals per game3
FC CincinnatiNew England Revolution
9Goals scored (last 5)8
FC CincinnatiNew England Revolution
14Goals conceded (last 5)10
FC CincinnatiNew England Revolution

How often they score at least...

85%1 goal75%
FC CincinnatiNew England Revolution
63%2 goals46%
FC CincinnatiNew England Revolution
41%3 goals21%
FC CincinnatiNew England Revolution
19%4 goals11%
FC CincinnatiNew England Revolution

How often they concede at least...

93%1 goal82%
FC CincinnatiNew England Revolution
67%2 goals36%
FC CincinnatiNew England Revolution
44%3 goals18%
FC CincinnatiNew England Revolution
22%4 goals4%
FC CincinnatiNew England Revolution

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

61%
New England Revolution - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.17 of 28 games
64%
League average

Goal patterns

52%BTTS at half-time18%
FC CincinnatiNew England Revolution
37%BTTS in both halves0%
FC CincinnatiNew England Revolution
44%Scored in both halves32%
FC CincinnatiNew England Revolution

BTTS and goal count

67%Min. 3 goals and BTTS54%
FC CincinnatiNew England Revolution
7%Min. 3 goals without BTTS18%
FC CincinnatiNew England Revolution
80%BTTS - last 560%
FC CincinnatiNew England Revolution

Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

Full game - team comparison (Over)

1st half

81%Min. 1 goal before half-time86%
FC CincinnatiNew England Revolution
63%Min. 2 goals before half-time43%
FC CincinnatiNew England Revolution
33%Min. 3 goals before half-time14%
FC CincinnatiNew England Revolution

2nd half

93%Min. 1 goal after half-time86%
FC CincinnatiNew England Revolution
70%Min. 2 goals after half-time50%
FC CincinnatiNew England Revolution
56%Min. 3 goals after half-time11%
FC CincinnatiNew England Revolution

Game halves— when do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

New England Revolution is 21% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.07 pts / game - FC Cincinnati · 1.29 pts / game - New England Revolution

FC Cincinnati - half-time state
22% leading41% draw37% trailing
New England Revolution - half-time state
36% leading21% draw43% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.07Points per game (1st half)1.29
FC CincinnatiNew England Revolution
0.89Goals scored (1st half)0.68
FC CincinnatiNew England Revolution
1.04Goals conceded (1st half)0.79
FC CincinnatiNew England Revolution
1.93Average goals (1st half)1.46
FC CincinnatiNew England Revolution
33%Clean sheet before half-time43%
FC CincinnatiNew England Revolution
33%No goal before half-time54%
FC CincinnatiNew England Revolution

After half-time (2nd half)

1.41Points per game (2nd half)1.68
FC CincinnatiNew England Revolution
1.26Goals scored (2nd half)0.93
FC CincinnatiNew England Revolution
1.37Goals conceded (2nd half)0.61
FC CincinnatiNew England Revolution
2.63Average goals (2nd half)1.54
FC CincinnatiNew England Revolution
19%Clean sheet after half-time54%
FC CincinnatiNew England Revolution
37%No goal after half-time39%
FC CincinnatiNew England Revolution

FC Cincinnati - second-half results

41% W19% D41% L
29
Half-time points
24
Half-time goals
-4
Goal difference (1st half)
38
Second-half points
-3
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.07
PPG before half-time
Lead holding150%

Leads at halftime in 22% of games and wins 33%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime+0.3

Allows 0.3 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

New England Revolution - second-half results

46% W29% D25% L
36
Half-time points
19
Half-time goals
-3
Goal difference (1st half)
47
Second-half points
+9
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.29
PPG before half-time
Lead holding139%

Leads at halftime in 36% of games and wins 50%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime-0.2

Defense stays consistent across the full game.

FC Cincinnati - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game0.201.80
Goals scored / game0.21.6
Goals allowed / game1.21.6
Average goals per game1.43.2
1 goal80%100%
2 goals40%100%
3 goals20%100%
Clean sheet20%0%
No goal80%20%
Goal difference-50
Half-time: 0% leading - 20% draw - 80% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 0% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 1
New England Revolution - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.801.00
Goals scored / game0.61.0
Goals allowed / game0.41.6
Average goals per game1.02.6
1 goal100%100%
2 goals0%100%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet60%0%
No goal40%40%
Goal difference+1-3
Half-time: 60% leading - 0% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 3

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

FC Cincinnati
ScoredConceded
5
4
0-15
6
12
16-30
13
12
31-45
8
15
46-60
5
8
61-75
21
14
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (21 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (15). Late-goal balance (76-90): +7 - wins late phases.

New England Revolution
ScoredConceded
5
5
0-15
4
6
16-30
10
11
31-45
8
4
46-60
4
7
61-75
14
6
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (14 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): +8 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

3.78
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
1.8 : 2.0
Estimated goal split
home : away
116%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
70%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+85%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
64%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
4%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 25 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

FC Cincinnati

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.06
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.20
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+0.1 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.48
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
-0.68
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
116%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
172%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
-0.33
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.4
Late goals
36% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 9% come in the first quarter-hour.
36%

New England Revolution

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.02
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.24
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-2.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.10
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.14
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
115%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
75%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
+0.16
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
31% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 11% come in the first quarter-hour.
31%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League context— is this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (MLS).

Teams vs league

FC CincinnatiLigaNew England Revolution
Average goals per game▲ 4.563.26▼ 3.00
Both teams scored▲ 78%64%▼ 61%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)▲ 74%64%▲ 71%
Clean sheets▼ 7%20%▼ 18%
Goal before half-time▲ 81%78%▲ 86%
Goal after half-time▲ 93%82%▲ 86%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.26
Average goals per game
64%
Both teams scored
64%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
20%
Clean sheets
1.85
Home goals / game
1.40
Away goals / game
+32%
Home attack advantage
+24%
Home defensive advantage
+18%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
78%
1 goal
43%
2 goals
19%
3 goals
6%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
82%
1 goal
54%
2 goals
24%
3 goals
11%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Record from FC Cincinnati's perspective: 0 wins, 0 draws and 1 loss against New England Revolution. Games average 7.00 goals, and both teams scored in 100% of them.

FAQ

When do FC Cincinnati and New England Revolution play?

FC Cincinnati face New England Revolution on October 14, 2026 in MLS at TQL Stadium. The exact kick-off time in your timezone is shown at the top of the match page.

What do the goal statistics show before FC Cincinnati vs New England Revolution?

FC Cincinnati score 2.15 goals per game on average and New England Revolution 1.61. The MLS average is 3.26 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 64% of games. Both teams score in 78% of FC Cincinnati's matches and 61% of New England Revolution's.

What form are FC Cincinnati and New England Revolution in?

Over the last 5 games FC Cincinnati have a 1-2-2 record (1.00 points per game) and New England Revolution 3-0-2 (1.80 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for FC Cincinnati vs New England Revolution?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.